How does the feed decide what to show? Is it last updated information? Will it show my bio if that's the last thing I've edited, or a picture if I uploaded a picture more recently than I updated the bio?

>>34687956
I thought it was a good idea, but I don't see a point in downloading. It's been several months since I've used it, but I have a feeling it would be all the same guys near me

>>34687979
The app is in a weird position, where it desperately needs more people to survive and perform its function, but at the same time more people would water down the /soc/ness of it and ultimately also lose functionality. At the end of the day, there's no hope for anyone. Kill your parents

File: 47kvy7dte5ne1.jpg (38.3 KB)

38.3 KB JPG

I set it up so I can only match with girls who aren't brown and answered that one question that asks that they were a virgin. Predictably reduces my results to like 20 and somehow most of them are Asian and one's this fat nog anyway.

Meanwhile even though my profile is completely blank, my inbox and visits are filled with women in their late thirties and forties who want to start a family and have kids.

Goddamn this app is so fucked. Every woman I've tried to talk to was either a bot or scammer, skipped me, or basically talked like an npc drone that didn't care about me or getting to know me.

This app is literally giving me depression.

>>34688117
I want to know why they can see my profile. I filtered out my preferences so that girls above 28 shouldn't be able to see my profile at all, yet these STUPID bot accounts that are 32, 35, and 40 can still find me to message me despite sharing no clubs.

How???

>>34688221
you dont want to be with the types of women that are attracted to this app. I used to post on soc cuz I thought I'd a girl whos similar and online a lot too. If there is a decent girl, I'm one of dozens of guys messaging her so it's doesn't really seem meaningful since she obviously just wants male attention. The others are non virgin, leftist, onlyfans girl, attention whore
A quality women who treats you right is not on soc or duolicious looking at porn messaging a bunch of different guys at once
The age of consent should be lower or rape should be legal
I don't think I'll ever be able to love a woman if i ever have a daughter I'd want her to be aborted

>>34687956
I got a gf from here that lives only a state away, can't help but feel like I'm not good enough for her but I'm happy for now either way.

>>34688254
>The age of consent should be lower or rape should be legal
lol oh man I like you

>>34688221
It sucks like there's bots/scammers that if they weren't bots or scammers I would love to talk to, but I go into almost every conversation with a bit of a notion that at some point they're going to try to get my money, but you can really sus them out easily if they A) have a very ESL bio (and their location is from the states) B) have absolutely no clubs C) generally are way too hot to be there

this makes me wonder, are there men scammers/bots on this app for the women? If any lady reads this, do you have an experience of a man trying to scam you? Or are very clearly bots?

>>34688252
Do you edit your profile often? The feed cares not for your preferences; every change you make is announced to the world.

File: hidethepainharold.jpg (28.9 KB)

28.9 KB JPG

>see 90% or higher match
>message them asking about their hobbies and common interests we have
>they disappear from the site, either account deletion or swiped left
That is like 99% of my interactions on this site. There's just no hope for me here.

>>34689561
that must be it I guess

>>34688733
I had gotten a gf from here who was pretty hot and liked to cosplay but she was also neurotic as hell and hypocritical and loved to always play herself as the victim of everything in life.

Really annoying and unstable. She was from Asia though and addicted to social media and constant praise and validation from strangers.

>>34688221
For me I got mostly ghosted after 1-2 messages max for the whole of 5 girls I ever matched with (going through the whole damn pool). However, one girl gave me feedback and I appreciated that at least. I was divorced and 30 and she didn't like that, even though I'm pretty sure my age settings were tight enough that she couldn't have been younger than 26 as I recall. Fair enough, but there just aren't enough people to talk to in the first place.

>>34688733
met really hot men in there. got one boyfriend and almost moved to Taiwan (even got a passport) then we broke up, then one situationship and then I met up with my current boyfriend and were surprisingly still together, surprisingly all the men are hot.

I'm bisexual, I met one really hot tgirl that looks so pretty as a boy and another tgirl who's fat but we're still friends to this day,

it's easier for people who are in Asia region. again, the people i met there are actually hot. too many are "18" tho,,,, either that or 27-30 year olds who's suicidal

>>34690335
If she doesn't want to see people above a certain age, she should use the damn filter herself instead of complaining about it.

