Thread #83785957 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
>type
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
>What's your biggest cope right now?
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.

>Sakinorva tests
https://sakinorva.net/functions
>attitudinal type/nu-psychosophy
https://www.attitudinalpsyche.com/take-the-test/
>16 personalities (the best test)
https://www.16personalities.com/
>MBTI test (don't screen cap your IP btw)
https://jupiter-34.appspot.com
>Jungian types tl;dr
https://wikisocion.github.io/content/psychological_types.html
>Big 5
https://www.personalityassessor.com/big-five2/
>paste your old messages and get typed
https://www.uclassify.com/browse/g4mes543/myers-briggs-type-indicator-text-analyzer?input=Text
>Associative MBTI/Jungian test
https://watchwordtest.com/wtitle2.html
>Turbie-Wurbie's Cutesy Test Link Compilation! UwU:
https://web.archive.org/web/20231220103736/https://pastebin.com/QK0uSJaT

Previous: >>83758169
+Showing all 523 replies.
>>
>>83785957
>>type
ESFP-T
>>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
Too much intake of junk food and sugary beverages.
>>What's your biggest cope right now?
That the government is going to get less retarded.
>>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
She'd be over the moon to learn how good things will go.
>>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
Yes and Yes.
>>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
Too many to narrow down; plus I'm going to bed.
>>
>>83785988
>Going to bed
NOOO ESFP-T-chan you can't. I wanna hear funny stories.
>>
>>83785988
>>83786002
Let her sleep chud.
>>
>>83785957
>type
INTP
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
Gooning to trannys
>What's your biggest cope right now?
4chan. I use it to ignore reality.
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
Wouldn't be surprised at all
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
No
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
I told a girl I liked, I could eat 3 hamburgers at once so took 3 McDonald's burgers smashed them into a wad and ate them. She went "EW!" And laughed at me. Then for the rest of high school she called me "the trash bin".
>>
Is Frieren INTP though? Wouldn't she be INFJ?
>>
>>83786055
She is typed INTP 5W4
>>
Early bird gets the buckshot.

>>83785957
This presumably is not the OP that requested to bake.
Know what made me guess so?

>>type
INTJ IN(T) 583 5w6 sx/sp VLEF
>>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
I got rid of psychological one this morning. The active imagination tribunal was very pleased with the SACRIFICE.
>>What's your biggest cope right now?
My anti-migraine meds.
>>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
"Oh NO... Oh, okay."
>>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
>>83743925

>>83785418
>Not quite. Could be directionally correct, depending on what you mean.
>But it's more like releasing control, rather than applied effort.
Control release definitely takes at least meta-effort if that already counts as release.

>The thing that kills a symbol (in the negative sense)
Ok but a negative killing is only in perception when the improved symbol version seems less accessible for no differentiated reason to seem so, no?

Primitive's symbols are very accessible to undifferentiated approaches, but what we see with differentiation is just some scribbles. Meanwhile the undifferentiated would see crazy overcomplications even in simplified contents from the differentiated.
Actually, there's effectively no good symbolic-makings, because even a proper new symbol will be eventually found to be inaccessible for at least someone. Blame Jung on him not thinking this through.

>When the ego is willing to receive from a symbol, the symbol will revive itself. The symbol is not a product of the ego. The ego is the receiver
Ego does not have executive function just to throw it away just because. Actually, that's ego inflation to consider that the ego is so special that it has to be magically excluded.
Because holistic participation means EVERYTHING is participating.
We're not doing new age spirituality woo here.
>>
>>83785957
Funnily enough Owls are dumb as shit while sheep dogs are at least average-tier in intelligence
>>
>>83785957
>type
INTP
>Most shameful habit
Always has been procrastinating, always will be
>Biggest cope
4chan
>What would my 18 year old self think
pleasantly suprised, I guess. Things are still down the gutter but not as bad as when I was 18.
>Will you ever ahve sex
No. I will be almost totally alone forever, and will likely die alone.
>Worst failure
Failing basically everything in my sophomore year in highschool other than my regular grades. I was intelligent but that broke me.
>>
>>83786145
you're an edgy fag.
>>
Tell me how I know you're SEA
>>
>hurr durr I'm... le psychotic!
ok retard
>>
It's diarygirl doing it btw.
>>
>type
INTP-T
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
nicotine addiction
>What's your biggest cope right now?
hoping all the indians will leave canada
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
"seems about right"
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
yeah
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
getting groomed on roblox in 2010
>>
>>83786135
>>83786159
>>83786173
>>83786207
This is why i feel nothing when a pitbull rips off a baby's face. The entire human race deserves punishment for their crimes against the doge
>>
>>83786285
>hoping all the indians will leave canada
That's racist. You have to support 20 million Indians moving in a year or you're pro-American and hate Canada.
>>
Do yall actually believe in MBTI or do you just find it entertaining?
>>
File: Oyy vey.jpg (268.7 KB)
268.7 KB
268.7 KB JPG
https://voca.ro/158KCd3PJYap
>>83786243

Yap Yap!
>>
>>83786371
Yeah, LMAO I "believe" in MBTI, I believe it exists and is a concept. Lol it's glorified astrology for nerds who think they're too smart for actual astrology.
It's peak Barnum/Forer effect. You read some vague word salad like "you sometimes struggle with details but have big ideas" or "you're logical but can be insensitive hurr" and your brain goes "holy shit that's literally me!!!" Same shit as horoscopes telling a room full of people "you have insecurities you've never told anyone" and everyone nods like "damn how did they know." Except MBTI dresses it up in fake jungian function stack cope so zoomers on /r9k/ and reddit can LARP as special snowflakes with "deep" personalities.
>>
The 'vague word salad' you're quoting is the 16Personalities trash tier website shit not actual cognitive function theory.
Introverted Intuition (Ni) vs. Extroverted Sensing (Se) isn't about 'big ideas' vs 'details' it fucking a framework for how the brain prioritizes information processing. Is it a perfect 1:1 map of the human psyche? NO. But it's a useful heuristic for understanding why some people lead with logic (Thinking) and others lead with values (Feeling).
>>
>>83786243
>It's diarygirl doing it btw
I'm curious to know why you think this at this point.
>>
>>83786423
It's a troll just trying to drum up shit.
>>83786418
Actually, it's hilarious that you think moving from 16Personalities to 'Cognitive Functions' makes you an intellectual. You're just trading a mainstream horoscope for a 'deep-cut' one. Calling Ni/Se a 'framework for information processing' is just using pseudo-scientific jargon to mask the fact that Jungian typology has zero empirical backing. You're essentially defending the 'purity' of a 100-year-old theory that modern neuroscience doesn't even recognize. Leading with 'Thinking' vs 'Feeling' isn't a heuristic; it's a false dichotomy. Real human cognition is a messy, interconnected web, not a tidy little stack of four functions you can swap out like RAM sticks in a PC. You're not 'mapping the psyche,' you're just playing a more complex version of 'Which Hogwarts House Are You?' But sure, go off about your 'superior' Ni-dom processing. I'm sure it's very useful for winning imaginary arguments on the internet lol.
>>
>>83786466
> sure it's very useful for winning imaginary arguments on the internet lol.
>>
Why would diarygirl do this if she hates gore?
>>
>>83785957
intj
suicidal tendencies. they've gotten really bad. also self harm. i havent done it in about a year but it was bad last time.
18 year old me would genuinely off himself. our life is pathetic and we're everything we hated and never wanted to be. for example i am attracted to feet now. we used to hate that shit.
not again, no. i hate sex in the past but i had a big std scare and refuse to fuck since.
i guess best copy pasta would be i can't last more than 10 thrusts which is another reason i stopped fucking.
>>
>>83786503
I have my own reason to believe
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRAkYY5S/
>>
Let's let the thread die for a few weeks in the hopes posting quality improves.
>>
>>83785957
>type
Entj
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
Laziness, which just leads to spiraling into total despair.
>What's your biggest cope right now?
In the end, all the effort and suffering will have been worth it.
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
Disappointed that I'm unmarried, don't run my own business, and am fat
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
Yes and I already have (though I regret it)
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
I don't know, and I don't really feel like blog posting either beyond what I already have answered above.
>>
NO! its SOPHIE!
>>
File: mint.jpg (44.8 KB)
44.8 KB
44.8 KB JPG
Its 100% diarygirl:
>The only time she's complained about gore it WASN'T her tripcode.

