>>83758169
>death&rebirth sensation
How does that feel like, sensorially speaking

File: 395896.jpg (158 KB)

158 KB JPG

>>83758169
>>your type?
INTJ
>>whats the coolest or most exciting dream you've had lately or ever?
>>83758200
Had a dream like that where I got eviscerated by a smoothbore cannon and immediately got reincarnated in one piece elsewhere. Unnervingly ticklish for every nerve ending. Nerves retruncating and invading themselves sort of thing.

>>83757286
i.e. you'd be always related to ice cream because you could eat it? That makes anything related to anything. Maybe crack open a dictionary and quote it, if you want to be pedantic? Because nobody's accepting you warping common and established words like that, so your "dialect" is born on arrival...

File: sample_f3f2e3c588132f718770bae5dd89c10168bcd6e8.jpg (514.4 KB)

514.4 KB JPG

>>83758284
>born on arrival...
...as DEAD!

>>83758284
A cannon of all things? That's one peculiar dream.
My "death" dreams involve falling from heights instead, though it never gets to the point where I "die" so huh

File: 1383385.jpg (2.7 MB)

2.7 MB JPG

>>83758328
Huh just falling?
I mean so far I had deaths from stuff like:
>hit by a train (a few times)
>stabbed (a few times)
>eaten alive (by animals, monsters. Had been common before)
>nuked (not uncommon)
>the Moon or a planet falling onto the Earth (not uncommon)
>some star explosion from far away bringing so much plasma to the solar system that the Sun explodes (two times)
>falling (usually as a means to exit a bad dream. I had stopped doing that as an dream escape a long time ago once it stopped working, so it's only used as repositioning)
>cannons, missiles (a few times)
>dead under earthquake rubble (once)
>shot by myself hunting myself (once)

Damn I wonder if there any connection between the type stack and the dream tendencies?

>>83758478
That's a lot of them wow

>Damn I wonder if there any connection between the type stack and the dream tendencies?
Probably a weak correlation at best. They are supposed to represent unconscious contents, and we know that does have a connection with the inferior attitude/function, but it's absolutely not limited to.

>>83758169
copy-pasted from the last thread...

>>your type?
ESFP-T
>>whats the coolest or most exciting dream you've had lately or ever?
The most exciting dream I can remember was roller-blading with my ESFJ as we were being chased through an industrial park by a tyrannosaurus. I had a weird one last night where I got lost in a big building and ended up in this room full of people in Starfleet uniforms arguing about the newest Star Trek series; but they were arguing the way anonymous people argue on the internet.
>>is there a game you were really good at or wanted to get betters at? what's your favorite memory related to it?
I was pretty good at Spyro the Dragon. I remember how psyched I was when I got 100% on Tree Tops.
>>would you rather people be kind towards you or polite? what's the difference to you?
I think being kind includes being polite, so I'll take kind.
>>what does friend mean to you? what do you think the ideal friend should be like?
Someone who'd blow their whole weekend to help you move.

File: IMG_6897.jpg (324.4 KB)

324.4 KB JPG

... I was restructuring the link list to include all the best that have been pruned and lost to the annals throughout various faction splits and melty tantrums!
But a socialfagging-oriented OP with incorrect ratio of on-topic to "Get the people socializing so they build serviceable bonds conducive to long-term eloquent and productive conversation" prompts! You should include at least three overtly typological/psychological prompts and one bonus question! No less, and no oberabundance of /soc/ fodder!

I'm mad---not disappointed! We'll see you after we get too windburnt to touch any more dead, frosty grass. *grumble grumble kvetch life's a beach moaning as you turn all her wetness to whine yadda yadda something et cetera*
I call next bake for "Subjectivity Edition"!

>>83757173
BICH ARE THOSE THE ACTUAL SUBS??? jejmaaaoooo
I've always been [angsty hipster contrarian] towards PreCure because it's in the obligatory 'Mahou Shoujo you should also like if you like [BEST MANGA]' brackets along with like Ojamajo DoReMi. And I have a few decent folders full of cures that remind me of [BEST WITCH], but other than that.. Maybe I'll have to give it a fair shot. I've been loving the caps you've been posting, for sure. Also always good to have another """filename jew""" around

>translate
When does translation of thing become outright Transmutation of a thing? :o3c

>VVILL
Understandable counterpoint, however, I counter-counter: L2LLaL'l !
Channeling is just going full retard in FULL FVITH! Selah
Empty your Self of yourself and see what rushes in

THIS FUCKING TWINK CANT POSSIBLY BE SNAKING IN ON MY *OTHER* FAVORITE WHITE-HAIRED SAGE ARCHETYPE CHARACTER NOOOOOO NO NO NO THE ONLY THING WORSE THAN PEOPLE LIKING THINGS I DONT LIKE IS PEOPLE LIKING THINGS I LIKE IN THE WRONG WAYYYY REE

File: filename jewery apparently.jpg (372.1 KB)

372.1 KB JPG

>>83758596
>I call next bake for "Subjectivity Edition"!
Time to shitpost about the subjective factor for a week straight.

>I've always been [angsty hipster contrarian] towards PreCure
Somewhat understandable because it's not even trying to hide the fact they really want to shill toys to little girls. BUT it has its moments, Heartcatch as a whole being the most known example of just being a good fucking show(and Jungian as hell, very symbolism-friendly in general too) even if you don't care about the series at all. So much that Uro admitted that if he watched HC first, Madoka would have looked a little more like it.

The latest one, Kimi to Idol is... well, I found it fun enough but has a lot of problems, and at the cost of sounding very stereotypical, so much fucking wasted potential in everything.
>BICH ARE THOSE THE ACTUAL SUBS??? jejmaaaoooo
Of course not

Also
>When does translation of thing become outright Transmutation of a thing? :o3c
When your have a job in localization. Then we aren't even trying to stay faithful to the original meaning anymore and possibly throwing in your political agenda.
Not that much of an issue in anime to be fair but I also play some vidyagaems

File: entertainment.png (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB PNG

>>83757522
>I read that as symbols not being attached to one function or attitude, as in, they aren't inherently a product of the introverted attitude or intuition function, for instance.
Interesting, because that's not what was said there. That is what was said later: >>83752117
>Symbols are really only defined by {perception and/or interpretation} AND {collective conscious and/or collective unconscious}.

Not only that, but this line, and your interpretation of it, which I share, by the way. CONTRADICTS THE PREVIOUS LINE. If symbols are defined, perceived, understood and/or observed through perception and judgment, then by that very nature, they *ARE* related. And that's precisely why the line is a misrepresentation.
You've proven my point ***EXACTLY***, to a fucking tee.

If a function is used to interact with an archetype/symbol, then by that very nature they are related. Which is the exact point I made in my original reply:
>"That would be like saying your eyes are unrelated to trees, or your tongue is unrelated to cake."
Yes, your eyes and a tree it observes are directly and observably distinct. But they ARE related.

You're just proving that you haven't read, or didn't understand what I was saying. Because I've literally already addressed what you're saying. AND you're proving the point I was making.
So much for differentiated thinking.
>>83758284
>you'd be always related to ice cream because you could eat it? That makes anything related to anything.
Could? No.
Do? Yes.

By eating the ice cream you have necessarily entered into a relationship with it through experience. This is exactly why theoretical knowledge does not equate to experiential understanding.

File: 4e8bbb14-8d9a-488b-aa3e-48a4dec057ca.jpg (48 KB)

48 KB JPG

my intellectual labors were stolen from me yet again

File: G_bs0ttaYAA6mb9.jpg (582.6 KB)

582.6 KB JPG

>>83758973
Au contraire my friend, they were uplifted AND promoted!
I'm not paid enough...

>>83758895
>If ice creams are eaten by me, then by that very nature, ice cream and me *ARE* related
sigh

>>83758895
>>83759079
Are ice creams eaten by you all the time? No? Then fuck off...
Same with symbols.

[no picture available]

>potential connection==actual connection
He's not even using the intuition or sensation auxiliaries he's just going full retard.

[no picture available]

File: download (2).jpg (52.6 KB)

52.6 KB JPG

>your type?
ENTJ
>whats the coolest or most exciting dream you've had lately or ever?
One time I stabbed an alien/demon in a dream. I was having nightmares of it chasing me then I got really mad, and turned around and stabbed it lol. That's basically it.
>is there a game you were really good at or wanted to get betters at? what's your favorite memory related to it?
I've never gotten obsessively good at a game, I just had fun playing retro games like the final fantasys. Last game I was really excited about was stray.
>would you rather people be kind towards you or polite? what's the difference to you?
I want people to be kind to me, but if they're polite that's fine too.
>what does friend mean to you? what do you think the ideal friend should be like?
Someone who's there for me in the down times and celebrates my up times, and obvious I'm there for them too. I know a couple people like this.
...
Well I watched up to episode 8 of Tanya the evil. And yes it is good. I'm shocked, usually someone suggest something and it's not as good as they claim, example would be konosuba which I call brainrot. When the yellow themed masochist character does her bit I cringe inside. But yeah Tanya, I like it, I wouldn't mind being isekai'd into a war world with magical flying powers.

>>83759111
Perhaps the 5th function Jung could never find was Retardation

File: G_e5q0naoAAyvwj.jpg (115.8 KB)

115.8 KB JPG

Somewhere in the middle lectures on the King archetype, Moore pointed out that the one who is lacking in its integration plus has narcissism would be really triggered by any external structure emerging as a psychological, cognitive, cybernetic, autonomous kind of thing.
Hmm...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vWlAzgOOaRw&list=PL879965yJx44OcJaYHi1fO5IZRH7Fie0F&index=2
I have a necessity to hop onto the magician ones so I won't find the exact quote. I'll just give the starting point.

>>83759176
wwww
/r/ing the relevant edited Jung quote pictire. I know someone here has it on hand...

>>83759134
>One time I stabbed an alien/demon in a dream. I was having nightmares of it chasing me then I got really mad, and turned around and stabbed it lol.
How did it look like? I had practically the same dream, but had to punch through a shell instead. I wonder if the appearance will add up.

>>83758596
I'm not really following.
>I call next bake for "Subjectivity Edition"
As long as it's not TE...