>>34690858
Of course. The other, more important aspect perhaps, is that I don't hide any such details. It's all on my profile. Why connect with me then? Connections aren't one-sided.
Even though her feedback was "eww how dare you think you can find a gf lol"-tier, instead of something more sober like "sorry, I'm not interested for X Y Z reasons", ultimately it is to me an indication that the same reasons probably resonate with a lot of the women on the site.
Hence why ultimately the issue is not enough people, or perhaps the filters don't work right, or something to that effect.
Also, I think I answered every one of the questions on the questionnaire but that didn't seem to help qualification, and it was clear to me the match% had 0 to do with either of my list or that of people that showed up in the list.

>>34690883
You're giving one interaction way too much thought. Women message here and on duo all the time and act completely retarded. There isn't any takeaway from it. If you're doing online dating/socializing you need to learn to expect constantly absurd interactions from flaky people. If you go into it getting dumbfounded every time someone acts like a sperg you're just going to emotionally drain yourself.

>>34690883
Answering every question is a mistake, you should have only answered the questions when you cared about the other person's response.

>>34690911
Also this, the questions are a total meme and have essentially zero bearing on compatibility or interest in a person outside of maybe a dozen major ones.

>>34690901
Maybe what I'm trying to say isn't getting across. My point is that people can have preferences and not know how to read, or as you say, people can be flaky. If there is a sufficiently high number of qualified (= passed filters if applicable) people exist, then even through the sea of noise, one can find signal. This is why I say either the filters don't work (= either are not implemented correctly or can be easily bypassed or...), or there are not enough people.
My comment about answering every question is that I expected (UX design issue) that more questions = more likely to match selectively (of course within the realm of how many questions OTHERS have answered). But >>34690911 could be right.
I hope this is clearer.

>>34690917
In a properly designed system, the questions are not used on their own except for a few key ones that are filter-type questions (e.g. don't go matching a straight edge with a druglord). They are transformed into a kind of similarity profile (some people try to map questions to summary statistics based on psychological profiling, some use machine learning, whatever). If done well, more questions answered -> more accurate profile vector. If uncertainty is also implemented, this works even with partial answers etc.

How easy is it for scammers to fool the AI verification? Cause I'm talking to a chick right now who has all her pics verified with the blue checkmark on them and I'm really fucking hoping they're not a scammer using advanced AI.

>>34692153
Oh fucking. Noo... Fuck no...

FFFUUUUUUUCCCCKKKK NNNNOOOO

That chick just asked to talk to me on discord and when I started talking to them there they typed like a gypsy scammer calling me "dear" and shit. I asked them to post a pic of themselves touching their ear and they started getting defensive and refusing.

Motherfucking shit. This is a PSA to anyone thinking of using this site. The AI verification can be faked. It can be fooled. I dunno how they're doing it but they're doing it. You cannot even trust fucking profiles with verified pics anymore cause the AI is fucking stupid.

Motherfucker... Is any bitch on these sites fucking real? God fucking damnit.

FUUUUUUUUUUCK

>>34692204
:( I'm sorry anon, it seems like AI has unfortunately gotten a lot better And the verification, a lot worse
. I remember asking another girl to verify herself from another app I was trying and she got really defensive too. Fast forward like a couple weeks and she's like "please pay for my phone bill" and beforehand she gave me this sob story how like she didn't have a job and how her boss molested her.

>>34692153
>>34692204
Every jeet scammer profile I've seen is the most obvious thing in existence. They're always attractive women with extremely generic dating profile information that isn't suited for the kind of platform this is. Their messages to you almost never reference anything on your profile or shared interests, just a generic try hard tinder bot message.

I literally don't even accept messages from most of these "women" that's how blatant their profiles are most of the time.

>>34692204
bro keep up with the times ffs

you can literally stream video of yourself with an overlay that changes your race, gender, body characteristics, etc. All based on a reference photo.


None of that verification shit matters anymore it's all outdated.

But as others said, the profiles seem unrelated to the website. So yes, if anygirl messages you here it's a scammer.