>She posted that she used to play with toy dogs by "smashing their skulls" and linked video about toy dogs bloody and killed in a pretend columbine:
https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83715155/#q83736263

>The only time she's specifically mentioned gore, she said:
"graze the gnostics garden ,grafiee the gospl with gore aand WATCH as senderman snd you into a Shizophrnic simulation gougineging your 1% gist of genuinity"
>Which translates to: "Forget your morals and your sense of self. I'm going to ruin everything you find holy and watch GORE until you lose your mind in a digital nightmare until the tiny bit of 'real' personality you have left is gone."
https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/83715155/#q83728562

>Finally, diarygirl has actually posted gore (albiet pics of herself cutting)
tl:dr
Diarygirl admited she was gonna post gore, then she post about wanted to smash the skulls of toy dogs. Case closed.
>>
>>83785957
Can someone explain why INFP has an egg
I don't get it
>>
Have you ever thought about building a robot wife and giving her the keys to your chastity cage?
>>
>>83786644
It's a plain no frills slightly depressing food ironically called "sunny side up". It vibes with the INFP: plain no frills slightly depressing person who at best could only pretend to be happy.
>>
>>83786681
I guess but I feel like it makes less sense than the others
Almost feels like it fits ISFJ better
The INFP food should be antidepressants lol
>>
I don't think Robots, like Chat GPT are actually capable of dominating, like in a psychological way because you have to give them permission for everything. Sure they could kill the whole world and destroy everything, but sexual domination is a domain that a character bot can never really do
>>
>>83786371
The idea was entertaining for quite a lengthy amount of time, at least 10+ whole years of my life. However I decided to eventually drop it for higher faithfulness to Jung's original typology and have helped develop the alternative theories people are using today ITT, along with alll the other Jungians who brought up various issues in the modern systems.
So currently, the answer would be "no, but Jung himself was onto something for real and you can build a working theory of types staying as close as possible to the original text", it's not just for fun anymore, now it's a settled valid idea for me.
It is very evident to me that there are really people who habitually fit into either extraversion/introversion, and they mainly go by one rational function, Thinking or Feeling, and one irrational function, Sensation and Intuition. It also evident enough that one function is the actual guiding principle: for some people their reality is identical to Thinking, for others it's Intuition etc. at least from the Ego standpoint.
>>
Incredibly bizarre shit is going on
>>
Also
>but they aren't real dichotomies!
Objective(as in, faithful to something external as far as humanly possible) and Subjective(read: "subjective factor" to understand exactly how the term is used here though) are, and that's what extraverts and introverts are in a nutshell.

The conflict between Thinking and Feeling is the most archetypal shit ever. Read something, watch some anime, idfk it's everywhere.
I summon Ben Shapiro in attack position and activate his effect: "Facts don't care about your feelings", and conversely feelings wouldn't care about facts. I summon the concept of Eros and Logos. Genuinely the most obvious dichotomy ever here.

Sensation and Intuition require more explanation I guess.
I see it this way: when you have a hunch about something, that's a mental image that you try to "perceive", and to do that you have to temporarily replace the image received from sensory perception instead, making the former the conscious content of your psyche while the latter is thrown in the background(despite the fact that your senses are still working).
And if you want to grasp at reality as is right now, you chase away the "fantasy" and just literally observe it through your senses, making sure the image you receive in your psyche becomes identical with sense perception(as far as possible still).

If the objection is something more like
>but no one is exclusively introverted or a thinker!
That's true and Jung himself said so. The type is both about psychological habits, and in a way also a construct of the Ego. There is such a thing as a "conscious standpoint" directed by your will, showing a higher degree of differentiation, and the more accidental/unconscious factors showing more primitive undifferentiated instincts.

Don't know if the skeptical anon will even bother changing his mind, but hey I get the chance to write this to whoever is interested.
>>
PS: sensation isn't always concrete even if it's easy to be fooled into thinking that. "Aesthetics" in the common sense of the word are abstract sensation, very much still related to the sensory but in a more ideational way as opposed to "merely reproducing reality"(or the apprioriate subjective impression attached to it) way. There is a will behind it, a selectiveness that's not accidental anymore, the typical signs of a differentiated function. The biggest mistake MBTI does is forgetting this aspect of Sensation, which is rather attractive both to the Sensation types themselves, and Intuitoids can only wish they had that since their sensation function sucks cocks by definition.
>>
>>83787794
Cock and balls that's what this all boils down to.
>>
>>83787850
Go back being dead, Freud.
Though, actually you have to thank both Freud and Adler for Psychological Types. Jung got his inspiration specifically from seeing both of their psychologies, both the dicks and the power complexes, as valid in a very introverted thinkoid sense, as in internally consistent and logically correct.
>>
>watch an anime
>See the credits are nothing but Korean names
I feel like I was taken for ride. I was robbed of my dignity as a man.
>>
>>83787872
Frued gave the best explanation for foot fetishes tho. Theyre a guy desperately trying to find a penis on a woman, so they put it on the feet.
>>
Animes are such bullshit.
A bunch of women living together that are after the same man and they're not at each other's throat causing shit tons of drama every day. Give me a break.
>>
>>83787903
Oh there are people who are indeed trying to look for cocks in women, but have you considered the fact I'm NOT A GAY COCK-MONGLING FAGGOT like YOUR INTROVERTED FEELOID ASS, eh Freud? Sticking magical rods into magical keyholes to fill cute girls with magic is more of my style you see. Have I already told you the magician and its trickster subtype are my favorite archetypes by the way?

>>83787920
Maybe don't watch harem shit then.
t. magical girl enjoyer, either no men in sight(which means /u/-coded as fuck), or straight shoujo romance
>>
Women living together and working together for the sake of one man is natural through all of human history though. It's the reason chad gets all the girls and you're a perpetual loser on r9k
>>
>>83787794
But are aesthetics REALLY strictly tied to sensation or the 4 functions per se?
It seems to me that any function's contents could very well be aesthetically rated based around (not not exclusively) the function's principles.

>There is a will behind it, a selectiveness that's not accidental anymore,
Entelechy per se fits this description, isn't tied to any function, would explain what the aesthetic sense of the person is based on after the content differentiations are done.
>the typical signs of a differentiated function

>>83787518
Typology?
>>
>>83788146
>But are aesthetics REALLY strictly tied to sensation or the 4 functions per se?
Actually not. Common way to use the word is related to sensory aesthetics but that is not the only form. Though I don't have a strict category of aesthetics per function, or attitude-type.

>Typology?
It's Jungian because muh enantiodromia of course.
>>
Speaking of types and magical grills...

