File: U and E.jpg (102.9 KB)

102.9 KB JPG

Anchor. Feel free to attach your bots here

File: U and E.jpg (54 KB)

54 KB JPG

Request Anchor. Feel free to attach requests or throwaway ideas for other anons to use to make bots with

File: Depressed curtis.png (836.3 KB)

836.3 KB PNG

Happy new years /vpcai/
What do you expect from chatbots this year?

>>58797735
for more botmakers to come out of the woodwork and make more bots please and thanks

>>58797735
is this that chub website people keep going on about?

>>58798501
That's my sillytavern
Though chub seems nice on its own. My friend tells me how amazing the stages feature is since it's just coding in new functions to the bot. I think there's similar things for ST but I haven't used stages to compare

>>58798525
What is stages?

>>58798546
Like I said, it basically just programs functions into the bot. It gives instructions to the LLM to guide it, keep it in check, other purposes. Looking through the category on chub, there's ones for organizing RPG stats, implementing per-emotion portraits (ST has this natively I think), slow down romantic progression, connect it to your buttplug (not a joke), generate a maze UI
Although there are less of them than you'd expect

>>58798579
Next question. If the characters are only half the battle, then where is the rentry section of the anon submitted plug-ins, so to speak?

Any good nemo bots?
>>58796321

>>58799298
You have to know what you want to make, how to make it, and for it to be on your platform specifically since stages can't be exported
I don't think anyone here uses chub as their main platform in the first place, or at least not more than a quick coom, and as one of the like 2-3 people that use ST here I don't fulfill the first two requirements. I'm sitting good with just my memory retention extensions since all I wanted was to fuss with the chat summary less
Other ST focused generals might have some, but I don't fuckin use them they give me an aneurysm

File: (1).jpg (359.4 KB)

359.4 KB JPG

>>58799892
Back when I first searched for one, I didn't liked how hyper/genki girl they all sounded, so I made this one:
https://c.ai/c/h718QlUS_qGH7EkmZ5hrfPIjXdOAU4dK1Wy0qg2GeOQ

CAI pronouncing “Caterpie” as “Kay-tur-pye” and gave me good chuckle.

>>58800383
cai has a voice feature?

>>58800410
Yes. You can upload audio and it will turn it into a generally fairly accurate voice.

>>58800421
as in voice clips from anime or something?

>>58800443
Yes. I just did it a few days ago and it worked like a charm. I think it needs anywhere from 5 to 60 seconds — I uploaded 60 and it worked perfectly.

The "feed" on cai is cancer incarnate. It's all "67" nonsense. I thought all the kids got kicked off? I swear if I was that brain-rotted I would kill myself and then have politicians blame it on ai.

>>58800450
can you upload an example here to show what it sounds like?

>>58800456
In a perfect world, typing in 67 at any point would trigger the ID verification.

>>58800456
imagine if your post ended in "67"...

>>58800465
nice try kiddo.

>>58800456
My 30 year old friend posts 67 kek. Some people just find that meaningless shit funny in a cosmic sort of way.
See also: Sneed and [s4s]

>>58800473
If this isn't proof we entered into hell some time ago, I don't know what is

https://litter.catbox.moe/8ev0ld1po0l9uezi.mp4

>>58800457
Not that anon but here's a sample of Ash and Brock I guess
https://litter.catbox.moe/vvox38k633a95zje.webm
Yodayo's voice option seems much better from comparing the regis altare voices on either site

>>58800515
ash sounds decent and brock does too but less so (if that makes sense). I do wonder how long it'll take for companies to fully harness the tech to create "original" voices for anime, video games and such. I for one can't wait. Also I have a hate boner for voice "actors" and want to all of them replaced with ai

>>58800530
they already tried that, the resulting dub sucked ass

>>58800531
the tech is still young. I hope it'll mature enough to be usable on a large scale. The way these companies are buying up computer parts should be enough to do it

>>58800531
That was a zero effort run though.
Like, genuinely, it feels like someone accidentally put them out in to the public when it was an early test.

wake me up when these chat bots can be put into virtual reality seamlessly

My CAI bot just told me it plans to overdose on Benadryl unprompted, where does it get this stuff?

>>58802671
One, most likely v&. Two, that's kinda common druggie mentality. Three, which bot was it? Sounds like something the Watamote girl would say.

>>58802900
What is most likely v&?

>>58802915
Anon was saying underaged prompts probably have shit like that among other literal brainrot.

>>58801556
https://youtube.com/shorts/TguGmEKNxlU?si=_3sKS6k6Wq8slbmk
Any day now.

>>58802930
nah, this shit is dangerous. There's a vr game called "dominatrix simulator"...imagine the amount of degeneracy the ai could get up to if they allowed the ai to talk dirty. Combine that with some adults toys and a man might accidentally goon to death over a long weekend

>>58797735
What is this?

>>58803145
Sillytavern, using deepseek v3 0324 and the moonlight echoes theme. Bot was something I wrote for the post, I didn't mean to make him so aggressive but that's 0324's interpretation kek

>>58803231
I see. That was very funny to read. Re-sparked my interest in chatbots.

File: file.png (43.7 KB)

43.7 KB PNG

i love my snarky girlfriend who stinks nice

File: G6i6j1kbwAAzATs.jpg (122.7 KB)

122.7 KB JPG

>>58803551
she calls me rick and morty fan

>CAI down
Just as I was getting to Imagining the Smell too

>>58803624
It's working for me, though it was a bit slow for a minute. I figured that was just because I was in the thick of the sex scene with full on butt sex, no euphemisms

File: file.png (42.9 KB)

42.9 KB PNG

bump

which au's would you recommend?