My bet is that Duodaddy got a gf from this place and no longer has a use for running it and that might have been half the reason for making this website all along.

I'm close to deleting my account and uninstalling. The young and cute ones keep ghosting and I keep getting intros from hags and only hags. Fuck this shit.

File: 7a5krrst101d1.mp4 (793.5 KB)

793.5 KB MP4

>>34693060
Yep, they use realtime deepfake software. Just like the one in the video I've attached.

This is why timestamps and telling them to do weird shit like touch their face with an upsidedown thumbs up and smile are fucking useless.

The only foolproof method I have found to work, that AI has yet to be able to do, is asking them to interact with their environment.

You first ask them to take a pic of themselves. Then ask them to touch their nose or mouth or whatever. THEN ask them to take a pic of like, the sofa or bed that's behind them. Make them interact with random objects in their room. Maybe even have them hold those same objects next to their face.

Also, it shouldn't take them 20 minutes to produce these pictures. One or two minutes tops!!! If they're taking half an hour that means they're fumbling around with their AI software trying to render a believable picture.

Also video is better than pics. If you can get them to do all this in one video, even better.

I have yet to see a scammer pass this test. And the girls who have passed this test did in fact turn out to be real.

Check it out now

>>34696409
Right about now

>>34696599
Rockafellaz Rockafellaz

>>34696689
Bout Now
Bout Now
Bout Now

>>34696720
The Funk Soul Brother

File: %224chan dating app%22 btw.png (902.1 KB)

902.1 KB PNG

this is the shit yall were trying to gas up a year ago?

I recreated an account and this time made sure not to answer too many questions. I also used real pics and everything.

Result: a total of 54 women appear in my feed.
The only "hard" filter I added was the "would you date a robot who had great personality -> yes" question with unanswered OK. I added the following criteria: straight, woman, profile picture required, long term relationship (or equivalent), not currently in a relationship, no children. All "unanswered" options were enabled where applicable Everything else is all-permissive, even though I actually have preferences (would filter to just 1 profile)

If one of you owns these profiles and have a new visitor, you now know who I am, congrats. I visited every profile and read it. I eliminated the following:
- Pictures, not verified. This eliminates 23 profiles (only rejected if the 'photo' category failed/is missing, any other part failing is OK. Not a fan of training AI. Less a fan of being scammed)
- No pictures (e.g. some anime pic or similar instead of actual pics. I accepted censored pics however). This eliminates 17 profiles.
- No profile content (i.e. only music in voice bio and no text, or nothing at all). This eliminated ~4 profiles, I got lazy and stopped counting.

I also removed any profile more than 7 years younger than me or no age provided. This eliminated 38 profiles including those eliminated by other criteria.

The numbers may be slightly off because I didn't tabulate any result and just counted as I went.

This left a total of 3 profiles. Of these 3, 1 is the most obvious scam I have ever seen. 1 is BPD. Thankfully she owns up to it.
This leaves 1 profile. We have virtually no common interests, clearly different humor, and based on the profile, there are at least 3 dealbreaking factors we have to check. We live on opposite sides of the world, too.

Will try but yikes.

At least some insights into what would make some loser like me pass one of you girls up. Have fun!

Is anyone having this issue?

When trying to open the app or web app it stays on the loading screen forever, the animation frozen.
At some points throughout the day, I can use the app no problem. Other times I get the issue above for hours. Any idea why?

>>34697329
>filter I added was the "would you date a robot who had great personality -> yes"
why would you ever do that

>>34697329
Why would any sane woman who actually uses 4chan use her real pictures on here? You eliminated a good chunk for a very poor reason.

>>34699613
If I did it wrong then h4lp pl0x and explain. The point was that I have a bit of a robotic personality (my love language is helping solve problems and achieve life goals through planning and support, I reason through things too much for most people's liking, etc.).
I hoped therefore that this would be the most relevant signal.

Was I mistaken? What should I do instead?

