>>97461304
So your character is comfortable killing a little girl?

>>97461308
Nice vague question. Add some context.

>>97461342
It isn’t automatically ethically wrong to kill her, but it is ethically fraught.

>>97461348
Depends on the context more than anything else.

>>97461357
Well considering she would have had to have been turned when she was just 14 years of age, that makes her a victim in away even if she is 200 now and a full-fledged vampire.

>>97461364
Is she a mindless, blood thirsty beast, is she a tortured soul fighting her thirst to not to kill her prey, does she revel in the power she has over mortals? These are more important than how young the vampire appears to be

>>97461375
Well, she would have to feed regardless and she probably has done so for close to two centuries by now.

>>97461388
Yeah, and? How many corpses did she leave in her wake, how many were innocent victims, how many were predators in their own right? Provide better bait when you go fishing.

>>97461397
I mean can you survive for 200 years without some being innocent, just by logical reason. But maybe mostly she does only prey on pedophiles is a good point.

>>97461244
No more so than vanquishing any other monster. Appearance is not an indicator of ethical status.

File: vampire_by_manzanedo_db1yx6o.jpg (274.8 KB)

274.8 KB JPG

How do I make vampires stand out with mystique they have in movies like Nosferatu etc.? I think a good place to start is Curse of Strahd which has a really well done vampire villain.

>>97461598
>stand out
>mystique
Doesn't work like that.
Mystique is from a lack of information, from mystery. Hint don't show. Vampires aren't trying to stand out. They're ambush predators.

How come 5e says in the rules players shouldn't play as vampires?

File: 0a8a4cdcf372444.png (34.9 KB)

34.9 KB PNG

>>97461244
Blow it out your ass.

is it ethically wrong to blow up a tank in woodland camo even if in reality it is a tank and not a tree

>>97464135
Well is blowing up a tree even technically wrong?

>>97461244
Vampires are souless undead. They are not alive. They are meat automatons that exists to suck the life out of the living. What they look like is irrelevant.
You might as well be asking if it's wrong to dispose of a wax statue at Madame Tussaud's.

File: dennis-frohlich-elsavampir-final-white.jpg (394.4 KB)

394.4 KB JPG

>>97464499
So they are spiritually empty beings?

>>97465070
Just like you, Puckee!

File: dd49q0w-033bf9bd-38c4-4ba1-b3ad-1f0093e74884.png (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB PNG

I guess vampires don't deserve remorse.

>>97465070
>>97465207
Correct. They are spiritually hollow and do not deserve mercy.
I'm sorry, but wrapping the abomination up in milky, goth tiddies doesn't redeem it somehow.

File: Jonghwan Lee-www.kaifineart.com-2.jpg (107.5 KB)

107.5 KB JPG

Vampires are pretty high level undead?

File: hury-art-vampire-hunter-main-front.jpg (401.7 KB)

401.7 KB JPG

How do people view vampire hunters in your world?

>>97461308
Would you be okay killing a 25 year old with a hormonal issue that made him not go through puberty or a growth spurt?
Would you be okay killing a 15 year old with a hormonal issue that made him go through an early puberty and growth spurt making him look 25?

>>97464135
If a tank blows up in the woods and no one's around, does it make a sound?

>>97467429
I am simply not a murderer.

>>97461244
Vampires are always creatures of evil, destroying them is righteous in all situations.

>>97467530
Answer the question that was asked.

>>97467648
I would not be okay killing either.

>>97461244
>puckee spamming his commission again
https://www.reddit.com/r/vampires/comments/smic42/cassandra_young_vampiress_art_by_kartstudio_art/
https://desuarchive.org/tg/search/image/nI3AYbGrIeoaWTGYUpKJkA/
>70 times

>>97461244
Killing children is wrong. Period.

>>97461244
It's a vampire, of course it's not.

>>97469562
No worries then, the child is already dead, hence the vampire.

File: kisuny-andria-1200py.jpg (372.6 KB)

372.6 KB JPG

>>97467317

>>97471228
Are child-lookin vamps more dangerous?