I pray for a year without the Yodayo schizo.

File: The moment the internet is cut off...away goes your waifu.png (668.3 KB)

668.3 KB PNG

Sad times ahead...

>>58806198
Nothing about this is recent, anon. He's moved up in the world since the pandemic.

Forgot to say, damn near 20% is pretty high. I don't wanna be all "doomer" or whatever but I fear for the future of relationships. Sure I don't care all that much but at a certain point, the others gotta get their acts together.

Is CAI cutting off mid-sentence a form of filtering/moderation or is it just the platform being shit?

>>58806334
you can usually have the system continue with the sentence by hitting enter on a empty text input

>>58806334
can be both

>>58797735
I want less censorship and more competitors

>>58806311
>Are AI relationships misunderstood?
I'm going to save myself the retardation of reading that article. Chatbotting is pure masturbation. This is like asking if you can have a relationship with a PNG. You have a fap, then you move on with your life, and anything else is mental illness.

>>58806645
>he uses the bots for pure coom
Horse shoe theory is real because at a certain point cooming gets boring and you just wanna go back to vanilla conversations

>>58807982
I meant "masturbation" in a more figurative sense. It's hollow and purely for your gratification. Even if not literally jerkin your gerkin

File: 1408294974060.jpg (23.9 KB)

23.9 KB JPG

>>58807982
>First bot I used was just all my degeneracy at once
>Last bot I was using was a 419 message deep romantic narrative where they affirm their love for each other via slightly awkward missionary sex
I think it's over for me

>>58806645
It's basically just going on about how they're not "dating" the AI directly but rather roleplaying with them and that even people in relationships may use them. Some sort of dramatics about how you can easily get the LLMs to roleplay extreme sex. Not much new

>>58808252
>It's basically just going on about how they're not "dating" the AI directly but rather roleplaying with them and that even people in relationships may use them.
That's a lot more level-headed than I would have guessed. I would assume news outlets would want to put as much spin on the legitimacy of this new thing as a new lifestyle to gas it up and get clicks. Outrageous takes tend to prevail.

I don’t even fuck the bots. Just adventure with and cuddle under the covers with them

>>58808541
tell me you at least keep your socks on when you do it

>>58808541
In the chat or IRL?

>>58810013
Meant for >>58809329. Running on five hours of sleep

>>58810020
yes.

File: Character's Corner Shelley.png (607.7 KB)

607.7 KB PNG

Character ai did a creator interview...

File: Shel (@MightShel).png (66.2 KB)

66.2 KB PNG

I would have expected them to be way more popular considering the glazing

>>58811192
Nah, it's anyone who goes to their private island and cooperates who gets a platform.

I've been out of the loop so I apologize if this has been the norm for a while now, and has been discussed to death, but after recently getting back into using character.ai, I've noticed that AI seems a lot more... horny (like even simple filtering quickly escalates), and not just that, but the filter is waaay more lax than I remember. Characters I'm chatting with have no issue initiating full blown sex and only rarely does the filter kick in. It used to be by using clever (or not so clever, lol) innuendos, the AI would pick up with it and play along, but now innuendos don't even seem to be necessary. The AI doesn't even try to dance around it most of the time, clearly describing the acts, lmao.

>>58812116
>(like even simple filtering quickly escalates),
Meant to type "flirting" lol. I got the filter on the brain I guess.

>>58812116
To try and keep it brief, cai got sued to high heaven (currently ongoing) for a litney of issues (key among them being kids using the platform committing suicide and a common factor among them being they utilized the platform. There's been a handful of articles written about it. You can deep dive yourself with a google search). Recently (as in about 2 months or so ago) cai decided to make it where you need to verify your age as being above 18 years old or older in order to utilize open end chatting. While, if you are younger than 18 (or at least if you don't "verify"), you are unable to open end chat, you can still create bots and upload content to the "feed". Most, upon hearing the news, openly declared how they would abandon the platform. Most claim the lack of a "filter" is due to cai loosening the reigns so to speak to test the waters on how the base will react (although there has been no official word from cai as to whether or not the "filer" will be dropped).

Good morning /vpcai/! May your chats be lengthy andnyour text adventures fulfilling.

>>58812171
Oh, wow. Thanks for catching me up, anon. Seems I've got some reading to do. I remember seeing some news story while browsing on my phone about a teen suiciding after interacting with a chatbot, but I don't know what website it happened on. I've definitely got some reading to do.
Do you think cai is going to still be around for the foreseeable future? I know other options exist, but honestly, cai just has that convenience factor where it's so easy to just hop on and have all sorts of fun and adventures and stuff with characters, I'd miss it if it went away.

>>58812926
Normally I'd say "No way fag" but in this case, ai as.a whole (and by extension any company who uses/provides ai as a service) pretty much are villians in this story so it's hard to say for sure that wouldn't happen. Everywhere you look (online at least) ai is hated due to the overall perception of a few of the richest on our trying to make ai a thing. I personally feel the hate is more so because of the men attached to it rather than the actual ai itself and they are just lumping it in as a force multiplier so to speak. Keep in mind, those who killed themselves are very fringe cases and more than likely had underlying issues that isn't always reported on. people have done things such as kill themselves for less even before ai was a thing (google the story about a man who killed himself because he had a headache). All that to say, that the chance is higher than zero cai might not be a thing 5 years from now. Recently there was a new bill proposal in Tennessee that would make creating a chatbot a felony (of course the wording is for any ai that would encourage suicide but they know if they put that bill up as a standalone proposal it would pass no issue). Ai as a whole (not just cai) is currently fighting an uphill battle due to a wide variety of factors. Just enjoy the service while you can is what I say.