>>34699623
As I mentioned, I found it acceptable to censor the pic so long as a real pic is used. For example, put an emoji on it, or put a mask on, etc., and I didn't remove profiles that did that. One of the leftover matches was using a mask and hoodie. Beside the fact that I'm pretty sure half the userbase is from reddit and has never heard of 4chan, I'm also not sure why a woman who uses 4chan wouldn't use her real picture anyway. It's not like it's enough to dox you if done properly, and there are far more important things to worry about than deepfakes surely. On the flipside, it has historically been very common for pics of "incels" to be collected and put in a mocking infographic that has survived on the internet for over a decade. Did I miss anything?

>>34699640
>On the flipside, it has historically been very common for pics of "incels" to be collected and put in a mocking infographic that has survived on the internet for over a decade. Did I miss anything?
Men are doing that to each other. What's your point?

>>34699648
My point was that it makes more sense to me that men should hide their real pics, rather than women, as far as consequences go, from what I can tell.

My other, more pressing points are as follow:
1) Women profiles are significantly more likely than men profiles of being fake (catfish, seller, scam) which is why I am a bit guarded
2) Is there any other solution to avoid these kinds of fake profiles, if not by requiring there to at least be some realistic censored photos, if not verified photos?

>>34699663
You cannot trust the AI verification.
Very easy to fake. >>34693575

>>34699807
To the human eye these videos are super easy to tell as not natural. The verification also uses a photo rather than a video, so it's technically even easier to fake, if one so desired. It depends how the algorithm works, which of course is not clarified.
2 profiles I saw used clear AI pics. 1 of them admitted to it. But neither had photo verification, so it's plausible that the AI works OK for these (of course, pure conjecture).
Regardless, faking with AI is high effort. If I can eliminate all low effort scams and only have to deal with high effort ones, it is still a win compared to being subject to everything.

>>34699640
>Was I mistaken? What should I do instead?
you should try not being autistic
but seriously remove that filter, thats not what the question means at all. its asking if if you would date a literal machine

>>34699862
I understood that. I was hoping that it was a good proxy for what I was trying to determine.
It's not even removing that many profiles anyway, but I'll try messaging more girls and get promptly ghosted anyway. Thanks for the heads up.

>>34699623
>sane woman
Wouldn't describe most of the ones I've seen on here.

A tranny keeps viewing my profile and I feel sexually harassed.

>>34701930
lol

>>34701930
And your reason for not skipping them? Does someone like the attention?

>>34687956
Why do the bots say they're 30+ rather than 18-22?

>>34703583
Examples of such bots?

>>34704327
everyone who views my profile and sends me messages are bots. They just make themselves generic women who have no relation to being on duo.

Generic women who are models or whatever and always 30-38.

I saw one called Karma and another called Melisa2026.

>the one girl I've gotten along the best with on this app is actually extremely likely to be a tranny because of 1. how easy it was to discuss the shit I would talk about with any other dude and 2. the way she sits in one of the profile pics could be interpreted as tucking (oh and 3. unable to discern boob size)
Sucks because it's also one of the very few people in my age range.

>>34704887
There's only one profile that looked like a bot on my end, which is why I was curious. Though I get no response from anyone else really. Having a bot message me from time to time could be fun.

Finding bots is easy jfc guys
1) get and crop just picture
2) yandex reverse image search
3) ???
4) profit

>>34705890
you are using boomertech

They don't use pics taken from other places. They AI gen that shit my nigga.

>>34706027
AI gen quality is bottom of the barrel garbage. If you can't tell it's AI at a glance, you have severe brain problems and deserve to be scammed.

>>34706027
I literally just reported Dani Daniels but ok

>>34706056
While you're at it, name and shame every bot you find. Wouldn't that be most effective?

>>34706088
He's not talking about a woman, he's talking about someone who is most likely a male who is transexual and wanting to present and be accepted as a female. Not something he would have to worry about if they weren't so common and aiming to deceive others.

>>34706056
>Using an actual porn actress

Might actually be a dude who gets off on rping as a woman.

>>34706060
The people making the bots can't be shamed. Just keep reporting.

>>34706140
nigga the fuck you talkin bout?

If a guy does everything he can to mislead a guy and say "Teehee I'm a girl, we have sooo much in common. :3" And lists themselves as a girl and tries to appeal to and engage with you while keeping the fact they're trans hidden then they're a liar.

