yeah

File: 210421-Z-GR156-435.jpg (751 KB)

751 KB JPG

Both.

Who would win in a fight, a lighthouse or a submarine?

File: YAL-1A_Airborne_Laser_unstowed_crop.jpg (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB JPG

>>64830573
The airborne laser

>>64830573
between shovels and pickaxes, which is more powerful?
the answer is they're different tools for different purposes retard.

>>64830837
The lighthouse

What about stealth awacs?!

File: 1350656007174.gif (94.2 KB)

94.2 KB GIF

>>64830866

File: ogzg7ifx.jpg (29 KB)

29 KB JPG

>>64830866
>1.21 jiggawatt emissions blow out every radar receiver in a 400 mile radius
>invisible
It could work.

>>64830573
India v pakistan proved the awacs is more vulnerable. Surface to air missiles have advanced too far for an awacs to be used offensively in the initial stage of conflict. Maybe later when long range aa missiles have been disabled or spoofed it would be a worthwhile investment
>>64830934
keep in mind that is will be used in conjunction with jamming technology
that energy could be coming from your own asshole for all you know

>>64830837
Is it an SSN or an SSGN?

>>64830934
what if the stewacs has a very small radar with very low emission and the radome is shaped like a b-2

>>64831137
It's a lighthouse

File: 1665254132753885.jpg (57.6 KB)

57.6 KB JPG

>>64830837
If disintegrating the enemy in a nuclear missile strike counts as winning in this scenario, I'm putting my money on the submarine.

>>64830934
>fly right up to the enemy line
>they don't see you
>flip on the radar
>flashbang all the radars on the ground, fry at least two dozen testicles as well
>immediately shut it off
>fly away while the enemy is still blind
Sun Tzu spoke about this in the Art of Trolling

>>64831433
Isnt that quite literally what they did in Venezuela with a bunch of Growlers

>>64831356
A guided missile sub beats any lighthouse
A guided missile lighthouse beats a non-missile sub
An unarmed lighthouse vs a non-missile sub is now a skirmish that favors the lighthouse if it has a garrison
An unarmed, ungarrisoned lighthouse vs a non-missile sub with no ability to land a small force is a radio battle until one side upsets the other. The sub has the clear advantage here, someone would be known for his shittalking abilities and commence a verbal assault that leaves the lighthouse keeper in tears. He cries, muttering that military men should be professional, marking a clear victory for the sub to report back to HQ with.

File: Porsche.jpg (370.9 KB)

370.9 KB JPG

>>64830573
between a 911 and a tiger which one is the better Porsche?

>>64830837
The awacs can be way out of range of your radar and while still having a lock on you.

>>64830837
They have dircms they don't even need to maneuver

>>64831397
There are too few harvested souls for it to be considered a victory for an SSBN. It is instead the air defence cuckold that wins in this eventuality, as the sexual release during the atomic disintegration of the asset he was sworn to protect leads to a climax unachievable by any other mortal means.

>>64831446
Comprehensive analysis, Kowalski. You've earned your rum and sodomy today

>>64831661
>8
it wont help against sensor fusion of UV IR and opto electrical + MMW:

>awacs locks on
>escorting jet shoots a missile
>turns around
>jet speeds up to reach range where radar can lock on and missile won't run out of gas before reaching the awacs
>launches missile
>meanwhile awacs missile is already halfway to the jet
>jet turns around
>jet's missile loses lock bc radar isn't on the awacs
>missile turns into a ditch and dies
>meanwhile jet's ir signature just got larger bc it turned around
>get hit by a barrage of the awac's escorting jet's missiles
>die

File: agawa-sensei.jpg (171.9 KB)

171.9 KB JPG

>>64831789
this, an AWACS can't directly fight a combat aircraft, but modern datalinked AWACS can provide a massive advantage to the combat jets fighting alongside it.
think of the AWACS as a tall onee-san coach standing in a grassy field, directing a team of small shota's who can't see above the grass in a game of dodgeball.
if the other team of shota's doesn't have an onee-san guiding their dodgeballs, they are at a significant range disadvantage.

File: image.png (8.1 KB)

8.1 KB PNG

>>64830866

>>64831605
The 911 is less likely to have its transmission catch fire, so I guess it wins in the long run.

File: 1689871891243092.png (214.1 KB)

214.1 KB PNG

>>64831699
>It is instead the air defence cuckold that wins in this eventuality
Ah yes, the sweet intoxicating pleasure of seeing your lighthouse penetrated, disintegrated and vaporized by a nuclear missile in the megaton range.
Imagine jacking off in the pure, blinding light of nuclear humiliation and cumming right as the shockwave hits.
No one will ever surpass your pure, undiluded bliss at the moment of climax and simultanious evaporation.

File: lighthouse cooming .png (337.2 KB)

337.2 KB PNG

>>64834547
>mfw

>>64830866
f35 can do that pretty well based on what my navy buddies drunkenly let slip

>>64831028
I thought that the India awacs kill claim was due to a cruise missile strike on a Parker one?

>>64833334
>authors thinly veiled fetish