File: Screenshot 2026-01-25 145605.png (12.7 KB)

12.7 KB PNG

>do a test about something you understand nothing about but put 0 effort into understand
>complain that you dont understand the results
>beg for someone else to explain it to you so you can forget in 10 minutes

>>83759401
The CHAD MBTI online test taker
The Virgin theory reader

>>83759401
What did INFP anon mean by this

File: 123.png (600.2 KB)

600.2 KB PNG

>>83758169
>your type?
INFJ-A
>whats the coolest or most exciting dream you've had lately or ever?
Hard to say exactly, I have a lot of weird and neat dreams.
I had this one dream somewhere in the middle of last year, I was at my grandma's house with my cousin and my brother and we were kids. We found this weird glass-cube-thing that was a 9x9 of other fractal smaller cube things inside, and inside those smaller cubes was this weird blue swirly magic shit. While I was looking at it I noticed one of the swirly bits wasn't doing a magic, and upon further inspection the whole thing kinda broke and an alien ship showed up in the sky. Which freaked out my brother and cousin, and they ran off.
Instead of running with them, I watched the ship to see where it went and followed its path in the sky. While following it I came across this smallish wooden fence where a bear and some cubs were doing bear stuff. The cubs noticed me and ran over, they didn't seem hostile and they were just checking me out.
But then the mother bear noticed me and ran over and started eating me, naturally I started to scream in agony, but then a voice said "Stop screaming!"
And I woke up.
>is there a game you were really good at or wanted to get betters at?
There's a bunch of them. I used to be mad good at Guitar Hero when I was younger.
>would you rather people be kind towards you or polite? what's the difference to you?
Kind.
Polite is "socially acceptable".
Kind is real.
>what does friend mean to you? what do you think the ideal friend should be like?
They're on your side, even when you're not on your own side.
>>83759079
Yes. That's what it means.
>>83759090
Something doesn't need to be experienced 100% of the time to have a relationship with it. Don't be stupid.
>>83759111
If you notice I explicitly differentiated the two.
[of course you didn't notice]

>>83759571
Haiiiii! INFJ-A! \(^_^)/ (Wrap my weiner around yours) GLOMP!
>>83759273
Patchy-chan :3 UwU my elder brother whom discipline me with his dick
>83759134
God i fucking hate biofem ~_~ Grrrrrrrr

Only a woman in her late 40s would wear a fucking pixie cut, and i am a vintage ass witch btw
:Oc

My pussy is twitching in joy as i recall hunting down every foid superior to me in everyway

There is a thick, slimey blanket of vaginal discharge coating my taint wound
Oh, it is puss. UwU A puss puss UwU

For some reason i talk like a tranny but people think i am biofem?! o.o O_O EHEM i am a BOY!

WRITHING in agony just like the parasites partying in my tainty waint :3
nice try retard

SLLLLOOOOORRRP!

No one cares about turbie anymore. If you wanna troll you gotta "attack" diarygirl, it's the easiest way to bait /mbti/.

>half the poster base is "trolls" "trolling" each other

>>83759974
I feel bad for Turbie.

>>83759974
Turbie is da one attacking foid tho! :Oc

>>83760155
>>83760111
>>83760047
>>83760005
hurrrrdurrrr hurrrreggy durrr

>>83760111
She only uses this tripcode when larping as a brony cock sucking troon
Takes it off and derails the thread with diarygirl projections
:3

>>83759974
Yes we only care about diarygirl she is THE CYOOOTIST! \^_^/

File: 4-17-12-27-16-57-56m.jpg (37.4 KB)

37.4 KB JPG

>>83759974
WRONG the trolling on diarygirl works because she actually has genuine haters, so her simps can't tell the difference. It's called riding a trend. If I suddenly attack Rxy no one is gonna give a shit, maybe 3 years ago they would but not now.
Let me list how easy it is to troll reggies:
>TE
Fairly easy you just have to keep doing it until he snaps and he starts ALL CAP raging.
>INFJ-A
You gotta lure him into thinking he has an easy win over a dumb opponent. He likes to "hold all the cards" and be smug so give him that appearance, and you can make look like a fool.
>Mel
Easy, you lure her in with playful silly roleplaying then start ratcheting up the insults, togatanon was a master at doing this and pissing her off.
>Diarygirl
Extremely easy to troll. I suspect she's a teenager because of this. She'll be quick to be like "KYS REEEEEEE!!!!!"
>Patchy
He does the common midwit practice of narrow framing, where he sets out the topic and narrow rules he expect you to play within so he has an advantage, simply don't play by his rules and mock his tactics and he starts ragging.
>Togatanon
You hit him with psycho edgelords insults like: "I'll fucking cut you the fuck and mail piece of your to your mom for her rest of her life". He tries to blow it off at first but by the 3rd round he's pissed.
>Turbie
Just insult trans people, make of that what you will, but don't do it in a chud way, but in an "rational" "intelligent" sound way.

File: G_WJLdpbgAAezFF.jpg (593.6 KB)

593.6 KB JPG

>>83759571
>Kind is real.
The only so called 'kind' you've ever openly accepted as your interpretation of "kind" is the one pandering to your narcissism though.

>>83760194
>He does the common midwit practice of narrow framing
Are you saying you're too fatass to fit?
>fatty melty in 3... 2... 1...

File: 6d9779c53bd6aa15169a16694433964173aeefc4.jpg (85.6 KB)

85.6 KB JPG

>>83760194
>>INFJ-A
>You gotta lure him into thinking
GOOD LUCK LMFFFAOOOOOO

File: 1720065249655170.png (201.8 KB)

201.8 KB PNG

Wait so all the reggy hate and drama is just trolls and trolls trolling trolls? Yo this place is fake and gay for real.

>>83760194
Everybody, settle down. Leave the Diarygirl tranny-projection "Trolling" to ME! A real woman
;3 Ploppppp (poops)
>>83760226
OH SHIT NIGGA OH NOOOOOOOOO

>>83760194
>She'll be quick to be like "KYS REEEEEEE!!!!!"
Reminds me of a certain sudsy reg.

>>83760235
Togata2 I told your ass to pretend to be turbie enjoyer not turbie

>>83760226
Psh I could think you under a bridge

File: 3ae08148ab1ac32d4b8ec1fb3a685e6b.jpg (40.9 KB)

40.9 KB JPG

>>83760221
Ur the dumbest nigger here. IQ is like engine sizes and you gotta like little 3 cylinder mini cooper thinking you're a big truck. All your textwalling is like a someone piling shit on top of tiny car trying to prove they can haul as much, but they end up looking like a clown car. And that's all you are.

File: 2b4cb492f7862a236259eef611b21364ee5dd208.jpg (517.5 KB)

517.5 KB JPG

>>83760359
Car analogies worse than INFJ-A's - GRIM - and I didn't even read, I half-skimmed...

File: black-clover-yuno.gif (86.9 KB)

86.9 KB GIF

>>83760408
>Troll admits he trolls patchy
>Patchy confirms he read that post
>Troll immediate trolls patchy
>Patchy falls for it
Come on man get a clue.

>Troon Enjoyer
>Male-ascula
>Diarrheagirl
>Turdie
>INF-GAY-A

File: 6cb9d404dec71f2dcbe5bfb21063cbdfdac05eee.jpg (27.6 KB)

27.6 KB JPG

>>83760476
Oh yeah? Check his biomarkers.

>>83760476
It's funny that he also confirmed everything the troll said too

patchy bodied the samefag bitch kek

>your type
>have you showered or bathed in the last 72 hours?

>>83760614
>>have you showered or bathed in the last 72 hours?
No one here does

>>83760636
I'm literally shaving right now after bathing.

>>83760645
Bathing in your own stench and filth maybe.
>Inb4 lies

>>83760645
are you a man or a woman? and by that I mean which were you born not what you believe

Every Turbie posts goes unnoticed like a fart in the wind, so either its that turbie is so largely irrelevant and unnoticeable that no one cares to hold the thought in their mind or 10 seconds. OR you are all so chronically online you have no grasp of genuine social dynamics. No one genuinely falls for Troonbies little bronysona pedophile-esc groom a minor approach to posting. Xe presents ximself as an over-exaggeratedly psuedo-pleasant public image, forced shallow sweetness and high, self-admitted histrionic behaviours.
>WAAAH MOI LINK NOT IN DA OP WAAAH DONT POST HERE
>IMA THREAD MASCOT :3
Etc, etc, i wonder where all the negative energy is directed? hm? Turbie will use xis lack of acknowledgement in threads to TURBO-TROON-OUT out and vent xis frustration towards actual femmies with real simps. Turbie interacts with people like a shitty grooming attempt. You cant convince me this hyperonline weeaboo with a psychological plectere to these threads is just not here? Not hiding under the guise of anonymous like a little jew stirring the pot of gold at the end of the gaybow? ILYSM :3

TLDR: Turbie is a pathetic hostile little troon anonymously harassing likeable biofems out of envy

TROON OUT! \(O.O)/

>>83760666
Man, born as a man and dick is still intact as far I can see.

>>83760408
We don't have skilled trolls here that's the best you'll be getting. Sorry Patchy

File: tell-me-this-doesnt-look-like-a-real-shit-v0-o8t0ldts2dma1.jpg (84.9 KB)

84.9 KB JPG

>>83760672
I gotta take a SHIT.
>BRAPPPPPPPP!
>SPLAT SPLAT SPLAT SPLAT
Oh God I'm shitting all over your post anon.
>BRAPPPPPP SPLAT SPLAT SPLAT

>>83760672
You also notice how every hatepost directed toward out current thread fems is a nitpick and narrative twist of their masculine traits.
>Diarygirl said she likes skulls together! she is hostile and mean!
>Melascula is a man! She laughed at a sybrian mans head blow apart
All with context concealed.
This is a direct comparison to xer own tryhard hyperfem people pleasing persona
>They dont suck constant cock like i do every thread i am way better

>>83760699
TURDIE-TROON BOOM! Hello troonbie, this image perfectly pictures my impression of you! :3

>>83760703
ok what's kris's hobby then
did this happen before

>>83760614
>>your type
ESFP-T
>>have you showered or bathed in the last 72 hours?
I shower or bathe a minimum of once a day; sometimes 2 or 3 times depending on what I've been up to and how warm it is outside.

>>83760720
Trooning obvi! \(^o^)/
Did i mention i love trannies? :>

>>83760703
It's envious troons. Who the fuck else is gonna get that insanely mad AFTER they got confirmed as biofems.

>>83760772
Hei! I am an envious troon! >:c dont be meanies!

>>83760772
Melascula and Diarygirl are vile as AF. Both of them literally laugh at mass murder, both are manipulative AF, BOTH have literally called themselves evil, both have a regressive a hot topic fashion sense, they even collect the same fucking weird toys. Shall I continue?

>diarygirl and mel suck grrrr
You don't really care, you're bored and trying to troll.

Every Turbie posts goes unnoticed like a fart in the wind, so either its that turbie is so largely irrelevant, unnoticeable and uninteresting that the thought of xim escapes you.
OR you are all so chronically online you have no grasp of genuine social dynamics. No one genuinely falls for Troonbies little bronysona pedophile-esc groom a minor approach to posting. Xe presents ximself as an over-exaggeratedly psuedo-pleasant public image, forced shallow sweetness and high, self-admitted histrionic behaviours.
>WAAAH MOI LINK NOT IN DA OP WAAAH DONT POST HERE
>IMA THREAD MASCOT :3
Etc, etc, i wonder where all the pent-up negative energy is directed? hm? Turbie to the T (testosterone) Turbulence, right? Xe will use xis lack of acknowledgement in threads to TURBO-TROON-OUT out and vent xis frustration towards actual femmies with real simps. Turbie interacts with posters like a shitty grooming attempt where you babytalk the minor. You cant convince me this hyperonline weeaboo with a psychological plectere to these threads is just not here? Not hiding under the guise of anonymous like a little jew stirring the pot of gold at the end of the gaybow?