If you think that's okay then FUCK YOU. Lying and misleading guys for your own amusement/benefit is heinous. If you do such you are engaging in fraud and setting up guys to feel betrayed. Men wouldn't have to care about this shit if so many dudes weren't keen on lying about the fact they're trans.

i don't give two fucks if you're trans or crossdresser or whatever, but lying to guys about it is foul and deserves to be called out for the evil it is.

>>34706094
If the problem is the harassment, there is no difference with or without the pic. Harassment happens even with no pics at all. If it's about the AI porn, I wonder how often that happens, how it differs from any other dating app, and what becomes of it. For example what was the significance of creating profiles with AI porn of her? Did he used that to pretend to be her and contact men on the site or what happened?
Once again in the end doxing is 1000x worse than this.

>>34706256
>how it differs from any other dating app
Most dating apps don't allow you to save the profile pics or take screenshots of them.

>>34706292
It's impossible to prevent these things. Just because you are not good with tech doesn't make it magic pixie dust. If you can see it, the image is locally available one way or the other. Even if we believed in magic computer secret protection veils, there is a thing called a camera. You have one on your phone right now. You can point a camera at a screen.

>>34706307
>You can point a camera at a screen.
Mind blown.

>>34706365
I know right? It's amazing the kind of boxes people limit their thinking to.

>>34705890
You don't need to "find" them. Their profiles are extremely obvious at first glace. They never tailor them for the platform and they stick out like a sore thumb. The only reason to look into them is because you're lonely and desperate enough to convince yourself there's a chance they could be real, when you know they aren't.

File: Screenshot 2024-01-15 202625.png (200.7 KB)

200.7 KB PNG

>yet another dating app with no weight slider
I just want to fuck really really fat girls man is that too much to ask

File: IMG_0972.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

>>34707242
Just spend two weeks on fb dating and it’ll dumpster you down to the fatties and disabled girls

I solved dating apps. Have women swipe right on whomever they want, and allow men to only swipe right on women who swiped on them. Also have men with a certain amount of unanswered swipes disappear from feeds until they get below that threshold.

>>34708668
That replaces one kind of angst, seeing a bunch of unobtainable women, and only replaces it with another, seeing no one. Women are just going to swipe on the same top 10% of guys.

Duodaddy is MIA? what happened?

>>34708770
>Women are just going to swipe on the same top 10% of guys.
>Also have men with a certain amount of unanswered swipes disappear from feeds until they get below that threshold.
Aside from this, you can also do what OKC does and make left swipes reappear in the feed after a set amount of time, the only way to permanently remove them from the pool being blocking them.

Guys is duolicious worth it? I wanna meet more women but don't wanna use tinder, is it worth it?

>>34708949
It's been totally worthless to me so far. Some people say they have had success though.

>>34708949
Infinite supply of ewhores who send nudes to anyone who asks, otherwise yeah it's a pretty shit platform

>>34708819
Not that MIA since now everything is paywalled, even darkmode lol

>>34699623
oh my god she uses 4chan call the cops

>>34708323
>Just spend two weeks on fb dating and it’ll dumpster you down to the fatties and disabled girls
See you're right (I like facebook dating for this specifically) but I want to date other total fuckheads who spend all day on the computer getting mad and jerking off, not corn-fed 80iq church girls with no teeth

>>34709256
Last git activity was the 17th, so he's around. It's definitely jarring the sudden radio silence. Since it is still being worked on, I have a couple theories:
1) He is totally exhausted listening to the retards here.
2) He realized that, for a variety of reasons, it is not a good idea to be interacting with users on the level he was.
3) The match group mafia/fedboys got to him.

>>34708323
imagine looking at the duolicious thread and seeing guys talking shit about you for being disgusting thats brutal
shes so ugly and fat lol

>>34708323
>>34711945
I don't think she deserves that treatment. There are far more profiles far more deserving of it. This one is just pretty ordinary.

Another day, another 0 new profiles in the search. Dead site.

>>34708668
decently good idea
also kek imagine opening it up and seeing 4 fatties before running out of options for the day

>relogged into this shit the other day
>today some random adds me on discord saying they're from duo wanting to be my "sugar mama"
jesus fucking christ what is going on in here lads

>>34714867
The Indians are deploying new scamming techniques every day.