>IN(T) magical fairy pet + magical girl rolled into one
>pretty unique character both in terms of typing and her technically having two roles that are often separate
>also generally the most developed in terms of character progression
>community reaction to her is mostly negative, they tend to find her morally questionable, some claim she ruined the show purely by being in it, and I even heard her being called more villainous than the actual villains
.. so I guess that counts as her type bering written properly.
Eh seriously though, the problem is that she showed her shadow sensation/feeling quite blatantly and even after her redemption arc, her sense of right and wrong is huh...the undifferentiated feeling kind. Seriously she suggested kidnapping Santa Claus, what the fuck.
>>
>>83785957
>type
INFJ-A
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
That's hard to say, I don't really think of things as habits and the moment I stop liking a "habit", I just stop.
I probably have some mental habits, habitual perspectives, you could say, that cause problems. But, I wouldn't say I'm ashamed of them.
>What's your biggest cope right now?
I'm not one for copes. To me, coping is a release of mental tension through some sort of action. Which just means whatever causes the mental tension remains the same, now you're just ignorant to it.
That's gay.
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
"Why'd we stop playing video games for 18 hours a day and smoking weed?!?"
Prolly.
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
Sure, why not? It's not like it's some big sekret klub that's mega gatekept. It's just sex.
Even literal retards have sex. Ever been to an assisted living house for people with intellectual disabilities?
They're fucking all the time.
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
This is another one I don't really get. I don't think at things as failures. I don't look at the world and my interaction(s) with it like a grade school assignment I'm handing into the teacher.
It's a ..... How would I say that.. What I mean is that the process of action is far more important than whatever outcome happens or doesn't.
>>
>Ever been to an assisted living house for people with intellectual disabilities?
Woaaaaah INFJ-A dont overshare!
>>
>take the Moore-based archetype test
>all scales are in the active shadow form
Thankfully I'm a sensible theory enjoyer, not an internet test [sic!] enjoyer, so I can be in denial of all of it in a Moore-approved way.
Funny thing is I think that result is a direct translation of getting ENFJ-A result on 16p.
Also having to make an account for the results is very gay but at least it's not paywalled.
I'll take 16p as an experiment, since it's a big 5 workplace persona test anyway.
...
Yup, ENFJ-A.
>MY SCHEDULED MODUS OPERANDI? WALK UP TO A POLICE OFFICER. THANK HIM FOR HIS HARD WORK. SLAP HIS ASS. HAVE US ORGANIZE A COCAINE PARTY, FOR THE COMMUNITY.
Yup-yup, yup.
Anyhow, this brought something actually good I ought to process.

>>83788429
>>community reaction to her is mostly negative, they tend to find her morally questionable, some claim she ruined the show purely by being in it, and I even heard her being called more villainous than the actual villains
If she were a main character like Homura (IN(T)) everyone would've liked her easily (possibly).
Sounds absolutely awkward so I guess I WILL have to watch Kimi to Idol at some point, putting it into my currently empty backlog.
>>
>>83788878
I have a retarded cousin lmao
I've seen some shit
>>
>>83788879
>If she were a main character like Homura (IN(T)) everyone would've liked her easily (possibly).
Not sure. She isn't part of the main trio but she does get a lot of focus and a character arc.
Homura is certainly more likeable though, and her typing was pretty much what I also guessed.
>>
Hes neeeeeeeeeeever had sex you guys
>>
>>83788902
Thank god, his genes probably have inferior thinking too.
>>
INFJ-A is a bitchless sexless virgin, is he that ugly?
>>
>type
INFP
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
overthinking/ruminating
>What's your biggest cope right now?
that the people who bullied me live shittier lives than me so i shouldn't be so upset
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
ashamed but also proud i hope
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
i don't think i'll ever find true love, it's a nice fantasy at least
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
too many to think of at the top of my head
>>
>>83788910
He cant think his way into a bath no way he gonna think into a pussy
>>
>>83788912
yes that is why he Eroleplays as alastor with underage little girls
>>
You're just mad I eroleplayed with someone that isn't (u)
mad jelly
>>
>>83788896
You stuck around late-night to hear the sloppy sex the wall over? Riiiiiight
>>
>>83788961
Im so jealous this hairy slimy hunk paid a prostitute to assist in his little 4chan thread drama, like a mama, mama hop on call
>>
>>83785957
>type
ISTP
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
consuming porn and being a lazy nigger
>What's your biggest cope right now?
Everything will get better
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
I'm 19, I probably would think the same about me
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
I could have sex easily if I took care of myself and grew some balls
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
>be me
>be with friends in a party
>we start drinking, all goes well
>my friend starts giving me more alcohol, already feeling pretty drunk
>when we finished the first bottle, my other friend brings out another bottle
>we start smashing it, it was so good, it tasted like candy
>I probably smashed 200ml of that bottle
>feeling alright at that point
>then it kicks off
>everything goes black, then when I wake up, I'm in the floor surrounded by 5-7 people yelling about calling an ambulance
>I'm sitting on my own vomit and the only thing I can do is puke even more
>One foid I have next to me is yelling at me trying to wake me up because I kept getting out of reality
>black out again
>suddenly I'm on a train station with my friends again, sitting, smelling like shit and passer by's are laughing at me with how bad I smell
>I feel a lot better so I reach my pocket for a cigarette
>It's all mush
>go back home in train, wake up next day with the worst hung over of my life
This was the time where my life really hit a max low, since then I don't drink as often and as regularly and I'm trying to do better with my life, I'm going to start doing exercise and try to do my first pull up because I am such a fat nigger and I ate more than what I had to eat on these holidays lole
>>
>>83788962
LATE NIGHT?? LOL
You think the people who will walk behind a couch and literally shit on the floor while there's people sitting on the couch wait until late night to have sex? You think they do it BEHIND CLOSED DOORS?
Any time you walk into a room there's a 70% chance you'll see someone shitting or fucking.
You've never met a real retard. You should count yourself lucky.
>>83788974
I paid her in discord gift cards and told her DO NOT REDEEM SIR
DO NOT REDEEM
That's why she deleted me and got so mad.
>>
My overcompensated Sensation is very amused with thread juxtaposition between primitive sex discussions and the animal abuse material spam, and my barely differentiated Feeling is displeased with y'all!

>>83787782
>"Facts don't care about your feelings", and conversely feelings wouldn't care about facts. I summon the concept of Eros and Logos. Genuinely the most obvious dichotomy ever here.
If entelechy of one changes the contents of reality and thus the entelechy possibility of the other, the other will absolutely care though.

In practical human interaction sense, too.
I think this is fun to bring up.
>>
>be INFJ-A
>be intellectually immobilized
>be chronic 4channer refreshing threads like crypto trends
>roleplay as edgy teenage girls tulpa oc
>entire legacy lives on 4chan
>has accumulated 300k settlement in (you)s
>hairy and slimy
>ugly boy no sex
>i sense a crooked nose also
>weird fixation with minor mind manipulation
But!
>this minor want me so major

> You've never met a real retard
well! then, shake my hand, retard
>>
I smgile evertim
>>
mel seething she's old
>>
>>83788879
>Sounds absolutely awkward so I guess I WILL have to watch Kimi to Idol at some point, putting it into my currently empty backlog.
Oh and, replying again since I'd like to add at least a few thoughts on the show now that's fully over, just to not give inflated expectations from my general appreciation of the genre.

>the good
Moment-to-moment content is fun, each episode is easy to enjoy individually, it is very cute as you would expect from combining magical girls and idols together, you get some cuteception for sure.
The protagonist image song (egao no yunizon/smiling unison) is actually high on the list of the songs I like from the franchise(below Heartcatch OP though), the others are all decent to good too.
There are some decently animated fights and if you like shield shenanigans, one of the cures will start getting creative with her shield after a bunch of eps.
As for Meroron, she has more depth than the average despite coming across as one-note at the start, though I will mention what's the average here later... Actual favorite character is Kokoro/Kyunkyun tho, her type is very easy to guess.

