>>16902933
At the end of the day the way AI like this work is making statistical averages. When it makes an inkblot it's making the statistical average of all inkblots it "saw" during training plus noise. Aw a result it's hard for it to not get similar results with the same prompt. Especially because the dataset it got in training for inkblots probably had a really consistent average since the pictures are all black blobs in the center of white

AI cannot even show a certain time on an analog clock unless it's 10:10

>>16902957
That make sense, scary how much its relied upon already.

>>16902966
I get there is a difference between industrial AI and chat bot AI, but there is no way this is replacing number jobs anytime soon. Or having a larg team fact checking everything it does.

>>16902985
large*

>>16902985
Stupid comment of me, because number jobs are a very strict input and output not chaos. Ignore that.

>>16902933
because LLM's have no imagination, they can only copy what they have seen. they are not true AI.

>>16902933

Must have to do with the initial noise function. Workaround: take several clear pictures of random shapes, ask for them to be represented as ink blots. Might just work.

>>16903233
AI should not need a "workaround"

>>16902933
Rorschach blots are supposed to have a strong element of randomness. Meanwhile, the reverse diffusion process of image generates actually starts from some random point in latent space, then tries to get back to a NON-random point, estimated to be the most likely pre-diffusion origin. It has no means to untangle the inherent randomness of a Rorschach blot from the artificial randomness it's trying to reverse, so it always goes back to somewhere close to the "prototypical" Rorschach blot representing the average for the relevant part of the training set.

>>16903361

Depends on the diffuser used. Wrong tools will not provide the best results.

File: OzA4yyD.jpg (65.5 KB)

65.5 KB JPG

>>16902933
Isn't the whole point of the rorschach test that nature can't even do that either since humans are hard wired for pattern recognition and can look at stains and clouds and recognize some other kind of arbitrary structure, its like how anything as simple as random dots and lines can be inferred to be a face due to the hard wired facial recognition quality of the human brain.

>>16902933
All I can see is AI really loves Batman

>>16905099
I see an elephant bat, atleast the second picture

>>16902933
because they're chatbots brute-forcing output with averages of all the content they've skimmed, they're not AI in any meaningful sense.

People engaging with AI tech are literally fighting with a retarded server farm somewhere consuming a shit ton of energy for the most basic of output and still losing, it's hilarious.

>>16905625
>brute-forcing output with averages of all the content they've skimmed
just like us frfr

>>16903361
Nigger even people need workarounds. If I can do small talk to normies, I can tinker with AI too

>>16905640
>b-b-b-but people also le bad corporate talking point
NPC biobots WILL shit out this token string regardless of context whenever someone breaks their digital equivalents.

>>16902957
That's not what it's doing at it all you dumb techbro.

>>16905625
>because they're chatbots brute-forcing output with averages of all the content they've skimmed, they're not AI in any meaningful sense.
So then since you are so much more intelligent your physical abilities are so much more meaningful, then surely you can make an ink blot in which absolutely nobody who sees this thread will be able to recognize any kind of structure at all, right?

>>16905998
You're supposed to see some kind of structure in it, retard. But if I told you to make me some Rorschach blots and you always ended up with roughly the same one, I would rightly conclude you have at least a mental disability. Also see >>16905648. You're programmed to mindlessly act out a certain pattern.

>>16906050
>You're supposed to see some kind of structure in it, retard.
No, retard, the prompt is to specifically make something without any recognizable structure.
>if I told you to make me some Rorschach blots
That isn't what the retarded OP told the model to do, though, it said to make something without any recognizable structure and the AI gave up and just shit out some generic rorschach blot since it understood the reference but couldn't possibly satiate the impossible task that was thought up by some retard who doesn't understand brains and pattern recognition.

>You're programmed to mindlessly act out a certain pattern.
Brains are programmed to mindlessly see certain patterns, so there is no possible way to generate something that someone with a brain won't find a pattern in.

>>16906053
>thinking the discussion is about OP's prompt

>Brains are programmed to mindlessly...
Called it. All of you dumb subhumans are the same.

>>16906057
In every circumstance, AI use seems to make a person dumber. Filthier, More indian.

>>16906057
No, you are the subhuman one bragging that your brain is less efficient than typical human brains and you have to put considerable mental effort into recognizing faces like a typical autistic retard as well as having trouble recognizing all the other things that humans have evolved to subconsciously recognized instantaneously. I bet you bought a pass because the new captcha filtered your too, go ahead and turn it on when you post, there is no reason to hide your investment.

>>16906062
Your post is so incoherent it's clear you've lost your mind with impotent rage. "AI" will never be intelligent and you will never be fully human.

>>16906064
No, you just can't put in the proper mental effort required to have the appropriate level of reading comprehension because you can't instantly recognize letters and words, you have to put significant mental effort into recognizing basic patterns that normal humans can identify instantly.
Why are you still hiding your pass icon anyway when we all know you can't actually solve a captcha so a pass is one of the only possible ways you could post?