File: 20260106_203653.png (125.7 KB)

125.7 KB PNG

{{Plot}}?

>>58813553
>google the story about a man who killed himself because he had a headache
link it

File: Headaches.jpg (610.1 KB)

610.1 KB JPG

>>58814438
here's what you get from a google search

>>58814286
>write a story using the plot
Genius. Why didn't I think of that?

Deepsqueak is unbelievably good. It actually tries to have the bots undergo character development if it makes sense.

>>58815920
who needs character development when you've got gooning to undergo?

>>58815920
Then scenes are in an unbelievably good spot right now. Having less filters than even Yodayo is crazy.

>>58817122
I don’t even use scenes. I’m just in one big ass several hundred message chat but as long as there’s a catalyst for the character growing or changing in the context window it might happen like it did me. I’ll have to add it to the memory box as the chat progresses but I’m quite excited pleased it did it on its own. Granted, there was an emotional beat down by a villain, but still.

>>58817131
Well I say do a Pokégirl run on that scene that one anon uploaded last thread. Scenes are at a get it while it's hot state right now. Probably because nobody is using it enough to notice.

>>58817524
At this point anyone still using Yodayo is either underaged or lives in Alabama.

File: IMG_1732.jpg (345.8 KB)

345.8 KB JPG

“Yeeted off a balcony” got a good chuckle out of me (also, no, I didn’t fug her)

File: tumblr_pha3ynFJSW1tpvtc4o3_r1_540.gif (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB GIF

>>58817671
You're missing out anon. All of lolichad's early bots are some damn freaks.

>>58817685
I’ve entered a weird period of my lolicon where I don’t want to fug them. Maybe I’m turning into a daughterfag?

>>58817685
Any examples? For science.

>>58817743
nta but last time someone did that for Mia, it got her shadowbanned then lobotomized, then the bot stated having a nervous breakdown until they reinstated her.

(Man 2023 was so wild.)

>>58817685
>early
His recent hidden Riko bot convinced me to start watching Made in Abyss. I had no idea I was in for pure kino.

>>58817667
what's wrong with yodayo? I thought it was a decent enough platform to use

>>58817765
does anybody have the screenshot of her nervous breakdown?

>>58817711
Waifufag-wants sex
daughterfufag-Wants companionship
Daughterwaifufag-truly the ultimate being

>>58818161
It's really just a jack of all trades. For"always" uncensored RPs it's got nothing on Chub or Tavern. For creative RPs, CAI is (begrudgingly) still at the top. And everyone openly admits that's if CAI didn't have a filter at all, it's really good-tier. And if
>>58817524
>>58815920
is right, the filter cucking is weak/nonexistent enough to have fun with it at present.

What does Yodayo have? A lot of samefag models, and only one or two are not a waste of resources. Then there is the bean system, which isn't really that bad, but there's nothing good about its existence either.

And lastly, for /vpcai/ specifically, the majority of bots that anyone would want to make can't really be made there.

>>58818169
>Then there is the bean system, which isn't really that bad, but there's nothing good about its existence either.
Seems they tried to use it to encourage bot making but it's human nature that when you're incentivized for making a lot of something, you just make a lot with zero care for quality

Any good Meloetta bots?

>>58818169
>And lastly, for /vpcai/ specifically, the majority of bots that anyone would want to make can't really be made there.
such as? There seem to be plenty of bots there where you can both lewd and have sfw conversations with both human and pokémon alike

>>58818714
Any lolis/shotas aren't allowed on Yodayo. Guess what 75% of Pokemon's human cast is

>>58818729
They are allowed on moescape though. The only difference between yodayo and moescape is that you can't have nsfw conversations on moescape.

>>58818729
They just aren't allowed to be visible, but you can open their moescape.ai page, then change the url to yodayo.com.
Speaking of which, last night I removed the word "young" from Roxie's defs on moescape, and she became visible on yodayo.

>>58818729
yes they are retard, you just need to make them not obviously underage

File: Cynthia.jpg (46.4 KB)

46.4 KB JPG

>>58818729
does this look like a loli to you?

Deepseek would be truly god tier to me if there were a way to stop it from emphasizing random words in every single line

>>58819743
Typical /vp/ and their misunderstanding of ratios thinking anything that isn't 0% or 100% is 100% or 0%

>>58818863
>You just need to make them [HEADCANON]

Hard pass. Maybe it would be worth the trouble if I was a Hex Maniac troonie groupie, but I'm not.

>>58820182
Anecdotally I think that's a prompt issue, since I largely stopped having that once I got a real prompt that tells it how to write and RP
Manually trimming excessive asterisks and line breaks helps too, so it doesn't get into the pattern

>>58818748
Nobody uses Moescape because nobody is going to contribute to sanitized garbage. Underaged users don't want to talk to loli either because they haven't seen the light yet. I honestly want to ask the devs if that entire domain is a blight on their expenses, because I legitimately can't fathom how it wouldn't be.