>the bad
Where do I even begin.
Without spoilers, let's say the average I mentioned above is fairly low and that's very true for the protagonist herself.
The overarching narrative is all over the place and annoyingly non-committal, if they ever bring something interesting up they will try to return to status quo fairly quickly EXCEPT with Meroron. They really are reluctant to add some real tension.
And finally, despite my best attempt at not sounding too stereotypical... the sheer amount of wasted potential with the idol theme holy fucking shit.

Overall it vibes with my inferior Si-groidism but my superior Ne-groidoid brain is quite disappoint.
>>
>Be infj-a
>Little underage girl enters thread
>Have blueprint on your shitpost multiverse saga
>Really proud/ that hill you die on is a 4chan shitpost
>Samefag and loredrop your AUs onto minor
>Minor notices samefag and leaves
>>
this niglet has an entire catalog of every shitpost he made over the past 10 years of 4chan and probably reads them over, late at night reminiscing on fond delusions of grandeur induced by a (you) in a thread 4y ago, smiling to himself, tear rolling down cheek
>>
He probably cachinnate at his own shitpost while his cognitive impairment is still mid-conjuring it
And read it over like 40 times, more than a muslim bound to his blowfly book
>>
>>83789008
>If entelechy of one changes the contents of reality and thus the entelechy possibility of the other, the other will absolutely care though.
I'm sure Jung mentioned that in a way or another.
Sure enough, if the thinking idea leads to "greater feeling potential", to explain it as simply as I can, then the thinking is cared for but purely in terms of its feeling entelechy, not under the principle of thinking itself. They cannot "think what they don't feel" after all, but the opposite is very true too, they can think what they feel very well, assuming they are smart enough regardless of typology.
>>
>>83786087
>Control release definitely takes at least meta-effort if that already counts as release.
That's why I didn't say you were strictly wrong. But, typically when people say "investing effort" they mean something like exerting will. Like gabbing a bar and trying to bend it with force. This principle, when exercised by the ego, does not result in the psyche bending. (Unless it's a temporary bend like a rubber band stretching to whip back to its neutral position once the tension releases)

They typically don't mean it in the Matrix sense, where effort is actually the release of control and realizing the spoon doesn't exist, which is what allows it to be bent.
I totally bet all that makes sense in a totally logically coherent way. :)
>Ok but a negative killing is only in perception
It's not only in perception. The symbol loses libido. In perception, the image may remain exactly the same. But it no longer carries energy.
>the improved symbol version seems less accessible
This is what I was talking about when I mentioned you having a habitual tendency towards "modular thinking". You're phrasing this as if "something is added to the symbol, and then a new symbol arises out of it"

A necessary quality of symbols is that they are not understood. If the symbol is understood, it's a mere sign.
A literal example, a sign on a road with a picture of a hill that points down the road. You go down the road you find the hill the sign was pointing to. The picture of a hill on the sign was NOT a symbol, it was a sign pointing to a known object.
>>
>>83785957

>type
INFP
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
My complete and utter lack of social skills and my terrible horrible awful abysmal interactions with people and the fact I am still thinking about them from the picosecond I wake up to the picosecond I fall asleep and they are making me want to kms for the entire day.
>What's your biggest cope right now?
That I can keep the hatred from entering my heart and remain a good person.
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
Pure raw disappointment and resentment.
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
Yes and yes.
I will have great love in my life I know it. As long as I can remain strong, endure the suffering, and keep the demons at bay I know it is waiting for me.
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
Literally the interactions I've had within the past week.
Yes every moment is worse than the last.
>>
>>83786087
And when you say the "improved symbol version seems less accessible" that isn't a failure of symbolization. That's exactly the opposite, it has regained its symbolic nature. I would gander that the first symbol which died, was actually not a symbol. It was a sign pointing to a symbol.
It seems to be what you think a "negative killing" of a symbol is really the ego's perception of loss when the symbol refuses to remain usable, legible, or a functional foundation for the ego to stand upon. Which is exactly the opposite of a dead symbol. That's an alive symbol that refuses to be turned into a sign.

Part of the reason, maybe even the whole reason, that primitive symbols appear accessible to undifferentiated consciousness is precisely because they are lived, they're not interpreted. Differentiation does not make a symbol more clear, it makes it less clear, unreadable. It becomes like spotless glass pane.
And only once the ego releases its interpretive dominance that is so loves to apply will the symbol release its oppositional tension and allow the self to embody what the symbol symbolizes.

To understand a symbol, you do not dominate it and twist it to your will through force.
You must surrender to it.
It is in their very nature to be inaccessible. That's the point.
>ego is so special that it has to be magically excluded.
It's not excluded. Its position is recognized. The ego gets to ride in the raft in the river. The ego does not get to dictate the course the water takes or how smooth, fast, or the waves in the river.
>>
>>83789058
>they will try to return to status quo fairly quickly
In some ways that's a plus in my kids show rating book (no I'm not an MBTI sensor I swear)

>>83789156
>The symbol loses libido
Libido is from a psyche in the first place.
Unless being in the unconscious soup counts as an argument, but then the libido is everywhere in there.

>I totally bet all that makes sense in a totally logically coherent way
It's a secret.

>The picture of a hill on the sign was NOT a symbol
I'm going to STOP and AMPLIFY IT and MEDITATE on it thoroughly. It's a symbol now.

>>83789203
>the first symbol which died, was actually not a symbol. It was a sign pointing to a symbol
Ok but the primitives and poorly differentiated people won't make sense of where it's pointing to, so...?

>what you think a "negative killing" of a symbol is really the ego's perception of loss when the symbol refuses to remain usable, legible, or a functional foundation for the ego to stand upon
>releases its interpretive dominance
More like all that becomes useless for entelechy/individuation. Like throwing out <50kg dumbbells and telling gym newcomers to start bicep curls with 50kg ones. Or me just linking you leetcode and telling you don't (You) me until you can make 5 deconstructed expansive abstract explanations of solutions which make you understand a solution on its own (good alchemical aptitude booster btw).

>To understand a symbol, you do not dominate it and twist it to your will through force.
Yes but that's irrelevant here.
>You must surrender to it.
Congrats you've just simply put the symbol in the unconscious and nothing happened, because the executive function and conscious standpoint only repressed it.

>The ego does not get to dictate the course the water takes or how smooth, fast, or the waves in the river.
Metacognitive approaches that even try to view that just for this view are like dams and hydrogen bombs though, among less drastic things. That messes a river up real good.
>>
>>83789082
stop. stop. stop. stop
>>83789126
stop.
>>83789033
st
op
>>
BBFARAFAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHJAHAHAHAHAA
>>
>>83789303
Holy shit I laughed so hard at this easily 10/10
>>
>>83789321
your aura is grey today, do you know what that means?
>>
die groomer pedo nigger
>>
File: (You).jpg (302.9 KB)
302.9 KB
302.9 KB JPG
>>83789276
>In some ways that's a plus in my kids show rating book (no I'm not an MBTI sensor I swear)
Holy sensor.....
The concept is fine on its own and in general terms all the seasons do this due to the format, it's the way they do it specifically in this season that didn't sit right with me. It is stifling to natural character arc progression, and errs to the side of having none at all at times(thankfully not always, Mero is an exception, Koko is somewhat of an exception at the start but then is made to fit the mold).
Oh well, I'm willing to gloss over many issues since all I want from the genre is being fun and cute purely from the side of personal appreciation, it delivers that.
this is obviously an edit but the show literally says things like "we made so many Yous" in reference to social media popularity for their idol group, soooooo
>>
>>83789346
Does it mean I'm DEAD?! Or does it mean I ate too much gray onions?
>>
>>83789355
your aura is yellow with a rim of pink
>>
>>83789365
your aura is reddish orange today
>>
>>83789365
Getting some really strong ENTP vibes from this purple hair girl
>>
>>83789398
No anon that's the picture's color.

