PREVIOUS THREAD:
>>4485000
>>4485000
>>4485000

File: 75r7565e67.jpg (3.8 MB)

3.8 MB JPG

>>4487411

File: DSCF5127.jpg (4.1 MB)

4.1 MB JPG

doggo

>>4487435
nice tongue

>>4487417
terrible, low-effort back-of-head shot
don’t post this garbage
>>4487419
ruined by back-of-head nonsense
nor is this highly symmetrical contraption symmetrically framed
it’s skewed
>>4487420
crushed shadows where there’s actual detail
>>4487421
back-of-head, cut off arm and a general menagerie of things that could be cropped out
but you see what that tourist is doing that you don’t have the guts to do? taking a photo that could actually be interesting
>>4487436
terrible background
>>4487435
instead of filling the frame with a mid-length portrait of a fantastically scruffy dog, you made sure to include a quarter of the concrete footpath, a bundle of straw and a twig
bravo, you made worthless garbage
do better

File: 1757584758678043.jpg (6 KB)

6 KB JPG

>>4487449
>nophoto

my photos
>>4487236
>>4486640
>>4486617
>>4486520
>>4486515

>>4487449
I think you should be in the location instead of posting your worthless reply.Your critique means nothing since you have nothing to show for it. Nice job and Kys.

File: OC062831.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

>>4487411
I shot a time travel

>>4487413
Thank you.

File: MX_19810.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

A few more Mex

File: MX_20276.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

>>4487508

File: MX_20200.jpg (1.3 MB)

1.3 MB JPG

>>4487509

File: MX_19653.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

>>4487510

File: MX_19275.jpg (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB JPG

>>4487511

File: MX_19215.jpg (1004.3 KB)

1004.3 KB JPG

>>4487512

File: MX_19770.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

>>4487513

File: DSCF7358.jpg (957.3 KB)

957.3 KB JPG

>>4487447
Thanks! That dog was very skittish. I was lucky enough to get him like that from the timing.

>>4487490
Funky.

File: 100S8849web.jpg (938.9 KB)

938.9 KB JPG

i can never seem to get a long exposure right

>>4487532
that's a cool shot

File: [005849].jpg (648.3 KB)

648.3 KB JPG

>>4487411

>>4487638
kys

>>4487639
s-should we hold hands first?

>>4487618
Ontario?

File: DSC01116.jpg (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB JPG

>>4487672

File: DSC01117-2.jpg (2.8 MB)

2.8 MB JPG

>>4487673

File: DSC01113-2.jpg (2.5 MB)

2.5 MB JPG

>>4487674
wish I turned my camera for this shot

>>4487509
Cancun? Playa del Carmen?

File: IMG_20042.jpg (2.9 MB)

2.9 MB JPG

>>4487692
5th Ave Playa

>>4487698
Now how the fuck does that happen posting from my PC

File: 9t97.jpg (2.4 MB)

2.4 MB JPG

>>4487698
I knew that place looked familiar! Those tacos were bomb!

>>4487699
the picture is in landscape but the rotation info is stored in the exif
4chan strips your exif
your image is kill
no

>>4487733
>>4487738
>>4487739

Thanks for taking a look, everybody

File: IMG_9053.jpg (3.8 MB)

3.8 MB JPG

She ded

>>4487733
Lovely. The silhouette of the walker orients just enough. Really nice.

>>4487771
Thanks, that’s appreciated

File: 1000028183_20251201091529503.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4487419
Fucking sick, love it.
Fuck that nophoto

>>4487522
Ultra comfy

>>4487733
Top notch

>>4487738
>>4487739
Love these, too

Here's my shit

File: [005831] (1).jpg (940.4 KB)

940.4 KB JPG

>>4487411

File: DSCF1591.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

christmasbros....it's time to get comfy

>>4487739
Whoa I really like this. I actually thought it was a bunch of paper bein thrown

>>4487779
You should at least try to lower the window anon

File: IMG_6949.jpg (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB JPG

>>4487810

File: station.jpg (839.5 KB)

839.5 KB JPG

m6 + ultramax

>>4487797
It is

Photocopier went haywire

File: IMGP2268.jpg (3 MB)

3 MB JPG

>>4487411
fucking retarded to make a photo of a camera the image for /rpt/
>>4487467
this would be better without the cars in the bottom left
their lights are bigger and brighter but they're out of focus
>>4487471
buy an ad faggot
that blue sucks
>>4487478
overexposed and blurry
>>4487490
the blue tint of the shadows looks terrible

terrible thread so far

File: wacko athena.jpg (4.4 MB)