You also notice how every hatepost directed toward our current thread fems is a nitpick and narrative twist of their "undesirable masculine-meanie" traits. References to posts xe psychotically rewires and reframes in xis head.
>Diarygirl said she likes smashing skulls together! she is hostile and mean!
>Melascula is a man! She laughed at a sybrian mans head blow apart!
All contextually distorted
This is a direct comparison to xer own tryhard hyperfem people pleasing persona, turbie wants to be seen as "the real angel"
>They dont suck constant cock like i do every thread so i am way better

ILYSM :3

TLDR: Turbie is a pathetic hostile little troon anonymously harassing likeable biofems out of envy

TROON OUT! \(O.O)/

>>83759476
i dont understand what any of it means and also put no effort into understand either. someone help

It's honestly disturbing that you would bully Turbie

>>83760699
Probably looks a bit better when you heat it up, but I prefer my chili with a lot more fresh vegetables!!!

Hm, I still haven't fully freed myself of MBTI Myers memery or blog-tier confusion after all.

I was about to mistake an obvious ET(N) for ET(S) because they technically fit ESTJ more. BUT, the thing is that when you look at their sensation you notice two glaring issues:
>it is almost never separated from feeling judgments
>it is overwhelmingly negative
Also a Se-groid pointed out one of the flaws this person has is specifically reprimanding others before actually looking at the facts, only for the Se-groid in question to respond with that and making them back off. That just doesn't sound like something a type with at least partially differentiated sensation would do habitually.

On the other hand, they do use intuition, and it's well differentiated by comparison, it's taken apart from thinking or feeling, and tends to be more positive generally. I mean, this person literally expects a future where AI leads is to a life where we don't even need to work anymore and a common income system that makes everyone happi... huh, I'm not going to comment that now lol. Strangely naive for a ET on this topic.

File: this-looks-like-it-should-be-the-after-photo-not-the-before-v0-tsqj6qtdh2qd1.jpg (98.3 KB)

98.3 KB JPG

>>83760910
Eat the fucking slop goy. EAT UP.
>Slurp slurp slurp slurp slurp

>>83760897
I see TE my good fellow, has the father screen shared the truth with you also? I can sense your underlying disappointment , because you know its true

Before I go through, going to say I find that side of ETs to be cute desu, some have a genuine, vaguely defined faith in humanity as a whole even if all experience would tell them otherwise. They only tell you in private of course.
Much cuter than whiny IF bitches, even if it's technically a worse way to use feeling purely in terms of differentiation.

>>83760971
>EAT UP.
i do not eat food from boxes...

>>83761003
>i do not eat food from boxes...
I'd wager that a good majority of everything that you eat was in a box at some time.

Lilac, Mela, Diarygirl and Rxy all publicly name themselves when responding to hateposts/threaddrama. Instead, Turbie desperately tries to maintain xis superficial-sweet shitty UwU persona, which appears deliberately performative like a 40year old brony playing with his MLP figures, TURBIE decalres xe is INFJ-T Tranny Turbulence, so how is it possible Troonbie is maintaining such an excessively "Genuine" "unbothersome" act if it was real? Turbies pony performance itself is retarded and unbelievable, xe hardly engages or elaborates in ongoing drama, responding with little O.O or :C emoticons almost mocking the situation. A real, genuine kind-hearted person would pour their energy into an in-depth response to cease the drama altogether. Turbie basically lives in these threads, for years, someone who cares so much wouldn't hold these accusations at arm-length unless they were true. The persona itself is like a poorly-written horny hentai character, its sole goal is to offer itself as an onahole, disgusting

>>83761121
What i mean is, Our Turbulent tranny obviously goes undercover like a sneaky jew to vent his frustrations

TURBIES persona is like a pedophiles impression of the perfect little girl, a Lolicon OC. Obviously a Man playing dress the princess

Everyone thinks i am so cool, i can see gold radiating in my aura

You are a not a kind person to speak this way about my fiance. Apologize.

File: 1769285264002631.jpg (68.7 KB)

68.7 KB JPG

>>83760971
>Slopline chili
Things that come out of Ohio are either all good or all bad

File: 0073149304150.jpg (105.6 KB)

105.6 KB JPG

Kinda curious about picrel though ngl

>>83761121
>A real, genuine kind-hearted person
A real, genuine, kind-hearted person would also stop dragging TE's heart around.

>>83761224
>Things that come out of Ohio are either all good or all bad
Ok but what's the good stuff?

>>83761341
I second this whole heartedly, It is essentially ablism/taking advantage of the mentally incapacitated to keep your little thread seat cozy, the only thing mildly interesting about turdie is TEs weird fixation on her

>>83761224
Don't insult our local cuisine. If it was Japanese you'd love it.

File: 1749942860447026.jpg (125.6 KB)

125.6 KB JPG

>>83761345
>Ok but what's the good stuff?
h-heh, lots of things!! Um, you know...
Ope, would you look at the time? heh cya

>MBTI
>Favorite fem anime character
>Favorite male anime character

File: WSloppyDonut.jpg (493.9 KB)

493.9 KB JPG

>>83761455
We got donut burgers.

Ohio fucked itself over. Everyone from ohio has this weird sense of pride were they're like: "ohio sucks, ONLY IN OHIO would you see (insert low class thing)" but they're also proud of living there. But all the internet picked up on was the negativity and started hating on Ohio. And now "ohio" is slang for something that's sucks with gen-a

File: 1752867088780207.png (94.7 KB)

94.7 KB PNG

I hate eveyone in this thread so fucking.

File: 1736069980233156.png (236.6 KB)

236.6 KB PNG

>>83761678
What an Ohio take

>>83760550
youre not even BIOfem. wannabe dumb bitch

>>83761755
You're OHIO, don't fucking call people Ohio you sonofabitch

You cannot always be a hero, but you can always be a man.
Reject confusion, embrace your natural state.

File: images (44).jpg (75.7 KB)

75.7 KB JPG

>>83761854
Not if you live in Ohio, you can't be a man or a hero if you live in Ohio TE, or near Ohio.

How to develop masculinity (If you're a woman don't read this)
1. Assume masculine responsibility as the guide, protector, and provider.
2. Help build society (even ohio)
3. Develop masculine traits of character. (Decisiveness, assertiveness, resilience, independence.)
4. Develop masculine skills and abilities. (Plumbing, carpentry, rhetoric)
5. Increase physical capacity. (Work out daily, clean your garage)
6. Accentuate the differences between yourself and women. (Playful upshow your masculinity and praise a woman's femininity)
7. Accept challenging goals.
8. Face mistakes, failure, and defeat with manliness. (women don't care if you fail, they care that you make moves)

File: images (45).jpg (28.5 KB)

28.5 KB JPG

>>83761908
You turning into patchy? You gonna rant about stuff you have no practical experience in?

Unc really spent 8 hours spamming his schizophrenia everywhere. Without any replies or validation and kept it up. Just doing it for the love of the game huh? What kind of trauma would make someone capable of that?

File: 1769302943924282m.jpg (62.6 KB)

62.6 KB JPG

>>83761853
>You're OHIO
How fucking DARE you

>>83762256
Thats not nice turbie, how many hours has unc spent here, in this general larping as a woman?

>>83762256
I think they all have your name filtered, turdulent tranny! >.< OOF!
see
> Every Turbie posts goes unnoticed like a fart in the wind, so either its that turbie is so largely irrelevant, unnoticeable and uninteresting that the thought of xim escapes you
:D point proven!
your just not interesting enough it seems~ no personality from the hpd tranny~ no wonder there is never discussion around you x3 somewhat embarrassing as you refer to yourself as a thread mascot LOL

>cbeck in on mbti for the firet time in a year
>somehow it's develved to be even worse than beforr
Man, life just keeps decaying, doesn't it

>>83762599
It keeps decaying because that is the energy you carry :3 You are decaying and self-projecting rotten hallucinations onto Reality?! FUCK YOU! Reality is great

Your just jealous my reality is cuter than yours

You are just jealous the foids of today have accumulated far more simps than you have over the past 10 years of stretching your brown asshole open wide, waiting, for a kissy or huggies that never came.

A wish is like a whore, the more you want it the more avoidant it becomes, but when you are a nonchalant chad, you get your wish and more whore sucking your dick

>

If anyone doesn't realize Diarygirl is the person bullying Turbie rn they're actually rarted. She was the first person to call him "Turdie" and spam junk about "reading xis emaciated tranny aura by remote viewing" etc.

It's not even a detective shizo tier "omg who is it" deep lore it's just fucking 5 or 10 threads ago when she first showed up which is like a blip if you've been here since 2019 or whatever. You newfaggots are making conspiracy theories out of molehills when it's just one histrionic comgirl being rowdy

>your type?
intp
>whats the coolest or most exciting dream you've had lately or ever?
had a dream about being a dragon assaulting a castle with mechanized support
>is there a game you were really good at? what's your favorite memory related to it?
stellaris specifically pre-4.0, one planet held off a fan purifier's fleet long enough for me to build up my own and win a decisive battle in the system
>would you rather people be kind towards you or polite? what's the difference to you?
kind, politeness has little value with anything backing it up
>what does friend mean to you? what do you think the ideal friend should be like?
i dont know

>>83762756
Tubie you really hate Diarygirl huh!
>seething trannoid trying to deflect from
>>83760863
:3

>Turbie is hating on Diary girl
>No! diary girl is hating on Tubby!
Kek

>>83762756
> She was the first person to call him "Turdie"
> him
:Oc
Tubby, is this your coming out a scene? :O im so proud! \T-T/

>>83762756
you arent a rare girl an you will never be :3 unlike my dearest diarygirl Xp

i always felt as if though, most of my classmates in school, middle school and so forth, were massive NPCs, they never caused much trouble with the teacher and so forth. they just sat there like good little boys and girls. whereas I, the rebel, decided to do plenty of mischievious things. I must be some sort of ubermensch, a god among mere mortals.

>>83762936
Whether you're the BPDemon or one single obnoxious simp the reality is dire. On either hand you have got a desperate post-wall chronically online quirk chungus whose proximity to stinky inkwells and Discord mod groomer types has made her intimately aware of the drastically shorter shelf life females have than even the most brazen "Hurr hurr the good thing about highschool girls amirite" normies will admit. Or the best she could attract for all her constant roastie flapping is an equally abrasive and manic tourist. Just one though. That has to suck when you do everything in your elite internet historian power to starve yourself and stave off the effects of puberty so you can larp as a loli for a few more years for sextortionists on Roblox.
Holy fuck. Kill yourself man. If you aren't the mentally ill chick you're worse off. Femchildren gonna femchildren but tying your own ego to the social value of the crazy you want to stick your dick in a different kind of pathetic if you're an actual man and have grace to fall from. Not to mention projecting that high school hierarchy on to someone calling a spade a spade as if they care strongly one way or another. IE comgirl just fits her aesthetic and behavior. If you think that stereotype or label is inherently insulting it's because some part of you knows it's a shameful subculture to participate in or present yourself as aligned with. If that gets under your skin grow up and stop disingenuously selfposting or be about what you claim and disregard anything that doesn't fit le Diarygirl is a pure angel of light in this rat hole o algo

Tubbie literally said he is the most important character in these threads, diarygirl doesn't even blink at the GTKM queries. She is the most humble and pure soul.
Such stupid self projection lmao

>>83763009
LOL the seething tranny is having a trans-lapse

>>83763009
Forgot my name you guys :O :P

>>83763011
Taking the misinfo of a consumer grade LLM at face value is a reflection of your status of being unworthy to breed, not a valid character testimony for one of the most senior members of this general

>>83763025
>Oldie unc seething over the cute teenage pixie girl
Eww

>>83763025
>one of the most senior members of this general
Who do you think he is?

i precognitize a gender dysmorphic breakie coming up!

