Thread #25056242 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
Anonymous
heh, it's simple 01/30/26(Fri)19:29:57 No.25056242 That which Is, Ought.
Showing all 17 replies.
>>
Anonymous
01/30/26(Fri)19:33:25 No.25056246 >>25056242
What Is?
>>
Anonymous
01/30/26(Fri)20:08:48 No.25056313 >>25056242
Absolutely not.
>>
Anonymous
01/30/26(Fri)20:11:52 No.25056320 Ought to what? This is an incomplete sentence
>>
Anonymous
01/30/26(Fri)20:42:01 No.25056370 >>25056246
The universe, leukemia, etc.
>>
Anonymous
01/30/26(Fri)20:45:11 No.25056376 >>25056320
>This IS an incomplete sentence
Therefore it OUGHT to be. You gettin it now, buddy?
>>
Anonymous
01/30/26(Fri)20:47:44 No.25056381 >>25056242
That which is, ain’t.
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)10:32:27 No.25057735 >>25056381
That which is, ain't, and the two of them together are some third thing.
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)11:25:10 No.25057786 It's not so much that as one thing another
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)20:13:58 No.25058546 >>25057786
The thing that ought is, ought to be
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)20:16:41 No.25058555 >>25056242
Define ‘,’
>>
Anonymous
02/01/26(Sun)12:11:15 No.25060091 >>25058555
...No.
>>
Anonymouṡ
02/01/26(Sun)13:02:14 No.25060140 >>25056242
THAT WHICH IS OUGHT
THAT WHICH I SOUGHT
Coincidence? I think not.
>>
Anonymous
02/01/26(Sun)23:26:51 No.25061256 >>25056242
>Your honor, my client didn't rape her, but he ought to have
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)14:19:13 No.25062344 >>25061256
nice
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)14:42:02 No.25062375 >>25056246
What ought.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)18:05:42 No.25062778 That which ought, also ought because it is thought.
>>
Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)10:30:29 No.25064291 >>25056242
True. Nonexistence can't exist, therefore that which does always will.
Reply to Thread #25056242
