Thread #7858976 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: 1764366113851408.jpg (151.9 KB)
151.9 KB JPG
Do I just draw to get good? Then why so many different courses and youtube videos about how to get good? Someone has to be lying
55 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (83.6 KB)
83.6 KB JPG
>https://www.scribd.com/document/608834418/Gitgud-at-Illustration-Guid e-for-Anons
>https://prrb.tumblr.com/post/30177790499/shrimp-method
these help me improve, they will help you as well
>>
>>
File: 1767959141966846.jpg (80.1 KB)
80.1 KB JPG
Yeah, just draw bro
>>
>>
Just draw isn't enough, but it's most of it.
You do need a basic foundation of knowledge, but like 90% of what you need to know is really basic stuff that's in every half decent book, so you only need one.
And when you're just drawing you have to actually apply it.
>>
>>7858976
You can't because you were raised with a smartphone and have permanently gimped your spatial thinking. They did a study and found gen z screen usage has retarded their cognitive development. It's why everyone under 30 can't even draw boxes, why old men like jung gi are so good.
>>
To learn anything, you need to look up how it is done, attempt it and then reflect over why it did or did not work. Repeat until you can do thing.
For drawing this means doing this for a few couple of things. Mainly shapes, perspective and maybe some rendering.
>>
>>7858976
It's kinda' like lifting. Obviously you need to lift regularly in order to get jacked, but if you do it wrong you could end up slowing down your progress at best or hurting yourself at worst. And so you learn how to do things properly from more experienced people and take that with you in your own practice.
>>
>>
>>
>>7858988
It's funny because both drawings have almost the exact same proportions and angles, as if he were just trying to literally copy the old drawing instead of reimagine it. I wonder what would happen if he tried to copy a piece of art that was actually good.
>>
>>
>>
Identify one accurate flaw in your drawing and practice ways to improve it.
If you keep doing this and continue to improve your drawings, you will steadily improve.
You won't make much progress if you rely on others to point out what's wrong with your drawing.
Look at many good drawings in order to identify the flaws in the drawings you draw yourself.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>7858988
>>7859022
hard to tell, and its not as if they made no progress, but unless you can see a comprehensive body of work from them over time, you couldn't really tell how they actually developed. Additionally, this particular measure doesn't account for other area of competencies, like compositions and technical drawings like background and objects. You don't know how long it takes for them to construct the first figure vs the latter, its possible that they are faster and can do more poses. I couldn't find the person's account so I can't survey the extend of their work, although in general, I feel people who deride the idea underestimated how much people who improves actually draws.
>>
>>
>>
>>7858976
Not many will tell you this, but the constant barrage of art tutorials and courses and books are no different than the same industrial-complex found within creative writing. Many hobbyists may flirt with an artistic medium, but few will commit to improving on a daily basis or taking it to a professional level. There are WAY too many people who get stuck buying books and watching videos or taking courses because they're in love with the idea of "being an artist" or are afraid to actually push themselves.
Outside of "common sense" stuff, you don't need to engage with most of these videos or books. They will eat up valuable time that is better spent drawing or writing or whatever it is you want to do. In this case, it's drawing, but you musn't "just draw" because you risk falling into stagnation or learning incorrectly.
The "common sense" stuff is the following:
>trace your photo reference
>do lots of contours of your subject
>draw your reference upside down
>break down your reference into shapes
>draw your subject on a glass sheet with a marker
>take your subject/reference, look at it, then take it away and draw it from memory (then draw it while looking at it, then repeat the first step)
>learn how to sculpt or crochet
>start doing origami on a daily basis
>learn a symbol-based language
>draw for 1-2 hours on weekdays, and 5+ hours on the weekends
>>
>>
>>7858976
>Draw
>See what you lack or hate about it
>Study it
>Repeat
Don't fall into the Youtube meme, they just repeat the same thing you would see on a book about it, but slower, with missing information and with a retard that doesn't know how to teach.
Same thing with courses, ignore everything made by artists that aren't teachers. And even then, some of them are/became useless because they we're made with receiving feedback from the teacher and he may no longer do it (or not possible in case you pirated it).
>>
>>
>>
>>7858976
No art journey is the same, everyone is different, but if I had to put it simply:
50% of it is "just draw/paint".
50% is "get good info".
Courses help because you are, hopefully, getting good information that helps you greatly to construct the form, understand anatomy, understand lighting, understand simplification, by a professional artist who is probably smarter than you.
If you grind art without a "guide", and are relatively intelligent, and do put an effort into understanding what you are doing and seeing, you would eventually figure out 90% of what courses teach out simply by grinding drawings and paintings, but it would take many years, probably a decade or more.
