Thread #218964850 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
File: IMG_7768.jpg (1021.5 KB)
1021.5 KB
1021.5 KB JPG
ummmahbros…..
+Showing all 21 replies.
>>
>>218964850
He was friend of the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, didn't you know?
>>
>>218964850
so we know now who he idol was, or more precisely has been
>>
@grok is this true :concerned:
>>
>>218964850
Makes perfect sense , he probably just wanted to do some historically accurate Mohammed roleplaying
>>
>>218964850
ngl that's pretty based
>>
>>218964900
yes
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/epstein-files-show-kaaba-cloth-pieces-makkah-shipped-epstein-uae-contacts
>>
>>218964954
I read this report with a fury that words can barely carry. If it is true that Jeffrey Epstein bought pieces of the Kaaba—the House of Allah, the holiest place on earth for over a billion Muslims—and desecrated them to be walked on like trinkets, then this is not merely scandal. It is sacrilege of the highest order.

The Kaaba is not a collectible. It is not décor. It is not raw material for the amusement of a wealthy predator who thought money could purchase immunity from God, history, and basic human decency. To even imagine the stones of that sacred sanctuary being torn away and turned into rugs is to glimpse the moral rot of a worldview that sees nothing as sacred and no boundary as real.

For Muslims, the Kaaba is the axis of our prayer, the symbol of our unity, the place toward which we turn five times a day in humility before Allah. To treat it as a novelty is an act of violent contempt—not only toward Islam, but toward the idea that anything should be revered beyond price. This is what happens when arrogance is fed by limitless wealth and unchecked power: reverence is replaced by entitlement, and holiness is reduced to a flex.

Let me be clear: outrage is not “oversensitivity.” Anger at desecration is not extremism. It is the natural response of a believer watching something sacred be dragged through the mud by someone who thought himself untouchable. Those who shrug and say “it’s just stone” reveal only how empty their own moral vocabulary has become.

If this report is true, it deserves public condemnation, full investigation, and accountability—not silence, not nervous laughter, and certainly not excuses. Sacred things survive not because they are indestructible, but because people refuse to accept their violation as normal.

Some lines are not meant to be crossed. And when they are, the outrage is not the problem. The outrage is the proof that something human and holy still remains.
>>
>>218964850
Damn, those Wahhabis are insane.
>>
>>218965076
You mean madkhalis, ibn wahhab wouldve burnt the entire country again over that
>>
ALLAH AKBAR WESSA NO ACCEPTA NOOOOOOOOO SAAAAAAR WE MUZZFARTS GOOD GOOD NOOOOOOOO SAUDI KING TRAITOR HERSTIC YES YES SAAAAAR NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO *explodes*
>>
>>218965100
Fuck ICE
>>
>>218965037
Thank you UmmahGPT, I will still ridicule the Zutt lovers for this, hard day to be a cube circler for sure
>>218965123
Why? I like to put some in my Arak to chill it a bit
>>218964872
MBS definitely getting the bonesaw if this is true
>>
>>218965097
>>218965076
Saaarr It's the Zainchi Muslims.
>>
>>218965037
spoken like a true Spaniard, mashallah
>>
>>218964850
last i heard here, it was a saudi foid living in uae though. the narrative is changing too much. i'll stick to believing the govt had nothing to do with it
>>
>>218966037
so, when is the foid executed
>>
I say bring back the Qarmatians and let them into Mecca to conduct an impartial investigation. They'll sort this out.
>>
>>218966489
never desu
https://xcancel.com/SuppressedNws1/status/2018313053561835916
>>
File: file.png (154 KB)
154 KB
154 KB PNG
ummahbros...
>>
>>218965097
Isn't it the wahhabis who don't care about holy items and see them as idolatry? Isn't that why they demolished so many early islamic historic sites?
>>
>>218964850
I'm starting to like this guy

Reply to Thread #218964850


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)