Thread #1477356 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
Anonymous
Korean man loses sexual function after urologist fucks up his penis in enlargement surgery 01/14/26(Wed)07:55:17 No.1477356
Korean man loses sexual function after urologist fucks up his penis in enlargement surgery 01/14/26(Wed)07:55:17 No.1477356
Korean man loses sexual function after urologist fucks up his penis in enlargement surgery Anonymous 01/14/26(Wed)07:55:17 No.1477356 [Reply]▶
File: GkHy4g0aAAU_oXm.jpg (42.6 KB)
42.6 KB JPG
https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2025-08-20/national/socialAf fairs/Doctor-who-severed-penis-duri ng-enlargement-surgery-fined-5000/2 379845
Doctor who severed penis during enlargement surgery fined $5,000
Published: 20 Aug. 2025, 12:52
[KOREA JOONGANG DAILY]
A urologist who severed a patient’s penis during an enlargement procedure was fined 7 million won ($5,000) by a Seoul court.
According to legal sources on Wednesday, the Seoul Central District Court on Aug. 12 fined the urologist for causing injury through professional negligence.
Related Article
Korea's medical licensing exam sees applicants return as doctor standoff thaws
Doctor who prescribed drugs to Yoo Ah-in fined 40 million won on appeal
Oriental medicine doctor given suspended sentence for sexually assaulting patient
Doctor who supplied ketamine to Matthew Perry and called him a ‘moron’ to plead guilty
The incident occurred in 2020 at a urology clinic in Gangnam District, southern Seoul, where a 35-year-old man underwent penile enlargement surgery involving the insertion of an implant. During the procedure, the doctor severed the patient’s penis horizontally.
The patient had previously undergone two surgeries, and the artificial implant had fused with the corpus cavernosum — the spongy erectile tissue of the penis. Despite this, the doctor failed to inform the patient that severe adhesions could increase the risk of complications such as erectile dysfunction, according to the court.
Prosecutors said the doctor proceeded with the dissection despite the adhesions and ended up cutting through 100 percent of the corpus cavernosum and 95 percent of the corpus spongiosum, which resulted in damage to both the penis and urethra.
During the trial, the doctor claimed that while adhesion was expected, it was not foreseeable that the dissection would damage the urethra. The doctor denied violating the duty to inform the patient of such risks.
11 RepliesView Thread
Showing all 11 replies.>>
>>1477356
However, the court found that the doctor violated both the duty of care and the duty to inform.
“In a case with serious adhesion, the dissection should have been halted before causing injury, and suturing should have been considered to prevent complications,” the court said. “Attempting dissection despite poor visibility of the penile anatomy led to the injury.”
The court also said the doctor failed to explain the risks of erectile dysfunction, urinary complications and other adverse outcomes. “The consent form signed by the patient did not adequately convey the risk of serious complications,” the court added.
The patient is reportedly suffering from severe physical and psychological trauma, including urinary dysfunction and loss of sexual function. “There is a possibility that the patient would have refused the surgery had the risks been properly explained,” the court said.
Still, the court noted that the doctor personally transferred the patient to a higher-level hospital to limit further harm and paid part of the hospital and surgical expenses. Compensation is also being partially addressed in a separate civil suit.
In January 2024, the Seoul Eastern District Court ordered the doctor to pay 24.63 million won in damages — including 4.63 million won in medical costs and 20 million won for emotional distress — representing 60 percent of the total assessed damages. The doctor has appealed the ruling.
This article was originally written in Korean and translated by a bilingual reporter with the help of generative AI tools. It was then edited by a native English-speaking editor. All AI-assisted translations are reviewed and refined by our newsroom.
BY HYEON YE-SEUL [yoon.soyeon@joongang.co.kr]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1477414
you do realize the main tenant of an idiocracy is that the people running it
1 have no idea are morons
2 have radicalized groupthink to the point they pretend common sense issues are a problem
now lemme ask you what sort of retard who uses "ADL's leftists are never terrorists we're good guys we literally call ourself anti-facist"
think letting males into female safe spaces is progressive and support murdering their opposition.
oh boy I know even when i say this you'll have 0 self-awareness so maybe you should just get purged.
>>
>you do realize the main tenant of an idiocracy is that the people running it
>1 have no idea are morons
>tenant
The turdie shill is a moron for being too illiterate to realize that the main tenet of an idiocracy are the subhumans that are the idiots within such. They have no idea they are morons because of their subhuman mindset. That, and their refusal to admit their stupidity because they aren't normal sane Americans.
I am American for knowing that word is spelled tenet. Subhumans that are illiterate can never be Americans, and they resorting to projection prove they're inferior subhuman turdies.