Thread #12353627 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: G_ruXm5XwAAVvFf.png (150.1 KB)
150.1 KB PNG
Post that obliterated the Nintenkiddies and vindicated the Atarichads
95 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: wrpgs btfo.png (77.2 KB)
77.2 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>12353862
Speaking of FFIII, found this:
https://10206000949050588919.googlegroups.com/attach/fba20b93e706eddd/ FF3BOGUS.TXT?part=0.1&view=1&vt=ANa JVrGClrOWxUU-m7g3Yo9YgC7gKYDk5igTyR KVF-Q0T1Y9Z3iDM--9BufGnn1EPdGk-OUQQ cb8LgCnbHIud5j3IIziw_sNzjDtdtvQ_-vL aGvq7oWXSaw
>T H E C O M P L E T E L Y B O G U S
> F I N A L F A N T A S Y 3 F A Q ! !
>Sometime in February of '95, Scott Tengelin started a thread on this
newsgroup involving hidden characters in FF3, which were made up.
Since there are so many people out there who have done everything
there is to do in FF3, yet still enjoy the game, the thread became
rather popular. People not only came up with ideas for secret hidden
characters, but also places to get to from other video games and
exciting new endings. I posted to the thread and suggested that
someone make up a Bogus FAQ, which would include all this humorous
and exciting stuff. Then I decided, what the heck, why not me?
Scott and I gathered up all the stuff we'd saved from the thread's
postings, and I organized it, forming a 17K file, and posted it.
Lots of people posted more ideas to the thread and some sent me ideas
directly, so I continued to add them in, all the while organizing,
improving, editing, and adding lots more stuff.
This is actually pretty sweet. Might explain the origin of some of the old rumors (or at least show they were around back then and incorporated into this). Stuff like reviving General Leo with a resurrection potion you get from fighting dragons (platinum dragons here), and walking in circles around Kefka's Tower to unlock something. I remember have heard both of those from other places in the late 90s at least, maybe earlier.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>12354413
Yeah that'd be sweet. This is the peak of that sort of thing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2x3pIvVnP4
Guy not only put Mew under the truck, but made it a virus so it updates other people's games to have Mew under the truck when you trade with them.
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_3274.jpg (377.6 KB)
377.6 KB JPG
>>12353803
>>12354365
As >>12354394 said, the post is from an old BBS (Bulletin Board System). Back before the World Wide Web, you could connect get one of these acoustic coupler modems (pic related) to hook up to your computer, you stick the phone over it and dial the number for the BBS from your phone and run some terminal software on your computer. When the phone connects, it would make sounds like a robot being murdered, the modem would transmit that as data into the computer to display content, and whatever you typed would be turned into similar sounds and sent back out over the phone. And since it was through a phone line only one person could connect to the board at a time so you had to wait your turn if the line was busy. Later they had modem cartridges that plugged into the cartridge slot of your computer and you could connect the phone cable straight into the modem cartridge and dial by typing the address on the computer (these were common on MSX for example).
I don't know the specifics but some of these old BBS' have been archived and you can read their old posts online. The op image is from one of these archives. It's worth mentioning, BBS are still around, and some of them are old legacy boards that have been revived and the old posts from the 80s are available to read. I personally use them, and they're popular in the Commodore/Atari/Tandy communities. You can also connect from a modern computer if you don't want to run an old 8bit machine.
>>
>>
>>
>>12354504(ME)
I forgot to mention, if you have ever used dial-up internet it's basically the same technology: data is transmitted as sound over phone lines. It's quite genius if you think about it. Old computers used sound to save/load data to/from cassette tapes so you could store your programs (unless you had a floppy drive which was faster), and someone had the bright idea to use that functionality in order to make computers communicate with each other.
>>
>>12354434
It's an observation, not an endorsement of monarchy.
>"people that don't believe in sapience champion democracy"
It's true though, many political brains spend all their time crying that someone is influencing the plebs in the wrong way. Like in OP's image. Does this make you uncomfortable?
