i think both are good :)

>>2325576
I think both are bad ):

I think both are average :|

I have no particular opinion on any of them.

File: 0852ydfh59302hf87340202jhd.jpg (277.8 KB)

277.8 KB JPG

As a seasoned GT player who played everything they made, including all DLC, I'm thinking about writing, recording and editing a comprehensive video tutorial series for Graviteam. Nobody else seems to have attempted this, just a few often incorrect tutorial videos exist focused on specifics like artillery, and some.

List the areas that new players struggle with most. Also, how best to structure such a series?

>>2325576
Wanted to get into these graviteam games then I saw that unit deployment shit with the squares on the ground and noped out

File: 1767835196777374.jpg (140.7 KB)

140.7 KB JPG

>>2328678
-not sure how to load my infantry into transport vehicles.
-struggling to understand how the radio/communication mechanics work.
-It's difficult to figure out when it's best to use orders and which in def and assault.
-Artillery seems to work, but im no clue to actually understand the mechanics.
-how to win an engagement with flamethrower units?

>>2328678
>do all that
>andre changes the entire game again

File: 3322.png (58 KB)

58 KB PNG

Reminder that the CM team is nothing but late-war fags who REFUSE to give us the Battle of France for some reason

>>2328678
>just a few often incorrect tutorial videos
Most of them are incorrect because there's been a few engine overhauls that have changed things a lot. I've seen the same for Combat Mission too.
>>2329495
Graviteam is early war, but they're slavoids on a mission to document every single minor engagement that happened on the eastern front.

>>2328678
I'm good with most of it now, but I remember having some issues with artillery, spotting generally, and communications generally. There were a lot of times that I thought on map fire support should have been firing, but they weren't.

>>2328678
I learned a lot from messing about in the battle editor. You could show how to set up simple scenarios for various aspects of the game to play around with.

File: ff11.jpg (204.4 KB)

204.4 KB JPG

Anyone here played Firefight?

it's a little known banger WW2 based real time tactical game made by a lone dev. 2D top down like Close Combat, with fairly simple mechanics and surprising tactical depth. Still being improved with an active modding community. I recommend it to anyone who enjoys these games.

Here's a great tutorial for infantry tactics that gives an idea of how it works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvG-U8VY-KY

>>2329495
I think it's just easier to work with.
As fun it would be I don't know how the game would be like in a desert environment, considering the master maps would probably be what half the maps in large scenarios would look like
Maybe in CM3

File: 160f8788c23cb345bf89635fb445436cfb776de467afe1fce0eb6063ca03c5bb.jpg (197.9 KB)

197.9 KB JPG

>>2333219
I think it's just easier for them to copy+paste PzIVs and Shermans for 80% of the vehicle roster.
>I don't know how the game would be like in a desert environment
It apparently worked fine before on the old engine

>>2328678
Give me your expert opinion on the AI, I always felt that Graviteam

a) plays itself when it works and you have very little impact
b) the enemy either does nothing or just walks or drives towards you