>>83789459
She is an ENFP/Extraverted Intuitoid leaning definitely more on the side of Feeling and she can be quite smug.
>>
>>83789513
Your aura is shattered glass
>>
>>83789551
What did he orijuganically mean by this
>>
>>83788146
In a sense there is something going on, my guess is that democrats are just learning to not want to be centrist anymore. It is actually kind of strange how in spite of "peak woke" (2015-2022) existing, the majority of democrats were actually more wanting to make peace with Trump and republicans but now they just straight up hate them. I think all the basedjak memes kind of got to them frankly.
>>
>>83788429(me)
Bored so let me add her criminal record for lulz
>Assault(multiple charges, obviously not counting magical girl fights)
>Trespassing(aggravated, multiple charges)
>Attempted Kidnapping(failed, but did set up traps with explicit intent according to witness testimonies)
>Permanent mental damage through magic shenanigans, for the lack of a more legal-friendly term
>>
>>83789276
>Libido is from a psyche in the first place.
You have a balloon
You release the air from the balloon by popping it
The balloon is dead.
It is irrelevant that the atmosphere is also made of air.
The fact that the air returned to the atmosphere also points to the fact that its no longer within the balloon.

>It's a symbol now.
That entirely depends on how exactly the process beforehand is done. If you're trying to MAKE a symbol, nope. You've failed before you even started. Or if you think you can extract some concept or conceptual knowledge from it, you've failed before you even started.
>won't make sense of where it's pointing to, so...?
They will make sense of it. They will make sense of it more than someone who is differentiated. They will make sense of it through living the symbol. Whereas someone who is more differentiated will struggle to make sense of a symbol because they're trying to interpret the symbol through the ego.
The ego of a differentiated psyche tries to GIVE meaning to the symbol.
The undifferentiated psyche tries to RECIEVE the meaning from the symbol.

A distinction to be made:
"make sense of it" does not mean "understand conceptually".
For example, seeing a symbol of God and feeling God. This is experiencing the symbol. God is contained within the symbol, and through interacting with it, God comes out of the symbol and is felt. That's what it means to make sense of a symbol.
For the undifferentiated psyche, this just happens. God seizes them.
For the differentiated psyche, the ego protests to this seizure and instead seeks to make sense of the symbol in a rational sense.
>>
>>83789906
>balloon
If symbols are ever alive then why you're making narrative of inanimate balloons for alive symbols in the first place?

>That entirely depends on how exactly the process beforehand is done. If you're trying to MAKE a symbol, nope. You've failed before you even started. Or if you think you can extract some concept or conceptual knowledge from it, you've failed before you even started.
Skill. Issue.
I just have to abide by Jung's symbolization rules.

>They will make sense of it
Hmm, have you seen much individuation happening in the assisted living house for people with intellectual disabilities?

>>83789906
>The ego of a differentiated psyche tries to GIVE meaning to the symbol.
>The undifferentiated psyche tries to RECIEVE the meaning from the symbol.
And both are the WRONG approaches, because meaning may only appear from the contact itself. Also see: constellation, synchronicity.
>>
On a past to present to future scale, I would say that I overwhelmingly think about the near to mid future. Late future just has too much random variables to really think about and yet at least here people say that I have a sensation preference. Not that I am necessarily disagreeing with them or anything, but is it possible to be like that and a sensation type, even if it is just aux?
>>
>>83790107
Jvvvng pretty much implied that time perception is a separate function that primitive psyches don't have.
Intuition is about potentials of a pattern or an object, it's not an exclusive time function. Yeah potentials imply time but they don't imply precision or differentiation of time. Much like presentness of sensation implies the present time moment but sensation can be temporally inaccurate with that, too.
Rational functions already imply time by progression of steps of rationalization.
Any inferior function is primitive and is described as "timeless" by Jung so that should give a good clue.
>>
>>83790107
Though there is overlap, thinking about the future isn't exactly the same as having a hunch about one or more future possibilities, so it's hard to accurately place it within the framework.

Very generally speaking, both Intuition and Sensation types think about the future, but the former tends to be actively attracted to speculation and the very concept of unrealized potential, how far they are projecting in time depends on the context - the latter might find it worrying and has a penchant for "what could go wrong"(and in that they might be very right, so it gives them the advantage of being prepared for the worst case scenario) in the normal case, and they can go full schizo in a neurotic case. Doesn't mean they dislike change, but they don't find it as inherently attractive to get involved into speculah as the intuitoids because they are more appreciative towards the present.

For a more theoretical consideration, auxiliary Sensation implies it is relatively more developed than Intuition, but the latter is not fundamentally incompatible with your Feeling or Thinking, so it will be allowed when proper but not habitually relied upon as much as the "favored" aux.
>>
Actually time functions are likely bundled with ego's executive function. Because Moore bundles up both under the "Warrior" archetype quadrant of the psyche.

I can kinda see why.
Of course you'd have little executive functioning when you're not feeling every metabolic iteration exhaust and devour itself, every step is a timeframe closer to hitting the complete reinforced and spiked wall of any bodily functioning. Ticksh-tocksh... Ticksh-tocksh...
>>
>>83790200
One thing that I'd like to point out is that Jung did associate "projecting the object in time and space" to intuition. That doesn't give them a better sense of time, but it makes them more willing to consider the object in relation to its timeline(both in the sense of how it could have transformed, and how it could have moved) as opposed to its present static form.

But you are right that it's not the "time function", it's about the dynamism of reality in general.
>>
File: 0dc.jpg (62.4 KB)
62.4 KB
62.4 KB JPG
>>83790200
>>83790256
On the topic of intuition, what do you think about the "Potential Man" Memes? One part of me believes it is actually a pretty good comeback from more sensation leaning types because all Megumi did was pose and act cool but not really do much in the story and so that potential is worthless, but it might also be an exasperated sigh from intuition types who saw that potential get wasted because Gege seems to be throwing around a lot of cool concepts that never really get finalized and to me it just seems like a bunch of random bullshit happening with no real rhyme or reason to it.
>>
>>83789978
[You've triggered my trap card]
Because the balloon is a symbolic metaphor. It's alive. It's proving the point I am making by the "real" physical counter part of the object being inanimate.
The balloon in the metaphor does not point a physical balloon, it's not a sign.

Treating the balloon as if it must itself be alive collapses the symbol into a literal object, which is exactly the mistake being illustrated. Effectively, you've taken my symbol and literalized it, which is the very thing I've been critiquing you for doing.
>I just have to abide by Jung's symbolization rules.
Except you've violated the precondition. It's like pouring gasoline into an engine. Except there's no engine for it to be poured in. It doesn't matter if your pouring technique is immaculate, your funnel placement pristinely perfect; there's no gas tank and no engine. You're just pouring gasoline onto the floor.

Jung's rules of symbolization is not a guideline to create symbols. It's a description of how the ego is to relate to the already existing symbols. And trying to apply the rules as a step by step process is already an ego centric violation of the rules.
>have you seen much individuation happening in the assisted living house
*shrug* I was just there to smoke weed.
>because meaning may only appear from the contact itself.
But the direction of the meaning is one way. That's the point.
>>
>>83790348
This sounds like just people getting pissed at scatterbrain writing with exposition that is not matching the intent for the story.
Never got into JJK though.
>>
>>83790348
Depends from the angle.
If somebody is arguing that the potential makes it good, then a typical objection would come from the sensation type pointing out none of that ever happened as a fact, and claim unrealistic expectations.
If somebody is arguing that it could have been good if they didn't waste the potential, then the typical objection comes from a disappointed intuitive.
>>
>>83790371
>Jung's rules of symbolization is not a guideline to create symbols. It's a description of how the ego is to relate to the already existing symbols
Which describes what the symbol would require in the first place. Inference, bruh.