4.4 MB JPG

>>4487851
>>4487733
very cool

File: skellington ornament.jpg (4.9 MB)

4.9 MB JPG

>>4487852
>>4487787
merry crimbus

File: crystals aura photography sound baths.jpg (4.3 MB)

4.3 MB JPG

>>4487853
>>4487419
>>4487490
sick pics

File: holiday spirits.jpg (4.2 MB)

4.2 MB JPG

>>4487854

File: every day.jpg (4.5 MB)

4.5 MB JPG

>>4487855

File: merry grinchmas.jpg (2.6 MB)

2.6 MB JPG

>>4487856

>>4487846
>fucking retarded to make a photo of a camera the image for /rpt/
Yes the actual thread is here >>4487403
Posted before this one and with an actual /rpt/ photo but anons are retarded

>>4487867
Your thread was posted at 12/08/25(Mon)19:33:37, when the previous thread was only at 148 photos. It didn't hit the bump limit until 19:38:26.

You made your new thread too early. Stop complaining.

>>4487846
>fucking retarded to make a photo of a camera the image for /rpt/
But I took it recently, though.

File: ogfyq56cx8qd1.mp4 (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB MP4

>>4487867
>MOM, THE ANONS ARE IGNORING MY THREAD
>MOOOOM

>>4487846
>talks shit
>posts shit
Most consistent /p/oster

>>4487888
It's not my thread, I simply prefer when they're well made. I blame the retard who posted this thread without checking beforehand (and who didn't even bother linking the previous thread either)

>>4487907
There's nothing wrong with the way the thread way made, just because "someone" is upset that their early thread didn't get traction.
>who didn't even bother linking the previous thread either
I guess you missed >>4487413. Any more invalid whining?

>>4487916
You have the right to be retarded, wrong and proud of it unfortunately

>>4487919
Most concessions are less pitiful than yours. How sad.

>>4487916
>”someone" is upset that their early thread didn't get traction.
check the catalog before making /rpt/, /gear/, /fgt/ or any other endemic thread, newfag piece of shit
it’s not a competition to see who has the best /rpt/, proud cunt

File: IMGP2267-1.jpg (3.8 MB)

3.8 MB JPG

>>4487508
I could only find fault with these if I tried really hard, very enjoyable series, anon.
>>4487502
The light leaks are a bad choice.
>>4487504
The subject's face is too grey.
>>4487522
The fountain is overexposed and there is a distracting bright strip in front of the bushes.
>>4487532
The black point is too high.
>>4487534
There's too much contrast.
>>4487535
The background is brighter than the subject and it's distracting.

>>4487951
Hey anon thanks for the consctructive critque, I am 'the black point is too high'. Can you give me any advice on how to fix? The water had a very blue tint so I chose white balance correction by picking a pixel i though was white and I did some dynamic range compression because the sky was blown out. Any way I can fix? I use rawtherapee because i dont pay for software

File: DRC-Example.jpg (970 KB)

970 KB JPG

>>4487963
>I did some dynamic range compression because the sky was blown out.
Did you use the dynamic range compression tool? I pulled picrel from the Rawpedia page for dynamic range compression and you can tell the blacks are washed out in every example except the original image.

File: IMG_63514.jpg (2.2 MB)

2.2 MB JPG

>>4487970
Yes I did. I have been shooting raw for 1 year ( I shoot every day the weather is good) and basically have just learned by fumbling with the available tools. I really have no idea how to properly use post processing software. Shooting underwater in caverns has a lot of challenges and I don't really know how to improve. Anyway I messed with the blacks and contrast here is a new edit.

File: image.jpg (565.5 KB)

565.5 KB JPG

>>4487972
Tonality is better in this one but I guess you should try removing a bit of the green tint. I don't know how to do it with Rawtherapee though, but with photoshop simply lowering the highlights of the green channel is more or less enough. I would also expect Rawtherapee to have this tool

File: MX_19637.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

>>4487951
Cheers criticanon. Gives me some motivation to edit more from the trip

File: MX_19417.jpg (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB JPG

>>4487978
Can't decide between color or BW for bird lady

File: MX_19417-BW.jpg (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB JPG

>>4487980

File: MX_20317.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

>>4487981

File: MX_19196.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4487983

File: MX_20166.jpg (478.2 KB)

478.2 KB JPG

>>4487984

>>4487993
Very nice. I would sit there for hours

File: duck.jpg (4.9 MB)

4.9 MB JPG

ahh im so mad the duck isnt more in focus, the water looks so good here

File: DSC06071.jpg (3.3 MB)

3.3 MB JPG

>>4487411

>>4488066
What made you take this photo? What did you see that made you think “ah this frame right here!”?