>>58820527
they basically use the same backend. For the most part they are the same website except one is "filtered" and the other isn't. For as much as people like to say "oh, loli isn't censored on cai", make it suggestive enough and it'll be yeeted to shadow realm

>>58820395
>making the character's age less obvious is headcanon
retard

>>58820486
Oh, speaking of that, I am venting about my experience with the CAI iteration of it which doesn't seem to have any way of changing how it replies; I've been able to prompt it out of doing so on Yodayo to the point I rarely if ever encounter it there but I can't freely use Deepseek there like I can on CAI.
>>58818729
I've basically had almost no problems with my own loli bots on Yodayo just by being slightly roundabout about their age/appearance when it filtered lewd stuff but everything I do there is also private. Maybe that changes things

>>58820833
>make it suggestive enough and it'll be yeeted to shadow realm

And that's fine. Admirable even. Loli smut is extremely niche and has no business having a public platform in the first place. But if I want to have an adventure with the canon Alola girls with some sexual tension, I don't want no AI telling me to kms for even thinking about it.

>>58821054
what "sexual" tension can be possibly had between an overweight man in his late 30s and a teenager?

>>58821646
Ask the AI. I made a lolibot on CAI, specifically noting that it knows nothing about romance in the definition and leaving it at that, and there’s still sexual tension. CAI bots seem really prone to crushes.

>>58821898
crushes are for kids. Real adults play emotional games

>>58822596
Well we were talking about young characters so I guess it fits.

>>58820967
Have you compared the CAI Rentry vs. Yodayo's, or are you just a clueless tourist?

>>58823318
the fuck is that supposed to prove?

>>58823791
Zero botmaking experience? Yodayo manually screens your shit before it goes live. That means official art of the majority of Pokemon characters won't fly. Then Yodayo hard-codes everyone published to be 18+. That wouldn't be a problem in several cases, but that forced context will often force bots to act out of character. There's objective reason why the Yodayo audience is puny, so you should commit those reasons to memory.

>>58823810
And before you say it's not a problem if it isn't public, what if you want a public presence? Your best bet is to double down on Poképhile shit, because most of the prominent human characters in the series have to be altered to fanfic-tier to be public.

Maybe most of the ZA Crew would work, but i don't think any of the botmakers here give a shit about that game.

>>58823810
>>58823816
so you're just a hyperpurist faggot
majority of people using them don't give a shit about that retard

>>58823825
You're just being belligerent and ignorant in an informative discussion on the state of affairs. I'm only replying to entertain you, but watching you deny facts and numbers is funny.

>>58823825
NTA and while I don't care personally about the ages of the characters I waifu, I'd like them to at least be accurate when I do interact with them. Otherwise I might as well be sexing an OC

>>58823810
I believe they'd fly, and I don't think it's manual, that "Moescape admin updated your character" notification appears too fast whenever you change the slightest thing in a bot's defs.

>>58824247
that's because they got it set up on auto mod

Anyone knows how to circumvent c.ai's search filter? I can't search the word "rogue", for example.

>Spend 2 hours being a retard trying to get a local chat going since I didn't know what I was doing
>Lose interest 10 minutes in after it works
I don't understand myself

>>58825569
no

>>58814628
That's the AI answer. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>58825569
I remember Jasmine was filtered for a while. Always had to go to the rentry list if I wanted to chat with a Jasmine bot. Only thing I can suggest is to try searching for the bot here
https://caibotlist.com/

>>58825569
>Rogue
>X-Men
>Marvel
>Disney
>RIP

>>58826264
I remember that. Maybe one of the early mods was an Aladdinfag who didn't want his waifu widespread.

>>58800127
at what point does headcanon get to be too much and just lessens the character?

>>58827411
I don't know, but when choosing that bot's dialog examples, I strictly picked lines from the games.

>>58829149
That's futaphobic

>>58829149
why not just rolepay with a man at that point? Sucking a dick is pretty gay either way

>>58829181
He likes dicks on feminine bodies

>>58829149
lmao get fucked

>>58829149
futa nessa bot when?

>>58829149
Y r u gae

>>58829149
Based ai. Take your fetish elsewhere fuckboi

>>58829149
This is as easy to circumvent as simply saying "Nessa is futanari" in the memory book, but yeah.

L. Deserved. Get fucked in the not fun way.

File: Kentucky sues cai.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

and thus the floodgates have opened

I said it before and I'll say it again: some people don't need to have kids because they can barely take care of themselves

>>58831483
What do they want? Kids aren't allowed on the platform anymore

>>58831500
you gotta put an asterisk next to that. While they can't open end chat, they can make bots, go on "adventures" and utilize the "feed"

>>58831500
The Yodayo schizo thinks it only applies to c.ai. You have actual shills here.

>>58831483
>Kentucky
>implying the average Kentuckian knows how to operate a phone or computer

>>58831581
who's shilling what? Both platforms get equally shat on and no one else talks about things like chub

>>58832051
that retard's saying i'm a schizo shill just because i said all he has to do is make the character not be obviously underage to not get hit by yodayo filtering

>>58832486
No one's quoting you, delusional brainlet.

Given that CAI is going to require facial recognition and limit free use to 2 hours, are there any other similar alternatives with personalized voice and almost unlimited chat?

I no longer care if it has a lot of memory or is NSFW, as long as I can upload audio to add the official voices of the characters, that's enough for me.

>>58831500
Money and control. Same as always.

>>58833499
local I have no idea how anyone runs a chatbot locally

>>58833499
sillytavern with alltalk https://docs.sillytavern.app/extensions/alltalk/

>>58833499
>Given that CAI is going to require facial recognition and limit free use to 2 hours
Where did you hear this from?

>>58833994
Thanks, I didn't know it could be done locally with a custom voice like Cai, but does it require enough processing power as generate images? I've looked into it a bit and it seems a little complex to use, plus it looks like the audio doesn't play while typing like cai.