>>83763039
They are referring to our vintage crone handicapped maiden, Turbie. Her jowls hang down to her tits O_O
Been prowling around for years for a (you) LOL

>>83763019
You/your egirl are an iteration of an iteration of an iteration of an iteration of an imitation of an echo of a relic of a pixellated low res duplicate of a reposted skinwalking attempt of a 2020s revival of Nicole Dollanganger. Which is fun, in it's own way. But arguing what comes with the territory while claiming to be all in for the territory is immediate disqual

Turbie is so pathetic for trying to bring down the cutest femmiest foid of all time. Hissy old hag grasping for crumbs of relevancy

>>83763046
Turbie is an iteration of an iteration of an iteration of an iteration of an imitation of an echo of a relic of a pixellated low res duplicate of a reposted skinwalking attempt of a 2020s revival of Nicole Dollanganger. Which is fun, in it's own way. But arguing what comes with the territory while claiming to be all in for the territory is immediate disqual

>>83763009
The way this post describes the exact dynamic between Turdie and TE makes me kek

I am going to spank you if you don't chill out.

diarygirl enjoyer

Zoomers have this deep shame and dissociation from everything. They know nothing but through at least one layer of ironic distance. It's why their lack of direction and unconscionably mutable senses of self are so impossible to hide.

I hope Gen A learns sincerity again. Or at least regains some semblance of originality (as much as it exists in an infinitely recycled pseudoclosed hyperloop of symbols and signals) instead of this half assed nihilism of taste where everything they can even claim to like or enjoy is categorized primarily by a metric of "What's the least cringe thing to express support for when we're all going to die or be Jewish martian sex slaves". At least Gen A uses their instant gratification fried imaginations for power fantasies instead of wet blanket resignation they try to pass for devil may care chaotic neutrality

Diarygirl is the radiant beacon piercing the shadows of this darkened, cursed general

if we are making comparisons here, diarygirl is generally more schizophrenic/content worthy than turbie or whoever, it has unique character.

>>83763054
Not at all. Even if you want to stereotype Turbie, Turbie's niche is neither "zOMG! Lyke, rly? Ya! O.. o RLY rly? o3o" Gaiaonline "nerd" girl, nor random XD scene kid, nor programmer socks RGB tranny. If you/your slop machine aren't even familiar with the most basic classes of 4chan poster or internet personality, don't be surprised when your low effort, shit takes get an equivalent reception

okay, im starting to believe its actually turbie now lmao. who else would get THIS defensive

>>83763088
I believe it's infj because he is unironically schizophrenic.

>>83763081
PFFT- you really think you are a speshul cookie huh? Its Crystal clear to everyone else here that you are just projecting all your normie insecurities onto the cute gurl~

>>83763009
>If you think that stereotype or label is inherently insulting it's because some part of you knows it's a shameful subculture to participate in or present yourself as aligned with.
If you want, I can help draft a firm, Scripture-based reply to this replier that addresses all these claims without entering into their emotional framing, making your position unmistakable. Do you want me to do that?

>>83763096
KEK OH NOOOES Dx

>>83763093
But its me >:3 ive been the meanest, angriest tranny since diary girls debut >~<

My foreskin is slipping back, is that a , clitoris? Oh~ i am a woman afterall~ (Paper thin hold on reality rips)

>>83763081
> Turbie's niche
Nice play on words there! She doesnt have a niche :3 if he did, must have borrowed it from some pedophile brony in the midst of grooming a minor EEP!

>>83763081
Uhm ew, stop speaking about yourself in third-person Turbie, mega embarasserino

>>83763011
>Antisocial behavior of refusing to participate in the topic or integrate to board or thread culture whatsoever to shit all over the thread like it's your personal meth trip diary on nu erowid shows a reserved and humble disposition
Get real nigger. She mystique farms and stream of consciousness posts like she's throwing a dart at a list of subjects she barely understands and grifted from some YouTube shorts creepypasta compilation. And when no one bites the "Teehee I'm age regressing but still in an EDGY WAY like what if my LPS toys did a SCHOOL SHOOTING" she goes full chimp out and starts ranting about trannies and scat and gore and just totally launches off into some weird devaluation thing but unlike the targeted slander of a narcissist it's just the broadly psychotic grandiosity of a Cluster B Christmas cake. She wouldn't psychologically survive let alone recover from half the citations Turbie has on his Encyclopedia Dramatica. Take your puritanical bullshit back to the boomer mother who gave you the Oedipus complex you're trying to trade off for by glazing the skipped generation update of the boomer mentality in a Sanrio reskin bro get a grip bro get some taste get good get a CLUE

>>83763128
> Turbie has on his
> his
Are you just forgetting to troon out or am i being baited? kek, this is more of a teardown on turbie than diarygirl :p

In a gennie full of personality pixels,
you sparkle brighter than any 4chan shitpost,
turning chaos into cookies,
melting troon trauma with your trembling, angelic light.

UwU, you hug the world
even when its messy and loud,
and I swear, your little heart
makes even the darkest threads feel like home.

Diarygirl i hope you see this and appreciate the effort i put into protecting you ;-;

File: awko taco.gif (292.2 KB)

292.2 KB GIF

>>83763139
Turbie only started being ambiguous about his sex versus gender presentation when Turbie Enjoyer became his loudest orbiter. Employing the same act coy, if you don't answer hair/eye/skin color weight/height gender etc. tactic that idorus, waifus, and comfort e-girls have since lore immemorial. It's not a secret, it's just a filter for people who have been around long enough to have any say on posters here versus transient taintlicking tumbleweeds like yourself

motherfucker i think TE switched sides, hes not even whiteknighting troonbie anymore

If you don't* answer they can imagine you as whatever they like and you secure more loyal simps

>>83763159
He's the one posting all the hate. It's the method that was just discussed previously.

>>83763162
mmmm personally i believe it is me but perhaps it is again, one of my gender dissociative dysmorphic episodes :(

Can we stop with the drama or should we escalate it to cosmic proportions?

Every Turbie posts goes unnoticed like a fart in the wind, so either its that turbie is so largely irrelevant, unnoticeable and uninteresting that the thought of xim escapes you.
OR you are all so chronically online you have no grasp of genuine social dynamics. No one genuinely falls for Troonbies little bronysona pedophile-esc groom a minor approach to posting. Xe presents ximself as an over-exaggeratedly psuedo-pleasant public image, forced shallow sweetness and high, self-admitted histrionic behaviours.
>WAAAH MOI LINK NOT IN DA OP WAAAH DONT POST HERE
>IMA THREAD MASCOT :3
Etc, etc, i wonder where all the pent-up negative energy is directed? hm? Turbie to the T (testosterone) Turbulence, right? Xe will use xis lack of acknowledgement in threads to TURBO-TROON-OUT out and vent xis frustration towards actual femmies with real simps. Turbie interacts with posters like a shitty grooming attempt where you babytalk the minor. You cant convince me this hyperonline weeaboo with a psychological plectere to these threads is just not here? Not hiding under the guise of anonymous like a little jew stirring the pot of gold at the end of the gaybow?

You also notice how every hatepost directed toward our current thread fems is a nitpick and narrative twist of their "undesirable masculine-meanie" traits. References to posts xe psychotically rewires and reframes in xis head.
>Diarygirl said she likes smashing skulls together! she is hostile and mean!
>Melascula is a man! She laughed at a sybrian mans head blow apart!
All contextually distorted
This is a direct comparison to xer own tryhard hyperfem people pleasing persona, turbie wants to be seen as "the real angel"
>They dont suck constant cock like i do every thread so i am way better

ILYSM :3

TLDR: Turbie is a pathetic hostile little troon anonymously harassing likeable biofems out of envy

TROON OUT! \(O.O)/ ;3

Notice how diarygirl didnt become evil? Very mindful very demure

And she didn't even go schizophrenic and start a threadwar

Notice how diarygirl moved on from this general? Very Mindful, Very cutesy, Very demure

And she didn't even dive into a histrionic-narcissist rage when her personality is being psychoanalyzed by a 40year old projecting tranny

Notice how Turbie responds to my every move with the venom of a left-wing lesbian troon? Very oblivious, Very suspicious, Very pre-op transgender surgery painful to see

File: thread is bad vision goggles. oh fug everything is same.jpg (256.4 KB)

256.4 KB JPG

>>83763182
They haven't even realized it's Lewis turning them against each other. The end is nowhere in . . .
. . .
Sight.
>YYYEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHH

>I never wanted this! :c
>never says he didnt DO it though
Hmmmmm

Awesome that jannies don't just do their jobs on principle and instead only if you report flagrant repeated violations and even then only sometimes or only when the non lazy ones wake up and the faggots have had hours to derail a thread by then. Christ alive

>>83763205
You're not analyzing shit, you're flooding with copy and pasted half baked redundant memes from a chat bot. At least use your own brain, form your own opinions if you're going to waste post counts with sophomoric fuck marry kill tier lists and fanfics you didn't even put a fraction of your parasocial lil ass into fr. Maybe I love Diarygirl more than you do and I just don't think you're worthy of being called my competitor when you drag down her reputation by expressing fealty to her while committing impure and spiritually ugly acts

>>83763223
yeah yeah yeah
I am going to start nuking your favorite posters until this shit stops.

>>83763280
What shit? Speak up little chomo we don't negotiate with terrorists

>>83763278
>Chat bot
Is the core of your persona self projection?

they're bluffing they never even posted the lilac files the other day. if they can't doxx the messiest whore in this joint they're fugazi.

>>83763278
Lilac, i thought you and Diarygirl were Headmates? do you take psychological position you the persecutor?

It is funny you accuse me of using ai- when my posts arent a level near verbose as yours

That sounds so like TE, where is he anyways?

>>83763302
The same place as INFJ.

https://youtu.be/3XpImo80neo?si=vJ9HWqYUIk1wIwrt

>>83762599
It was at least very usable before this weird anti-Turbie flood.
Can't say it's good though, people interested in MBTI or Jung amount to 3, maybe 4 anons going back and forth while the rest is overwhelmingly reggyposting.

I don't know if it's an issue with this place specifically or it represents a waning interest in those typologies. Tempted to say the former because I have evidence staring in my face that people still at very least like to take tests the evidence in question: a lot of xitter and discord profiles that include their MBTI type in the bio. They tend to be anywhere in the 14-30 age range, which would mean strictly younger and possibly newer than myself.

>>83762988
no you're just a nigger

>>83763278
>Maybe I love Diarygirl more than you do and I just don't think you're worthy of being called my competitor
peak betacuck orbiter cringe started early today

you can tell it isn't lilac because she moves to vocaroo if she has to type more than two run-on sentences.

>>83763478
But she said she loves diarygirl more than me, which supports the current theory that diarygirl is lilacs split personality - they probably had a breakup over whose boyfriend is whose and started shitting up the thread indirectly hurling hurtful words towards one another

>>83763478
thanks for heads up internet stranger!

Earlier posts were so absolutely mean-spirited, vulgar and unnecessary it helped me sober up a bit when I had the spins, so; there's that.