>>4488067
It was just as far as I could lean out of the window without falling out.

>>4487980
>>4487981
Black and white, but bring down the contrast, up the visibility around the face and the darkness/crows by her neck.

>>4488078
This is the only shot in your series that got my interest. The others were lacking something and I think this one encapsulates everything I would want from this style of photography. Good shot anon

>>4487993
a picture worth showing on google when looking up "mountain photo"

>>4488121
>>4488066
>>4487672

Some seriously cringe, questionably recent photos in this counterfeit "rpt".

>>4488122
>still seething

>>4488122
You can call my picture seriously cringe, idc. But questionably recent means you call me a liar. I took this pic two weeks ago.

>>4488250
"Questionably recent" sounds like a projection to me, since he's obviously upset about the two threads. I wonder if he's padding threads to hit the bump limit.

>>4488235
Seething that the "photos" are cringe? Definitely.

>>4488250
If yours is the one with the cat, that was an accident. I meant this one >>4487673

>>4488251
Neither the scene nor the colors in these look recent to me. Your mind went to padding and assuming I'm upset about two threads, so I'll assume these garbage ones are yours and padding is exactly what you're doing.

File: IMG_8028_copy.jpg (651.6 KB)

651.6 KB JPG

Holy shit, shut the fuck up you're both insufferable women-tier faggots

>>4488254
post photos or stfu

File: IMG_9056.jpg (4.4 MB)

4.4 MB JPG

>>4488255
That’s all this site is

>>4488260
It's very hard to tolerate NGL. I wish there was an alternative photocentric online place but IG is an shit so here we are

>>4488269
Probably an unpopular opinion here, but I enjoy the photography discord

https://discord.gg/photography

They don’t hate themselves, enjoy photography and never use the term seethe

>>4488273
intadasting

File: Etang1b.jpg (4.9 MB)

4.9 MB JPG

What u guys think of the depth effect i added ? :D

File: deerhunter.jpg (2.2 MB)

2.2 MB JPG

recetly dug out of catalogue ad wated to share

File: 20251210091426264.jpg (1 MB)

1 MB JPG

>>4488099
Chill. Thanks dude

File: 20251002_140528_Original.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

Good? Bad? Tryhardy?

>>4488345
adorable little jay

>>4488292
If you're referring to the black borders, I think it frames the picture nicely. although I think the edges are a bit too straight, if that makes sense.

File: IMG_9057.jpg (4.2 MB)

4.2 MB JPG

Which rpt am I supposed to be posting to?

File: IMG_3614_v1Q.jpg (495.2 KB)

495.2 KB JPG

>>4488391
This is a gear thread sir

>>4488399
They all are

>>4488297
Country?
>>4488325
Feels like home. Tasteful crop.
>>4488345
Blue jays are the best.
>>4488399
Pretty clean darks. Did you expose to the left for this shot?

>>4488400
I NEED TO CONSOOOOOOMMM!
AAAAHHHH, I'M CONSOOOOMING!!!

>>4488330
London?

>>4488254
>If yours is the one with the cat, that was an accident.
No, I'm the intersection.

>>4488450
I get the joy of acquiring new gear, especially for first timers. It’s the talk of what mogs what that prevents people from simply enjoying and producing the art

>>4488456
I did the sane thing and made my first, only, and last camera a ff dslr so i can mog everyone all the time while gearfags seethe about 5% of noise and 1/4lb while dancing around the fact they’re just insecure about being seen with a camera that’s nicer than their photography

File: Ducky1b.jpg (4.8 MB)

4.8 MB JPG

I liked how cohesive the colors were here, like a thought out painting, lemme know if you see it too

File: Doggy1.jpg (229.6 KB)

229.6 KB JPG

this one partly feels like a gimmicky insignificant photo but also a little bit iconic im not sure why

>>4488457
Fair enough

It’s interesting how nice gear can limit creativity somehow.

File: 20251201_163834.jpg (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB JPG

How's this? Can it be edited to be a better photo?

