Thread #7872796 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
What are your thoughts on people editing other people's art?
+Showing all 40 replies.
>>
>>7872796
People should just make their own art.
>>
>>7872796
Fine as long as you mention it.
>>
>>7872796
ok as long as they have a similar skill level, which OP clearly does not

the cloth has no thickness on the edit's edge, and the texture on skin in the cleavage is completely different to the original
>>
>>7872796
The Caleb edits are distasteful, fat woman are disgusting and fat saggy tits on fat woman are the worst of the worst
>>
>>7872796
edit as you wish, but don't post it online.
>>
evil only corrupts etc.
>>
Edits I am fine with:
- constructive criticism (possibly with notes to the artist on how to improve)
- when the edit is better than the original
- adding cool backgrounds to a 'character in white void'- drawing
- making tits bigger
- an improvement of morality in the work (e.g removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls)

Edits I am not fine with:
- shit taste
- perversion
- anything meant to put down the original artist
>>
>>7872796
It depends. Most memes are just edits of other's art, and people reuse other's art in plenty of other context, so in a general sense I'm okay with it, and I think most would be too.
Then there's edits to make fun of the art or artist, and I think the artist themselves would obviously disapprove of that, and therefore I would as well... so I guess my approval depends on the artists approval.

As for AI editing, which I assume is the real meat of the question OP wanted to get to... I'm against it in a general sense, since the artist will likely also be against (since artist are almost universally loath to AI right now), it probably trains the AI on the artists work without their permission, and many have moral considerations against AI at this time so, having an AI edit of someone's work without knowing the artist's feelings on the matter is extremely inconsiderate.
>>
>>7872796
if you put it on the internet it's free game
there is no way to enforce edit etiquette, so it's a moot point
>>
>>7872796
>>
>>7872898
Look at those sheep. that lady must be huge
>>
>>7872796
Dick move. Art "fixers" should get the rope. Unless it's to teach.
>>
>>7873018
seethe
>>
>>7872904
nigga, she's literally wearing shields as bracelets
>>
>>7872844
>- an improvement of morality in the work (e.g removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls)
does this happen...
>>
>>7872844
>improvement of morality in the work (e.g removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls
>replacing men with w*men
>improvement of morality
>>
>>7872796
subhuman behaviour
>>
>>7873141
>behaviour
>u
guess you would of known about subhumans lol
>>
>>7872796
Tale as old as time
>>
>>7873146
>would of
>>
>>7872814
i mean, for a photoshop job it's ok
>>
Breast edits are fine
>>
I think counterspells are bad game design.
Planeswalkers were a mistake and you deserve way more UB than you slop eating pigs in the Nebraska ecosystem can handle.
Also tittyedit anon uses AI.
>>
>>7872796
depends on the purpose, obviously
I think it's fine when it's done out of actual appreciation for the original and you're trying to build on top of it and make something cool
stuff like making covers of songs
making edits of films
editing sprite sheets (I remember spending ages making little characters and scenes out of final fantasy sprites when I was a kid. in paint. if I had aseprite I would have been in heaven)
>>
>>7873146
>would of
>implying I care about your ooga booga amerimutt way spelling
COLOUR
ARMOUR
FAVOURITE
>>
>>7873525
>OUI OUI HON HON
what did he mean by this
>>
File: smugly.png (364.3 KB)
364.3 KB
364.3 KB PNG
>>7872796
it has its place
>>
>>7873530
retarded or just very american?
oh wait there's no difference
>>
Can I get more GTS art pls?
>>
>>7872898
Original is much better. You cant stop people from making lewd edits anyway
>>
>>7872844
>an improvement of morality in the work (e.g removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls)
unfathomably based
>>
i’d hate it so much, probably because the stuff i’ve been making recently feels extremely personal and i care about it a lot, specifically as i feel the subjects are complexly characterized, and people tend to do really bad things with them. kind of like how you wouldn’t want someone to take a quiet, soulful drawing of your waifu and hypersexualize it.
>>7872832
but this too.
i wouldn’t mind at all if they did absolutely anything if they kept it to themselves. but i understand stuff happens, and wouldn’t lash out at anyone no matter what they might do. it’s me who shouldn’t feel this way, because it will happen, like ai grabbing whatever you post, and there's nothing i can do about it, except to try to engage with more interesting, positive things elsewhere rather than tilting at passing windmills.
>>
is Richard Prince's work really transformative?
>>
>>7872796
its like fucking the creators girlfriend.

not yours.
fuck.
off.
>>
>>7872844
>removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls
dogshit awful taste
>>
>>7875364
>>7875564
the duality of man
>>
Making this sort of garbage with Jesper's art should get you whipped
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (73.8 KB)
73.8 KB
73.8 KB JPG
>>7875531
>its like fucking the creators girlfriend.
>>
I hate cuck shit so I managed to acquire the skill of race swapping brown/black people to white or, at the very least, sorta orange.
>>
>>7875938
how does turning a nigger white make it not cuck shit?

Reply to Thread #7872796


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)