Thread #4481441 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: 1746874767858756.jpg (454.4 KB)
454.4 KB JPG
Should i get a Sony zv-e 10 II new or a Lumix S II.
My goal is 4k 30fps with the highest dynamic range possible, 10bit log and fast sensor readout speed (low jellow)
37 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>4481441
Her stuff was pretty underwhelming once you get past blasting a load to the fat tits. Pretty vanilla uncharismatic frdige bod masturbation is the craziest she’ll do type stuff. Crazy people out there pay for it.
>>
File: Color_Science.jpg (943.6 KB)
943.6 KB JPG
>>4481441
>>
File: 1623058010007.jpg (207.6 KB)
207.6 KB JPG
>>4481441
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: thanksgrokky.mp4 (823.3 KB)
823.3 KB MP4
>>4481556
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>4485905
ehhh... sure why not.
I like the little goblin that crawled out her butt to help pull her clothes off. I'm so glad we're all going to gamble our entire economy and energy industry so Ai can replace everything and everyone as quickly as possible. Finally we can all sit in our little cardboard boxes looking at 6.5-fingered cartoon boobgirls.
>>
SII in general is gorillion times better choice especially if you can pair it with an anamorphic lens. As to DR I've heard stories that older S1 has a bit better dynamic range than SII. Not sure if true.
Also I assume you meant ZV-E1 as in the full frame version. ZV-E10 is APS-C. (Both are shite - get an FX30 or used FX3)
>>4481494
Doesn't really matter for video - as soon as this thing hits Resolve it gets hit with a rec. 709 conversion and (if needed) colorized from there. Generally in video Sony skin colors are usually overly red - not green.
>>
File: 5ImageDaly1.jpg (710 KB)
710 KB JPG
>go to youtube
>check for muh cinematic gear advice
>influencer tells me to buy fast 1.4 lens for muh bokeh
>need expensive ND filter to shoot at fast apertures
>also to make it really movie like, need black mist filter
When in reality all iconic movies barely use any sort of background blur because it would kill immersion when all you see is just the actors. Black mist was popular in 90s soap operas and that's it. No real film maker would use smear on his 20k$ lens.
All you need as a non pro consumer is a small compact prime and shoot at f8+. No need of an ND filter then in most situations. Can even shoot fully manual because at those apertures it's easier than auto. I bet with an 99$ 7artisan at those settings you get more cinematic than with any Sony 50mm 1.2 GM lens.
>>
>>
>>4488812
Nothing is cinematic about chinkshit lenses ass color rendition and fugly flare. At least buy a vintage nikon/canon prime ffs (cinematographers actually use those)
Also that way you’re not giving money directly to chinks
>>
File: sddefault.jpg (58.6 KB)
58.6 KB JPG
>>4488812
7artisan is a goated cine lens (both photo and video versions as I'm pretty sure they're the same lens)
Get a bog standard 24-70 and a cine prime and you'll be set for life.
>>
>>
You might want to crop just a tad
https://youtu.be/T-zs6qbOW6I
Dude here cropped to x1.1 and it's perfectly fine
https://youtu.be/9Z0vKKT-6k8
>>
File: 22052514463239-740x494.jpg (59.8 KB)
59.8 KB JPG
>>4481441
>highest dynamic range possible
alexa 35 bro
but seriously, learn how to light the scene, and any camera will do just fine
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: nightcrawler_tr.jpg (10.6 KB)
10.6 KB JPG
>>4488812
>No need of an ND filter
If you shoot "cienema" you are gonna be shooting with a 180degree shutter. With a base iso of most cameras at 800, 1/48s outside is going to be fucking impossible. Even 100iso will be a stop over at f16.
>>
>>
>>
>>4489262
the funny thing is she has overpriced pic sets and even those aren't as hot as that ai slop video where she has hands growing out her back, kek.
new generations will be sodomized by technofeudalism but at least we got to see that