>>16902461
bernardo katrup. he prooves that conscioseness is like qandom feelds and evrything is consnious.

Science no longer needs superheroes

>>16902461
The odds of another singular figure coming along and shaking things up that much is unlikely; physics has become far more collaborative, and the degree of specialization needed to make progress in any field is now far more substantial.

>>16902468
>physics has become far more collaborative, and the degree of specialization needed to make progress in any field is now far more substantial.
Establishment hivemind physics has clearly hit a wall. There's nothing left to do but antwork and it isn't getting anyone anywhere. A paradigm shift from an original thinker is as likely as ever under such stagnant conditions because brilliant minds aren't so tempted to join this obvious swamp and be crippled by its dead-end dogmas.

>>16902461
It is haunting that most people have trouble with classic mechanics.

>>16902487
>establishment hivemind physics
i.e. people you disagree with
>paradigm-shifting original thinkers
i.e. faggots spamming ai-generated theoryslop on /sci/

>>16902497 is a good example of how it's mostly the mindless bottom of humanity that still aspires to academia.

File: then nothing is.png (420.4 KB)

420.4 KB PNG

>>16902465

>>16902461
Protein folding AI is a good example of how future discoveries will look like. My personal favorite would be relativity demolished in favor of non-local physics.

>>16902461
>who will start the next revolution in physics
I already started it.
>and what will his theory be?
Neither photons, nor other particles, exist. Only waves exist. Contrary to what those two scientists said about light.

>>16902461
Einstein had no relevant degree or reputation when he published those 4 revolutionary papers. No one would've taken him seriously in this century.

>>16902461
Myself and it isn't physics per se but metaphysics.

>what will his theory be?

Change is the nature of all things and the metaphysical nature of change is expressed in one way as the fundamental theorem of calculus. The dynamic between integration and differentiation described is mirrored by a philosophical romance between being and becoming.

>>16902461
Hawking was our most recent. He should be there.

>>16902461
What mysterious inexplicable phenomena is left that has no explanatory theory? Once physics had a model for light and atomic processes, there wasn't much left . There's a reason its been stagnant since the 1940's, or maybe the 1950's if we give them MOSFETS..

>physics has become far more collaborative
It should remain a solo effort, if people are incapable of completing the most basic of requests or tasks then they should lose their job effective immediately.

>>16902612
>What mysterious inexplicable phenomena is left that has no explanatory theory?
>inexplicable
Your expert class barely knows anything about anything and gets regularly stumped by anything that happens outside of lab conditions. You have some vague feeling that your particle zoo physics can theoretically account for everything, so everything is explicable, but in reality they can't even explain basic everyday phenomena. Even stuff like why ice is slippery is still contested.

File: Wind-ee-boi.jpg (34.6 KB)

34.6 KB JPG

Clever, VERY clever young man, but it's

F
R
A
C
T
A
L
S

All the way down
Always has been fractal theory

>>16902624
>feh, scientists these days. back in my day if we needed a particle collider we built on ourselves out of aluminum foil and leftover bits of string from the shoelace factory and we were grateful for the experience!

>>16903001
name one (1) useful thing that required us to know particle colider results.
What new thing are you able to do with that knowledge of those results?
The model gets a little fancier, we can balance more equations - but what is the benefit besides the masterbatory "my brain gets to understand more things"?

>>16902461
why are people in this board so hopeless?
here's something that happened recently (~the 60s), that seems to be unresolved, even though experimental physicists "proved" that the ones who challenged the statu quo were right (which only generated even more questions):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKSjCOKDtpk

whoever gives us a model of the universe

>>16902590
> rate changes and differences in area describe not only existence but beginning to exist as well.

It's one thing to call yourself a retard but to call yourself a metaretard makes it really funny!

>>16903038
Rabi's experiments with molecular beams in 1938 had no practical applications outside of making models a little fancier by introducing nuclear magnetic resonance. 40 years later this discovery was the basis for the development of magnetic resonance imaging which, now almost 90 years after the discovery of NMR is one of the most useful medical imaging technologies available to us.

Not having an application today doesn't mean there won't be one tomorrow. If we don't push ourselves to build better models and understand more there'll be nothing on which to build new technology and ideas.

File: 754378.jpg (102.4 KB)

102.4 KB JPG

>>16902461
I'm following Sean Carroll atm around YouTube like a Ferris Bueller student.

>>16903215
rabi wasn't spending a billion dollars per year on molecular beams.

>>16902461
E = mc^2 + AI

>>16903220
Rabi did the research he could with the grants he could get like any researcher today. If there was a cheaper way to do collider experiments at the energies necessary, they’d do it that way.

>>16903409
Oh I know the experiment requires very expensive apparatus. I'm saying the experiment has not yielded results worth the large amount of resources it uses (and has used for many years), and seems very unlikely to every be useful for anything in terms of developing technology.

Someone notably claims the earth solves itself into a thumbtack.

>>16902599
He was a friend of Epstein. He's boiling in Hell for all eternity.

>>16903476
This mass hysteria about Epstein must be studied scientifically. I suspect there's a strong correlation between this hysteria and being very low IQ.

>>16903483
Normies still aren't used to the idea that they're living in a kakistocracy. The fact that 90% of their idols are friends with human traffickers, organ thieves, mass murderers etc. is still news to them. They thought you get into a position of power and fame based on merit under this system. You gotta give them some time to process this new reality.

>>16903493
You don't even need to be tested for me to conclude that your IQ is < 75.

>>16903500
You didn't even need to reply for me to know what (((your))) reply would be like, but nice nose reveal. :^)

>>16903503
Lol, you are more retarded than I guessed.

File: seething_calmly.jpg (39 KB)

39 KB JPG

>Lol, you are more retarded than I guessed.
Learn to control your emotions better.

>>16903476
See of all the people tied to Epstein you really expect a guy dead from the neck down to be into anything like that?

File: Screenshot_20260202_073123_Awful.jpg (385.9 KB)

385.9 KB JPG

>>16903762

File: 20260202_115249.jpg (116.4 KB)

116.4 KB JPG

>>16903762

>>16903762
>you really expect a guy dead from the neck down to be into anything like that?
The main reason redditors are so in denial about Epstein's dealings with his scientist "friends", is that they suffer from this childlike image of Science Man as a hyper-rational being, impervious to the power of instinct, dedicated solely to objectivity and the pursuit of truth. In short: dead from the neck down, at least figuratively. Sexless nerds idolize this icon because it helps them reframe their own painful virginity as voluntary. So of course it drives them off a mental cliff to think that even the literal embodiment of their fantasy - this hideous, paralyzed genius - was not only secretly into cunny but actually getting it. And he was getting it based on his science idol status. Absolutely blasphemous. It's their equivalent of a bishop diddling choir boys.

>>16902461
Me
Universe is discrete

>>16902461
neither because both are dead

>>16903500
I wonder if the animals on farms think other farms want to do them harm and that their own farmer is only their protector? They would be shocked to see their farmer playing cards with a rival farmer, telling themselves its 5d chess or something to cope.

>>16903762
Hawking was a depraved coomer. He famously wanted a playboy or penthouse magazine as the prize if a black hole was discovered.

There is no unification
The simulation uses different algorithms according to the scale of the phenomenon.
The next big breakthrough will be proof of this seam across scales.