Thread #4479336 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
Your photo must be at least 5 years old.
If you are new to photography - share the oldest you got.
+Showing all 73 replies.
>>
>>
>>
File: AD2I0566.jpg (868.1 KB)
868.1 KB
868.1 KB JPG
>>
>>4479336
June 10 2013. Shot on Minolta SRT 101-b. Not sure which film. Probably 200 or 400 Kodak
>>
>>
>>
>>4479368
I like the pic but what caused that bokeh?
>>
>>4479430
The camera settings.
>>
One of my 1st shots from my 1st camera
>>
File: room 001.jpg (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB JPG
found this on an old harddrive taken in 2005 with a canon ixus 400, its the first photo i ever took with it. I was 15... i dont think i knew how the camera worked.
>>
File: room 003.jpg (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB JPG
>>4479483
that looks like newgrounds and a way too slow shutterspeed.
>>
File: P1040763.jpg (3.8 MB)
3.8 MB
3.8 MB JPG
Nothing particularly special here, but it is nostalgic. This was taken on the 11th of January 2018.
Taken on the first camera I ever had, a Lumix travel zoom, though exact model I don't know.
>>
>>4479447
I actually quite like this
>>
File: Canyon.jpg (658.2 KB)
658.2 KB
658.2 KB JPG
>>
>>4479611
Where is this? I wonder if a UV filter would actually have been useful for the haze. Beautiful formation.
>>
File: PixelDusk.jpg (325.1 KB)
325.1 KB
325.1 KB JPG
Took this one summer 2015 with my first smartphone: a Samsung Galaxy Discover.
>>
>>4479616
near grand canyon, cant put a uv filter on my phone sadly
>>
When I was 1st starting portraits and just trying shit
>>
>>4479336
Mid America Motor Works FunFest for Beetle 2005(?)

It was either 05/06/07. I went 3 years. This one was from when the Lindsay Lohan Herbie movie was coming out.
>>
more from the same roll. not sure what camera. likely a canon sure shot owl or pentax IQzoom 60S. this was before we all had smartphones or even dumb phones. it was normal just to carry a film camera if you wanted to document anything about your experience. then we would sit around as a family a few weeks later and review the prints. someone else might have an envelope too so you can see what they were up to.

we lost something along the way here.
>>
>>4479813
Oh well. The kid in yours, hugging his mother's leg is surely something I had lost a long time ago. This feeling of trust and love.
Apart from that it is anticipation. Boredom. Patience. And I mean the good boredom. The one which you own. I am starting to lose my confidence too. Better stop drinking for real this time.
>>
>>4479336
here's one of my oldest, timestamp says october 2010. it's a snapshit and i couldn't tell you why i felt the need to take it 15 years ago, but today it's certainly an interesting time capsule. Blockbuster, and those "hot new" phones. what a world.
>>
>>4479650
subject is king

when men have wider hips take a photo of a better body part
>>
>>4479968
Subject was a cis woman. You porn rot retard
>>
File: IMG_0502.jpg (456.8 KB)
456.8 KB
456.8 KB JPG
>>
File: IMG_0507.jpg (365.4 KB)
365.4 KB
365.4 KB JPG
>>4479998
>>
File: 1000011471.jpg (1015.5 KB)
1015.5 KB
1015.5 KB JPG
>>
>>4479343
Didn't you just post this in an rpt?
>>
File: IMG_6521.jpg (2.2 MB)
2.2 MB
2.2 MB JPG
>>4479999
>>
>>4480002
Its a fresh edit but taken in 2017
>>
>>
File: bday.png (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB
3.1 MB PNG
Just what defines age of a photograph. Is it just how long ago it was shot, regardless if it was edited or modified at a later date. Or must it be as it was.
>>
>>4480585
Nice shot. Perfekt Wintermood

It is the date the image has been taken. Recent edits may change the outcome (more or less slightly) but it's about old photos, not old or new edits, new photos with old edits....