Why learning from someone else is great is because they already went through all the grinding, were likely instructed and guided by another teacher, and they figured out their own ways to deconstruct visual representation, that being knowing anatomy really well (Scott Eaton), or constructing from imagination the figure (Krenz), or values colour and paint (any of the painting teachers in NMA, or Marco Bucci), understand gesture intuitively (Vilppu), etc.
Knowing that the average person isn't really that bright, then simply "draw to get good" won't work for most people, they simply won't figure out anything when they still haven't even figured the most essential basic (copying accurately without tracing or guides, just look at the beg threads), how are they going to successfully deconstruct the figure by themselves?
However, someone who simply follows youtube courses, and "learns", without applying any of it and putting in the work, will also not improve.
The average person, who isn't particularly impressive in terms of intellect, will never improve, unless he follows courses (learns from smarter people) and puts in the work (develops the actual skill and mental library, to actually understand how and what is happening in the human figure, light, perspective, etc).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: xD.jpg (2.8 MB)
2.8 MB JPG
>>7865085
Most youtube artists are nodraw frauds.
Modern art is garbage.
Modern artists are garbage.
AI is not the great equalizer that you think it is, it simply cements the older generation as the last great art generation. Nothing more putrid than a modern day "artists".
>>
>>7865091
>Modern artists are garbage.
It's all that damn phone!!!
Back in my day when you had hobby, you would no life in it. Nowadays you are gonna doom scroll, and maybe partake in your hobby afterwards.
Very bad deal for wannabe artists.
>>
>>
>>
>>7865101
>Do you do math to get good at math?
>No you don't. You study.
Are you fucking retarded?
The only real way to be good at math is to do math. Studying math is literally doing math.
You wanna learn algebra? You grind algebra problems.
You wanna learn calculus? You grind calculus problems.
You wanna learn proofs? You write proofs.
No wonder so many people have issues with math if you tards go around learning formulas by heart.
>>
File: 1762958273054382.jpg (71 KB)
71 KB JPG
>>7865096
You are actually stupid if you think we are not in a bad state as a society or maybe just completely sheltered from the outside world. Quick reminder that Disney is still seen as the holy grail for a lot of artists and animators.
People simply used to be better and smarter, has nothing to do with time, zoomniggers job all the time against older generations despite being medicated with meth (adderall), they are just stupid people.
>>
>>7865108
To do math you need to understand math, ideas and patterns that requires critical thinking and intelligence, formulas can be memorized and that's something anyone is able to do.
To be a good chess player you need to understand geometry, ideas and patterns which require critical thinking and intelligence. Memorizing lines will only get you so far.
To be a good artists you need to understand planes, depth, ideas and patterns which require critical thinking. If you are left brained RETARD you memorize things and to 5 minute doodles, but you will always be a clown and you know this. No construction, not a real draw.
>>
>>7865116
>To do math you need to understand math, ideas and patterns that requires critical thinking and intelligence, formulas can be memorized and that's something anyone is able to do.
>To be a good chess player you need to understand geometry, ideas and patterns which require critical thinking and intelligence. Memorizing lines will only get you so far.
>To be a good artists you need to understand planes, depth, ideas and patterns which require critical thinking. If you are left brained RETARD you memorize things and to 5 minute doodles, but you will always be a clown and you know this. No construction, not a real draw.
And how do you thing understanding arises? From doing. You do then understand, not the other way around.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>7865319
construction is how you practice to improve your imagination. But you're acting like a good drawing needs construction used in it. That's not true, if you're constructing then you're studying, so that's not your peak form, you will get better and then draw amazing things WITHOUT construction.
So you are still using construction overall to get better but the actual drawings themselves will look better if you can draw them without using construction due to practice and experience.
>>
>>7865327
>you will get better and then draw amazing things WITHOUT construction.
Maybe your entire workflow is built on fallacy and little effort that to you you can't draw good things without construction? Ever thought of that?
How are you doing to draw a thoracic cage in that exact angle or how much foreshortening something has without constructing it first? Rolling the dice? AI does that better than you can.
You have a left brain and you need to understand this. You have less intelligence than me and right brainers. No need to spew bullshit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
careful slow drawing and focused study has never led to a good artist. all good artists intuitively learn by drawing without construction or rigid guidelines.
There are plenty of examples of constructoids that dedicate years to theory but can't draw a paper bag, though.
The actual use for art studies is to make up for not drawing as a kid. If you had been doodling your entire life then you have muscle memory that will take you far and you don't need to do all these gay circles and cubes. Those are for people who literally have never drawn or imagined anything before.