Thread #129302137 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: 1751879618335575.jpg (162.2 KB)
162.2 KB JPG
>Chappell Roan at the #GRAMMYs red carpet.
204 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: 1742750707660047.jpg (287.3 KB)
287.3 KB JPG
>>129302137
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1757062547382079.jpg (255.8 KB)
255.8 KB JPG
I like the tattoo
>>
>>
File: chappell roan.mp4 (3.2 MB)
3.2 MB MP4
>>129302137
What a cock lust whore
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129302137
>>129302143
HOLY SHIT! SHE'S MAKING MAGGIE ROGERS AND ROSE MCGOWAN LOOK MODEST!
I see why Cannes banned nude dresses.
...is this real?
>>
>>
>>129302137
>>129302143
Rat queen is right.
>>
>>
>>
File: 14._Death_Becomes_Her_film_still.jpg (69.8 KB)
69.8 KB JPG
dumb bitch is going to make me relapse
>>
>>129302137
Mugler Mugler sheer dress, inspired by the brand's 1998 "nipple ring" design, held up by visible nipple piercings and paired with temporary tattoos and a matching cape. Scroll down to R9, C4.
https://fashion.mugler.com/pages/spring-summer-2026
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129302137
>>129302143
why is she dressing for the male gaze if she's lesbian?
>>
>>
>>
>>129302137
Where exactly is the line for indecent exposure drawn? Sure Kanye had his wife get naked last year but shes a hoe made for the streets and everybody already knows Kanye is a genuine schizo. This is just sex offender shit for attention.
>>
>>129305955
Yes everything after Lady Gaga has just been trying hard imitation. You can't get more grotty than the meat dress. There are no more boundaries left to cross so all of this staged rebellion feels stale.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: file.png (426.7 KB)
426.7 KB PNG
>>129304455
"fashion" designers deserve the rope
>>
>>129306450
yeah and im asking where the line for art is drawn because even the women at the actual AVN porn awards dress more conservatively
does someone need to expose their butthole on the red carpet for it to no longer be "artistic"?
>>
>>
File: 1761239347137461.png (209.6 KB)
209.6 KB PNG
>too busy to tour or release an album for the next 4-5 years
>not busy enough to avoid attending every award show
is this how she plans to remains relevant?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129306468
Fair point, but I think that’s the point of some artists trying to make a statement while they’re there. They’re trying to maintain their cred.
>>129306482
Dressing up at AVN is to offset how much of their lives they spend naked. Everyone already knows what their holes look like, so being covered up is their version of edge.
>>
>>
>>129302137
cool. I hope this came with some "hot" political takes as well?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zjc1AFpqIw0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129306588
>Nobody wants to see penises
Speak for yourself. If even one artist at this shitshow was brave enough to hang dong, even the silhouette of dong, it'd be way bigger news than Chappel Roan's desperate attempt to maintain relevance.
>>
>>
File: retards.png (113.5 KB)
113.5 KB PNG
>LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME
>>
>>
>>
>>129306760
>can't stop thinking and seething about religion
>thinking certain centuries-old ideas are valuable or liking something = as bad as worshipping celebrities (modern mental illness)
Interesting mental gymnastics.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 11-29-43-1770019799501232m.jpg (95.6 KB)
95.6 KB JPG
>my carreer is going downhil
>fuck I need to do some kanye shit for attention
>>
>>129306441
I cringed so hard at this when she showed up in this dress. Also at your twitter faggot stan post, trying to sell zoomers the idea that Gaga is original https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tqzjvz8O43U
Everything Gaga has done has been a copy of something someone smarter than her came up with. She should literally pay royalties to Grace Jones, David Bowie and Cyndi Lauper for so blatantly copying their style over the years.
