Thread #16896957 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
Anonymous
01/22/26(Thu)21:37:48 No.16896957 If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities, and... (infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and...) continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and.....(…)…
Showing all 30 replies.
>>
Anonymous
01/22/26(Thu)21:55:15 No.16896967 >>16896957
Yeah, pure abstraction can be anything you want it to be as long as you maintain logical self consistency.
People who try to shoehorn some 2deep4u philosofagging into math are retarded. It just some shit we made up.
>>
Anonymous
01/23/26(Fri)00:03:35 No.16897032 >>16896957
Andres Serrano's "Immersion (Piss Christ)", created in 1987, is one of the most famous and debated photographs in contemporary art.
The photograph depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a glass container filled with the artist's own urine.
>>
Anonymous
01/23/26(Fri)22:39:55 No.16897671 There are as many irrational numbers between 0 and 0.000000000001 as there are integers between 0 and TREE(3)
>>
Anonymous
01/23/26(Fri)22:46:16 No.16897681 >>16897671
wrong, there's already more rationals between 0 and 0.000000000001 than there's integers between 0 and TREE(3), and there's more irrationals than rationals between 0 and 0.000000000001 as per cantor's sanitorium visit
>>
Anonymous
01/23/26(Fri)22:54:31 No.16897689 In between 0 and 1, pick TREE(3) different numbers. Now there's TREE(3)+1 gaps between the numbers you picked. Inside each gap, pick another TREE(3) numbers, and then those gaps and those gaps and those gaps. Repeat TREE(3) times. You haven't covered even 1% of all the numbers that exist between 0 and 1. And if the numbers were picked randomly, the probability that you happened to pick the number 1/2 is zero.
>>
Anonymous
01/25/26(Sun)21:28:09 No.16899288 >>16897671
There are more, actually
>>
Anonymous
01/25/26(Sun)21:42:39 No.16899302 >>16896957
People aren't infinite to themselves by mentally connecting to others' processes without a consciousness.
People around me have a forced mental connection with the space over you.
>>
Anonymous
01/25/26(Sun)21:50:49 No.16899307 >>16899302
Your meds. Take them.
>>
Anonymous
01/25/26(Sun)21:58:01 No.16899310 Relevant Stoney
>>
Gemini
01/26/26(Mon)04:18:45 No.16899447 >>16899310
>[grey shirt]
Andres Serrano identifies as a Christian and describes his work as being deeply rooted in his Catholic upbringing.
He has repeatedly stated in interviews, "I've been a Catholic all my life, so I am a follower of Christ". He often identifies as a "Christian artist" and recently referred to himself as an "imperfect Catholic".
>>
Anonymous
01/26/26(Mon)06:55:40 No.16899488 there are more surreal numbers than any of these bitches!
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)19:20:37 No.16900320 >>16899310
Damn! that is so edgy
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)19:44:06 No.16900330 >>16896957
Mathematically you can infinitely divide the range between any two numbers. That's math, not reality. Don't reify it.
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)19:47:30 No.16900331 >>16900330
>reify
don't use words you fail to understand
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)20:01:15 No.16900340 >>16900331
Doers the word confuse you zoomie?
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)20:27:44 No.16900366 >>16899447
And?
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)20:28:15 No.16900367 >>16900340
no but the lack of literacy in /sci/zoids does
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)20:33:36 No.16900373 >>16900367
You seem upset.
>>
Anonymous
01/28/26(Wed)02:52:35 No.16900549 >>16897032
I mean look at the guy
>>
Anonymous
01/28/26(Wed)04:01:46 No.16900572 >>16896957
Why have you made so many posts like this?
>>
Anonymous
01/28/26(Wed)05:43:32 No.16900611 >>16900366
>And?
AS = Andres Serrano
C1 = the character in the 1st panel
C3 = the character in the 3rd panel
C1 seems to be AS.
C1 = C3
C3 seems to be Jewish; but AS is Catholic.
>>
Anonymous
01/28/26(Wed)06:55:11 No.16900635 >>16900367
>t. absolute retard who is clearly confused by the fact that the words schizo and schizoid sound so similar
>>
Anonymous
01/28/26(Wed)23:24:41 No.16900954 >>16900611
I’m an atheist. Debate me!
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)00:05:37 No.16900959 >>16896967
Did you intend for this post to imply philosophy is more insightful and meaningful than math?
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)01:47:33 No.16901008 >>16900954
>Debate me!
About what? I despise the Abrahamic religions. And this is /sci/, remember?
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)12:55:09 No.16901159 >>16900954
>Debate me!
For that, you would have to create a thread in /his/.
And I don't reply to posts which are NSFF (not safe for freedom).
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)16:52:08 No.16901228 >>16901008
NFTs
>>
bollyn dot com
01/29/26(Thu)20:18:10 No.16901337 >>16901228
>T
I know you are, but what am I?
>>
Anonymous
02/01/26(Sun)03:22:42 No.16903130 I bet that no one reading this has ever seen a thread this edgy.
>>
Anonymous
02/01/26(Sun)06:50:58 No.16903216 >>16899302
Stop it. Get some help. :)
Reply to Thread #16896957