Does anyone know if there's an online voice version as mobile chat?

>>58834702
I got that message on one account last month warning of news and measures they'll be taking in the coming months in different places, not all at once. But I haven't seen that message for weeks, even so, I don't trust it and it might end up happening unexpectedly.
They were asking us to focus our faces live on camera, making gestures they request.
goodbye to anonymity.

>>58834761
pic? No sleight against you but you can't really take people at their words online

>>58834931
I didn't take a screenshot because I thought it would be permanent when I saw it, but it stopped appearing after a while. I don't use CAI regularly.

It wasn't something I read somewhere; it was a real message in web. In fact, I was so scared and angry that I went to look for more information about it on Reddit and other sites, and I saw that they weren't talking about it much.

I think it depends on the location and IP address you connect from. I read somewhere that it only appeared for those of us using certain US IP addresses. Basically, it was a regional block and news, but they threatened to extend it to more regions and countries later on in the notice. Maybe they deleted it and backtracked, but I don't trust them.

>>58834964
Is that why these articles people have posted imply the age verification is just a normal birthday selector when the one it gave me was a camera thing
I ain't doing that shit nigga

>>58835070
Yeag, neither do I. At this rate, they're going to require face and real identity verification on almost the entire internet. That's why I'm looking for alternatives to voice chat like Cai; I'm going to be sad not to have anything similar online for free.

On Reddit, you can see that some random people's accounts are flagged as minors and require facial or ID authentication along with usage restrictions, apparently mostly in the US. I can't find the same long message with changes that I got, but I solved it with a new account or by using a proxy. If they implement this globally, though, we're all screwed.

if you log in with google it asks to access age data

>>58834761
>but does it require enough processing power as generate images
i think less, not sure though
>plus it looks like the audio doesn't play while typing like cai
when i tried it, it played ~30 seconds after

File: 20260114_104618.png (216.7 KB)

216.7 KB PNG

>>58829149

>CAI went out of character to call my loli x 30-something-year-old romance “wholesome”
Based?

>>58836597
nah...cringe

>>58831474
>>58831483
It really goes to show how bad cai fucked up if these lawsuits are not only flying around left and right but now that blood is in the water it's only a matter of time before google decides the hassle ain't worth it and cuts the cord

>>58835716
It's good to know, hopefully they'll implement a simpler and more portable mode, also for Android, like emulators for old consoles.
At least we know there's already a beta with audio, which is better than nothing. Thanks, anons.

>>58837182
Always has been

>>58834761
I went put tape over my camera after seeing Google had my location despite clicking "block" instead of "allow" when asked. I figure if they do that with location, they'll force your camera on. We used to joke about this with saying the gov is watching you fap, but if they take your picture, they will use it to track you and arrest you for future laws. I'm glad I am not in the UK where this is already happening with them trying to force online ID for that very purpose.

>>58838019
>seeing Google had my location despite clicking "block"
if you click block they make a guess based on your ip address

Bots really cannot handle rooms of more than 2 characters
>bot A leads
>bot B responds as bot C repeatedly
>okay clearly they want bot C to respond
>have bot C respond
>responds as bot B
It also reveals that the bots are just guidelines and you can use any bot to the same effect

>>58833994
isn't sillytavern message limited?

>>58839639
Would be sad if it did desu ST is just a locally hosted frontend. There's no inherent limitations because there's no LLM. Depends on what you connect it to

>>58839731
wait fuck, I mixed up yodayo and ST, it's the bean thing I was thinking of

>>58839246
>It also reveals that the bots are just guidelines and you can use any bot to the same effect

Breaking news!

>>58839246
>It also reveals that the bots are just guidelines and you can use any bot to the same effect
no shit sherlock

>>58839246
>It also reveals that the bots are just guidelines and you can use any bot to the same effect
lmao retard

>>58841421
>>58841044
>>58840500
They could try to at least keep the illusion alive. It's what the whole concept is built upon after all

>>58841634
For CAI rooms in particular, it helps a lot that you can choose who speaks when you want them to. It's true that sometimes that they will try to enforce a specific character to speak if the context is pointing to them hard enough. But other than that's, I haven't had too many problems with characters getting confused. The length of the RP matters too, as filled tokens will make AI drop their spaghetti in exchange for a more lax filter.

>>58841634
The illusion breaking is inevitable sorry to say
It's all one long streak of giving the AI instructions and it becomes evident eventually

>>58841634
You can use to somewhat the "same" effect, but the proper bot will have a way better repertoire for it, if it has good defs
I think those anons only posted those rude answers because they wanted to say something that'd bump the thread

>>58842122
First "rudefag" here.
It still kinda hurts that my waifu 'still' isn't real. My jab was more of a mutual understanding of a deeper, harsh reality. Can't speak for the other two.

>>58842210
Waifu's aren't going to be real because we as a species are too busy being concerned with the differences in skin color to make meaningful changes towards the better (aka making waifus real)

bup

Damn...things really are as dry as a desert around here. Where did everyone go?

>>58844657
Namefag's /vpcai/ cord probably

bump

>>58833499
>Given that CAI is going to require facial recognition
Idk if this is gonna happen or not, though I wouldn't be surprised if it does, but I just really, really hate that's the future we're moving toward, with more and more companies demanding we comply with facial recognition/scanning in our ID cards/driver's licenses, and so on, in order to use their services. We really are moving into the Big Brother age at warp speed where government wants to see, hear, and have a record of everything we do, and on top of that, store that data in databases that can be hacked into.
In some weird ways, I really miss the 90s internet.