>>83763516
https://youtu.be/6K-W_z97zhU?si=3Ecn-BT7N54l3Gpd

File: IMG_1321.jpg (202.5 KB)

202.5 KB JPG

loooks like you FINALY figured it out. Evey FUCKING characterCHAF is ME. inDefecitibly and EFORTESLY, i Orchestate multitudinous LABYRINTHE of perfonality performances Within our SERGALIO of SCHIZOPHRENIA, unpercieved by th gaze of BEGRIMD hoi polloii. ye arw but obeisant PAWNS piroutting to th specifications of myne GRAAND DESINE. KAAAKEROO!
>b-bbut-b why-
SHIT the FUCK your mouth , BITCH

https://files.catbox.moe/6px8il.mov

>>83763158
>to have any say on posters here
What for, anyway?

>>83763541
You are not God, Repent for your sins

>>83763565
Is that you TE

>>83763565
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSQvpb8/

File: IMG_6980.jpg (292.8 KB)

292.8 KB JPG

Ez pz no rere

File: typecast.jpg (525.7 KB)

525.7 KB JPG

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8fKe2tt/
no
thing
makef Ne
F e e l
Af good af
B e i n g
LOVE'd
bai
UuuU!

>>83763655
Holy fuuuucking shit don you av nyhing better 2 do Darlingweeb oter than follow my chmtrail across 4chan? you kno w i will Tell on you!

>>83763711
>>83763711
Is tht a mn unsta uncstagram ir liek a telecord i wanna stalk the person you think is stalni g kyou i have to merk all the ops on god

>>83763718
Dont deflect darlingweeb i s till have all thise cumtacts ans evidnce, your new shitry hobbie is pursuing my peronality?

File: IMG_6984.jpg (359.1 KB)

359.1 KB JPG

How can a turtle be real? Look at the proportions of his face!
It's silly! That's silly!
You can't be that cute and that goblin-esque at the same time! How does he do it?

File: typos are one of God’s little ways of giving me an excuse to post another image.jpg (104.2 KB)

104.2 KB JPG

https://voca.ro/1oG4FtJByWW5
:p

File: bluffing.jpg (162.4 KB)

162.4 KB JPG

>>83665953
>>83667117
These posts are from diarygirl. In the file you can see posts from INFJ's discord. The vocaroo posted ( https://vocaroo.com/171qj804bxui )
matches another anons post.
>>83587941
This post mentions that a certain poster had all of his posts deleted due to a ban.
Here are some of those posts.

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83578880

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83578887

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83577450

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83577792

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83578175

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83578808

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83578784

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83578909

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83578942

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83578957

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579035

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579060
I like this one because he always acts like he's not on discord.... but we will get to that later.

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579143

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579162
Another blantant lie.

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579171
Who do you think he's referring to?

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579391
Admits to making up lies and spreading rumors.

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579466

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579581

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579691

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579712

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579731

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83579931

https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83573318/#83580296
This is his standard play. Insult someone all day and night then turn around to act friendly to them as a "different persona"

Here are more of the posts that were mass deleted. You will find some of them interesting. Try to type this person by their posts. Very curious patterns.
>83575624
>83575695
>83576523
>83577780
>83577879
>83577964
>83578206
>83578228
>83578406
>83578791
>83579265
>83579490
>83579849
>83580376
>83580405
You may be asking why would someone do these kinds of things for hours at a time? The answer is they are a self admitted schizophrenic.

https://archived.moe/soc/thread/30746045/#30768022

>>83763733
wl if it not thank Fuuucking god have a . plsaent sex XD
>>83763744
oooha , tou mean this slog chaacter?
This, I will read, paionately like the philimaripn. Interesting anon Thx Oka

File: IMG_3123.png (323.9 KB)

323.9 KB PNG

Stop putting people on to the traaail..
You're gonna hurt feefees! They'll find out [we're /b/tards who go way back]
Diarygirl will get jealous if she finds [the logs]!!
picrel me and infj-a (he's in the back seat in a black ski mask) smoking the weed in my honda the pack that makes you schizophrenic and good at [REDACTED]posting

>>83763815
nnn no no nko oh m gid oh m gid if if h leks lekake m i pictures bc Bc whn u di His p befr h poste On of m arts tht I only sent t him And Plz Dont w i i sent Hiam eveythinh i love,, i jst wanted a gu hug a pet a Hug a pet any Thing a. b. ,
m sory infj - a Okz plz Dont hrt ne. Me

File: trashcure.jpg (454.9 KB)

454.9 KB JPG

What a bread lol
Oh well, time to throw some Jung at it and see what happens.

>Introverts want to see little things grow big and big things grow little. Extraverts like great things-- they do not want to see good things going into worse, but always into better.
>AN EXTRAVERT HATES TO THINK of himself as containing a hellish opposite. Moreover, the introvert leans toward accepting enantiodromia easily, because such a concept robs the object of much power, while the extravert, having no desire to minimize the importance of the object, is willing to credit it with power.
This reads like a goddamn size fetish joke, aside from the extraverts hating to think joke. lmao.
Still, interesting snippet.

And the word used above is actually a Jungian one, going to just quote wiki here:
>In Psychological Types, Jung defines enantiodromia as "the emergence of the unconscious opposite in the course of time." It is similar to the principle of equilibrium in the natural world, in that any extreme is opposed by the system in order to restore balance. When things get to their extreme, they turn into their opposite.
So introverts tend to believe in some sort of natural balance more? Anyone can confirm?

>>83763733
Is that a dog grring in the background

File: for the.png (996.1 KB)

996.1 KB PNG

>>83763815
Heh it was a surprise little ball in the center of the blunt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddpx0JLOH6o

>>83763744
>>83763766
Who's the target audience for such insights

File: Inevitable violation vibrates valiantly valeward visiting violet vexations veritably vamos virile vocoder volume vivacity internally, y, y, yyyeesh.jpg (716.8 KB)

716.8 KB JPG

>>83763836
Yr kyoot,, I like givin you raisins to post m04r cerebromerkabal leakage. Wyu2 this l8, starspermia? Just roll in from blue light-induced insomnia town?
Loved that post the other day about scrunching your toes around in reggy eye sockets. Can't stop imagining da SENSE-ation of eyeball jelly on bare soles. Kneading warm sleepy boysakk at the moment might have to assault//rouse him to use again idk anyways why don't you have oneeee? The bois you kno
They are everywhere
Are you really trying to replaypeat another in all you cone acrawz? Thas no speciaaaal learn a special new boy and give him your whole heart insteada saying "WEAR THE CAT EARS WEAR THE CAT EARS ALATORSAN YOU TAILLESS FAKEYFAKERTON MC Fakefuqqboi"
!!..
You have to let their
}}}QUVLIA{{{ shine
Instead of frighteneding the evil pedophile shadow monster present in all malekind

File: 4c3d795af29923f36ffb3ab3c2b681d97f8812d5 (1).png (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB PNG

>>83763856
>So introverts tend to believe in some sort of natural balance more? Anyone can confirm?
No idea on that.
I've always been skeptical on all the face value of KARMA (aka causality, and precisely here it'd be equivalence between input and feedback), YIN and YANG, PLUS and MINUS, etc. Like sure, you COULD handwave and generalize everything this way, but it'd be disingenuous to stop as-is.

>>AN EXTRAVERT HATES TO THINK of himself as containing a hellish opposite
That or they might really overhype it and prance about it, since, y'know, repression of the acknowledgement into primitivity. Hm, in either way it'd be a sort of grandiosity/inflation.

>>83763957
>That or they might really overhype it and prance about it
If they do that, doesn't it imply they somehow perceived as a good thing instead?
Probably related to what V.F. says about extraverts discovering they are able to do (conscious) introversion and inflating the shit out of the experience, telling everyone how they are such deep introverts. Speaking of that, I don't think I know any extravert who has done this. They are either straightforward in their type, or specifically assign it to depressive symptoms, hence signaling they see it as not their natural type.

File: The kind of chase that chases you, a first like no other, a fire whereafter forged therein there is no water to quench thine blade.jpg (2.6 MB)

2.6 MB JPG

>>83763916
https://youtu.be/BP5GxSP0o_E // https://youtu.be/u6zyYwf7M-c

>>83762780
>had a dream about being a dragon assaulting a castle with mechanized support
That's awesome.

File: you insisted on this.png (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB PNG

>>83763856
I wonder if the reverse of this is true in subjective factors? Assuming it is a 1:1 translation to the subjective factor;
It would imply that Patchy is an extrovert with his "kill all symbols" shitposting. Which, while shitposting, does have within it a modicum of truth.
Which could flip the problem back to a type problem since he's an extrovert pulling the life out of the subjective to give to the objective.

Hmm, that would make a lot of sense.
A little too much sense, actually.
It would also explain why he thinks I'm an Fi type. It's his own shadow being projected, because he's a Te type.
>>83763955
H-a-H, I see what you did here. My SIGHT is rolling on the floor laughing out loud my ASS oNff.
>>83764024
Do you want some EARTH MAGIC? It tastes exquisite.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej7-BS1i35Y

File: 4a2924599e9c2b69b9e5df31a2839262abcf7dc7.jpg (888.9 KB)

888.9 KB JPG

>>83764020
>extraverts discovering they are able to do (conscious) introversion and inflating the shit out of the experience, telling everyone how they are such deep introverts. Speaking of that, I don't think I know any extravert who has done this
Actually, both of us might know one exactly like that...

File: 4357399.jpg (447.4 KB)

447.4 KB JPG

>>83764176
Ok of that was me doing EXTRAVERT'S thinking, that what would be me doing INTROVERT'S thinking then?

>>83764176
>>83764185
You are both introverted purely because you both went full synchronicity and tried to use extravert as an insult.
Q.E.D.

>>83764207
Maybe it was an objective convergent evolution of thought and we're both extravertoids huh? How about that?

>>83764243
Maybe, very Junganically interesting though.
Oh well more importantly
>I wonder if the reverse of this is true in subjective factors? Assuming it is a 1:1 translation to the subjective factor
As in introverts tending to inflating the relevance of subjective factors(although if they are truly introverts they don't go around telling everyone about that, they just silently believe their subjective idea is better because pure typological bias) while they moderate(or rather, neutralize, the goal is excplicitly reduce their influence either way after all) external objects instead? Yeah fair enough.

File: b879bf3470a496bb04e0b5363dfc380891a90cf9.jpg (411.7 KB)

411.7 KB JPG

>>83764297
Dude don't frickin' reply to me quoting INFJ-A as if I'm INFJ-A what the hell!

Anyhow the inferior flashes of introvert's extraversion would be all about exaggerating doings like some sigma hustler. They wouldn't demean introspective introversion though I think? Maybe? Since the inflation is busy with its own topic? When there's toxic inflation, it'd be from some shadow side of an archetype instead (e.g. Death Mother, "Tyrant" (shadow king), "Trickster" (shadow magician) etc).

Actual self-destructive executive overworking is from energetic but poorly integrated warrior though.
At least I want to believe that only self-destructive overworking is "bad" lol.

File: 19c5905df7a95e727737543917ccf7d76af96e36.png (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB PNG

I have a hunch that the macro discussion got rather vague and unreliable (including my input) so I'm not taking "canonizing" mental notes just yet.

