Thread #12361041 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: timthumb.jpg (93.7 KB)
93.7 KB JPG
Does the original Metal Gear Solid hold up still?
49 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>12361041
if you accept what it is, a visual novel anime with some novelties breaking it up, I would say yes. the story is supported by extremely competent art design/production and the gameplay is largely an inoffensive mix of gimmicks and puzzles. you can call it shallow but I don't think you can call it bad.
>>
>>
>>
File: Metal-Gear-Rex.jpg (140.5 KB)
140.5 KB JPG
>>12361041
Yup.
>>
>>12361320
msx games are light on cutscenes and shitty stealth, mgs is ok because the characters are interesting and controls work fine. everything after that leans more into stealth which mgs never does well and controls and stories only get worse. snake's revenge may be the best entry in the entire franchise.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1645647615124.gif (60.2 KB)
60.2 KB GIF
>>12361082
Konami literally remade Castlevania 1 as another 2D game and called it Castlevania IV
>>
>>
File: 1653870614384.jpg (181.2 KB)
181.2 KB JPG
>>12361332
>stealth which mgs never does well
My 100% camo index begs to differ
>>
>>
>>12361041
Yes, it's still my favorite in the series.
Unmatched visual aesthetics and atmosphere.
Areas are a blast to explore with some cool stuff to find.
Not exactly the most complex stealth game but has varies and addictive, fast-paced gameplay with plenty of cool tricks to pull of.
Memes about the story and cinematic parts aside it's just genuinely a fantastic game.
>>
>>
>>
>>12362351
Twin Snakes is absolute fucking trash. It ruins the cutscenes with stuff that's over the top even in the context of MGS and makes the game disgustingly easy by giving you access to first person aiming in environments and against enemies where it was never a consideration. The re-recorded voice acting is also massively inferior and everybody sounds bored.
It would have been roundly shit upon had it released on the PS2, but of course Tendies had to defend it to try and pretend that the GameCube had received some meaningful third party support for once.
>>
>>
>>
>>12362464
>The re-recorded voice acting is also massively inferior and everybody sounds bored.
it cannot be overstated how ridiculously terrible some of the line reads in the twin snakes are, before I had actually sat down and played through a chunk of the game I had just assumed that the delivery would naturally be muted, phoned in, soulless...but acceptable, something that could be handwaved as not that bad, "the new gray fox is good, the translation is more accurate"
some of the stuff that got ok'd for the game is legitimately unprofessional, like fail the nintendo seal of quality bad, out takes that got mistakenly put into the game. arguing that the presentation is an acceptable substitute for the original is insane, I know that now.
>>
>>12362491
that is pretty pathetic because mgs1's normal mode is too soft if anything. boss damage doesn't keep up with the life bar and the /5 ration count you have at the end of the game, it should have been balanced to be a little tighter.
>>
>>
>Does the original Metal Gear Solid hold up still?
Nope. Never was good.
It's the original Sony movie game and is pure cancer.
2 minutes of boring gameplay followed by 2 minutes of boring custccene/dialogue rinse and repeat
>>
>>
>>
File: myw44qwo8z061.jpg (105.1 KB)
105.1 KB JPG
>>12361089
I first played Twin Snakes about 7-years ago after having played the original MGS all the way through at least 10 times in the late 90s/early 2000s; in no way is Twin Snakes better than the original. I would argue even the grungy PS1 graphics are superior in terms of aesthetics and atmosphere. And somehow they got everybody back a few years later to re-record all the voice acting and the performances were way worse. It was an amazing oppurtunity that was squandered, imagine a RE1 Remake style situation where the remake is so good that it basically makes the original game obsolete.
>>
File: harro.png (24.8 KB)
24.8 KB PNG
>>12361041
It wasn't even good when it came out so no. Play Twin Snakes instead.
>>
>>12361082
MGS1 is more of a soft reboot than a sequel, basically every time they reference the events of MG2 in the game what they're referencing is either completely made up or some kind of retcon
>how did h get away with it?
MG2 was 8 years old at that point and had never been released in the West, chances are that most people who played MGS1 on launch (even in Japan) had never played MG2.
>>
>>
>>12361082
>parroting a meme from early 00
If you weren't a zoomer faggot and played MG2, you would know this isn't true.
MGS actually reused some ideas from MG1 while expanding the gameplay of MG2.
And Kojima was aware that MG1 and 2 were obscure so he changed the game name from MG3 to Solid to make it accessible for new people, so it's not weird that he wanted to redo some ideas.
>>
I ignored the series because sneaking up on a computer script always struck me as very stupid and boring
if I'm going to fight a computer script, I want to fight it, not watch it move around and then stab it in the back
at least give it some chance to fight back
>>
Yeah. I like MGS2 and 3 more but MGS1 is still great. The stealth mechanics are simple but well though-out, everything is satisfying to do, and how short it actually is makes it easy to jump back in for another replay just to try out something different.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>12364269
I know everyone says its MG2, but to me its more of a MG1 remake
>start off by swimming
>fight a helicopter
>go to the basement and blow up walls
>fight a tank
>use guided missile to disable electronic floor
>got to rescue captives
>mine fields
>main villain is manipulating you on radio
I get that MGS1 has a lot of story references to things that happened in MG2, I just don't see how MGS1 isn't more of a remake of MG1.