>Because the balloon is a symbolic metaphor. It's alive
Facts:
1. I'm not satisfied with seeing it as a symbolic metaphor. I don't even do logics on it first, it just feels off even at simple face value.
2. It didn't abide by Jung's Symbolization Rules. No airtight reasoning (whatever it could be), it didn't work out of the box, et cetera.
3. "Just surrender the ego" would mean just ignoring that and putting that into the unconscious.

>But the direction of the meaning is one way. That's the point.
I wouldn't be so sure.
>>
>>83790371
>spoiler
Nice argument, INFJ-A, however no.
Jokes on you though I play burn, not control shit unless I really want to shit on somebody in GOAT/play singleplayer retro YGO games like Tag Force.
>>
>>83790395
Fair enough, I kind of dropped it when it started to annoy me. I just look at the animations on youtube if I'm in the mood for it because the story seems like shit anyways. I keep seeing people over think basic-bitch shonen anime and think they should read some actual literature for once if they want to think hard about themes and shit.
>>83790399
I suppose so. I think that the concept of "Early Access" games is kind of banking on the potential that a game might have down the line. I do have a habit of buying early access games on steam but oddly enough a lot of them actually do get released.
>>
File: Yes.png (261.2 KB)
261.2 KB
261.2 KB PNG
>>83790442
>Which describes what the symbol would require in the first place. Inference, bruh.
It describes the precondition for symbols to be interacted with, yes. And that precondition is a necessary release by the ego of its habitual, dominant attitude.

>1. I'm not satisfied with seeing it as a symbolic metaphor.
You want to rationalize it, I know. That's the problem. You want the metaphor to MAKE SENSE in a logically coherent way. Or, probably more aptly, you want it to bend to your definition of what it means to make sese.
>2.
Wut?
>3. "Just surrender the ego"
No, that's not what it means. The ego surrenders its identity as the arbiter and recognizes its role as a passenger.
>>83790451
I play [Jung] The Archetype of the Collective Unconscious.
His effect is:
He can be willfully possessed by any archetype by channeling the collective unconscious once per turn.
>>
>>83790593
>I think that the concept of "Early Access" games is kind of banking on the potential that a game might have down the line
That, but also straight up lying at times. And if you break trust, I would argue any type would quickly label early access promises as trying to scam you out of your money.
>>
>>83790624
I think the genres with shitty open access (Such as open world sloppas) kind of ruins it for the rest of the gang.
>>
File: 850181.jpg (456.8 KB)
456.8 KB
456.8 KB JPG
>type
INTP 5w6
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now
Mostly just being lazy. When I don't have anything planned I just lay in bed and don't do anything productive
>What's your biggest cope right now?
Browsing /r9k/ and /gif/ rekt threads. Listening to RYM recommendations as well.
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
"Wow look how much time this retard wasted"
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
I'm borderline ENTP and am relatively good at socializing, so I think that sex is inevitable for me. I still have minor autistic tendencies, but they could just manifest as a crazy sense of humor. I guess I haven't lost hope yet.
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
Probably injuring my boss on accident
>Be me
>Work in warehouse-type setting
>Help boss move something heavy and awkward
>Forklift starts beeping behind me with the driver yelling at us to move out of the way
>I instinctively drop my end (?) and move to let the forklift pass.
>By dropping my end of the burden, all of the weight is transferred to boss
>He's pushed backward and almost falls over; cries out in pain
>fml.wav
>I say "are you ok I'm so sorry" but he just glares at me and limps off for the day.
>fml^2
>I wasn't fired but it's never been the same.
>>
At a certain point, differentiation hits a wall, and trying to push past that wall does the opposite of what you want. It turns form differentiation to abstraction. This is particularly bad when done with parts of the psyche. It's what causes repression or inflation.
If you differentiate the ego TOO much, it becomes abstracted from the self. Like a rose being torn off from a bush.
The ego alienates itself from the rest of itself and deems it to be the center of itself. Simply because it has been so far separated from itself.
The point is not to differentiate something so cleanly that it becomes abstracted (analog: physically separated). The point is to differentiate to observe the relationship between the two (or more) aspects of the psyche, and rather than abstracting, concretizing and bringing the aspects closer together.

The point of differentiation is to establish a relationship with the aspects which are differentiated. Not to isolate them into neat little boxes and cut off their relationships with one another through abstraction.
>>
>It turns form differentiation to abstraction.
Huh yes that's kinda the point. The more differentiated a function is (or anything else in the psyche), the more it's separated from its primitive/concrete origins and tends to abstraction.
It's fine though because you can't just differentiate literally anything, starting with your inferior function&attitude, and other non typological things.
>>
NO. That's absolutely not the point. Over differentiation is a very bad thing. The result of which is one sidedness.

The point of differentiation is not to cut a rose off of the bush, it's to identify where the rose ends and the stem begins in order to observe the relationship between the two.
To abstract the rose is to kill it.
>>
One-sidedness is because you differentiate one thing at the cost of everything else.
Good thing you can differentiate auxiliaries too to a certain degree and get closer to the inferior function, and you kinda can't just undifferentiate back the function itself(though you can do it on contents, in the sense of purposely try to work something through the auxiliary more than the main function).
>>
That's the definition of abstraction though. If you differentiate to the point of abstraction, you've removed the thing from the other thing that it was being differentiated from.
You can undifferentiate. It's significantly harder to un-abstract though.

>Look at hand
>Undifferentiated hand
>Look at index finger
>Differentiated index finger from hand
>Move index finger around independently
>Practiced differentiation (developed "finger" analog: function)
>Chop finger off
>Abstracted finger
>One sided-finger, all finger no hand.
Good luck reattaching that finger.
>>
>>83790694
>>I instinctively drop my end (?) and move to let the forklift pass.
Dude... I think you might be an INTJ/IN(T). That's a total inferior sensation moment.

>>83790764
Au contraire.
Getting a better hammer isn't bad. Obsessing over the hammer so much you see only the nails everywhere is what's bad.

Aka rigidity of the compass AND the ego arrow.

>>83790613
>You want to rationalize it, I know. That's the problem. You want the metaphor to MAKE SENSE in a logically coherent way
No, I just find it yucky on its own, but that won't make for a good logical argument so I find the logical rebuttal.

>The ego surrenders its identity as the arbiter and recognizes its role as a passenger.
Yeah when you throw your executive functioning out for a ride from the unconscious, it's psychosis/avolition/possession depending on the weather of the psyche.
>Wut?
Basically the same as 1. but Jungian.