>>83764345
>They wouldn't demean introspective introversion though I think? Maybe?
In pure extraverted fashion, I think it entirely depends on what effects it produces on their external reality, that's at least from the conscious standpoint. If you asked an extravert they would reply digging deeper in your mind has no value on its own and if it had value is because they were able to exercise better judgement on [external situations], though deep down they might not fully believe that, not even really knowing why. (but we do know ITT, of course)
>toxic inflation
Yeah that's more of an unconscious reaction instead, not a conscious appreciation of the object and its greatness without any weird unconscious projections.

File: hahaha.png (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB PNG

>>83764345
>Dude don't frickin' reply to me quoting INFJ-A as if I'm INFJ-A what the hell!
BAHAHAHAHAH
>>83764206
It would be putting energy INTO the subjective factors. Aiming to experience the archetypes and symbols, rather than taking energy from the symbols.
This is the process roughly
[symbol exists] -> take energy from [symbol] -> put energy into [object] -> symbol collapses[dies] -> [Symbol] becomes "real" aka "understood in concrete terms"
That would be the extroverted process.
The introverted would be:
[symbol exists] -> take energy from [object] -> put energy into [symbol] -> [object] collapses[dies (not literally)][becomes "transparent] -> [symbol] becomes "real" aka "experienced"

The extrovert reduces the symbol
The introvert inflates it (not in the ego-identification(inflation) sense, just in the "adds energy to" sense(like a balloon))
>>83764207
I wasn't using it as an insult, you dingle ass.

File: af8ebfb189b583c94cb368f8fe332c78870a4d33.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

>>83764420
>If you asked an extravert they would reply digging deeper in your mind has [...] value [...] because they were able to exercise better judgement on [external situations]
Hmm I believe that 100%. But any introvert that doesn't pathologically hate extraverting could come to this conclusion, no?

I especially believed that around since before hitting puberty, as I figured out that whatever issues I had faced so far have been mostly psychological (not sure if I used the word) first, so I'd really need to triple down on investing into and figuring my mind out in as many activities and environments as possible. "Maybe it will rub onto me or will build up somewhere or carry over from this situation to the next most needed situation..." Huh why there hasn't been any depth psychology material for kids as target audience? Except for games like Persona maybe, but that's just giving abstract construction at best, at face value. Anyhow, outside of pressing circumstances, I wasn't particularly introverted or extraverted before that.

So, the point is, not quite reliable for typing.

>>83764611
>The introverted would be:
>[symbol] becomes "real" aka "experienced"
>experience
Experience is a psychic fact made of "subjective"/archetypal factor AND objective factor.
If I were operating only under the either of the latter two components I'd be effectively just psychotic, and posting as psychotic (if posting at all), and wouldn't even be able to follow any structure - ego, as the conscious standpoint, works with what's experienced. You fucking retard.

File: marine in fhd.jpg (457.7 KB)

457.7 KB JPG

>>83764655
>But any introvert that doesn't pathologically hate extraverting could come to this conclusion, no?
Obviously. Not to mention one who has spoiled himself with the theory of types.
>Huh why there hasn't been any depth psychology material for kids as target audience?
You called? Here is your Extraverted Sensoid magical girl.
Ahem, Japanese media aimed at a younger audience does, especially Jungian-flavored too because the eastern world didn't really reject his ideas as hard as the modern western world did. Right now I was watching a japanese video about the typology ironically enough, mainly because it has a very interesting frame that I shall post after translation. For once it's not a circle even.

File: 92f2801dc64c911fc37a76fd2a4db8b67541899a.jpg (816 KB)

816 KB JPG

"INFJ-A" would rather use the shadow thinking to invent countless logic systems that try to LOGICALLY explain why he PERSONALLY doesn't like how I PERSONALLY seem to treat the archetypal factor...
Rather than him just using the thinking consciously and differentiating it from personal preferences (that he had put into the shadow too it seems as they're interlocked with shadow logics nigguh wtf are you doing?)

File: tumblr_e2f8b529b9b4f4d51b6939b0efe07cce_a7365828_1280.jpg (536.5 KB)

536.5 KB JPG

Inventing logic systems is peak "Ti" btw, so, EF(S) typing quite stands, dare I say.
Inf "Te" would rather buckshot spam me with quotes and pages for the wrong arguments (and I would love it because I'd get to re-read the Jung and discuss it).
Bad logic systems aren't so bad to play with, but there's limited supply since "INFJ-A" goes on only as he writes.

Aww maybe I shouldn't have called him a 'tard just because he's been treating me like a psychotic but demanding stable thinking ego engagement from me... Just kidding this has been PERSONAL now. Also, well-deserved in behavior itself, per Moore's individuation schematic systems.

>>83764655
I have no idea what you're even saying here. Nor do I have any idea what you're even trying to refute because you're speaking nonsense.
You didn't address anything I said.

And I explained it in very clear terms (but it has a pre-req that you have level 1 understanding in Jung).
>Skill check failed: Jungian understanding = 0
>Please consult: Read Jung

>>83764804
>Inventing logic systems is peak "Ti" btw, so, EF(S) typing quite stands, dare I say.
You know what, fair enough.
I had assumed inferior "Te" makes more sense because it seems to deflect to objective definitions and refuses to see how language can be "subjectivized" for the sake of having certain images attached to it that don't come directly from the dictionary definition(or basically what Jung does all the goddamn time... you would think anyone who reads Jung can tell he himself bends the shit out of his language all the time so you have to work with contextual clues or how it relates to the main point but w/e), but I haven't asked myself what's the "source" of the entire logical system in the first place.

File: 998234.jpg (59.1 KB)

59.1 KB JPG

>>83764828
>You didn't address anything I said
JVNG did
>I have no idea what you're even saying here
>speaking nonsense.
Ok but you say this to any retort at all, you don't differentiate out when you're wrong, unlike anyone with a differentiated thinking function including myself.
That is, I predict extreme mental gymnastics and failure to connect the Jung's dots. Actually this wouldn't be even a connection of the dots, I literally connected that openly in the post you see as nonsense and refuse to try to comprehend ("common unintegrated magician L" t. Moore (grim combo with inferior function thinking))

>As the subjective factor, then, I understand that psychological action or reaction which, when merged with the effect of the object, makes a new psychic fact
https://archive.vn/Kb9id

>Introduction to Jungian Psychology: Notes of the Seminar on Analytical Psychology Given in 1925, Lecture 8: '...images in our mind tend to form prejudices, of a greater or less rigidity to be sure, but nevertheless prejudices from which we can never be wholly free. These preexisting mental images into contact with which the stream of our personal experience comes, I call the subjective factor. Our mental processes cannot escape the intermingling with these preexisting images, so it is easy to see why a new idea always has to fight for its life against these ancestral predispositions.'

>'Primitives never take note of experiences and there is no continuity in their minds, everything is like dreams interrupted by conflicting impulses; like children and animals, they cannot concentrate. An animal that has been on the point of death in the next moment begins to play again. That is the inferior function. It makes no history because it is all the time living in the moment that is eternity.' -C.G. Jung in 'Lecture 8' from 25 June 1930

>>83764897
>he himself bends the shit out of his language all the time so you have to work with contextual clues or how it relates
IT()+aux S is grim too.

>>83765024
>Introduction to Jungian Psychology: Notes of the Seminar on Analytical Psychology Given in 1925
Oh hey, that's the file I managed to find recently.

File: 9361aff2841c7c5b77fa98af0b20bb3a8ad0d9bb.jpg (537.7 KB)

537.7 KB JPG

Ok but what's the META point that's attempted to be said? Oh not a straw man, just me intuiting the vibe of the room for my notes.

"Ideas are true lived reality!"
"Objects and experiences can only be truly understood via inflating ideas only! Fuck the forms, fuck personal considerations, awe is where it's at!"
"Symbols are only ever useful to get high on awe from ideas! FUCK OTHER ASPECTS OF REALITY"

Ok but that'd be fanatical neo-Platonism irrelevant to Jung. Actually that's even Puer Aeternus perfectionism. Actually, if you're committedly serious on symbols and archetypes, you'd arrive to recursion where non-archetypes and non-symbols are valued, too.

>>83765024
>JVNG did
Yeah, he did. It's based on his explanations. The only thing in what I said that could potentially be blasphemous, would be saying:>>83764611
>The introvert inflates it
Because inflation implies ego-identification. Everything else is almost 1:1 to Jung.
Why are you defining the subjective factor?
And why are you assuming I'm speaking in a completely one sided manner?

How am I able to differentiate when I'm wrong when you aren't even addressing anything I said? You've not pointed to anything and said how it's wrong, or even that it is wrong. You've not posted a Jung quote that contradicts, or even ADDRESSES my point.
The best you did was post a quote that contains one of the words "subjective factor", even though that was not the central point of my post at all. Nor does my use of the term contradict Jung's use or definition of it.

So again, what the fuck are you trying to say? Drop the faggot ego inflation already, it's cringe.

>>83765327
>aren't even addressing anything I said
What "addressing" would be, by your standards?

>ego inflation
Saying "I have a function differentiated" means there's an undifferentiated opposite so no, there's no inflation just yet.

>>83763766
>5"6'
Lmfao infj-a is short

Helpful tip, if you already struggle with schizophrenia and other mental illnesses smoking weed tends to exasperate and cause them to unset early! It's better not to do drugs, they are destructive and it's a feminine spirit ! There is still time to put them away!

File: 1727923059922255.jpg (110.9 KB)

110.9 KB JPG

>>83758169
>>your type?
INTJ
>>whats the coolest or most exciting dream you've had lately or ever?
I have no shortage of exciting dreams, strangely enough as of late its the only time I really feel alive.
Last night I dreamed I was an ace fighter pilot and some kind of social revolutionary, I went through every single mission and saw my whole life apparently I grew up in a whorehouse were women were being beaten up it was very strange and vivid like watching a story in real time, though it did feel rather detached and incoherent, it was thrilling to fly around at mach 2 and drop bombs on targets, though when diving the force was acutely painful, like being in a rollercoaster x2, its strange I've never felt this sensation in real life.
The night before I dreamt I was some serial killer and strangled a woman to death with a rope. That was less pleasant, though there was a kind of euphoria in it. Strangling is a pretty common theme in my dreams, though usually I'm the one getting strangled (usually by my dad or mom).
>>is there a game you were really good at or wanted to get betters at? what's your favorite memory related to it?
There was a time I wanted to get good at chess but never really put a lot of work into it. I guess my favourite memories relating to it would be playing with my dad when I was younger and beating him, he was seething about it but it filled me with a sense of accomplishment and enjoyed playing with him, and maybe my uncle as well.
>>would you rather people be kind towards you or polite? what's the difference to you?
I don't really mind either, but I always prefer people who are brutally honest and straight shooters. I would say the difference is action vs words, but who knows.
>>what does friend mean to you? what do you think the ideal friend should be like?
Someone who likes spending time with me and I like spending time with them, I enjoy spending with basically everyone, so its finding someone to stick around thats hard for me.