Just Pics you have taken a while ago. I find that arguing rather strange.
>>
>>
>>4480622
I feel moist just looking at this
>>
>>4480625
I was actually inside nice and dry
>>
File: 2015.jpg (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB JPG
>>4480006
not really a recent photo then, right...?
>>
>>4480689
It is both. Sorry your brain is limited.
>>
>>4480741
No, it's not.
Following your logic a TV series which had its colours corrected, 8 years after airing, would be old and new.
Newsflash asshat: it's still 8 years old, just with different colours.

What kind of substances do you shoot up your ass to figure out these weird logics? Fucking imbecile.
>>
>>4480752
Wwwwaaaahhhhhh
>>
I think I posted this before, but when I look at the photos I took 10+ years ago, this is one of the very few that holds up. At least I think it does...
exif got fucked at some point, but this was a Canon S90 in full auto mode
Greece, 2014
>>
>>4480761
Holds up for sure
>>
>>4480757
Apparently crack

>>4480761
Sweet. Makes me wonder why I think that I need more than a point and shoot
>>
>>4480825
Whhhhaaaaaa
>>
>>
Ice fishing on a frozen lake, March 2010. Taken with a Sony W210.
>>
still like how the lighting ended up on this one.

shot in 2016.
>>
File: _MG_3631.jpg (97.4 KB)
97.4 KB
97.4 KB JPG
>>4479336
Spring 6 years ago.
>>
>>4481712
Fuck me twice on mondays! That's awesome my man.
>>
File: IXEbyF5.jpg (108.1 KB)
108.1 KB
108.1 KB JPG
Here is even an older one.
>>
>>4481712
This would be so awesome if the scene was all blue.
>>
>>4481712
This is exactly the kind of shot that would have impressed begging me
>>
2013 or 2014

>>4479412
best pic on /p/ rn
>>
Around 2017 I think
>>
>>4482305
Same with this one
>>
>>4482236
Where is this
>>
File: Tigger.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB JPG
This photo is around 5 years old now I think. Never bothered to process it before now
>>
>>4480826
I hope no one tells that guy that I've been uploading 5+ year old photos on RPT that I only edited recently.
>>
File: IMG_3917.jpg (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB
3.4 MB JPG
2014
>>
File: IMG_3926.jpg (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB
3.4 MB JPG
>>4486675
same day
>>
File: new 2141.jpg (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB
1.6 MB JPG
New years day 2006 sooc
>>
File: 3904345.jpg (2.4 MB)
2.4 MB
2.4 MB JPG
2013
>>
File: DSC_1012.jpg (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB
3.1 MB JPG
2018.

I also have some digishits somewhere of my city in the 2000s. I was just a teenager so the photos were all just street shitter but I guess now they'll look interesting since everything in them is a bygone era.
>>
File: DSCN0143.jpg (4.1 MB)
4.1 MB
4.1 MB JPG
2016
>>
>>4479957
is that the outer richmond district SF? seems older BTW because of the blackberry "unlimited plan" like 2005
>>
File: plumb.jpg (2.3 MB)
2.3 MB
2.3 MB JPG
2020

>>4482451
read filename, dummy
>>
This is one of my firsts photography. It’s from 2022.
>>
>>4493505
>literal garbage
There was no way but up for you anon kek
>>
>>4493507
lol I feel that I’m still stuck in there… not much have changed since
>>
they use us in these captures. it has to be. but what in the flying fuck would need such translations? and fuck me twice on mondays, this fucking captcha expired quickly! fuck you, 4chan coin shoveling fuckface cuntassniggers from hell.
>>
File: aIMG_6458.jpg (968.4 KB)
968.4 KB
968.4 KB JPG
>>4493760
>>
File: a.jpg (3.2 MB)
3.2 MB
3.2 MB JPG
>>4493760
>>4493762

first was in amsterdam. friends of mine gave it to me for my 30th birthday.

2nd was with my ex-gf in croatia. was a nice trip.
>>
>>4493763
>>4493762
>>4493760

all around 2014 to 2018

Reply to Thread #4479336


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)