>>11681414
>Why are all Creator sets now either "thing but lego" or brick built animals?
Um... weren't they always like that?

what the fuck were they supposed to be?

>>11681414
Because modern creator is less about it being a parts bavk anymore and it's just a "look it up on rebrickable" set.
I can't wait to byuld yet another MILLENNIUM FALCON (tm) from my 3in1 hamster.

>>11681414
it was 2024 when they started doing this shit it's so lame i miss the cool house sets they used to have

>>11681414
Ignorant that a shocking number of the stuff you can build falls might be described as a “thing,” more than a fifth of the sets in that image are neither brick built animals nor “thing but Lego.”
>>11686443
There’s a literal haunted house in OP’s image. Plus the unicorn palace thing, the recent castle, the “modern house,” and so on

>>11681698
Lego but thing

>>11681414
Probably the most offensive thing about the modern 3-in-1 sets is how they're meant for kids but the builds look virtually impossible to take apart and reassemble. Good luck getting all those tiles apart, even with a brick separator.

>>11688589
cool thanks for bringing up the exception like it's some profound statement, if you want me to explain shit like you're five none of those that you listed are normal lego houses except the modern house that came out in who would've guessed 2024

>>11681414
3 in 1 is the only Lego that still reliably has soul

>>11688589
>haunted house but lego
>castle but lego
>telescope but lego
everything in the image is either an animal or thing but lego

>>11692759
>Hunky little Chungus but lego

>>11681414
Are you complaining about just the 3 in 1 sets or are you butt hurt about the whole line?

File: 5770_alt1.jpg (489 KB)

489 KB JPG

>>11681698
From 2011 onward Creator had minifig compatiible sets that integrated well into your city. In recent years they got rid of that and it's now manly animals and random objects i.e display sets.

>>11692759
Nigga, if you’re counting a haunted house or magical unicorn skypalace as “thing but Lego”, then anything you could plausibly put in one of these sets is “thing but Lego.”

What do you want them to make? Dignity but Lego? A lack but lego? The platonic ideal of a chair but Lego?

Is there any concrete object you can make out of Lego that doesn’t fit under the category of “thing”?

>>11681414
"Thing but Lego" what the FUCK kind of dumbass fucking retard are you? What is Lego supposed to be abstract concepts?

Kill yourself