>>83790732
>the more it's separated from its primitive/concrete origins and tends to abstraction
I don't remember that in the concrete/abstract discussions? You totally could abstract out something with an inferior function, but mistake it for intuitive hunch because of lack of differentiation, no?
>>
>>83790865
>You totally could abstract out something with an inferior function, but mistake it for intuitive hunch because of lack of differentiation, no?
Abstraction applied on "something"(a content) does not imply abstraction of a function.
That being said, I'm not sure how you can abstract from a content as per Jung without doing it through your general conscious attitude(including type and everything else). Pretty sure he said you need a directed effort that doesn't just happen without you explicitly and willingly trying to.
>>
>>83790922
>Abstraction applied on "something"(a content)
>abstraction of a function
Hmm, what are the definitions/distinctions for these, anyway?
>>
>>83785957
>Type
IDK, maybe Thinking and then aux Sensation after that
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
I don't really do anything consistently at all, I just lose motivation and become obsessed with a new hobby and then drop it for something else when I hit too much friction. I am kind of spineless
>What's your biggest cope right now?
That it'll be all okay
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
You're still a loser but at least you're a skinnier one now
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love
Eh maybe, I don't really want to have sex with women and I live in the south so homosex might be a bit harder to acquire
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
I pitched a massive fit about not getting a new iphone because I thought it would make people reject me, this is ignoring the fact that I barely had any friends to begin with. Honestly becoming much more apathetic to social norms and trends have done a lot of good in my life. My life is otherwise kind of boring and I like it like that.
>>
>>83790934
The concept of abstracting functions was quickly defined after PT Chapter X, don't have it handy right now but I recall it's written multiple times, including as a part of the 4 function definitions.
Abstracting from a content I think literally just means taking any specific aspect out of it(e.g. if the content is the perception of a red flower, you take out the redness) and making it into a new content. Through which function depends on your type in general and whatever you are trying to do in that specific moment.
>what if the redness is picked out accidentally
Well here is the thing, is the operation was accidental(read: unconsciously), what will actually happen instead is getting attached to unconscious contents that you have no control of, and might arouse inappropriate instinctive reactions(e.g. sudddenly being afraid of red things because idk what weird connection happened there)
>>
>type
ENTP, I haven't been on r9k in earnest since cool story bro
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
Talking down to myself.
>What's your biggest cope right now?
I'll find someone like her again, from personality, way of loving me, to body
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
That's a great question. I think he would be happily surprised at the adventures and luck I've had, the strength I've developed mentally and physically. The things I've produced
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
The real question is do I ever think I'll never not have sex with various women for the rest of my life, settling down with no woman? Yes, and it makes me sad.
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
I have some good greentexts but all my failures were preambles to a great time, so it's hard to say that I have a "worst failure" I have a breakup that happened but I don't think of it as a failure on my part.
>>
>>83790694

>"Wow look how much time this retard wasted"
>I'm borderline ENTP and am relatively good at socializing, so I think that sex is inevitable for me.

You're like mid-20's dude, start embracing wizarddom.
Also how the fuck does an INTP work at a warehouse LOL
You really do need to get off /gif/ fuck.
>>
>>83787794
I think we can see this in action when we compare Kemonos and western furries. The shortening of the snout makes the figure more human-like and appealing and a lot of the more popular furries tend to look closer to human beings than they do to animals. I also just think a lot of western furry designs are flavor blasted with color that hurts the eyes.
This is also why I really do not like that tall scalie chick from MHA because it lacks that abstract element but I do like Caimen from Dorohedoro and the various object/animal heads in MHA
>>
>>83788912
Not just ugly he's also 5'6 (self admitted so likely shorter)
>>
>>83790865
Differentiation does not equate to higher proficiency with said hammer, nor even a development of the hammer in question.
That's practice, which is the development of a relationship with the hammer.
Callback to an earlier post of mine about eating ice cream mates you related to it

It's very hard to develop a relationship with a hammer when you cannot tell where it is because it blends into the rack on the toolshed, though. First it much be differentiated from the rack. Its outline must be discerned.
But if you don't stop the differentiation when the outline of the hammer becomes clear, what you have is a neurotic repetition of concepts into concepts into concepts and wind up in analysis paralysis, or just turn the hammer into dust by differentiating its components.
A hammer without a handle it's very useful.
A hammer head cut in half to abstract the head from the claw isn't either.
>No, I just find it yucky on its own, but that won't make for a good logical argument
If you could qualify why it's yucky, that would be a better argument.
>executive functioning
Equating the ego to executive functioning is not a good thing to do.
>>
>>83791082
> I also just think a lot of western furry designs are flavor blasted with color that hurts the eyes.
Holy Si-groid...
But that part might have to do with Se-groidism(objective intensity of the sensory impression, what's stronger is better generally, strong color is better then, you get the point), against Si-groidism(a too intense, or not intense enough sensory impression that deviates from archetypal standard is considered worse).
(that does not include purely personal taste)
The rest of the post seems to also be mostly concerned with that, so let me clarify that "concrete" sensation is basically equivalent to sense perception, it cannot create anything that doesn't exist concretely at all, it wouldn't just be able to draw a furry because nothing doesn't exist exactly in that form. Adding more realistic features but to an object that's still not literally a real thing is more proof of extraversion than the function being more primitive here.
>>
>>83790934
To abstract is to (physically) separate.
To abstract a function is to separate it from the other from the other functions of the psyche or even the psyche itself. Where it becomes elevated (identified with/inflated) or subjugated (repressed).
To abstract the content of a function is so bring that content into the forefront of the conscious mind and separate it from the other content. You could call this "focusing on one aspect of the content of a function".


Abstracting content is fine, usually.
Abstracting functions, not so much.
>>
>>83791173
>nothing doesn't exist exactly in that form
nothing exists* even
>features but to an object
delete the "but"

Huh yeah "realism" is an aeshetic, a very Se-groid brained one specifically, but nonetheless. Let's not confuse using it an aesthetic with being unable to conceive anything that's not literally a real object you have seen, that's dog-tier primitive sensation.
>>
File: consent.png (885.5 KB)
885.5 KB
885.5 KB PNG
Alright I should stop typing while doing other shit, I get the memo.
Have >implying Meroron for your trouble. Real subs btw.
>>
>>83791192
>To abstract is to (physically) separate.
Ok
>subjugated (repressed)
Repression is not abstraction, it's merging with unconscious contents.
>To abstract the content of a function is so bring that content into the forefront of the conscious mind and separate it from the other content.
Ok

>Abstracting content is fine, usually.
Ok
>Abstracting functions, not so much.
Re-read the "Definitions" part of PT, carefully this time.
It is equivalent to differentiation of a function, the differentiation itself is not a bad thing, you are supposed to do it and will just do it naturally to go through life anyways. A one-sided type is created when only one function is differentiated(and the attitude too actually), but the others are strongly repressed, eventually creating a strong unconscious counteraction in the flow of libido.(you have to concede something to your aux and the inferior too, or they all will force you to do it in the form of neurosis and complexes that you aren't able to control anymore)
>>
>type
ENTJ
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
I have the urge to be moids little wifey. Truly sickening.
>What's your biggest cope right now?
That I'll find true love. My heart is turning to stone.
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
I would probably be pleased.
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
Yes and yes.
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
I once tried to cook fried shrimp and caught fire. I can't think of anything since I don't dwell on it.
>>
>>83791308
>Repression is not abstraction
Repression *is* abstraction. Repression indicates a direction. Specifically "away from the ego".
Abstraction in the direction of away from the ego "not me" is repression.
Abstraction in the direction of towards the ego "is me" is inflation/identification.

Repression is abstraction, but not all abstraction is repression. Very important distinction to make.
>It is equivalent to differentiation of a function,
There's something extremely important you're missing. Differentiation and abstraction are not equal. For a very specific reason.