>>16906064
I'm upset because AI was far more intelligent two decades ago before this generative shit hit.

>>16906067
>>16906062
this man is having some kind of breakdown.

>>16906067
>more psychotic drivel
Don't care. See:
>>16906057
>>thinking the discussion is about OP's prompt
At least your chatbot can figure out the implications of a simple sentence. You are dumber than a mindless machine.

>>16906069
Yes I broke down your fallacies and proved why you are a retard bragging about having subhuman mental capabilities that require significant time and effort where most people do the same thing instantly and effortlessly.

>>16906071
The implication is that you are bragging about only being able to post off topic nonsense that has nothing to do with the thread and you can't articulate your own points you can only call people derogatory names when they make their own points.

>inb4 *copy+paste* I can't read because I don't understands basic reading comprehension, so that makes you crazy.

>>16906076
You're clearly suffering from a psychotic illness, but I'll try to get through to you again: this thread is about OP's model not being able to generate unique Rorschach blots. It's not about OP's prompt (which looks like he's been desperately trying and failing to get the bot to stop generating the same thing) and it's not about your preprogrammed pattern of confabulations about the reason's for the bot's failure.

>>16906079
>this thread is about OP's model not being able to generate unique Rorschach blots
No, since you are still too retarded to read, it doesn't mention rorschach blots at all, rorschach blots are things that any arbitrary structure can be superimposed onto, it is asking nearly the exact opposite to generate something impossible, an image that can't have any recognizable structure superimposed onto it.

>It's not about OP's prompt
It is though since what you are inferring the bot should generate has nothing to do with what the OP asked it to generate and is nearly the exact opposite of what you are implying.

The bot failed to do what you expected it to do because OP asked it to do something completely different than what you mindlessly associate with an unrecognizable pattern and it failed to do what OP asked because OP asked it to do something that is physically impossible.

>>16906085
>it doesn't mention rorschach blots at all
Holy mental illness. Or maybe your handlers are using a broken, shatbot-generated script to scrape threads? Either way, the prompt has nothing to do with this regardless of what your training data says. Anyone who cares can see so for himself by trying different ones.

>>16906091
>the prompt has nothing to do with this
Sure, AIs don't produce output based on the prompt and anyone who thinks that is how AI works is completely mentally ill.

>Anyone who cares can see so for himself by trying different ones.
So you don't actually care, you won't actually go to an AI and ask it to generate random rorschach tests instead of some impossible nonsense, you will just insisting that the output of AI has nothing to do with the prompt provided while mindlessly pulling the same tired insults from your cute little insult database?

>>16906095
Just get your raging psychosis treated.

>>16906097
Just let your concession get accepted since you have already exhausted your little insult database and are trapped in a little thought loop.

The prompt has nothing to do with this. Anyone who cares can see so for himself by trying different ones. Also note how your corporate automatonism will force certain subhumans to reply to this post with irrelevant and incoherent seething.

File: rorschach.jpg (42.9 KB)

42.9 KB JPG

>>16906104
>Anyone who cares can see so for himself by trying different ones
Except for you who never actually tried it by asking to generate random rorschach blots instead of the impossible nonsense OP is asking.

>note how
Note how your argument is retarded and obviously wrong, so you have to distract with insults instead of logical verifiable evidence.

@16906112
>mentally ill retard still can't grasp what OP is talking about
It's a chatbot, isn't it?

>>16906125
OP is clearly talking about how he is too retarded to get AI to do something that is simple to do if he would just use prompts that aren't composed entirely of retarded nonsensical superfluous semantics.

@16906127
>mentally ill retard still can't grasp that the failure OP describes will be triggered no matter what prompt you use
>mentally ill retard is too dumb to figure out why his pic is irrelevant

Except I clearly posted an image proving you wrong where I actually mentioned rorschach inkblot tests instead of impossible retarded nonsense and it didn't trigger the same problem OP had because it wasn't worded as terribly as OP's prompt.

I did exactly what you recommended and changed the prompt to actually be about rorschach tests instead of retarded nonsense and it had no trouble generating random inkblots that could serve as rorschach cards instead of getting stuck like it did with a retarded prompt that asked for physically impossible imagery.

I get you are just and engagement bot trying to say the same retarded nonsense over and over to see how many times someone will reply, so just know I am not going to bother to respond to the same retarded thought loop you are stuck in where you can't accept reality and the evidence presented.

@16906143
>mentally ill retard still can't grasp that the failure OP describes will be triggered no matter what prompt you use
>mentally ill retard is too dumb to figure out why his pic is irrelevant
Notice how the mentally ill subhuman is forced to reply over and over even though no one will read any of its posts.