Thread #4495027 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: images - 2026-01-24T024227.908.jpg (21.2 KB)
21.2 KB JPG
Is it over for micro four thirds or is it over for the rx100?
18 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>4495027
It was already over for micro four thirds when people more competent than fujifilm began releasing aps-c mirrorless and most 1” point and shoots are discontinued
So its more like its over for aps-c and most mirrorless cucks and specs fags that just shoot benches and trees
Shoot fulm or soulful vintage large sensor digital for a hobby, high end digital for pro work, and if you do action and flash any camera is still better than a phone
>>
>>4495027
Micro Four Thirds has an unlimited potential, it's just that the manufacturers suck ass. Due to the size and resolution, they could offer global shutter on all the models from the OM-5 onward. The professional bodies could have unmatched battery life, video shooting time, and stabilization due to the extra space. At the same time, they could bring back something like the GM1 so you can take incredible photos with lenses and camera bodies that fit in the palm of your hand.
>>
>>4495030
global shutter doesnt change the fact that the sensor is essentially bottomed out at iso 800 (best case, most expensive scenario) and requires more expensive lenses to correct smaller aberrations for smaller pixels
to save like a quarter pound and an inch of length over aps-c
>but fps
fps has literally never mattered after cameras broke 10fps… on 35mm film. its a video thing and guess what, mft is indeed still alive as a low budget cinema system. because its digital 8mm.
>bro the gm1!
always had the quality of a phone further kneecapped by panasonics inability to make a reliable camera with autofocus worth a fuck, worse ergos than a phone, and relied on $500+ f4 primes to sort of edge ahead of a phone and lose true pocketability
the ricoh gr pre-destroyed the lumix gm series
>>
>>
>>
>>
M4T is the copey'est class of cameras you can buy and that was true when it was at its peak before mainline brands transitioned from DSLR to MILC.
There was potental as other anon mentioned but it'll never happen now. Panaolympus have already checked out of the idea and nothing new is going to come of it since they're not confident of any real revenue being brought in via R&D. APS-C MILCs embody the whole ethos of M4T but with appreciably better SNR, software, features, and ecosystem support.
SNOY RX100s already kind of sucked but that was more to do with the fixed lens and shitty SNOYGRÖN Jpegs. Ricoh outjerked SNOY with the marketing for PnS package + APS-C sensor, and Fooji INSTAX outjerked the LARP retro hipster shittery department. So who buys RX100s? /p/tards who want a compact but are unwilling to just get a fucking Canon Powershot and be done with it.
You want a camera in your jeans pocket? Buy a phone.
You want a camera in your coat pocket with proper ergos? Buy a PnS.
You want anything else? You buy an APS-C camera if you're poor or a full frame if you're not.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Sony FF vs Phone Camera.jpg (102.8 KB)
102.8 KB JPG
>>4495027
>casually mogs your dedicated FF camera gear
heh nothing personal kiddo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>