Thread #25063793 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: gettyimages-959162590-612x612.jpg (28.3 KB)
28.3 KB JPG
>this is not the time for art
Do you believe that?
32 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_2150.jpg (56.6 KB)
56.6 KB JPG
>>25063793
there are different kinds of art
https://www.brighteon.com/f6878fec-3fc6-42a6-89bd-63ab5c248eff
>>
>>
>>25063793
The Internet was invented and people used it to proliferate industrial production line "art" on YouTube and TikTok.
AI was invented and people used it to replace human creativity altogether.
The age of art is over.
>>
>>
>>
>>25063793
Yeah. The High Arts are very dead, and were so long before AI. They all reached their natural conclusions by the mid-late XXth century. What follows is just meaningless craftart and personal fancy.
Even by his time you could tell the forms were dissolving.
>>25063800
Joyce is very nice but he is very much an endling. Pound too. The form was stretched and explored until everything was scoured from it.
The culmination of those forms, of course, had been already reached a hundred or more years ago by then. This was just the epilogue.
>>
>>25063793
To an extent, especially if you're a Westerner. How can you look at society, care about its trajectory and spend your time indulging in painting or whatever? It just isn't possible to maintain the fiction that "everything's okay" and the world will continue more or less as normal anymore. Seen in this context, art pursued in the way those in other eras pursued art seem naive, indulgent and childish.
>>
File: giambattista-vico.jpg (63.1 KB)
63.1 KB JPG
>>25063793
Yes it is.
>>
>>
>>
>>25064495
His theory is that anything of value expressed through art is no longer possible after the extent forms have exhausted their trajectory and only scientific endeavors can reshape the foundations on which art can proceed. Saying that we‘re politically dispossessed isn‘t to the point and I would argue actually is actually contrary to distancing ourselves from art; it seems to me that the question of finding ways to do more with fewer resources available and preserving the light of past eras as our society decays is, however grim, the strongest fire for pursuing art which civilization has received in at least a century.
>>
>>
>>25064633
He didn't necessarily dislike romanticism. He was very romantic himself. Beethoven was his favourite composer while he thought Wagner was the last great composer in the Western tradition. He was also hugely influenced by Nietzsche.
>>
>>25064633
He was noted as being morose by his contemporaries
>>25065118
His criticism or romanticism resonated with me personally, it was an extremely urbane movement fantasising about a life none of them lived whilst the people who actually lived it were the most practical, salt of the earth people around who'd find it to be childish faggotry. Remember cottage core?
>>
>>
File: ALTN_PaulaMonje_Volksfest_Ausschnitt_minimum.jpg (659.9 KB)
659.9 KB JPG
>>25065420
Depends
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_7992.jpg (147.2 KB)
147.2 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>25066234
Go back to /pol/, chud.
>>25066712
If by doing arts you're not striving to achieve excellence and higher arts, then don't do it. Your life is meaningless in itself, do not waste it trying to do art just for the vibes of it, just because you "feel like it".
>>
>>