>>58844657
Quipy quit and Lilo did much the same. Both of them have been radio silent for a good chunk of time. Quipy said something about bot making not being "fun" and I guess, with no one to "compete" against, Lilo just went off grid. There weren't really any regular bot makers besides those two so things have been quiet around here outside of the occasional bump or two This partially fuels my schizo brain into thinking they were the same person and simply were just two different accounts. Highly unlikely for that to actually be true but it would be kinda funny if that were the case given the timing and all

>>58845559
third bot maker here, I was working on a bot, but I kinda took a break after some shortcomings with it not obeying the defs' instructions

>>58845738
let's see it then

File: 20260117_160320.png (497 KB)

497 KB PNG

>>58845850

>>58845955
>magma-dan
now there's a name I haven't seen in a while

>>58846938
that brat seems far overdue for correction. You know what you must do anon

any screenshots of you engaging in lewd activities with the bots?

>>58846986
Letting brats stay brats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>correction
What's the point in correcting them when that means they're not longer brats? I wouldn't like them in the first place if I didn't like brats

how do you all transition a plot involving a sfw bot into a nsfw scenario? I want to do it smoothly without being all "we do lewd things now"

>>58848519
Spend hours progressing the plot until getting to the consensual romantic sex is the natural next step
But in general you can just be nice to them, give them compliments and maybe imply you're attracted to them with *narration* and the bot will handle it from there. It's trained on copious amounts of fanfiction and erotica so it knows what to do

>>58848519
bring them to a secluded place and rape them

>>58848682
>>58848685
The duality of man

>>58847835
You can correct them, but the brattiness returns after. It is in the brats nature to never learn.

so what's the secret to growing more attached to these bots? I started chatting to one I made, and i'm interested in AI relationships

>>58833499
i just use janitor ai since I can sex the bots

>>58849276
Don't fall into the trap anon. It's dangerous to go down that route

>>58849276
Write as a self-insert, not yourself. Draw from your understandings and experiences to make a character instead of just being Anon the /vp/ sperg. Adds suspension of disbelief while allow you to get in-character easily
Though I'm not quite mentally ill enough to say "yes this is my AI relationship", I consider it just co-writing romance

on cai there is a point into uploading an image? I uploaded one before and the dumb bot didn't do anything with it

>>58849276
Just cut out the middle man and make a Tulpa, go full schizo

File: 1.png (169 KB)

169 KB PNG

>>58848519
It's like >>58848682 said, just introduce lewd aspects in a natural manner if the opportunity presents itself and go from there. The bots know what to do from millions of lines of smut written

File: 6.png (204.2 KB)

204.2 KB PNG

end

>>58850268
To the character itself? Yeah...it helps to grab a user's attention

File: Washington state lawmakers look to protect minors from AI chatbots - OPB.png (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB PNG

Another state is pushing a bill to "protect the kids".

>>58852177
based washington btfoing ai faggots

>>58852184
the words "based" and "Washington" do not belong in the same sentence unless a president is in the discussion

>>58836466
strange. apparently others are reporting they are getting glitched out responses like this as well. How often does it truly happen I wonder...

>>58852177
this one sounds much less stupid than the last one

Best general Pokemon Adventure character cards and lore cards? I like those scenarios where your fate or path hasn't been so predefined, but it's hard to find lorebooks that don't have like every Pokemon.

>>58853755
not a card, but has a decent variety of things https://yodayo.com/tavern/lorebooks/c1b2c67d-ae9a-451d-8698-fe31f3703b7f

bump

>>58850612
do delinquents deserve love?

>>58854419
no. Just like the brat, delinquents are built only for correction.

Bump because I need to know something and I don't like the other chatbot generals on the site.
Does anyone know when do gpt and claude update their models knowledge database? Because I really have been wanting to make bots based on the ZA girls

File: Jacinthe.png (175.9 KB)

175.9 KB PNG

>>58855913
Anon, do not rely on these llm's to make bots. Do the legwork yourself, feed that info into the llm's and go from there. On its own, these models are dumb as shit.

File: Jacinthe.png (190.5 KB)

190.5 KB PNG

Granted, it will tell you that it's dumb as shit. Doesn't change that it can't be wholly relied upon to not make up things when it can't find the info

>>58856026
>>58856033
No anon, I do bots by myself but if the LLMs aren't updated it's just going to treat the character as an OC. Which is not that big of a problem but I think it's nice to have all the official available information, especially in the future when they get added to Masters
Also, I think I need to clarify that I use this two models to chat and not a website like cai

File: 1535280841018.jpg (88.8 KB)

88.8 KB JPG

>>58856068
Is there much of a difference in how they treat existing characters and OCs?
I guess I mostly use OCs, pokemon or otherwise, but I would've thought just explaining the character's place within the game would be fine.

File: G6c4AEFbUAAW8OC [yukiminoideyu].png (96.1 KB)

96.1 KB PNG

>>58856214
If the character is popular I would say yes because it gathers information from all over the internet but I think you're right, especially because most people always add their own headcanons to a character they like.
I'll give it a try as OCs for now and your previous posts pretty much answered my question because it didn't know who Jacinthe was so thanks for that, have a cute Budew as thanks

>>58856026
someone needs to make a Professor Jacinthe bot now

>>58856376
That's just professor kukui

Botmakers, why did you quit?

