Thread #41910321 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: one_aperture.png (28.1 KB)
28.1 KB PNG
Why am I me instead of you?
>we're all masks of God playing as many all at once.
Why am I experiencing this mask instead of another mask?
>God placed your soul in this body
Why am I this soul instead of another soul?
>you're just a brain. materialism.
Why am I experiencing this brain instead of another brain?
>no reason. is what it is
Something cannot come from nothing. If you say it is what it is, then you'll have to say that for the question of why does anything exist instead of nothing.
12 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: 2026-02-03-19:42:43_screenshot.png (822.6 KB)
822.6 KB PNG
>>
File: egocentric chad.png (420.6 KB)
420.6 KB PNG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugAx8seqlL0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ709yH9NqY
>>
>The Glitch: But where is the computer that runs the Code? Anon’s point stands: Why is there a Computer at all?
Answer: Because if there wasn't, you wouldn't be here to ask the question. ( The Anthropic Principle). But that feels like a cope.
>>
https://unfinishablemap.org/topics/vertiginous-question/
>Every attempt to answer the vertiginous question seems to miss its target.
>The biological answer: “You are this person because of your DNA, your developmental history, your particular brain.” But this explains how I came to exist as a distinct organism—not why I am experiencing being this organism rather than another. Someone else could have had this DNA, this brain. What makes the experience mine?
>The psychological answer: “You are this person because of your memories, personality, and psychological continuity.” But memories and personality are contents of experience, not what makes it my experience. Two people could hypothetically have identical memories; the question of which one I am would remain.
>The deflationary answer: “There is no further fact. ‘Why am I this person?’ is like asking ‘Why is this spot here?’—the question presupposes something mysterious where there’s only a brute particular.” But this dismissal doesn’t dissolve the sense that something demands explanation. I don’t merely happen to be this person; I live as this person, from the inside. That lived reality seems to be a fact—but what kind of fact?
>The vertiginous question reveals that first-person indexicality (“I,” “mine,” “here,” “now”) may be irreducible. You cannot translate first-person facts into third-person facts without losing something essential.
>>
File: 1751162991205391.jpg (87.2 KB)
87.2 KB JPG
>Something cannot come from nothing
Correct
>why does anything exist instead of nothing.
Because something is the default not a result of something else. You are working with a false premise that something must comes from something else.
The truth is something or anything is just is.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: universeorigin7.jpg (2.9 MB)
2.9 MB JPG
>>41910568
Take the Zero Ontology pill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdDNfTREQJU