File: imm031_32.jpg (1011.6 KB)

1011.6 KB JPG

We visited an esoteric shop

File: imm035_36.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

sunset on a ferris wheel

File: 1_imm013_14.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

Nice lake

I'm stopping here because of the retarded captcha

Do you have any advice on how i could edit these (or if i should just leave them as is)

>>4495013
If people edit their film photos at all, what they typically edit is the tonality, so the brightness of the highlights, midtones and shadows. Most people don't mess around with the colours of film, as that's sorta what you shoot film for. I think the tones of your photos look good as they are, so personally I don't think you need to change anything as far as editing goes.

>>4495012
buy a lens hood

>>4495063
Okey. Thanks gor the advice anon. I'm very new to this so it means alot.
>>4495081
I just checked up on this and wow. Thanks thay is goated advice I didn't even know why people used em until now

>>4495063
>If people edit their film photos at all
hurrrr
People absolutely do

Also lame thread if you're stopping after 4 photos, post some more, osloanon

>>4495783
>People absolutely do
No one is disputing this. Not what the message says. Please learn to read before you make yourself assmad over nothing.

>>4495790
Editing the colors is step one of making a negative into a recognizable photo lol

>>4495797
No it isn't. There is an actual process, its don't just tiktok colour grading lmfao
Making the colours that are there interpretable =/= editing colours!
Hope this helps! :D

>>4495009
Focus in closer, probably faster shutter also and wider apeture to compensate.
Might just be a product of your lens but this is quite soft and I think there is some motion blur worsening it.

>>4495010
Motion blur. What ISO were you using indoors? I assume using auto metering?

>>4495011
Pick a point to focus on, currently everything is soft and blurry which leaves you with no clear subject.

>>4495013
Small edits to remove the "haze" of scans but yours don't seem to have that, the colours in all these seem fine to me.

>>4495012
Somehow I feel like a shot of this at sunrise or sundown would be even better.

>>4495798
>>4495063
> Most people don't mess around with the colours of film
Although technically correct it's a misleading statement. If you shoot film routinely you will find out the colors are highly dependant on how the scan were made, and many film stocks will look like dogshit if you make them scan by a random shop that doesn't know what they are doing (harmann phoenix...). So yes most people don't edit because they don't give a fuck, yes when you open the jpgs from the shop in lightroom it's already over, but being involved in the color editing process is a big part of film photography in my opinion. And it's actually the same for contrasts, if you are satisfied by the midpoint the scanner from the shop automatically picked for your photos that's great, but if you want a bit of creative control over the image you cannot leave it to the machine.

>>4495009
cool contrast
>>4495010
very blurry
>>4495011
cool but blurry
>>4495012
meh

Cool pictures but the sharpness is shit, are you shooting with an Ektar H35?