>>
>>
>>129307238
>>129302137
>>129302143
I honestly like this. It's attention whoring, sure, but tastefully done. She looks like a beautiful renaissance painting.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129307259
The only one you really have an argument for is Bowie. Grace Jones accuses anyone who tries to do an androgynous or hypersexualized look as copying her. She said Rihanna was ripping her off solely because the latter experimented with body paints during one of her eras, as if she invented body painting. Anyways, 99% of her "art" came from her boyfriend, who handled everything from her looks and aesthetic to her album covers in the 70s and 80s, when they broke up in the late 80s, her career died immediately and despite many attempts to reimagine herself, she got nowhere without him.
>>
>>129307293
Agreed, but as another anon said, it was a bit of a cop out to not use actual nipple piercings and do it the way the original Mugler dress was done. But yes, this is different from what Kanye's wife did, even though both are attention whoring. This one is based on a famous fashion moment from 30 years ago and oddly enough comes across with a certain weird elegance.
>>
>>129307216
Projecting what exactly? You're the one showing negatively-perceived things live rent free inside your head. Must suck.
>>129307312
Most likely the same results.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129307259
I didn't say Gaga was original or good, just that she reached a level of disgusting attention whoring that all these other pop sluts are trying and failing to emulate, which is why their rebellion comes off as boring.
>>
File: gaga satanist .png (610.3 KB)
610.3 KB PNG
>>129308094
Gaga took it to the extreme with the avant garde performance art from a normie's perspective. You still see people today bring up how she paid people to throw up on her, the paparazzi suicide show on MTV or her meeting with Abramovic, among other things. None of what she ever did was particularly impressive to people who are into performance art, but to the average person it was shocking and still is. She goes trending on twitter every other month because someone dug up something weird or "satanic" she did back in the day. This was her plan all along though, she said before that the Lady Gaga persona was always there to be as bland and commercially available at first to "draw people in" and then slowly introduce them to "weirder" things she liked and see how they reacted. She went too far in a few places though, but I don't see any modern pop girl having the balls to do something like pic related.
>>
>>129302137
>>129302143
did they show this on American TV?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129302137
>>129302143
Interesting look and this year we'll start seeing celebs show full nipple on red carpet events. It's an expected development of how normalized casual exhibitionism became
>>
>>129308277
Abramovic is herself a larper butit brought her to meeting with actuall known kabalist so who knows whatthese bitches aregetting into. Jeff Epstein talked in his emails about gaga and madonna being stupid goy larpers trying out kabala.
These dumb celebs probably think they're getting into some dark shit while the real kabalist jews like epstein and Rotshild are calling them stupid goy cattle behind their backs.
>>
File: 11-21-11-1769917636186562.png (36.3 KB)
36.3 KB PNG
>>129308530
>>
File: b4abaff0-3bc8-11ea-aff5-41adf85b58e1.jpg (576.1 KB)
576.1 KB JPG
>>129305955
>This might have been controversial in the early 2000s
nah this is pretty appropriate for the 2020s. pic related is what was actually controversial in the early 2000s.
>>129307238
you're incredibly naive and sheltered if you think her career is "going downhill" which Tbh is to be expected of the shut-ins on this site
>>
File: epstein gaga.png (155.4 KB)
155.4 KB PNG
>>129308530
>Jeff Epstein talked in his emails about gaga and madonna being stupid goy larpers trying out kabala
You got it a bit wrong. Epstein called Madonna a dumb larper yeah, but he was a fan of Gaga and tried to get into the premiere of her Artpop tour. She ghosted him though.
>>
>>129308312
>she shows up with a dildo hanging out
>she shows up with an ultra realistic dildo which will be a homage to early gaga rumors that she has a dick
we can't be like this anon. chappells stylist needs a job to pay her bills.
>>
>>129308277
> I don't see any modern pop girl having the balls to do something like pic related.
She's a dumb rich girl from NYC. None of this stuff is particularly edgy. Rich nepo babies have been "worshipping Satan" since Aleister Crowley. That is what makes all of this stuff incredibly boring. Ostensibly the reason for the satanic cult pedo baiting is to shock the normies, but really it's just a class signifier to set rich people apart from the rabble.