>>
>>12354512
I think a lot of users here are too young to remember that. It flips every so many years. Back in the 90s it was bored Republican mom's who wanted to ban anything and everything. Pokemon was seen as satanic, card games were evil, and if you played Dungeons and Dragons than you were a freak who murders people in the sewers (or a poor kid who's about to be a victim of that). The punks and the counter culture of that era were all left wing because they were opposed to that stuff. Today it's the lefties who want to censor everything and the republitards who want to uncensor everything.
It's not so much to do with politics and more to do with who is trying to censor stuff.
>>
>>12354518
the person in the OP is your average run-of-the-mill 95 IQ autist that has tantrums when people have interesting differing from their own. the exact kind that this website is infested with. that kind of brain-damaged way of thinking is going to exist regardless of the political system they live under.
what a colossally retarded observation, to think that actually matters. again, go back to your containment board so you and your butt buddies can huff each other's farts about how democracy is sooooo awful. better yet, why don't you go to saudi arabia go live under a monarchy since they're so wonderful? do it faggot, you won't.
>>
>>
>>12354525
All of it lies in letting women and weak men have political power. Women are intrinsically moralist, which is a good thing for a mother to be, and weak men will repeat whatever women want to hear in order to get laid. Throw these inclinations in a godless pluralist society constantly looking for something to ground itself with and increasingly powerful mass communication technology and you get endless finger pointing.
>>
>>
File: 1737041979044.png (314.2 KB)
314.2 KB PNG
>>12354525
>the republitards who want to uncensor everything.
Yes, all those blue states that are nannygating adult con-
Oh...wait...
>>
>>12354542
I mean, you're not exactly wrong but you also seem to be injecting your own politics into it and failing to recognize that 30 years ago it was the church people who were censoring everything. Hell, not even that far back.
Don't think I forget. I clearly remember them trying to ban literally all of the things that kept me from killing myself. I was a "rebel".
>>
>>
File: 1756925505979052.gif (71.4 KB)
71.4 KB GIF
>>12354542
>REEEEEEEEEE WOMEN!
Put a lid on it incel. In fact take this guy's advice >>12354536 and go live in Saudi Arabia if you hate women having rights so much.
>>12354560
The politicians reflect the people that elect them.
>>
>>12354557
I have no politics since I'm not trying to change anyone, just philosophy.
We can go back to Prohibition, anon, for religious women trying to control men through the State. These things are old. It's just that now women aren't particularly religious. The mistake was thinking this was a religious tendency rather than a feminine one.
>>
>>
>>
>>12354567
They often don't though.
>>12354568
My bad, when you said godless I misunderstood what you meant. Yes I agree, prohibition, censoring stuff like Pokemon and D&D, and chopping off kids genitals are all things that happened due to basically the same reason. Religion or lack of it is irrelevant.
>>
>>12354536
>don't you go to saudi arabia go live under a monarchy since they're so wonderful?
>>12354567
Is there an alternate option i can move to if i prefer not being around brown people?
>>
>>12354579
>They often don't though.
In America they do. People are getting exactly what they want. Half the country thinks it's perfectly socially acceptable behavior to act like a brash faggot pissing off everyone around them and that you win when they get mad at you.
>>12354607
>Is there an alternate option i can move to if i prefer not being around brown people?
Nope. Why does that matter? You're around other low IQ individuals like yourself that despise things like egalitarian rights.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: slowny.jpg (683.5 KB)
683.5 KB JPG
Ah sweet a Usenet thread
>>
File: 1764512862410572.gif (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB GIF
would you retarded gorilla ape fuckshuckles shut the fuck up about politics in a fucking /v/ thread about old forum posts? Are you so brain rotted all it takes is seeing a single instance of "conservative" in an image to get you going? get a grip
>>
>>
>>12354696
>slowny gaystation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUzyu8qVNq0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>12354729
Yes.
