Thread #28827411 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: hio.jpg (449.5 KB)
449.5 KB JPG
>"This is a Hyundai Ioniq 5. It doesnt burn a single drop of disposable energy, and if you dont own one, you're a horrible human being for killing polar bears."
92 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: 1000000329.jpg (773.1 KB)
773.1 KB JPG
>>28827411
I don't hate polar bears, but I do hate modern nanny cars that are annoying as fuck to drive. Plus Hyundai, lol
>>
>>
File: Doubt - Tragic Kingdom (Front).jpg (205 KB)
205 KB JPG
>>28827411
>It doesnt burn a single drop of disposable energy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>28827411
>>28827566
he was bitching about cars having regenerative braking not turning on brake lights.
motherfucker just use your eyeballs and gauge the speed and distance with the car in front of you instead of jerking your tiny dick watchinig tiktok while driving.
he has some decent takes like >>28827547
but holy fuck is he annoying at times.
>>
>>
>>
I wondered if this would come up here.
He's right it would be environmentally wise to use just solar (what about hydro?). But he is a little insufferable about it. I think everyone has an intuitive understanding of this, but this isn't going to make the government shell out $30k to each residence to buy a solar kit that also charges an EV and he sure ain't handing them out.
>>
>>28827670
>this isn't going to make the government shell out $30k to each residence to buy a solar kit that also charges an EV
Why not? The gov't was more than happy to waste several trillion shooting at a bunch of nogs (sand- or otherwise). Surely an investment into the welfare of the average American is worth at least the same amount?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1461302927136.png (34.4 KB)
34.4 KB PNG
>>28827411
hey alright, electric cars are neat and all, the infrastructure for me personally just isn't there yet chief. unless you're gonna come over and install a 220v setup in my garage, and also, build me a garage, because i don't have one of those and it's -14 degrees centigrade outside
>scroll down to video comments
>scroll back up
>last half hour is ranting about republicans and unironic "everything is political. everything."
sigh
>>
>>
File: file.png (200.9 KB)
200.9 KB PNG
>>28828667
>even though it's huge
This is what surprised me the most when I first saw one in person. It has hatchback proportions but everything is scaled up like 20%
>>
>>28827614
>90% of the materials that make up the vehicle are oil based
Same with petrol cars
>the ship they came here on burnt road tar as fuel
Same with petrol cars (Though this is a bit of misinfo, most new ships being built in the last decade aren't 100% fuel oil.)
>they're likely charged from a coal or gas power source
It's significantly more efficent to burn oil at an oil power plant to run your car than it is to burn oil inside the car.
>>
>>28827411
he doesnt say that, it makes sense that you have to make up some shit he doesnt say in the video because he actually makes a lot of good points.
of course americans dont actually care about appeals to logic, american conservative identity is solely centered around appearing as masculine as possible according to their third world macho mexican ideal of masculinity that reads like a 12yo boys vision of manhood so others dont think theyre a homosexual (theyre all homosexual). at conservative events they rarely talk about actual policy, they just drone on about how masculine and strong conservatives are and how weak and effeminate liberals are. because its just stupid retards voting based on their base monkey impulses, learning about anything is for faggots.
>>
>>28828718
>significantly more
It's on the order of a 33% gain from source to power into the wheels. Something like 25% total supply chain efficieny (fossil fuel) to 33% (grid powered recharging).
Effectively the resource usage difference of having a camry with 32mpg get 42 instead.
It's a step up but a far cry from "significant"
A significant change would be real solid state batteries with 3x the capacity per weight, and vehicles with the batt weight scaled down but not minmaxxed, so that people arent hammering their utility grids out of range panic every day in a cheapass electric with only 150 miles of realistic year-averaged usable range.
And what of the grids? How many trillions will it cost to revamp grids into more efficient, more capacity, higher KV systems so the electric cars aren't an excessive strain?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>28829039
I have not forgot the reasons why child immigration / separation detainment is a thing nor why it was put into law. Kidnapped and smuggled kids brought along because child sympathy laws basically force the leeches into the system. Trafficked kids, abused kids, mad amounts of rapes.
People like alex need to be shot on live TV. There's no excuse for being willfully ignorant to support an agenda.
>>
>>
>>
>>28829328
>>28829337
also the part where he just casually lifts an entire dishwasher up onto the table he's talking over
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>28828718
>It's significantly more efficent to burn oil at an oil power plant to run your car than it is to burn oil inside the car.
yeah thats why we convert it to gasoline
>>28828952
if it were more efficient at all trains wouldnt have stopped using steam engines. literally they use piston engines to drive a generator.
if a powerplant boiler and turbine really had any efficiency gain it would it in use everywhere and not just that one application
>>
>>
>>28829596
>convert it
Besides you trying to be disingenious, conversions aint free.
>piston engines to drive a generator
And what does that generator generate anon?
Piston engines are at their most efficent when they're running at a constant rpm uninterrupted. But that's not a car engine. And unless you're advocating that cars should have 2 cylinder generators that power electric motors, you've basically admitting that EV cars are more efficent.