File: MCD_1777 edit 5x4.jpg (1019.2 KB)

1019.2 KB JPG

>>4488456
As much as I cringe at all the money spent, it was still fun to try out different cameras and formats over the years and the hands-on experience is invaluable. Between APC-C, M43, and FF, I had fun learning and adapting to the different workflows for each (although M43 tended to feel more like wrestling back usable data than any real editing). I'm pretty firmly settled on my FF collection now, but that's just personal preference. I wouldn't mind trying one of the larger formats one day just to see that side of the fence, though.

>>4488464
Nice gear doesn’t limit creativity. If anything it adds opportunities. Shit gear is a long walk with lots of photos not taken because the light wasn’t there, not even for the darkroom to bring out. Who has time to play weather games? That’s not what photography is anymore.

I rented some shit kit and found out. Yeah, its just a lot of passing up photos or accepting phonelike quality. If it doesnt fit in a normal mans pants pocket like a grIII its a useless gimmick for people afraid of being seen holding a camera and old prunes with actual issues carrying 1lb

File: 04_notme_grade.jpg (276.9 KB)

276.9 KB JPG

>>4488465
Just play around in any photo editor software with colors until you think it looks nice

File: 20251201_163834(1)(1).jpg (1018.4 KB)

1018.4 KB JPG

>>4488472
Yeah, I'll do my take on it, but I wanted to see some other exemples of editing since I'm just getting started and don't know too much. The problem is that sometimes I can only find a photo a little appealing if I over edit it somewhat like this

File: 20251201_164233(1).jpg (1.3 MB)

1.3 MB JPG

Or this

>>4488553
>>4488472
WE NEED A RAW THREAD. RAW EDIT THREADS ARE KINO. PLEASE PROCEED TO POST RAW LINKS AND COMPETE FOR THE PRIZE OF TOP KEKEDOM.

>>4488457
But these are the exact people who wouldn’t give two shits about the quality of the their work.

Their pricy camera is simply a status symbol.

>>4488467
The quality of work can diminish, as now they focus on sharpness, or other non soulful qualities.

It’s the struggle of using less advanced tech that inspires creativity. Images don’t even need to be in focus at to make a powerful piece of art. I’m reminded of the game boy camera pics that were posted some time back. If your art is weather dependent, perhaps this is a skill or creativity issue

>>4488592
>soulful
>let me tell you what le art should look like - the latest instagram trend among teenage roasties
People like you are why photography is seen as masturbatory, pretentious non-art

Trevor Wisecup is not creative and using shitty gear has never made him more creative. Creative people make things. Gearfags buy their heccin ~look~ for an instagram trend.

>>4488613
I’m not doing anything of the sort -

I’m describing why spending more money doesn’t necessarily equate to better photography.

Who?

>>4488635
You said a nicer camera makes photography worse because the photos aren’t blurry and tripods arent required when its dim out. Do you realize how stupid you sound?

>>4488648
I’m sorry if that’s how you interpreted it, but my point is that one shouldn’t expect more artful pictures just because they’ve spend more on a camera body. Sometimes people tend to focus on sharpness and other technical elements instead of the bigger picture

I don’t see tripods even being mentioned.

>>4488655
>sharpness is never artfulness
Expressionism is better off dead.

Max data gathering enables max creativity and minimum camera operation. Ansel adams knew it. Modern camera guys pride themselves more on shopping and turning rings than actual creation.

>>4488655
>tripods
why would I need that when my latest camera has 27 axis IBIS stabilizers and advanced AI interpolation, so that every image I shoot wide open with my f/1.2 55mm equivalent lens is sharp and perfect

>>4488670
Ansel Adams chastised gearfags

File: d1.jpg (3.1 MB)

3.1 MB JPG

Sup

>>4488671
Is that Ken Livingstone?

What $300-$500 body would you pick up if you wanted to get back into photography and don't have any lenses?

File: DSC00468.jpg (361.6 KB)

361.6 KB JPG

>>4488698
Buy a $50 digishit and spend the rest of the money on travel

>>4488698
>>4488699
If you can't take good pics from your nearby surroundings, you will never going to make it
Canon 5DmkII, Nikon D700, Nikon D3

>>4488698
Literally check your local pawn shop anon

>>4488703
I'm sure that fullframe will take really excellent pictures of your dog

File: IMG_1236.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

>>4488696
Hiyo

File: IMG_1366.jpg (807.8 KB)

807.8 KB JPG

>>4488344
Different edit of the next shot

Sorry, I thought I was in the gear thread
>>4488699
I'm a dad so traveling with (or finding time to ditch) the kids is a no go.
>>4488703
I took photography for 2 years in high school and know what you mean. I've passed up too many photogenic opportunities with my pets and kids and while on walks. I was thinking of a D700 (or any D6xx or D7xx, or D8xx). I'll keep an eye out for a Canon too. Thanks
>>4488706
I never thought of that - I usually venture to the gun and tool section. I appreciate it