>>12354748
Usenet is still part of the internet, it just predates the World Wide Web.
>>
>>
>>12354512
I honestly don't even remember politics even mattering that much outside of political freaks.
People back then just treated politicians and politics as clown shit, you didn't need to pick a side. If anything, leftist types were usually hippies, who were severely mocked and ridiculed in the 90s.
It was a magical apolitical time.
And that's why they were scared and had to do everything in order to get us to where we are now.
The guy in the OP pic was just weird, bringing politics onto old console wars
>>
>>12355249
>I honestly don't even remember politics even mattering that much outside of political freaks.
Reagan repealing the Fairness Doctrine which led to 24 hour news networks like CNN and Fox News changed all that. They have demonstrably been some of the most evil institutions of the past half century.
>>
>>
>>
File: gUI8gt.gif (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB GIF
>>12354734
>rightoidwe're making fun of you btw
>>
>>
>>
>>12354197
>>12354512
>when you see it with a modern lens
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1768166626890417.jpg (99.4 KB)
99.4 KB JPG
>>12353627
I always hate how these cherrypicked flamewars are used as a basis of "see? this is what forum conversations were like back in the Usenet days!!!" Yes, people like that existed, but were still marginal in discussion.
>>
>>12360318
That's just how the double digit IQs that infest 4chan populate. They think their sample size of 1 is indicative of an entire trend. The worst is
>well i didn't experience it so it didn't happen/doesn't exist!
>>
>>
>>12360318
I'm not convinced there was ever constructive or informative discussion on the internet between people at any point in time and the only way people ever spread useful information is on personal sites, someone monologuing on a forum or in video form. Every time you get a discusson forum with a useful thread it's the OP with a name like dsk_22, member for 24 years, 86 posts dropping a complete breakdown of what the front panel circuit communicates with on the original Xbox for revisions 1.0-1.6 and listing out part numbers and circuit diagrams he put together in his own free time. The only "discussion" you ever see in these cases is replies asking for someone else to do it.
Discussion is a meme, it's all about declaration. Declaration is declared so the mice can "discuss." Unaware they are irrelevant.
>>
>>
>>12360358
Rs were never cool, though. They never had powers to trick kids into thinking they were. That's the part of the post where the commie/hippie/loser morph of leftists reveals his delusional victim mindset. I bet you anything that's what provoked the other anon to call it out.
>>
File: 1748038461722292.png (10.4 KB)
10.4 KB PNG
>>12353627
>>
>>12353667
You have consider the time period to put what he's saying in context. Back then, left-wing was hippies and right-wing was "greed is good" / '80s business guy capitalism/consumerism. He's not saying that Nintendo are nazis, he's probably just mad that they're marketing shit at children to turn them into life-long consumers. He'd probably have the same complaints about sugary cereals and Saturday morning cartoons.
>>
>>
>>12362751
No that's the problem.
You had to be a delusional leftist/commie with a victim complex to believe that right-wingers were in any way cool or had any serious influence among young people in 1989.
Today it's the other way around. At least far moreso than it's been in century.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>12354504
actually these are from an early part of the internet called USENET. USENET began in the 80s and propagated across bulletin board systems, as well as the early commercial online services (Compuserve, GEnie, etc).
Anyway, at some point in the 90s a website called Deja News started archiving everything on USENET except binaries and posts that used a header X-No-Archive: Yes. Eventually Google bought Deja News and over time turned it into "Google Groups" which they eventually killed, but they still kept the old archives from USENET (but with the really shitty search system they designed for Google Groups).
Generally these archives are where all these famous ancient shitposts (like Mifflin Devin) come from
>>
>>12354557
The church people and the wokescolds are 2 flavors of the same people.
Women and womanbrained men. So on the right it's mainly actual women (church ladies), on the left its a mixture of fat fugly feminists, trannies, and faggots ruining things.
Both are primarily women trying to take men's fun away, and it's been that way since the 1910s at least.
>>
>>
>>