>>
>>
>>
>>28829610
trains literally do it for drivetrain reliability, 5000ftlbs of torque is really hard to transferred onto wheels, and the drivetrain stresses on all of those extra parts is immense
youre so retarded you cant even read what im saying, power stations use a boiler and a steam turbine, thats where the EV efficiency supposedly comes from. Trains just use a piston engine to drive a generator.
Almost like its more efficient on a smaller scale to use a piston engine, like in a car. if you only have to manage 500ftlbs of torque you dont need an unobtainable drive train, aluminum is fine, car go fast.
given the weight of batteries and the energy density of gasoline, no, it would make more sense for cars to have a v8 driving a generator, no batteries at all. and electric hub motors on the wheels. but the conversion losses are obviously higher
desu I can tell youve never felt the same car slushbox vs manual
>>
File: 1200x800_wmkn_670649062157_202501260021000000.jpg (69.4 KB)
69.4 KB JPG
>Saves Energy by KYS
>>
>>28829620
>trains literally do it for drivetrain reliability
Trains in the US do it due to lack of infrastructure. In EU and China majority freight is electric.
If electric wasn't more efficent, nobody would electrify railroads and we'd have gone straight from steam to diesel.
Difference is of course trains don't have to haul batteries whereas cars must. That's why so much money is being poured into improving batteries. Whoever cracks it is going to be a gazillionaire.
>>
File: circut.jpg (37.3 KB)
37.3 KB JPG
id buy an electric car if this was the entire wiring diagram for the drivetrain
>>
>>
>>
>>28827446
And? It's their nature. They can't help it. Same with nogs and sandeaters, being thirdworlders is in their nature and I can't hold it against them. However, I do hate the insistence on these gimmick retardmobiles. You know what would save the environment? Not making these things in the first place. EV buyers, kill yourselves. If you really cared about the environment you'd buy used.
>>
>>
>>
>>28829616
But it isn't though. It's a statistical reduction not some massive gain.
Look at it this way. Assume the world has 50 years of oil left, just for simple numbers. A 33% decrease in consumption gets us 65 years. We'd still run out before you die.
It's relatively insignificant compared to the actual problem.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>28829837
>>28829839
Again, not a big picture understanding of what's important.
>>
I say we pool the collective skill and capacity for shrimp and krill farming and start whale farming for a replenishable oil supply.
Can even do that thing that was proposed with headless chicken towers so there's no brain and no moral ambiguity.
As a bonus, the algae food farming to grow the whale food will be double-used as c02 absorption for net equivalence.
My ideas are way better than some fat gay city kid obsessed with dishwashers and air conditioners.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1650813775336.png (153.7 KB)
153.7 KB PNG
If nothing else, the fact that nearly half of all corn produced in the US is only grown to make ethanol fuel is absolutely retarded. Using ethanol subsidies for solar or wind power would make a lot more sense.
>>28829996
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM
>>
>>28830232
Corn isn'f just or only ethanol. Ethanol is a product of specific oils in the corn.
The rest of that corn, the actual corn, goes into animal feed and the leaves, husks etc go back into the soil.
It's called a national security asset for a reason.
80% of the beef and chicken you've ever ate in the states has been dual-use fed by that ethanol corn.
Faggot.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1755615722121059.png (465.9 KB)
465.9 KB PNG
>>28827411
>literally ignoring the entire point of the video
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Lancia Delta 1100.jpg (648.8 KB)
648.8 KB JPG
>>28827554
Yeah, it is a hatch. One of these lives close by. Don't mind the shape of it. Reminds me of the Lancia Delta.
>>
>>
>>
File: ioniq.png (874.3 KB)
874.3 KB PNG
>>28827494
>>you're not gonna hear me tell you to stop using your machines
This is a lie.
He is a homosexual.
There are two types of homos. One is just a sex pest, bug chasing, showing his buttcheeks at parades. This is the good homosexual, he doesn't really hurt anyone but himself.
Second type is what we see here, dork homosexual. He is a prime member of the coalition of weak and envious that are being used to democratically enslave us.
His statement was just a copout, he is trying to avoid direct conflict, because he is gay.
He would cream his pants harder than jamal giving him a reach-around if your machines got taken from you.
Don't trust a homosexual unless they are telling you about how much gay sex they want to have, this is the only honesty they are capable of.
>>28827411
>I had 4 trouble free years with this car, well except the major unfixable fault
>>
File: IMG_1519.jpg (81.6 KB)
81.6 KB JPG
>>28827411
> *Pushes "his" sunglasses down, and stops sipping his extra sweet sugar pumpkin spice xmas latte.*
> *Swishes and uses a fag lisp*
> This is a train.
> It doesn't use an ounce of excess energy.
> If you don't use one you're a horrible pxrson, and hurting the cute little thermally-challenged bxars.
And the rest of us would like to go to places where trains don't reach or drive a serpentine. We're not the same.