>>
>>129308597
>She's a dumb rich girl from NYC. None of this stuff is particularly edgy.
Yes, I acknowledged this in my post. I'm only pointing out that amongst mainstream pop stars, you will never see someone take it as far as Gaga did ever again. And she herself probably regrets it because she'll forever be branded a baby eating satanist by tons of people, which I doubt she is.
>>
File: FilmMagic-74702976.jpg (196.2 KB)
196.2 KB JPG
This was considered shocking in 2004.
>>
>>
File: Screenshot from 2026-02-02 16-13-55.png (613.7 KB)
613.7 KB PNG
>>129308668
This was not shocking at all and I saw it live. The next day it was all over the news and we're all wondering what the fuss was about. This is a case where /pol/ "is always right." This was genuinely a jew going out of their way to destroy a goy's career.
>>
>>
>>129308698
>In an exclusive report, HuffPost found that this derailment of careers may also have extended to Janet Jackson after her Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime performance in 2004 with Justin Timberlake, often referred to as “Nipplegate.”
>At the tail end of the performance, Timberlake ripped off Jackson’s black leather bustier, accidentally exposing her right breast for nine-sixteenths of a second. The Federal Communications Commission reportedly received over 540,000 complaints and eventually fined CBS for $550,000. But according to HuffPost, Moonves “was convinced it wasn’t a malfunction, but rather an intentional bid to stir up controversy,” and systematically damaged Jackson’s career because of it.
>Moonves was allegedly “furious” that Jackson didn’t make an apology for the malfunction—unlike Timberlake who “tearfully apologized” and went on to perform at that year’s MTV Video Music Awards (an affiliate of CBS), attend and win at the 46th Annual Grammy Awards (broadcast on CBS), and eventually perform again during the Super Bowl LII halftime show this year (once again, on CBS).
>>
>>129308709
>Jackson, on the other hand, was banned from attending the 2004 MTV Video Music Awards, uninvited from the Grammys, and allegedly blacklisted from promoting her projects on all CBS top music affiliates.
>HuffPost reports that “Moonves ordered Viacom properties VH1 and MTV, and all Viacom-owned radio stations, to stop playing Jackson’s songs and music videos. The move had a huge impact on sales of her album Damita Jo, which was released in March 2004, just a month after the Super Bowl.”
>In an interview with Broadly, Shannon Holland, a visiting assistant professor of communication studies at Southwestern University and author of the study “The ‘Offending’ Breast of Janet Jackson: Public Discourse Surrounding the Jackson/Timberlake Performance at Super Bowl XXXVIII,” talked about what “Nipplegate” and the career trajectories of Jackson and Timberlake says about privilege.
>The move “reminds audiences, at least in passing, that his role in the 2004 controversy was minimal, insignificant, and/or manufactured by his performing partner,” Holland said. To suggest Timberlake gets a pass, she told us at the time, because “modern audiences have a higher threshold for ‘inappropriate’ behavior and/or Timberlake has ‘grown up’ significantly during the past decade [is] problematic because those rationales have not been extended to Jackson.”
>>
>>
>>129308709
>Moonves “was convinced it wasn’t a malfunction, but rather an intentional bid to stir up controversy,”
and he was right. i don't have the source but i do remember reading about the production company and one of the people that did her wardrobe quoted as saying "make sure you're watching the performance"
>>
>>129302137
So shocking
So original
So unique
Literally no woman ever has shown her tits or alluded to sexuality in the past 50 years or, shoot, 5 months. She sure showed those religious prudes down in the bible belt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129302137
>>129302143
How does it work? I'm not seeing her raw unobstructed nipples right? There's some sort of fabric over them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129305888
>>129310891
stfu faggot
women should be given rule over imbeciles like you
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129311026
all power to all the people, I can insult your sexism here all I wish, middle ground is always nice but there is no middle ground where you are discussing the removal of rights for this or that group in favor of making the already powerful even more powerful
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 20260202_152639.jpg (155.5 KB)
155.5 KB JPG
>>129302137
>>
>>
>>
>>129312125
She's so bad. She has tits and shows them off. So bad. Literally nobody else does that. Such a harlot. So whorish. Tee hee. There is nothing more shocking in 2026 than a woman, gasp, showing some skin.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129313164
https://youtu.be/4QWzYjatCCs?si=p5lBNqNj41JRb_7_
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129308597
except at this point money is really their only signifier, they don't have anything more than that, like long hereditary bloodlines and family hearths that distinguished nowadays 2nd generation neo-gilded agers from the dynasties of the Holy Roman Empire.
