Thread #4490365 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play

Anonymous
/4:3/ general 12/26/25(Fri)16:52:18 No.4490365 After much positive feedback to the /m43/ general I re-thought the whole thing. Why limit to one mount if the defining defining feature is the aspect ratio?
Let's have a /4:3/ general for all the based chads who shoot in 4:3 ratio!
Welcome: Everyone whose system shoots natively in 4:3!
Also welcome: Those who accept the superiority of 4:3 and crop their 3:2 (cringe) images to the 4:3 (based) ratio.
Not welcome: Everyone else.
Topic of the first /4:3/ general ever: Are 5:4 and 6:7 based, too? Or are they just tryhard?
Discuss!

Showing all 127 replies.
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)17:46:20 No.4490369 >>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)18:15:03 No.4490372 >>4490369
you're not welcome
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)18:36:55 No.4490373 >>4490365
4:5 is the most based of all aspect ratios.
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)18:40:56 No.4490374 >>4490373
Most based would be xpan. See >>4490369
And >>4490372
For just how much it makes foolthirdies seethe
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)18:52:22 No.4490378 >>4490369
What phone was this shot on?
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)19:03:43 No.4490379 >>4490378
Seethe more, and bow to XPan's superiority.
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)19:51:42 No.4490387 >>4490379
But anon, this looks nothing like the quality of an X-pan. Those are larger than 35mm, this looks like a phone picture (1" or smaller)
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)20:37:38 No.4490390 >>4490374
6x12 or 4x10 is the superior pano format. Sorry.
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)21:11:54 No.4490395 >>4490379
this literally looks like a phone photo
>>
Anonymous
12/26/25(Fri)21:53:41 No.4490402 >>4490378
phones that shoot in 4:3 are welcome, too
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)00:30:34 No.4490428 >>4490365
1:1 mogs all other aspects
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)00:47:55 No.4490429 I like cropping my full frame to 4:3 and 5:4 most of the time. It seems like going for a more square composition activates something in my brain.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)01:24:48 No.4490431 >>4490428
Squares are for squares. Ong
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)04:23:21 No.4490452 >>4490365
>no 9x3 general
hopefully this board sees the light next year.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)04:54:19 No.4490454 >>4490452
I think 35:12 is far more impactful of an aspect ratio for the discerning photographer.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)05:54:20 No.4490457 >>4490387
>>4490395
Kek, for a minute there, I misinterpreted this to be an aspect ratio thread. But of course, foolthirders always regress to bemoaning their (lack of) IQ.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)06:07:35 No.4490458 >>4490372
>>4490365
Which phone? Xiaomi?
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)07:27:19 No.4490473 >>4490457
this is an aspect ratio thread. all gear faggotry not related to aspect ratio has to go to a /gear/ thread
keep on discussing anon.
I like 4:3. I also do like 5:4 - 5:4 is very based for printing as most commercially available image frames above baby size are for that aspect ratio and you don't need to crop before printing
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)07:28:41 No.4490474 >>4490429
yes, 3:2 is way too wide for me. especially for portrait orientation. what do you do with all that empty ceiling space? just crop it to god's chosen ratio!
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)07:29:43 No.4490475 >>4490428
every time I try 1:1 I cringe. i have maybe 2 or 3 pictures a year I like in 1:1 more than in 4:3
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)07:30:43 No.4490476 Why do foolframers get so upset at m43?
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)07:30:58 No.4490477 >>4490475
here's the building corners (very special to me) in 4:3
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)07:32:12 No.4490478 >>4490476
I guess it's the same as with conservatives getting mad at people enjoying drugs.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)07:32:53 No.4490479 >>4490476
Calling it anger is extreme cope.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)07:56:17 No.4490481 >>4490457
what the fuck are you on about it literally looks like a phone pic is all im saying
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)08:38:14 No.4490486 >>4490481
that's because the default aspect ratio on the iphone is 4:3. your brain has been cooked. just as with the teenagers who associate 28mm with phones. you need therapy
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)08:48:39 No.4490489 >>4490476
Very bad photos
Very big egos
Notice /dst/ and /pp/ know their place and post in peace lol
The m43 shill is such a retard, he destroyed his marriage over this shit sensor size
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)08:52:42 No.4490490 i like 3:4 for portraits
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)08:57:11 No.4490492 >>4490489
>Very bad photos
>Very big egos
thanks anon. this is my instagram tagline now
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)09:11:48 No.4490494 i thought this would make a good backdrp for a portrait
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)09:31:01 No.4490495 >>4490494
imagine putting JD Vance infront of that lol
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)10:25:06 No.4490498 >>4490489
>The m43 shill is such a retard, he destroyed his marriage over this shit sensor size
qrd?
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)13:01:38 No.4490509 >>4490475
this one is better
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)16:12:07 No.4490552 >>4490492
Are you going to spam the same 4 snapshits on instagram as well? I wouldn't be suprised if you posted your boring ass snaps in fgt next. Lmao.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)16:16:57 No.4490554 >>4490498
>starts out with a very reasonable kit, z6ii and 50mm f1.8
>comes to /p/
>wants to fit in to (you)maxx
>tries doing gay urban photowalk shit to have an endless stream of /rpt/ grade garbage
>gets self conscious
>tries to solve that with a smaller camera
>manages to get a mile away from home without having a panic attack
>photos still suck
>switches to trolling about sensor sizes for hours
>tries to force wife to use a lumix gx9 (garbage camera with shit autofocus btw, she would have probably been better off with a sony)
>realizes m43 sucks, buys zf
>panic attacks return
>buys om5ii for JUST $1500
>$6000 and 6 hours of 4chan per day later and his wife divorces him
>now he’s also broke
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)16:18:39 No.4490555 >>4490492
This is the fifth time you’ve posted this and it keeps getting worse like you crop it and re-compress it each time dear fucking lord
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)16:46:14 No.4490558 >>4490552
nah I post my good shit to insta. /p/ only gets the refuse :)
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)16:47:32 No.4490559 >>4490555
I'm sorry. You can complain to United Nations Assembly when Internet gets full because of me posting my images :)
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)16:54:00 No.4490561 >>4490558
>good shit
>german
Literal shit posted on instagram. Disgusting.
Another snapshit. You have incredibly poor visualization and control over DoF. It reveals how much of a gearfag you really are.
>>4490559
Nothing picture with zero composition.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)17:15:35 No.4490567 >>4490559
Monochrome doesn't make it good anon.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)18:01:01 No.4490586 >>4490561
>>4490567
thanks, my nophoto fans :)
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)18:25:17 No.4490593 Cope, seethe, snapshit spam.
That's the m43 guarantee.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)19:22:51 No.4490606 >>4490593
this is a 4:3 thread. it has nothing to do with m43. why are you retards spamming m43 shit all the time? go to your shitty gear cope threads
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)19:34:51 No.4490610 >>4490606
>immediately proves the point
>adds projection to the list
Kek
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)19:45:21 No.4490613 Why would you buy a brand new micro four thirds camera when you could just buy a used 5D2 which takes better photos for a fraction of the cost? Seems retarded to me.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)19:47:49 No.4490614 >>4490613
dont know. ask over in the gear thread
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)19:54:24 No.4490617 >>4490614
But anon you want people to ask you, don't you? Otherwise you wouldn't put metadata on your photos.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)20:05:41 No.4490620 >>4490617
i think it's a nice touch. you don't have to read it if you feel angry about it
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)20:05:47 No.4490621 >"Hello, I'm a shitposter from an unofficial shitpost thread. We're not shitposting here though, teehee!"
>"NOOOOO stop shitposting! That's what the gear thread is foooooor!"
Fatherless behavior.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)20:12:23 No.4490623 >>4490621
why shitposting? anon has an obvious gear related question. this is an aspect ratio related thread. anon should just ask his gear question in the gear thread.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)20:21:39 No.4490626 >>4490623
>wink wink nudge nudge
>noooo haha how could you
I guess the other /m43/ thread hit the bump limit. You should label them better next time, instead of making stealth threads.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)20:40:10 No.4490630 >>4490621
M43 is such a failed system every image posted is legitimate shit posting. The m43 sissies have already admitted to it.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)22:21:59 No.4490643 >>4490373
This. 5:4 > 4:3. 4:3 is too wide.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)22:26:53 No.4490645 >>4490643
10:9 chads report in (FF).
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)22:38:18 No.4490647 I got a feeling.. Somebody's watching me..
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)22:42:41 No.4490648 I christen thee: "/butt/" - the official buildings und terrace tops thread.
>>
Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)23:52:11 No.4490673 >>4490645
This is one of the most difficult images to look out I've ever seen. I'm genuinely impressed, how did you even manage that?
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)00:17:31 No.4490681 >>4490673
How so?
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)00:25:40 No.4490683 >>4490681
It has so much 'almost detail' in the foliage, such a busy, cluttered composition, and truly radioactive colours. It's also overexposed.
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)08:06:34 No.4490741 >>4490643
isnt 5:4 the instagram ratio? is there any film or sensor that uses it natively?>
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)08:08:26 No.4490742 >>4490681
it's a nice image. dont listen to the nophoto.
you could slide some lr sliders and fix the "overexposure" but why would you?
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)08:09:32 No.4490743 >>4490647
this image has it all:
>building corners
>moon
>societal critique
>right aspect ratio
very well done, anon
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)16:07:25 No.4490820 today we had fogs and holy corners
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)16:09:39 No.4490821 >>4490820
god is so based
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)16:11:35 No.4490823 no jews allowed
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)16:41:45 No.4490825 >>4490823
>>4490821
>>4490820
Boring and badly composed gearfag snapshits. Zero joy sparked.
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)17:21:33 No.4490828 >>4490683
>>4490742
>tfw you get more feedback in a shitpost thread than in /rpt/
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)17:27:01 No.4490831 >>4490823
It's the synagogue of satan that rules over them (and us) that needs segregation followed by condemnation. The time to separate the wheat from the tares is nigh.
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)17:28:03 No.4490832 >>4490825
Yid detected. Oy vey.
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)18:08:57 No.4490890 >>4490828
guess why I make them
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)18:09:57 No.4490891 >>4490831
based and true
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)18:31:08 No.4490894 >>4490832
>take extremely shitty pictures
>blame it on the jews
>get divorced
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)18:41:03 No.4490896 >>4490894
the divorce industry is a jewish power play
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)19:11:22 No.4490902 >>4490896
>I externalize all of my problems because I can do no wrong!
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)19:20:37 No.4490906 >>4490902
He is correct. Divorce was pushed by jews because it is literally how their religion handles marriage. Their religion also explicitly allows abortion. Now look at where attempts at banning medically unnecessary male infant circumcision go. And who is in charge of organizations insisting something that causes neurological damage and raises the infant mortality rate is actually healthy.
Now look at this guy instead of JUST the pharisees. He was greedy and prideful. And these goeth before a fall. He too denied Christ. Not in his words but in his heart. Jesus would find his camera neuroticism and greed for a perfect camera, his hours coping to convince himself this purchase is the last, pathetic. He had one good camera, what were the other five for?
All problems in society trace back to literally any individual, jew or not, who denies Christ, and does not live as a true Christian, and furthermore makes this everyone elses problem by propagandizing their sins as good if not necessary.
>>4490896
Who are you to complain about people you fit in with?
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)19:27:34 No.4490907 >>4490820
this looks like the quality from a $150 dslr from 2007 or cheapie aps-c like a canon ef m, but your caption says it came from literally over $2000 of gear
what would jesus think of this, once he found out you used to use something cheaper and better, saw the wealth of cheaper and equally good and often better tools available, and saw your lack of charity, your pride and hubris?
i think if i handed jesus a $100 dslr+kit zoom he would take a better photo and give the camera to a homeless guy
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)19:39:25 No.4490910 >>4490906
stfu you retard. jesus would shoot OM-5 II if he was alive
>>
Anonymous
12/28/25(Sun)19:40:26 No.4490911 >>4490907
>jewish drivel
not reading that, satan
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)02:50:34 No.4491926 retard wised up after I told him, he's been doing it for years tho, he has an obsession with MFT
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)02:53:30 No.4491928 >>4491926
fucker got banned, celebrate brothers
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)02:59:12 No.4491935 >>4491928
>>4491926
This is your handler from the 4chan team discord speaking
Your janitor status will be removed effective immediately
CIA agents are on their way now
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:05:29 No.4491940 >>4491935
check out my MFT photo
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:07:45 No.4491943 >>4491940
i used the gh1, samyang 21mm and sirui anamorphic adapter
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:14:54 No.4491949 Good for him that he found help, I always found him a seriously psychotic, totally obsessed with MFT loser
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:20:02 No.4491957 >>4491926
Micro four thirds can not justify its own existence desu
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:22:15 No.4491962 >>4491940
Looks really bad. Try shooting over the grass. Show me the lake, micro four toneh.
>>4491949
Are you having a schizophrenic episode?
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:26:29 No.4491964 >>4491962
yes its shit, how did you like my capturing method?
> you having a schizophrenic episode?
I just enjoy being free from that retard
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:29:53 No.4491965 >>4491964
You keep taking about someone. Are they in the room with us?
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:31:06 No.4491966 >is this the POWER of
hello where are you?
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:33:24 No.4491967 >>4491965
>Are they in the room with us?
that fucker is banned LOL
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:49:51 No.4491970 >>4491967
Who?
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)03:54:29 No.4491972 >>4491966
Is this the POWER of... saying hello?
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:07:45 No.4491974 >>4491970
>>4491972
Your leader has left you, now you're left with pure MFT
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:08:38 No.4491975 >>4491974
Are you on drugs?
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:11:44 No.4491976 >>4491975
I choose to ignore that, maybe you're new here
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:12:46 No.4491977 >another day
>another mfturd spontaneously turning into a crazy homeless man
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:13:38 No.4491978 >>4491977
is that the power of you
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:18:24 No.4491979 >>4491977
Is this the TRUE POWER of mft?
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:20:54 No.4491980 MICRO FOUR THIRDS looks very powerful, maybe it's the most powerful camera system in the universe?
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:29:15 No.4491982 gonna SLURP another mft anamorphic soon yummy 2x coming up
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:33:10 No.4491983 >>4491980
Yeah the most powerful at making you homeless.
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:39:04 No.4491986 >>4491983
just wait til I post sum JUICY 2X
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:42:56 No.4491987 >true power skipped ban
Oh
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)04:51:35 No.4491990 >>4491986
You've discovered the true power of buying useless gear as a coping mechanism for actual improvement. BASED and THAT is the true power of m43.
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)05:13:02 No.4491995 >>4491990
fuck off, these cameras cost nothing, and the lenses cost a little more
>>
Anonymous
01/04/26(Sun)05:20:52 No.4491996 >>4491995
If they truly cost nothing how could one schizo german snapshitter lose everything because of his m43 obsession?
>>
Anonymous
01/05/26(Mon)00:38:03 No.4492217 >>4491995
NTA, I remember when I tried getting into M43 a few years back after trading in a 2010's Canon APS-C. I wouldn't have regretted it if the equipment was even *half* it's cost (taking inflation into account, the prices have more or less gone up proportionally - with even less incentive than ever).
>>
Anonymous
01/06/26(Tue)05:11:39 No.4492429 You know why you are a faggot if you shoot mft?
My full frame also Olympiss brand camera goes up to 170mm zoom but fits entirely on my pocket
Meanwhile your tiny eenie meenie sensor can't even fit that same focal length lens in your pocket. All the while providing zero bokeh and lower low light capabilities lol
>>
Anonymous
01/06/26(Tue)05:29:44 No.4492432 >>4492429
Can we see some pictures you've taken with it?
>>
Anonymous
01/06/26(Tue)05:42:06 No.4492434 Micro four thirds cameras are for pedophiles
Think about it. The obsession with reach. The obsession with cameras being noticeable. The hyperfocus on the retro toy-like models that would appeal more to children such as every 14 year old girl that uses instagram.
Dear god, taylor swift even has an em10. No wonder predators go for it.
>did you know taylor swift has this camera? i have more in my camper -average micro four talmudist
>>
Anonymous
01/06/26(Tue)10:56:19 No.4492447 >>4492217
Fucking this. When will micropeen peen realize they have overpriced lenses?
This Olympissed poo poo made in pajeet lens is a 70-200 f/5.6 lens but cost more than a FF equivalent all the while having worst aperture
>>
Anonymous
01/06/26(Tue)10:57:38 No.4492448 >>4492447
With a fraction of a price you could have bought a FF equivalent lens with higher aperture, sharpness, IQ, less coma, faster autofocus and so on.
>>
Anonymous
01/06/26(Tue)11:33:15 No.4492450 >>4492447
>80-300mm f/5.6 equiv. PRO LENS
>760g
>$1650
vs
>EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 Consoomer lens
>630g
>$400
So... spend 4x the money for worse AF, worse abberations, more weight, more distortion... Why? Can a Turder please actually argue a positive point to buying one of these things?
>>
Anonymous
01/07/26(Wed)00:54:54 No.4492528 >>4492450
It's very similar to scientology.
>>
Anonymous
01/07/26(Wed)03:05:11 No.4492535 >>4492450
Mirrorless babbies are too unskilled to use DSLRs and can only accept the newest and best mfturd or the newest canon
Even snoy is too demanding for them and nikon is basically unusable
Someone post the om1 vs z8+400mm prime comparison where the cropped z8 looked exactly like the uncropped om1 with its $7000 zoom lens and the nikon setup was actually heavier
>>
Anonymous
01/07/26(Wed)03:06:12 No.4492536 >>4492535
And the *OLYMPUS setup was actually heavier
And more expensive
>>
Anonymous
01/07/26(Wed)03:51:41 No.4492538 >>4492535
The best camera systems ever made take skill to use well.
>>
Anonymous
01/16/26(Fri)13:23:30 No.4494003 here, a phone photo
>>
Anonymous
01/16/26(Fri)13:24:47 No.4494004 >>4494003
Yet another
>>
Anonymous
01/16/26(Fri)13:35:19 No.4494005 >>4494004
Another one
>>
Anonymous
01/16/26(Fri)13:41:27 No.4494006 >>4494005
And here, the last phone photo
>>
Anonymous
01/16/26(Fri)13:47:07 No.4494007 >>4494003
>>4494004
>>4494005
>>4494006
Conclusion: I really like the 4:3 format and am glad, that smartphones also have this sensor ratio. For me 5:4 is also a top contender, but so far, I took better pictures with the 4:3 and 3:2 format. Maybe it is really how the format influences the choice of composition. With 1:1 and 4:3 it is quite easy to make a pleasing composition.
I‘d really like to try 7:6 someday…
>>
Anonymous
01/22/26(Thu)02:44:46 No.4494836 >>
Anonymous
01/22/26(Thu)02:47:37 No.4494838 >>4494836
>>
Anonymous
01/22/26(Thu)02:59:04 No.4494841 >>4494838
>>
Anonymous
01/22/26(Thu)04:01:38 No.4494849 >>4490365