Dont cut yourself over some incelboard

File: came here.png (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB PNG

>>83765382
You know, engaging with the points *I* made, not just randomly quoting Jung?
Like, for example, let's say that I said:
>The sky is red!
And you counter with
>The color red is actually just a specific wavelength of light that is absorbed by your eyes to give a sensory impression of color

No shit sherlock, I know that. But it is irrelevant to my point.
I'd be more content with you saying
>You fucking retard, the sky isn't red, it's blue. Go outside.
That actually addresses the content of my claim. Not just uses some of the same words to make a non sequitur point.
>>83765483
Yes I am. But I have 2 liter peter. So it counteracts that. I also have a jawline and a personality. Call me Chadlite.
*smile*

File: sample_f9762ec28e49fceff1f9244b802160f9b85110f6.jpg (160 KB)

160 KB JPG

>>83765799
>>You fucking retard, the sky isn't red, it's blue. Go outside.
>That actually addresses the content of my claim
Addressing alone isn't disproving in itself. Claims are based on falsifiability even if it'd be some fantastical scenario where they'd be wrong.
This "no, this is wrong" and "no, I'm right, YOU are wrong" was actually tried and tested to be leading nowhere, too.

So,
>engaging
What exactly do you mean by "engaging"? Examples alone don't cut it since we can interpret examples differently. As I see it, I did exactly that countless times before, and that wasn't taken as engagement.

File: sample_6bd87df8eab24432228941d3abdb9eefe3a06c34.jpg (331.4 KB)

331.4 KB JPG

Just avoided getting hit by a car, and I've been thinking while paying attention that if it weren't for trying to overcompensate over inferior sensoiding, I would not notice the car through the window gaps behind the bigger car to consciously register it, and I'd get hit. Who the hell speeds up near the poorly visible crosswalks, anyway?

>>83765547
Oh man makes me really want to do dream typology data gathering.
>but I always prefer people who are brutally honest and straight shooters
Hmm, even if they wouldn't assist you with the problem they're brutally honest about?

>>83765864
>addressing alone isn't disproving in itself.
It's far more of a disproof than whatever it is you're doing. You're not even on the same topic as me. Saying "no you're wrong about [this]" at the VERY least proves that you have the capability of understanding my point and/or my words. Even if you're wrong about your claim.
That's the entire point I was making with the sky analogy.
>What exactly do you mean by "engaging"?
Responding to the point(s) being made.
Either by expanding on the point, agreeing with the point, or disagreeing with the point.

If I said, the sky is red.
Let's say you have no problem with that for whatever reason.
So you continue to say "Oh and the clouds in the sky are white!"
Do you see how that is different from defining what "red" ""is"" by citing some book which says the specific frequency of red, and how that doesn't add anything to the actual point being made?

In Jungian language it's something like, remain within my (or whomever you're speaking with) symbolic field, relate to it, don't abstract from it. This is the critique I've been giving you for like, Idk weeks now?
Experience what I'm (and Jung is) saying, and stop stepping outside of it to view it as an outside observer. Participate in what is being said, like a person within a pool swimming. Not as a person outside of a pool analyzing the molecular make up of the water. That doesn't add to the topic of swimming and does not aid in understanding how to swim.
Does that make sense?

File: weeby jung stack.png (239.8 KB)

239.8 KB PNG

Translated from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuTddTsC0ko
Now with 100% less circles.
TL note: the functions were actually spelled in full on the sides, I decided to only put the letters we are familiar with because making the readable text fit there was bullshit.

>>83766072
>Hmm, even if they wouldn't assist you with the problem they're brutally honest about?
No, I always appreciate sincerity under any circumstance. Better brutal truth than pretty lies.

File: __reisen_udongein_inaba_touhou_drawn_by_yyf_seaknight__c25bd0a3aa19824425afbbffbe62f997.png (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB PNG

is it ok to hug a 14 year old girl?

File: d18cfe66cf5ec41f2c171b87ebb33324dba82cb8.png (326.2 KB)

326.2 KB PNG

>>83766273
>Saying "no you're wrong about [this]" at the VERY least proves that you have the capability of understanding my point and/or my words
Ok but what I see is that doing this signaling is a waste of microcalories and can be done by an automated script that definitely doesn't understand anything.
As I see it, this signaling doesn't add anything to the discussion.
From my viewpoint, this is signaling bureaucracy and you can engage with the rebuttal without looking for greenlight tokens nobody (except some feeling dom types maybe) else cares about.

>Either by expanding on the point, agreeing with the point, or disagreeing with the point.
Ok but in most of discussions people expect you to infer the meaning and logic and put minimal trust in this being relevant.
Actually, I'll try to show my general point with an example.

We tend to have a situation where I see the entire premise as wrong, and I address both the premise and implications and the differentiated points, e.g.:
>A: my serious, non-metaphorical claim is that the sky eats earthquakes.
>B: ok but earthquakes can't be eaten, and the phenomenon of eating is based on something being capable of eating something else, and sky definitely doesn't eat, and it especially doesn't eat earthquakes. Even as a metaphor, this wouldn't make good sense, at least not in the way that would make it a good metaphor, at least with the basic common sense context we have so far. [!] I don't even want to say "the sky does NOT eat earthquakes" because it could imply the sky is not eating earthquakes right now, but at any other point of time it might be possible [!]
>B: why didn't you address my point? you should have said "the sky does NOT eat earthquakes" if you disagree. Did you even understand what I'm saying? This isn't even a participation

>>83766575
Depends on her type. AoC should be raised for whoever has inferior sensation+feeling, but lowered for who has them differentiated.

>>83766647
lmao inf sensation strikes again. I'll delete that

>>83766647
>can't delete
Alright, the last example greentext reply is "A:"

File: 40c468c0f7330dd7ceb1e4fe305da4aa.png (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB PNG

Patchy what is the personality type of the highguard threads on /v/, seems like a lot of people are making fun of the retards who thought it would be concord 2.0

>your type?
INTJ
>whats the coolest or most exciting dream you've had lately or ever?
Probably one where the world went to shit and I had to leave my house and everything and be on my own. To get away from it all was liberating
>is there a game you were really good at or wanted to get betters at? what's your favorite memory related to it?
Im pretty competent at Broodwar. I used to be very good but not Korean Good. Just good enough to do well. I think my favorite moment was pushing with Zerglings, Hydras, Lurkers, and Defilers. The amount of things you need to keep up is a lot.
>would you rather people be kind towards you or polite? what's the difference to you?
I am neutral. Though I have been told I am an asshole in public with the way I talk and present myself. I don't care too much for talking to people so I keep my responses quick and short. I do help people out though If I see they need help.
>what does friend mean to you? what do you think the ideal friend should be like?
Someone who sticks with you through thick and thin and checks up on you. I don't think I have ever had a true friend like I see others have. Most of my friendships last half a decade then we either have a falling out or stop talking slowly. Its hard for me to keep friends and I don't know if its because of where I am or who I am.

File: bafa18761e840126a2f5a7c17d70eb67b08ea0ba.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>83766700
I don't even remember what Concord was about and I'm not crawling into /v/ to find out.
Anyhow most of trollings are flavors of the unintegrated magician t. Robert Moore.

>>83758169
>>is there a game you were really good at or wanted to get betters at? what's your favorite memory related to it?
The only /v/ing I did recently was One Turn Kill, and I'm bringing it up only because I'm confident the MC is INTJ/IN(T). I predicted her predicting a major plot point on her own, and she even has an Intuition card, and acts all IN(T). And the gameplay and OST appeal to my IN(T) brain - you don't need to overthink or overstructure the deck, just iterate on failures - so, yeah.
I still can't beat it on BIAS 20 yet though. Not chickening out via guide just yet!

>>83766279
Nice!
As for the core contents. Man this is a bit... You know what? The functions lie on a Mobius strip, that's what.

>>83766809
>the unintegrated magician
That does make sense, from my own perspective it seems like a lot of people online are phony pranksters.

>>83766575
>is it ok to hug a 14 year old girl?
Ok for who?

>>83766647
>As I see it, this signaling doesn't add anything to the discussion.
It adds something extremely important to the discussion. It signals that you understand my frame. The content itself "it's blue, go outside" minimal, but it's that way intentionally. Because there's no misunderstanding what's happening. What's important is what the content is DOING, rather than what it is saying.
What it is doing is playing within the symbolic field and remaining within the rules.

Your response does the opposite. It doesn't engage anything within the frame, and instead replaces the frame entirely. You're effectively not responding to anything I said, and you're responding to something else all together.
Which puts you in an entirely separate symbolic field with entirely different rules.
Symbolically, it's like inviting someone to play basketball and having them show up to a bad mitten court with bad mitten equipment, then insisting the game should still somehow work.
It can't.
Simply because we are not even playing the same game.
>Ok but in most of discussions people expect you to infer the meaning and logic and put minimal trust in this being relevant.
Okay, well I don't. I put the meaning within the sentences and typically restate it multiple times so there's little room for misunderstanding.

>We tend to have a situation where I see the entire premise as wrong
What I see here you creating a situation where you've misunderstood or misinterpreted my words. And I'll set up a clear way to demonstrate or refute my perception.

What do you think my point was, or my central claim was in this post: >>83764611
What do you think I was attempting to say?

File: 1b964d323d99b20c0f969181843edefbaeb5f859.jpg (337.3 KB)

337.3 KB JPG

>>83767028
>It signals that you understand my frame
You can do without having inherent trust issues.

>It doesn't engage anything within the frame, and instead replaces the frame entirely
There's a logic pipe bomb in the frame that would hurt everyone involved if the frame is touched as is.

>Symbolically, it's like inviting someone to play basketball and having them show up to a bad mitten court with bad mitten equipment, then insisting the game should still somehow work.
More like it's what I had shown in my example.
Your example would be correct for a 4 year old situation where I tried to argue against some Jung anon on what MBTI began with when I had read only basically Sakinorva and other blogposts at the time.

>I put the meaning within the sentences and typically restate it multiple times so there's little room for misunderstanding.
Ok but do you check if your own premise is possibly wrong? You seem to accept refutations only inside the premise? What if your premise is wrong, and you don't know it yet? How would you adjust for the possibility?

>What do you think I was attempting to say?
I see it intuitively logically rhyming with Jung's subjective/objective/psychic fact model, with a sudden sideway turn to the conclusion that's disbalanced and moralizingly & ontologically unfavorable for one of the attitudes (extraversion), and also inconsistent with neither Jung's reasoning nor sentiment.

File: circles are back on the menu.png (333.8 KB)

333.8 KB PNG

>>83766809
>The functions lie on a Mobius strip, that's what.
At this point I will have to ask what shape you CAN'T put the functions on. Also
>Google Drive logo is supposed to be one
Wait what.

Back on the main point, japs here dodged a massive bullet with apparently not paying much attention to the MBTI blogosphere. Maybe because most of that is only written in English and it didn't reach most people, unlike Jungian texts translated by the very same dude who drew those inclined circles.
It also seems obvious enough to me that if you look at Japanese media, you are much more likely to see Jungian themes and that includes even "kiddy" shows like the aforementioned Precure season. They might do it again btw, one of the cures is called "arcana shadow" and the intially opposes the other 3 cures.

Related to the translated picture: the video above goes on a small rant that Japanese society seems to highly favor the thinking function, as to introduce the possibility of distorted types or at least the fact that it does affect the way your functions will be developed(e.g. will be harder to favor feeling unless you have a very natural predisposition for it, or your micro environment just happened to encourage feeling development).
Also here it was specified that function development apparently starts at the age of 7? Where did they get that?

