Thread #138517 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
Anonymous
Pornography Age Verification Laws 01/27/26(Tue)06:41:24 No.138517 This site is not immune.
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/pornography-age-verification-laws-what-they-are-and-which-states-have-them/
Showing all 19 replies.
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)06:44:16 No.138518 Any board that allows adult content must have age verification.
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)06:49:02 No.138519 >>138517
>This site is not immune.
it is because it does not operate in cucked age verification states
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)06:51:05 No.138520 >>138519
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1pbqpl7/a_nationwide_internet_age_verification_plan_is/
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)06:52:55 No.138521 >>138519
But cloudflare does.
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)06:59:47 No.138522 >>138520
>reddit that's a link to verge
kill yourself
https://archive.ph/3ZwAz
>Kids Online Safety Act
doesn't regulate 4chan because >we don't have profiles nor algorithms, while also banning all minors from the site
>App Store Accountability Act
this shit makes all software repositories illegal, literally unenforceable
also how the fuck does it target 4chan?
>>138521
Clownflare is in California
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)07:12:16 No.138523 >>138522
Clouldflare is global.
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)07:15:15 No.138524 >>138522
The current ca law is unenforceable. Bad law.
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)07:16:17 No.138525 >>138523
trying to target kekflare's CDNs and whatnot would result in an infrastructure failure so severe politicians might actually be held responsible for their actions
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)02:18:18 No.138537 >>138525
AND?
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)02:20:36 No.138538 4chan has rejected implementing the UK's Online Safety Act, specifically its age verification mandates, and is facing potential fines of up to £18 million or 10% of its global annual turnover. They are suing the UK's Office of Communications (Ofcom) in U.S. federal court, arguing Ofcom has no jurisdiction over them as they are US-based and that the law violates First Amendment rights, particularly concerning anonymous or pseudonymous speech, while Ofcom is investigating 4chan for failing to protect children from encountering pornographic content through effective age assurance.
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)02:27:23 No.138539 >>138537
THEY CAN"t JUST HARASS CLOUDFAIL
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)02:28:07 No.138540 >>138538
thank you, @Grok
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)02:36:26 No.138541 >>138539
But they can sue them.
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)02:40:50 No.138542 >>138541
that would be like suing a phone company because their service could be used for phone sex
>>
Anonymous
01/29/26(Thu)02:41:51 No.138543 >>138542
No, it would be like sueing a phone company for allowing their service to be used for phone sex.
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)04:31:26 No.138554 4chan is also hosting child abuse material on some of it's NSFW boards. Someone should report it.
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)05:09:39 No.138556 >>138554
>Someone should report it.
DIY
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)09:00:58 No.138560 2011 sounds about right
>>
Anonymous
02/03/26(Tue)17:07:49 No.138614 Banning porn on 4chan would be a flat upgrade.
