Thread #16902600 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: bose_einstein_condensate_620.jpg (93.5 KB)
93.5 KB JPG
>be me
>thinking about the hierarchy problem and why QFT and GR refuse to kiss
>realize modern physics is essentially coping because they refuse to treat spacetime as a physical medium
picture this:
The "Fabric" is a literal superfluid (non-viscous hydrodynamics)
The Universe is just the surface layer of this fluid
Gravity isn't a force pulling from underneath
Gravity is a static, high-intensity "Light" (scalar field) originating from the Bulk (5th dimension/external)
The light is constant. It never changes.
Matter/Mass acts as the wave peaks (perturbations) in the fluid
The "Gravity" we measure is just the Reflection Coefficient of that external light hitting the peaks
Flat water (vacuum) = Light passes through/reflects uniformly = Zero Gravity
Wave Peak (Mass) = Catches the light due to the angle of incidence = We observe "Gravity"
This implies Gravity is emergent/entropic. The source is static; the medium dictates the interaction.
Basically combines Verlinde’s Entropic Gravity with Superfluid Vacuum Theory, but fixes the mechanism.
Why are we still wasting billions on String Theory when Analogue Gravity experiments (water tanks simulating event horizons) literally prove the math works better with fluid dynamics?
Am I a schizo or did I just unironically solve the measurement problem? The observer doesn't collapse the wave; the wave peak is the observation mechanism.
23 RepliesView Thread
Showing all 23 replies.>>
>>
>>
>>
Physics is not cool ideas and thought experiments, it's always been about mathematics, and it always will be mathematics. For example, read a string theory paper.
This is from page 2 of "Classical scale-separated AdS3 vacua in heterotic string theory" by Tringas and Wrase, arXiv identifier 2511.07781.
>>
File: retard.png (263.3 KB)
263.3 KB PNG
>forgot pic
>>
>>
>>
File: retard ii.png (436.2 KB)
436.2 KB PNG
>picrel: pg. 15 of The Weight of [math]\mathbf{Spin(32)}/\mathbb{Z}_2[/math] Little Strings: T-duality and Hasse Diagrams by Oehlmann, Ahmed and Baum
This is how the state of the art looks. Sure, it's obtuse as fuck but this is how physics is. This math isn't pointless, it exactly describes what's going on at a fundamental level in the universe. If you don't want to concern yourself with the basic principles of physics much less the state of the art, then physics is NOT for you.
>>
>>16902681
>>16902693
In other words:
You.
Are.
A.
Fucking.
Crackpot.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16902664
In his post, encoded in the natural language.
>Where are my babylonian graphemes???
Make them yourself if you want them so bad.
>>16902678
>Physics is not cool ideas and thought experiments
That's literally the entirety of what mathematics is, so if physics is not that, it's not math.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>