>>
>>129306441
> You can't get more grotty than the meat dress.
>>129307259
>>129307289
>>129307311
the Meat Dress was originally done by Canadian artist Jana Sterbak in 1987
>>
>>129304455
>>129317636
based runwayfag i love you
>>
>>129310905
That's the core of female logic. Everything has to have a story attached to it as to why it's "pure" and "not of ""improper"" reasons". If they can't figure out how to invent a story like that then they get scared. Allowing that fear to have any serious basis in how a society operates will turn that society into a game of Mad Libs.
>>
>>
>>129302137
ahahahahah holy shit, this escalted quickly
This is even more pathetic and desperate when Billie Eilish dyed her hair blonde nad did a photoshott in lingerie
She is done, her 15 minutes are over, none of her future sngles will garner more talking than The Giver
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129317911
>>129318068
billie is still relevant so i guess it's working
>>
>>
>>129307259
You forgot Cher. She's the one responsible for all this degeneracy and sluttiness amongst women in how biz. Not like I mind, because I'm a perv. But society needs to know it all started with Cher. Then Madonna. In that order.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hair and makeup look good. Costume is nothing special, barely a conversation piece. She doesn't have the right body type to really pull it off, but it is ""provocative"". In the sense that it's a new step in the same familiar direction. "She's slightly more naked than that last one." Minor conversation piece.
This kind of provocation has opposite effect (or is it intended?) of de-sexualizing the body. It's not possible to find her sexy anymore, because she has dangled her body in front of us until we're bored of it. It's not remotely shocking to see Chappell Roan's tits on the tv. They might as well be Lena Dunham's.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1000010450.jpg (281.2 KB)
281.2 KB JPG
>>129302137
What if a guy did this but with his balls
>>
>>
>>
File: 1000010453.jpg (160.5 KB)
160.5 KB JPG
>>129322973
Revised version
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129302137
>>129302143
Goddamn, she looks so hideous.
>Hurr durr she's exposing her breasts and is therefore automatically attractive
I swear these people are looking more alien every year. She looks like a zombie from a medieval painting. All these celebrities are starting to just look like characters from Star Wars, like they came from another galaxy. It's really, really weird.
>>
>>
>>129305888
Kill yourself, faggot.
>>129323989
No, they're right. Why the fuck is everybody on this website a fucking nun now? We get it, you're a gay faggot who hates women and gets triggered by seeing the naked body of a member of your own species.
>>
>>
>>129324881
>>129324944
>subjective opinions
she's the sexiest woman alive in my book
>>
>>129302137
So trashy to come to an award show in fetish gear. Do any male artists do odd shit like this? If she's performing like this I don't really care, men perform shirtless all the time, but this is just weird.
>>
>>
>>
>>129324021
Please fuck off from 4chan and make your own site to spam korean clowns infinitely. you females ruined this board and everyone hates you.
>>129324905
>who hates women
Women are literally destroying themselves with muh rights. Thus i against women having rights because it's basically a poison, self-harm device for them. Still am i really a misogynist?
A man prohibits a child going near a skillsaw or a nail gun makes the man child molester or child hater?
>>
>>
>>
>>129326188
>if you think chappel is hot it means you also think korean bugs are hot!
brainrotted incel logic.
like i already said, you don't want to deal with women having the same freedoms you do, then put your money where your mouth is and move to saudi arabia. they hate them just as much as you do.