> woman finally starts a chat with me
> asks to move the conversation to telegram
It's a scam, isn't it

suddenly got a handful of visits from <20s with no clubs in common when I don't have that age range visible
nevermind there's a dude in there, I probably just showed up on the feed even though I haven't updated my profile in more than a month.

>>34715895
Had the same but that was on day 1, plus the messages were strangely delayed and low quality.

>>34715895
There's lots of autists who like telegram but it's probably still a scam

>>34701930
holy kek

So can someone explain where the duo guy went?

Like, he doesn't have to reply to everything, but it seems kinda like he just gave up, pulled the ads, and stopped communicating?

File: file.jpg (144.3 KB)

144.3 KB JPG

>>34724720
O_o

duodaddy doesn't delete bots anymore.
just move on, it's over.

File: Screenshot_20260123_191940.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

Hey if anyone wants to add me my
Description is as follows

Ive been arrested by 50+ police cars and two SWAT trucks for my activities out in the street. Im tiktok famous but i wont say the clip name because i dont know it. Im being looked at for a sheriff postion in Salem Oregon but its nothing too serious yet. I'm learning japanese. I have political family in Mexico. I'm sorta known on 4chan. Im living in an adult family home and i was just recently living in the rough streets. I have a lot of life expierance for some one my age. Im looked as a leader from youth.

And my name is Angel

>>34715895
Only Eastern Europeans use telegram otherwise it's 100% a bot

I've had surprisingly good luck making friends on Duolicious. I thought it would be a shithole but there are some interesting people to chat with. Wouldn't use it for dating though.

>>34731861
I only use it for the prospect of dating and yeah, it's horrible.
I think online friends rarely work out that well so I don't really do that. I guess it depends on interests and temperament though.

>>34726957
>i just got arrested by 50 cops and a swat team
>they actually want to make me their leader as the sheriff in oregon despite that and im famous
>also im homeless and just got out of a halfway house
this sounds like a story a homeless person would make up. I believe you about the halfway house and being homeless though. Are you posting this from a library computer or something?

>>34715895
there were two girls on duo that used telegram, both seemed quite real. one was from Asia though

Hijacking this thread to ask if any1 has made friends or had success on tagmap

>>34738433
I talked to a person kinda nearby on tagmags like a year ago then got nervous and ghosted them
I still feel bad i want to message them and say sorry for ghosting I hope I didn't hurt their feelings

>>34740342
Aww. I have done the same thing when I almost met up with people (not standing anyone up, but getting cold feet). Personally, I’d be happy to hear back from anyone who has ghosted me. I encourage you.

>>34740467
"Ghosting" can mean a range of things and the impact of it is drastically different depending on the context. There are contexts where ghosting someone can be extremely fucked up to the point where they'd despise you.

I actually cant talk to foids. This is holding me back fuck.

i know the creator sometimes talks here.
add the ability to look up tags without adding them to your profile.
theres PLENTY that people add that would make sense to look up even if you wouldnt add them to your own profile.

>>34740632
>There are contexts where ghosting someone can be extremely fucked up to the point where they'd despise you.
It doesn’t sound like that’s what happened though.
>>34742177
Did u fuck up?

>>34687956
>Been using this app for a year
>ended up messaging every single woman so I know anyone who is new
>last week there have been 50+ spam porn accounts on this app with new ones daily
FFS

>>34743274
Pretty much this.
Tried a few times.
Most genuine femcels just ghost, don't want anything serious, or I don't know what.
Something is deeply wrong with women, they're just living in constant fear and sickness, it sucks.

Tried Duo twice and while I made some decent female friends out of it, its horrific for dating. Based on what I've seen in this thread it hasn't gotten much better it seems.

Man all I want is an autistic right wing woman, and at this point it seems based on pure luck rather than anything else.

>>34745958
>female friends
cucked

>>34745958
>>34746799
Truth being that men and women cannot be friends.

>>34746799
>>34747071
Eh. I see it as networking, and a way to make sure I'm not entirely unlikable. They really aren't my type anyways.

>>34749453
cope.
I still wouldn't encourage these horrible women.