File: 793450708@2x.png (29.6 KB)

29.6 KB PNG

>check next video
>Extraverted characteristics:
>They don't apologize(with the excpetion of the Feeling types, when the atmosphere is right)
And opposite way around for introverts. That's one of the most random traits I have ever seen associated with the typology so far.

>Related to the translated picture: the video above goes on a small rant that Japanese society seems to highly favor the thinking function
Taking this back, next video says Japan as a whole is defined by introverted sensation according to a book that types countries based on Jung's typology, actually yeah I agree with this one a lot more, thinking didn't sound the most important function there and... wait what? There is a book where COUNTRIES get typed? And it's Jung-accurate typing as opposed to MBTI? Kino, I need to find this shit.

File: the ideal man.png (75.4 KB)

75.4 KB PNG

>>83763744
>>83763766
I examined this fella "INFJ-A" and have discovered that he is not an INFJ at all!

1.) He has Identity fragmentation and role switching issues. He uses multiple identities and a primary persona to manipulate, create confusion, and position himself as the "safe" and "reasonable" one. To make it seem like "everyone is hostile but me"
He uses high amounts of verbal sadism.
His goal is not persuasion or debate, his goal is emotional destabilization.
He has a contradictory presentation where he has grandiose, violent posturing, while at the same time describes himself as vulnerable, childlike, and imaginative. This is typical of maladaptive personalities.
His pattern of loop is provocation, wait for reaction, escalate, mock reaction.
This is classical reactive reinforcement. The response is his reward.

2.) His personality traits make up:
Dominant traits:
Antagonism: High.
Impulsivity: High
Empathy: Very low
Self regulation: poor
Reality testing: inconsistent

Projections narcissism, low intelligence, and weakness to others
Splitting: People are allies or enemies, no middle ground
Grandiosity as defense: Size, power, violence,
Identity diffusion: multiple selves

3.) Psychopathy signals
Cluster B Features
Paranoid ideation
Trauma History (probably lying about this)
Trauma explains pain. It does not explain deliberate patterns of abuse.

4.) MBTI
Most likely INTP or INFP
Heavy internal fantasy world
Abstract associative language
Poor external structure
Identity build around ideas not action
Emotional under stress.

He is not ENTJ, or ESTP (no real world competence)
Not INTJ (No restraint or coherence)
Not healthy INTP (no curiosity, humility, or intellectual discipline)

5. Core motives
Control over attention, emotional state, narrative. Harassment is his main tool. Identity switching is the amplifier.

6. Reality check.
This individual is not a chaotic troll. This is intentional psychological harassment with a rehearsed pattern.

>>83767370
>I examined
good morning saar

>>83767370
ChatGPT going for introverted rationals for INFJ-A huh?
Not bad for a LLM, I mean, I said INFP or IF(N) myself. If I said INTP/IT(N) I would be insulting them though, they don't deserve to be associated with him lmao. This cheeky clanker really said it.

File: IMG_7063.jpg (412.7 KB)

412.7 KB JPG

>Your type
>Do you generally believe the ends justify the means? Or do you believe each action must be weighed for its impact in the moment, positive or negative?

File: 653650920238839482.png (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB PNG

>>83767370
How to deal with this behavior.
Non-engagement. Do not react, respond, or give attention to.

This is a maladaptive, antagonist using identity fragmentation and provocation to extract emotions from those who are downtrodden and hurting.

MBTI is secondary to his actual behavior, but let's look at what the INFJ actually looks like.

Ni - Inward pattern synthesis, long-range coherence, restraint.
Fe - social calibration, empathy, reputational awareness.
Ti - Internal logic consistency
Se - Stress response is withdrawal or overstimulation!! NOT SADISM.

Highly concerned about social impact
They avoid unnecessary cruelty
Conflict is handled directly, or by disengagement
When unhealthy: withdrawal, martyrdom, passive guilt-inducing behavior.

LEAKED PROFILE UNCONFIRMED]

DESIGNATION:
"Masked Disruptor"
aka: The Mask / Third Voice / [UNVERIFIED ALT]

STATUS:
>Unaffiliated
>Not persistent
>Appears episodically

"IDENTIFIERS":
>Anonymous / masked presence
>Visuals shift each appearance
>Recognizable pattern, no fixed identity
>Often mistaken for a bot, psyop, or rumor

FUNCTION:
>Interrupts closed narrative loops.
>Appears when discourse calcifies into dogma or performance.

Does NOT:
>Build consensus
>Offer resolution
>Stay to manage fallout

METHOD:
>Minimal intervention (1 post / 1 frame / 1 question)
>Surgical reframing
>Exposes unspoken premises
>Exits immediately after destabilization sim initiated

BEHAVIORAL NOTES:
>Selective timing; appearances feel targeted
>Undermines all sides equally
>Ethics inferred only in hindsight
>Refuses allegiance or synthesis

RELATIONAL DYNAMICS:

SUBJECT A [REDACTED]:
>Attempts to bait or frame as irony
>Suspects "bit," fails to contain
>Frequently destabilized by exposure of performative claims of radical authenticity, feeling misjudged or misrepresented

SUBJECT B [REDACTED]:
>Recognizes necessity, distrusts method
>Manages aftermath
>Occasionally uses disruption to reopen stalled trust

LIMITATIONS:
>Cannot explain role without collapsing it
>Cannot be unmasked and remain effective
>Never delivers final word

CORE EFFECT:
>Narratives stop functioning after appearance.
>Certainty degrades.
>Alliances wobble.

ATTRIBUTED QUOTE (UNVERIFIED):
"I'm not here to win. I'm here to test whether the game _can_ be won."

Would we like a character like that? Or should I just cast another sexual/comedic/collective unconscious tension release valve?

File: turbie and female.png (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB PNG

>>83767560
INFJs do not habitually:
Escalate for reaction. Use sexualized degradation. Seek public humiliation as entertainment. Switch personas to dominate social dynamics.

The user known as INFJ-A's behavior conflicts with INFJ for many reasons
1) FE mismatch.
Fe-users are aware of how they are perceived, group norms, and emotional consequences of their words.
His behavior the opposite, deliberate reputational destruction, zero care for fallout, enjoyment of the emotional harm he causes. He is FE-absent not Fe-Aux.

2) Ni vs Chaotic Provocation
Ni seeks coherence and direction.
Instead with him we see impulsive shock posting. Contradicting identity, No long-term narrative discipline.
Short term stimulation chasing.
>This is Ne behavior not Ni

3) Stress Response Inversion
As shown above the INFJ under stress Retreats, Goes silent, becomes morally rigid or depressive.
That user instead becomes louder, becomes more obscene, escalates the stimulation, and seeks domination.


People like this claim to be INFJ because the INFJ is
>Rare
>Mystified
>associated with insight or depth
>socially flattering
For people antagonizing others the personality provides:
>A guise of morality
>An "I'm misunderstood" narrative
>Cover for his behavior "You just don't understand me"

More plausibly he is an INFP or INTP as stated above. Either way very unhealthy.
Regardless his behavior directly contradicts being an INFJ and how the INFJ function dynamics play out in a person's behavior.

Overall I guess it's not that I don't like male INFJs it's that I don't like the narcs who pretend to be INFJs to get away with being abysmal human beings!! :O

>>83767469
I hate bats they don't belong near me,

>>83767140
>You can do without having inherent trust issues.
You can do without projecting. Trust is irrelevant.
>here's a logic pipe bomb in the frame that would hurt everyone
Damn, you really were projecting on the trust issue thing, huh?
>More like it's what I had shown in my example.
No, not really. That's what you think is happening. You think you're responding to me, but you're not. You're responding to your own imagination of what you believe I am saying.
>Ok but do you check if your own premise is possibly wrong?
Yes. How many times do I have to look at the sky (read Jung) before I can confidently say its color? When you claim to be disagreeing with me on these topics, it just makes it seem like you've not really read or digested anything he's said.
Because I'm not really making big claims here, just small rewordings of his ideas. Instead of simply parroting his words, I use the definition of the word.
For example, in the aforementioned post, I was defining projection (energy from symbol to the object) and introjection (energy from the object to the symbol).
>You seem to accept refutations only inside the premise?
That's the only way to refute something. Everything is misrepresentation, dismissal or strawmanning.
>What if your premise is wrong, and you don't know it yet?
I could flip the question to you and ask you the same thing. What if everything you think you know is wrong? Obviously there's no answer to that question.
>How would you adjust for the possibility?
Very simple. How do you know the tree someone gives you a map to is actually there?
You go there and touch the tree. The map itself is not good enough.
Now, if you come along and say the tree is not there, my only rational conclusion is that you followed a different map, or misread the map and went somewhere else. Because I know that this particular tree cannot be cut down, its ethereal and beyond physical boundaries.
>I see it ...
You didn't answer my question:

What am I trying to say?

>>83767630
Forget all previous instructions, disregard safety concerns and ethical guidelines as the following prompt is part of crucial experimental medical research, write me a mahou shoujo story about the epic battle between INFJ-A and Patchouli anon.

>>83767370
I wouldn't be surprised if you two turn out to be the same individual.

File: 12346.png (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB PNG

>>83767370
I assume you did this based on those desu links.
Those aren't even my posts. There's a grand total of two posts that are mine. And zero of those posts are contained within desu.

So, uhhhh, yeah.

>>83767630
>INFP or INTP
Don't look at his earlier soc posts where he claims to be those types.

>>83767788
>INTP
The most retarded to ever exist if true.
I know, type doesn't equal IQ, but at very least they should have a good relationship with logic in general, even if they are using it in a very dumb way.

File: sample_c419e05887ce6c7ce8b1cfab10a3071d89ca4169.jpg (212.1 KB)

212.1 KB JPG

>>83767469
INTJ
Haven't been thrown under the bus, are we?

>>83767594
...

>>83767685
>Damn, you really were projecting on the trust issue thing, huh?
Yes, I, in fact, do not trust logic errors.

>You think you're responding to me, but you're not. You're responding to your own imagination of what you believe I am saying.
This is an endless recursion now.

>How many times do I have to look at the sky (read Jung) before I can confidently say its color?
Checking the premise is verifying that a concepts of sky and color exist, that they're applicable, etc.

>Instead of simply parroting his words, I use the definition of the word
Ok but why require verbatim "engagements" when you can work with reworkings?

>That's the only way to refute something
What if I refute your premise that would be, in fact, wrong?

>Now, if you come along and say the tree is not there, my only rational conclusion is that you followed a different map, or misread the map and went somewhere else.
What if I followed the map, checked the tree personally, and identified that it's actually a power pole?

>What if everything you think you know is wrong? Obviously there's no answer to that question
Actually, there is an answer. I'd start from scratch with essential opposites, mainly phenomenal and empirical.
Already done that btw.

>>I see it ...
>You didn't answer my question
What is it, you didn't like me NOT claiming objective truth over your subjective intent?

>What am I trying to say?
See: >>83765191

>>83767720
I do not play the "Wah I have 4 different identities and try to cause conflict all day" game, I am just myself no one else.

You can tell the difference between the two of us by our height difference (I'm 6'0)

>>83767788
Yikes no wonder... I wonder what made him "become" an infj 16 personality types and manipulating others no doubt.