>>4488723
>I've passed up too many photogenic opportunities with my pets and kids and while on walks
I suggest you get something light and small because you won't take your D700 or D810 with you. It's huge and heavy and when you have to manage kids (and all the shit that comes with that) you will loathe the thought of bringing your full frame DSLR + lens with you.
I never took my Nikon Zf when I went grocery shopping with my son. Well I did once but that taught me a lesson. But I do take my small camera with me everywhere I go - even grocery shopping.
So if you want something to keep memories and not get in your way: Think practical in terms of weight, size. If you want to masturbate over charts and pixel peep: Get a full frame camera with the full size lenses.

>>4488752
People have been taking D850s up mountains for a decade. Consider the grocery store is not an appropriate place for a camera and the ugh you feel is insecurity and shame. The ZF isn’t even heavy.

Protip: good cameras are for interesting lives not grocery shopping

>>4488759
yes, thanks for your autistic input

>>4488760
Before calling other people autistic consider, you took a $1500 camera grocery shopping, felt ashamed, and bought a marginally smaller $1500 camera to feel less ashamed.

>>4488762
>projection
I didn't feel ashamed. Lol. I'm not an autistic teenager who gives a shit about what others think.
The Zf was just too big and heavy and got annoying/in the way when I was grocery shopping.
(Non mentally ill people go shopping without a handler/their mom - so they can't just lean back with their huge DSLR and take shitty photos all the time while someone else does the shopping)

>>4488768
>The Zf was just too big and heavy and got annoying/in the way when I was grocery shopping.
The Zf... was too bulky for you? Use a phone wristlet.

>>4488768
yeah you sound autistic. its a small camera. if you are not a 5’4" manlet your issues are obviously psychological.

File: IMG_3352.jpg (80.3 KB)

80.3 KB JPG

Friendly reminder DSLRs and FF MILCs are actually a lot smaller than /p/ makes them out to be. Many are close in dimensions to soda cans and the weight is unnoticeable unless using fancy lenses like zooms and fast teles/UWAs. With FF mirrorless a lot of it is unnoticeable period

File: DSC_0006.jpg (3.1 MB)

3.1 MB JPG

>>4488752
Anon who takes photos

>>4488759
Anon who pretends to take photos

>>4488723
>I'm a dad
Still save your money and buy a cheap camera, buy cameras for your kids. A compact bridge camera will fit in your (coat) pocket and is more than capable at taking good photos. 2MP is already larger than most websites will even display. If you just want something to snap while on walks, a professional camera is way overkill.

>>4488776
DSLRs are not small, picrel

>>4488776
>>4488777
>Using two image slots for gear posts.
>>4488723
>Sorry, I thought I was in the gear thread
LMAO
This is the worst /rpt/ I've ever seen.
>>4488706
My local pawn shops all had some of the worst gear available: Canon and Nikon DSLR blobs, mid compacts marked up 500% and Sony mirrorless priced 20% off new. Long gone are the days where I could buy a digishit for $5. That was after COOFID, too. Buying and selling cameras is fucked now.

File: 100S8021.jpg (2.7 MB)

2.7 MB JPG

>>4488698
nikon fa

>>4488792
looks like phone but with too much AI

>>4488797
No it doesn't.
(but it is a phone pic)

>>4488752
Are you like 5'2?
How small do you have to be that a Zf is too big for EDC lol

File: IMG_9071.jpg (3.7 MB)

3.7 MB JPG

>>4488805
>>4488797
A6700 w/70-350

>>4488813
>A6700 w/70-350
Oh man, that's like more bulk and 240g more weight than the Zf and a simple 40 f2
How did you possibly walk around with such a monster of a setup?

https://www.exibartstreet.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/nikon-z-f-camera-exibart-street-photography-10-969x1024.jpeg

How does she do it? Maybe I should ask /fit/ if she's just not natty

>>4488777
Yes, they are. Especially without zooms. Stop being autistic.

>>4488777
>websites can onwy dispway 2mp
Your brain is more outdated than ken rockwells and his anti-raw rants. Bridge cameras are short lived ewaste btw.

>>4488813
baby sensor
just use a phone

>>4488817
>her
>she
that's a man

>>4488826
Nah still way better than an om5. Just oversharpened. Skill issue.