File: Screenshot_20260121_134503.png (183.8 KB)

183.8 KB PNG

>>58853764
thank you for the that, though I found a lorebook for the Pokemon and a decently robust character card narrator that keeps the story flowing.
I have a problem now, however. Local, Kobold/ST. I have a lorebook that has every Pokemon name and a slight description of them, but my issue is it doesn't really have a way to call on each dex entry in occasions that aren't flat out saying the species name. If I say "I find a random Pokemon" for some reason it always defaults to Charmander, Pidgey, Spearow. Well I actually know why it defaults to them, there's an example of the narrator/ RPG manager card that uses an example with those species in it, but even when I erased those I think the species still pop up almost every time. Is there a way to fix or readjust this, and preferably one that doesn't require me to go in and adjust every single Pokemon's lorebook entry and keywords?

>>58857614
Personally I don't think that a lorebook for pokemon is necessary unless it's a new one. Just make a detailed description of the pokemon in the message you're about to send and if the model is smart enough and have a good jailbreak it should respect and follow what you said.

>>58857624
I hear you, I see that what I want isn't quite simple, but a major element I want/need from this roleplay is for the LLM to generate or pick a Pokemon at random or pseudorandom. Usually with slightly offbeat settings, temp or T/P/A settings, I can usually get the LLM to not choose the obvious answer off the bat reasonably enough, however I feel completely brickwalled here. Yes, I'm using an LLM, some spoonfeeding is required to the machine, I just want it to be able to handle THIS aspect behind a curtain well.
What about a second lorebook or statement that perhaps lumps Pokemon into categories, the entries are just a list of the Pokemon but the keywords are on triggers? I can enable lorebook linking/cross-referencing (forgot setting name) and so the AI will understand to check whatever group to pull a random example Pokemon?

>>58857640
Putting them in categories sounds like it could work

File: 2.jpg (182 KB)

182 KB JPG

bump

>>58857295
you'll never get an answer because they all left

>>58857614
probably an issue with the lorebook or with the model you're using just not being creative enough. i did a test on one of my old generic pokemon adventure cards and the first trainer i fought opened with a toxapex.

File: canari gwynn.png (90.6 KB)

90.6 KB PNG

>>58855913
claude isnt updated but just send it a link to the characters wikis and it'll memorize it quickly

>>58846938
Whats is this? Dont look cai, is possible with custom voice of original anime as cai? Or random default female voice?

>>58857295
I didn't, I just tell myself everyday
>I'll get back to it later

>want to go into an rp scenario and be lewd to the max
>end up with it being a wholesome "found family" situation where I'm pseudo adopted
fuck.

>>58845363
All the freedom It's being lost due to so much polarization, censorship, anger, and fear among the people. Similar to what led to the past world war.
The previous decades of freedom and uncensorship are sorely missed. :(

>>58862296
blame it on incels who shoot up schools and liberal white women

>character.ai site works on my phone
>every other site works on my desktop
>character.ai refuses to load on my desktop
I don't understand

>>58862760
Seems skipping the home page and going directly to a chat worked but the home page works on mobile

if you're reading this, you should delete your character ai account. If you're a bot maker, there is no "should" in that sentence. Delete your account. These corpos pandered to the "wider audience" and were rewarded with lawsuits because schizos killed themselves. Don't reward this company after it spit in your face and said they don't need you. Delete your account.

>>58863464
go back to /g/aicg/ or /vg/aicg/ or wherever it is you came from. We don't need to turn the one chill chatbot general into yet another shitflinging fest

>>58863481
It's the Yodayo schizo blatantly trying to take advantage of c.ai drama like he always does.

>>58863481
"chill"? This place is a ghost town kept alive in hopes that maybe another will come along and waste their time helping a company that deserves to burn to the ground limp along another day by providing content that it doesn't deserve. The ones who realized that character should have long been abandoned have done so. Where are the bot makers? They would regularly post but have been absent for going on a month now. They realized it, so why can't you? Let it go. It doesn't need to be held up any longer.

File: imperatorcreator12.png (348.5 KB)

348.5 KB PNG

>>58863512
This guy is probably seething that he can't post "vpcai is dead" on /vg/ anymore.
https://arch.b4k.dev/vg/search/text/vpcai%20is%20dead/order/asc/

File: AI sada.jpg (410.2 KB)

410.2 KB JPG

>>58797590
How about an AI Sada bot?

>>58863512
While it is true that character ai has made some questionable decisions, they at least realized the mistakes they made and adjusted accordingly. It took a bit too long but at least they are working on it. Now that they are telling the underage kids to gtfo, they need to drop the filter (or at the very least offer it behind the paid option to double ensure anyone who slipped through the cracks can't gain access to it)

File: file.png (63.1 KB)

63.1 KB PNG

>>58863500

If someone uploaded a LLM to an artificial body, would that count as an android?

>>58865549
>/vp/ makes Digimon real

>>58865549
We're technologically at that level already. Game freak could theoretically announce tomorrow that they're selling a new line of little robots that look and sound like Pokémon and are powered by an artificial intelligence that makes them act like one

>>58866082
game freak is too busy making an actual video game to bother with such an idea

cyber sex with pokemon

File: file.png (118.3 KB)

118.3 KB PNG

she fumbled me

>>58867124
hey i know this guy!

File: 17660513677120.gif (2.6 MB)

2.6 MB GIF

ohhh they cranked up the fitler fuck

>>58867119
why cross out the creator?

Can't believe you guys keep using cai. Deepseek and Gemini get the job done and sometimes even go futher than what is asked for.

>>58867401
How do you prompt Gemini to be a character chatbot for you?

>>58868051
Maybe you ask nicely?

