Thread #97486541 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)15:40:45 No.97486541 How can you implement fairies or pixies as playable characters in D&D 5e? Is there an existing template for them?
Showing all 18 replies.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)15:46:56 No.97486584 The good thing about tabletop RPGs is that it's almost trivially easy to just make your own content but of course a DnDrone is still incapable of if.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)15:54:11 No.97486638 >>97486541
D&D 5e is shit anyway, so just do whatever.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)15:57:16 No.97486666 >>97486541
Threads that could have been google queries. Or searching "pixies" on the DM's guild or DTRPG.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)15:57:44 No.97486672 >>97486541
Don't make them tiny. Stick to a species of fairy that is Small sized.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)16:20:33 No.97486866 Another fucking puckee thread
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)16:44:52 No.97487018 >>97486541
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=How+can+you+implement+fairies+or+pixies+as+playable+characters+in+D%26D+5e%3F
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)17:05:08 No.97487122 >puckee thread
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)17:41:22 No.97487354 >>97486541
Its already a playable race are you fucking retarded????
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)18:15:10 No.97487565 >>97486666
The numbers have spoken, OP deserves a perma ban on his entire IP range
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)19:02:50 No.97487879 >>97487565
We could eliminate all puckee threads if /tg/ adhered to having two specific threads
>Tell me stories from your last game session
>Questions that don't deserve their own thread (QTDDTOT)
Anything that fuckee could possibly pretend to discuss or care about could easily be contained in both of those threads where general threads don't already cover the exact topic, and they would be made in good faith with actual intent to share and discuss various topics and peripheral matters to /tg/-related material.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)19:50:27 No.97488155 I think there is a "Fairy" template in 5e. But it's not as cool cause you're not "tiny" you're small.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)19:54:55 No.97488192 >>97487879
We could eliminate all puckee threads and remove the specious "but it's on topic" complaint with literally one action: delete the OP image. No image spam, puckee stops posting/bumpfagging. Then it's only real engagement and real discussion...of which there would be none, because these are fakeass potemkin threads.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)20:03:43 No.97488245 >>97486672
I like the idea of a "tiny" campaign.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)20:07:29 No.97488275 >>97488254
Wish they made them tiny.
>>
Anonymous
02/02/26(Mon)23:08:33 No.97489341 >>97486666
Which just yields people screaming "BUT THEY CAN BYPASS OBSTACLES!" and similar shitty takes. Well good, but to quote a classic game: "You must gather your party before venturing forth"
>>
Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)15:00:57 No.97492783 >>97487354
It's not in the rulebook.
>>
Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)15:17:07 No.97492844 >>97486541
5e already has fairies and pixies, they're tiny but can have the same stats as a minotaur
Reply to Thread #97486541