>>4488827
Must be a giant too

>>4488789
we love a good zoom burst don't we folks

File: IMG_9072.jpg (4.3 MB)

4.3 MB JPG

I wish the focus was a bit better

Ah well.

File: IMG_9073.jpg (4.3 MB)

4.3 MB JPG

>>4488854
Thanks. Here’s another albeit less successful one

>>4487411

File: DSCF8970.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4488462
colros look good
>>4488078
this rocks. could see it not on an album cover, but definitely back or liner notes
>>4488330
>Tryhardy
>no evidence that shooter tried at all
>>4488561
reminds me of ps2 era magazine ads

>>4488821
There are reasons to want more megapixies, but web display most definitely is not one of them.

>>4488918
>> reminds me of ps2 era magazine ads

Spot on

>>4488918
What happens here

File: IMG_1411.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

The rut is over, and the bucks are out and looking for food. They lose 20-30% of their body weight during mating season.

File: IMG_1385.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4488957

File: IMG_1402.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4488958

>>4488957
nice shots.

Lens and settings?
How far away?

>>4488960
Thanks- Tamron 100-400 @ 100mm. f/5.6, 1/160, ISO 1600. He was probably about 30 feet away.

>>4488957
Bambi!

File: ir1178.jpg (557.4 KB)

557.4 KB JPG

>>4488959
nice set, always cool to see theses guys.

File: 32600992_Unknown.jpg (149.8 KB)

149.8 KB JPG

>>4488959
>>4488978
>>4489015

File: 32600928_Unknown.jpg (157.8 KB)

157.8 KB JPG

Really like em too

File: 32600880_Unknown.jpg (147.8 KB)

147.8 KB JPG

The cycle of life folks

File: 32600912_Unknown.jpg (108.3 KB)

108.3 KB JPG

Cheers

File: IMG_7700.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

Been practicing some night photography lately (shit's hard) and also pushing the boundaries of how obnoxious I can get with the editing.

>>4487478
I like the idea, but feels like it lacks a subject for the viewer to focus on. Probably could have looked for a pine cone or at least have a whole branch in focus. I think if the one running from the center to the top left was completely in view/focus it would have been a pretty neat pic
>>4487502
Thought for a second that was a double exposure, that would have been sick as fuck
>>4487733
Very nice.
I hate it when I find a nice looking spot like this, but without a person to draw your attention a lot of them just don't work and usually you have to just get lucky with someone walking by
>>4487787
Cozy
>>4487852
Like the vibe. Is that actually on film or just replicating the look?
>>4488078
>>4488326
Good shit.
Are you using some kind of filter to get those cross shapes in the highlights in the second shot?
I've been thinking of buying some creative filters myself, just not sure which ones are worth it
>>4488462
I like the colors and the dark landscape painting feeling it gives off. Probably should have bumped up the exposure just a bit though.
>>4488555
This is cool, just rotate it a bit so the tower isn't crooked.
Just don't be afraid to fuck around and overedit. You're bound to make edits that look like shit or look great and a year down the line you realize look like shit. But it's all part of the process. Just have fun with it and don't let people judging you get under your skin.
>>4488804
I'm a sucker for rimlights. Wish more of the cat was in focus

File: christmas tree cafe.jpg (4 MB)

4 MB JPG

>>4489603
>Like the vibe. Is that actually on film or just replicating the look?
ty. on film, 800T.
are you also a film shooter? I love the composition of your shot, its a great balance between the sign and the arch (and hey, some blue/orange contrast to boot!)

File: 01.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

>>4489619
>800T
thought so, the color of the lights is a dead giveaway
>I love the composition of your shot
thanks, it was a super lucky shot, but I'm still proud of it. I walked past this side alley and noticed the cool red sign and just then a guy walked out of there and I just barely managed to get a shot out before his silhouette left the arch.
This is digital and I faked an 800T inspired look in post. It also helps to hide some of the sloppy focus on many of my night shots as a bonus.
I do also shoot film, but almost exclusively on Kodak Gold, don't feel confident enough yet to spend more money on expensive film-stocks

File: DSCF8964.jpg (2.5 MB)

2.5 MB JPG

>>4488937
christmas parade

>>4489625
Nice CORNER OF BUILDING.
I mean at this point jfc.

>>4489669
thanks

>>4489467
Neat! When did you take this?

Max image limit. New thread

>>4493110
You're nearly a month late...

>>4493118
twss

>>4489467
dead bambis, sad

>>4487765
what happened