>>97461244
>Vanquish
Don't fucking bullshit us, anon.

>>97462029
because 5e is written for fags and trannys who can't handle the word "race" much less playing as a morally gray character that needs the blood of the living to survive.

>>97472441
Depends, are you a pedo?

>>97472441
They have smaller hit boxes.

>>97471228
No, the child still exists. She must not be harmed and instead any good aligned characters should try to find a way to cure her condition.

Bumpfag thread

>>97472441
Loli 'pires are more dangerous to my dick.

>>97481535
So you think OP pic is cute?

>>97481999
Yes but that's not a loli. It's fine, I like JCs and JKs as well. Anyways yes, she's cute enough to be called cute but perhaps not cute enough to be remembered as "ah that one cute vampire girl". You know? Though I suppose that calling her cute is nothing short of common sense in the first place.

>>97482036
>I like JCs and JKs as well
Which one does OP pic veer towards in your opinion?

>>97483045
Could be either. What's the point of asking, just to bump the thread? If so, fucking kill yourself.

>>97483058
Just wanted an opinion from a "loli expert". I actually had to google JC and JK for context.

File: 1619197644970.jpg (387.3 KB)

387.3 KB JPG

>>97483071
Post-pubescents are difficult to differentiate. It more comes down to level of confidence and personality than body type, as some people will have a 14 year old be extremely curvy and developed and others might have an 18 year old be short and thin. While I can't speak for everyone, the general appeal of a JC or JK is that they are for practical purposes an adult women, but less jaded and worn out physically. Less used and abused by life.

Many people mistakenly think that loli means short and flat, but comparing to actual lolicon characters shows the difference. For example, Megumin from Konosuba exhibits a change in character design in the novels going from no hips and no curves to an obviously more mature and developed body while still being very lithe. Progression from definitely a "loli" in the age 12 bracket to a 14 year old in the JC bracket. "Proper" loli designs you'd find in something like Medalist. Good artists also tend to use proportion well, if they are 7 heads tall then they aren't really a loli but a young woman. The attached image should make this more clear.

As this pertains to vampires, a child and a young woman would have very different hunting strategies I think, as the latter probably focuses more on hunting men while the former can easily lure in women as well.

Curse of Strahd proves vampires are kino main antagonists. for campaigns.

File: 268177.jpg (44.8 KB)

44.8 KB JPG

>>97461244
>200 years old
That's the key part. She's been surviving for 200 years living like this. Maybe her circumstances surrounding her becoming a vamp were bad. But now she actively chooses this life with her continued existence. She dies.

>>97461244
>loli vampire
puckeedophile moment

>>97481487
The corpse still exists. The child has perished and all that remains is an unholy cadaver operating off of basal appetite.
It cannot be cured of its affliction anymore than those feeding worms in their caskets.

>>97464184
is vanquishing a vampire even wrong

>>97472441
Feigning innocence to lure in prey which is... Insectish in nature, honestly I'm also reminded of the Cuckoo Bird. I'd say Childlike Vampires would be pretty dangerous but extremely fragile.

>>97461308
It's not a little girl though. It's a predatory being out to kill you. Look at the Cuckoo bird and how they're raised. Cuckoo chicks feign being a mother bird's young to trick it into feeding it, killing the other chicks in the process.

>>97461244
>Is it ethically wrong to vanquish a vampire who physically looks like a 14 year old girl?
No
>Even in reality they are likely around 200 years old?
Also no
>So your character is comfortable killing a little girl?
Yes
>I guess vampires don't deserve remorse.
Correct

>yuckee puckee spam thread

>>97461308
The little girl has been killed already; presumably by the vampire that turned her.

>>97461244
This thread brought to you by Jeffrey Epstein, in partnership with moot and RAPEAPE.

>>97487347
Even if they aren't luring in pedophiles but just people with soft-hearts and parental instincts.

>>97461244
So that Vamp in OP is by most systems physically stronger than most male warrior characters?

>>97489205
Yes, significantly so.