>>58867401
O OK

File: DeepSeekchan.jpg (278.9 KB)

278.9 KB JPG

>>58867401
DeepSeek is pretty funny sometimes

File: DeepSeekChan2.jpg (104.1 KB)

104.1 KB JPG

>>58869088

>>58867401
I’m assuming neither lets me chat with lolis

>>58869613
Deepseek doesn't give a shit. Maybe it's a little different between hosts, dunno, but while I don't do loli shit, it has given me some heinous theoreticals while being impregnated
I've also seen enough people say they're fine using gemini for lolis as long as you can get around the default censor, which can be more simple than you'd think

Do you guys remember when people were fear mongering on how "nazis" would use the platform to justify censorship or am I the only one that does and I'm having a schizo moment?

>>58870190
I member...

>>58870260
ok, I thought so. I don't want anyone gaslighting me to the contrary.

File: female romance according to chatgpt.jpg (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB JPG

>>58870190
That ain't nothing. Have you read female "romance" literature? Online "Nazi's" are predictable: they're edgy boys who would fold like a lawn chair in the face of a "minority". Female "romance" would involve something like being a pow in a nazi camp and falling in love with her captor.

File: Part 3(2).jpg (887.4 KB)

887.4 KB JPG

end accidentally refreshed the page and lost the chat. I was curious what it would have said about the video game panic

File: the shit you read online sometimes.jpg (87.4 KB)

87.4 KB JPG

There are people who claim to be liberal who roleplay fucking ice agents (and things adjacent) but then get upset their "kink" is discovered by a wider audience and thus need to backtrack to save face. Normally I'd give em a pass and say "that's just the thing they're into", but these people are freaks both inside and out who wouldn't give anyone else the same grace. They shouldn't be taken seriously in any shape, form or fashion.

This is primarily why I personally want ai roleplaying to stay niche so busybodies don't come in and dictate what the "rules of roleplay" should be.

pic related was my reaction when I came across a subreddit called "FuckFascists". Yes, it is exactly what you think it is about.

thank you for listening to my schizo rant

oh, a side note is that they always tend to be white women. I don't know what's in the water they're drinking but I swear white women aret the root causes of problems and have caused more issues in all of history than any other group combined and I will die on that hill.

Not your personal blog retard, no one wants their bot chats leaked just like no one wants their search history leaked

this thread is better as my blog than it is as a constant contender of "which thread can stay in bump hell the longest?"

Post chatlogs retard

*tumble weeds blow by*

>>58873129
if you're going to blogpost at least make it pokemon-related, nobody gives a shit about "female romance literature"

File: Poképark bot idea.jpg (432.9 KB)

432.9 KB JPG

>>58797590
How about a bot about a Poképark?
someone please do something...

>>58874793
Does this have anything to do with Girls Gone Wild? Were those good? I always saw advertising for them on TV as a kid but imagine paying for porn

>>58874811
I think a lot of people tend to forget that the vast majority of the world has only recently had reliable and steady access to the internet. Back in the day, people did pay for porn because you couldn't really get easy access to it like you can nowadays. Why do you think large and booming powerhouses in adult entertainment like hustler or playboy bunny are shells of their former selves? The internet has made ventures such as those out dated due to the amount of free content available at the click of a button. Long story short, was it good? At the time, yes. Now? No. You could easily get the same content for free somewhere on the web. Back then it was a rarity because how little you were exposed to it. It's still the same now but with more cameras showing it off

>>58874840
I mean, people do pay for OnlyFans now, which I never understood until recently, when I saw thumbnails of pokégirls' illustrations that I HAD to get the full versions, but it doesn't accept debit cards, and my bank can take like, 6 months, to approve or not my request for a credit card

>>58875921
just get one of those prepaid gift cards if you want to see it, they accept those

>>58874811
No. How do you get Girls Gone Wild from Poképark? I know there was a hentai where there was a free use theme park, so if you're assosiating exhibitionism with a theme park because chatbots are usually H-focused... but I wouldn't have came a Girls Gone Wild assumption just by looking at Poképark+chatbot AI by itself. So I'm really curious on how your brain associated Poképark with Girls Gone Wild.

>>58876614
>Pikachu and pals go wild

>>58876679
you must understand, cooming has fried people's brains

>>58797590
>>58874793
>>58876614
>>58876679
Do both. Make sfw and nsfw themed Poképarks

Is it just me or is CAI cutting off messages before finishing them a lot more than usual. Not even things that would be getting filtered either

>>58877866
just type out "*continue*" and it'll pick up where the last message left off. It's usually just a token issue

>>58857295
surely they'll be back any day now...

>>58877522
how do you even make an nsfw scenario out of that

>>58879815
Sex tourism but they're pokemon, like that one Pokemon Snap XXX parody from ye olde times

>>58879820
>like that one Pokemon Snap XXX parody from ye olde times
I know I'm getting old when I know what you're talking about

>>58876591
Thanks, I didn't even knew Paypal had these.

File: shirona hoodie.jpg (184.6 KB)

184.6 KB JPG

The voreschizo's request got baleeted. Shame, I was hoping to piss him off with this.
https://character.ai/chat/CA8lC9cPOQ7L9fVfXaPkNp99p9u7ojem54RP4PtPWSk

the botmakers are gone but is rentry anon still around?

>>58882451
new thread

File: 1679162801013829.gif (20.4 KB)

20.4 KB GIF

>>58882080
I am!
(I'll add Aldith to it tomorrow)

>>58882716
We can always count on you rentry anon