mon dieu

File: magic-school-bus-carlos-joke-meme-2681927605.png (137.6 KB)

137.6 KB PNG

I bet the doctors were shell shocked as well

>>64831066
I think they were shook as shell.

Yet another example of the bitter bad luck that comes with warfare.
You can prepare all you can, pray all you want, but at the end of the day, an artillery shell can end up in your foxhole.

File: Soup Guy.jpg (21.3 KB)

21.3 KB JPG

>>64831058
>article says it was an 8inch shell
>later says its 37mm
Which one is it then did the true son of France insert up his bum bum?

>>64831126
The shell just keeps getting larger each time is measured, damn inflatable sex toys.

>>64831058
if this was in the balkans it'd start a war

IIRC, it was one of those demilled 37mm shells, so I don't think there were any charges.

>>64831169
It is the fact there were no 8 inch long 37mm shells in WW1 as far as I am aware that makes me confused. Guess they must get harder if they pull on it?

File: 1705154536349710.jpg (169.2 KB)

169.2 KB JPG

>>64831516

generally the Sun hack writing the piece has fucked up all the measurements.

For example they say a 37mm shell was "just over an inch in circumference" but a 37mm shell would be 11.6 cm circumference or 4.5 inches which is a much more daunting girth the unlikely event the 24 y/o frenchman has an untrained ass.

>>64831579
and here I was thinking that the Frog was about to get a surprise visit from Ian to discuss some rare WW1 French shell that was lodged up his anus.

There was a case exactly like this in France couple years ago too.

>>64831579
The best article The Sun ever wrote was complaining about the 5" guns the Royal Navy was getting by claiming they cost £25m for 'a gun the size of a toothbrush' or something retarded like that.

File: Bong Journalism.jpg (143.7 KB)

143.7 KB JPG

>>64831616
That was the Daily Star but they pretty much are the bottom of the barrel "journalism" anyway.

>>64831653
That's an extremely impressive display of either Dunning-Kruger, or intentional dishonesty. Not sure which would be worse.

>>64831126
presumably the 37mm: 8" diameter would be siswet tier, unless they're referring to length
>>64831579
clearly the writer meant diameter rather than circumference
they're not sending their best

>>64831579
>a 37mm shell would be 11.6 cm circumference or 4.5 inches
kys

>>64831796

does π upset you anon?

File: Screenshot_2026-02-02_16-40-52.png (41 KB)

41 KB PNG

>>64831796
what's incorrect about it?

>>64831881
Either he can't understand what circumference is or he is going full autist that 4.5 inches is actually 11.4cm and 11.6cm is closer to 4.6 inches. There is no inbetween.

>>64831983
>4.5 inches is actually 11.4cm and 11.6cm is closer to 4.6 inches.

I apologize if I undersized his manhood by 700 thou

>>64832094
You probably oversized it.

>>64831058
>stick a century old piece of UXO up your ass
>get charged with weapons violations
>and not damage to historical artifacts
I hate the french so much it's unreal.

>>64834629
The Frenchman for sticking the shell up his ass or the French government for charging him with what they did?

>>64836275
Yes.

File: paths.png (697.3 KB)

697.3 KB PNG

>>64831612
>monsieurs, vous are accused of sticking le shell up le derrière without proper autorisation, how do vous plead?

>>64836275
Oui

>>64831126
Article said 8 inches in LENGTH dummy

>>64836423
It has already been established that the 8 inches in length makes no sense for a 37mm shell.

>>64831058
The French still not beating the affeminate/fag allegatios.

>>64831058
The consequences of the first World War continue to reverberate.