Differentiation maintains the structural relationship.
Abstraction severs the relationship.
Abstraction literally means to cut off. To sever. To remove. To separate.
Differentiation itself is not bad. But OVER differentiation is.
>>
I should clarify, abstraction is not bad in and of itself. Just like differentiation.
>>
Are you sending your clones after me, Kris? I had a run in with someone that sounded exactly like you, and they sounded angry too.
>>
Anyone else carry a knife around to defend from immigrants. What's good knife to buy, that's not too expensive?
>>
roblox federal building
shoo shoo
>>
>>83791667
Knives are retarded to carry for self defense tbqh. Knife fighting is dirty and you will get hurt. If you live somewhere that permits it, buy a gun. If you live in Canada, learn how to perform the best fellatio you can
>>
File: FX-593.jpg (125.9 KB)
125.9 KB
125.9 KB JPG
>>83791667
Fairbanks sykes fighting knife. Some brown starts swinging at you you come in low from the side like a swinging door between the ribs to hit the vital organs. One more dead brown lol.
>>
>>83791173
>Se-groidism(objective intensity of the sensory impression, what's stronger is better generally, strong color is better then, you get the point), against Si-groidism(a too intense, or not intense enough sensory impression that deviates from archetypal standard is considered worse).
Well I do tend to like stronger tasting alcohol or ones that taste a bit weird but novel unless I get drunk and then I can just pound piss beers like it's nobody's business. Not sure what that is.
>>
You tell me this "thinking"(technically it is, because it's about connecting concepts) isn't incredibly destructive with a straight face. It's not even trying to transmit any idea, it's not trying to reject, it's not trying to agree, hell it's not even trying to "win" an argument, it's devoid of everything. One should ask, why is this being posted at all? Pure trolling? Even that doesn't sound right, you get tired of trolling eventually.
It feels like some form of psychological warfare, just trying to tire somebody out, or trying to mine their reliability by appealing to technicalities. Oh well, it doesn't really have the desired effect since my Ne ass is only tired when Intuition decides to move onto the next image (or the body physically gives up).

And it's still wrong, since in this case, in this context, differentiation and abstraction were defined as meaning the same thing, trying to communicate the same concept regardless of what the words mean in a dictionary, if you will. Only per Jung and related to the functions of course, not in any general sense of the terms.

As for "over differentiation", I will content myself with saying:
Bad in theory if you somehow manage to differentiate your entire psyche and kill any tension with the unconscious
Not bad in practice because it's literally not possible either way. At some point you will have to middle realm(hence detach from ego and conscious standpoint) anyway and go full T.F. because turns out you cannot really bridge all opposites otherwise.

>>83791779
Usual answer in this case is to see things holistically, because type is about psychological habits anyways.
Could I interpret it as proof of Se-groidism if now you are valuing a sensation purely because it's "objectively" more intense? I guess, real question would be how it fits with everything else. What's the recurring pattern, is it generally about doing Se-groidisms with some exceptions, or Si-groidism with some exceptions?
>>
>>83791667
I don't need knives when I have words and aura.
>>
>>83791667
Anon: >>83791724 is right knives are stupid. They're just not effective, especially if the enemy is on drugs. Sure you'll slash up their arms but it won't stop them.
...
A better option is a pipe wrench that you carry in a backpack. First: it's legal and second it's longer then a knife if you get into knife fight. Third it'll break their hands and arms if they swing at you.
>>83791740
>Fairbanks sykes fighting knife.
Anon are you sneaking up on German guards in the middle of the night and stabbing them in jugular? Cause that's what that knife is made for, not self defense.
>>
Oh and, if a lot of ambivalence presents itself in terms of attitude related to function, I choose to interpret it as proof of an auxiliary function.
That's a whole can of worms but I provided a lot of proof that this theory seems to fit Jung's own ideas imo, and other Jungians seem to have tacitly accepted it as the truth.
>>
>>83791848
>Could I interpret it as proof of Se-groidism if now you are valuing a sensation purely because it's "objectively" more intense? I guess, real question would be how it fits with everything else. What's the recurring pattern, is it generally about doing Se-groidisms with some exceptions, or Si-groidism with some exceptions?
I want more of the things that I like and less of the things that I don't like. I'm not a fan of overly saturated colors so I don't want that much of them, I like desaturated colors more as a general rule of things. I like bitterness and sourness in beer so the more of that the better. Food that is tastier is good to me, I think that my own internal impression of objects in general is kind of weak now that I think about it. Something is just kind of "Is" but there is sometimes a level when something becomes too overbearing but I think that my own sense perception of things is pretty blunt. Often I might think of what something might represent in a specific time or location, or where and how it could possibly evolve but just as often I don't and just see it as what it is.
>>
>>83785957
>>type
INTP
>>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
bitting on my nails way too much. they are looking awful right now.
>>What's your biggest cope right now?
its between drawing, 4chan and movies. i can't decide lol
>>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
he would probably be proud in a way.
>>Do you think you'll ever have sex?
no
>>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
i have two, but one's more funny than the other.
1:
i swallowed one of those round button cell batteries when i was eight years old and i still have it laying around somewhere
2:
when i was still in highschool and my father made me stay at his house for the whole month of january, in which i cried myself to sleep every night. i still really don't like the month, even if it is the one i was born in
>>
>>83791848
>"thinking"(technically it is, because it's about connecting concepts) isn't incredibly destructive with a straight face.
It absolutely is. Reduction through abstraction is unequivocally destructive. That's why Jung warns against over abstraction for thinking types, relying on it too heavily can lend oneself to inflation and inhibit individuation.

I don't know where you're getting the notion that abstraction and differentiation are the same. Sure, they're *similar*, but they're not the same.
If they were the same, he'd use the same term for them.

And I'm not talking about the entirety of the psyche when I say over differentiation. I'm referring to any specific function or aspect of the psyche. Like I said, at some point of differentiation, you can no longer differentiate without abstraction.
There comes a point where you hit a metaphorical wall, and passing that point necessarily means you are separating ((see: cutting) abstracting) a subject from an object. You've passed from relating to (differentiating) to separating from (abstracting).

We have a pizza. It's a pepperoni and pineapple pizza.
If you look at the pizza, you can differentiate the pineapples from the pepperonis, and you can differentiate them from the whole pizza, the cheese from the crust, etc, etc. But they're still all related, they're still on the pizza.
We can abstract the pepperonis (take them off) and view them individually. No problems yet, you can still place them back on the pizza.
I decide, I don't like pepperonis, they're not mine. They're now repressed. I put all the pepperonis on one half of the pizza and say that half is "not me/not mine". Small problem, there's repression but the pizza is still ultimately whole and the pineapples are still related to the whole pizza.
NOW I abstract the pizza itself and cut it in half. My half of the pizza has only pineapples. Now we have one sidedness.

(I think this metaphor sucks, but oh well.)
>>
File: Tacwak0.jpg (276.6 KB)
276.6 KB
276.6 KB JPG
>>83791667
Get a Wakazashi, the mere site of it will drive off brownskins or leftists from getting uppity. And if you have to fight it'll fuck them up. Also it's shorter then a katana so you can use it in hallway or in a bus.
>>
>>83791667
>Anyone else carry a knife around to defend from immigrants
Nah; if I'm worried about immigrants, I'll carry my gun.
>>
Forgive delay, IRL distractions.

>>83791948
The post taken hositically seems to represent sensation and feeling working together.
It appears to me that the called "numinal accent" falls on Feeling, while Sensation is possibly an auxiliary, it stops mattering too much once it accomplishes the goal of the main function.

I see hardly any mention of Thinking but this could be contextual so don't take it as a very strong hint.

Now onto some specifics:
>not a fan of overly saturated colors
Tentatively interpreting this as closer Si-groidism because Se-groids are flashy as shit. Sure they have "taste" but it's generally in making things bigger, stronger, more intense, and so on, more penetrating to your senses, and so on. Not in way that's disgusting but decisively showy, striking, "you can't look away". That's the Se-groid way.
The Si-groid instead doesn't do this, he finds comfort in moderation, not greyness but subtlety, just a little more red, but also in esoteric things indeed(do they attract inferior intuition? Probably)
>Food stuff
That seems more of a matter of selective taste, which is.... loosely connected to introversion but very loosely. Why? Because it denotes a general dismissiveness to the external objects unless they hit the right spots. Extraverts are generally less able to discriminate but not because they don't have taste, it's because they default to appreciating the object unless it has proved itself to be disagreeable.
>Representation
Heh, the old name of intuition. Yes Jung himself called it like that before writing PT, interesting coincidence or did you already know?
Anyways, it's telling me your rapport with the function might not be overly negative so it counts as possibly being merely a lower auxiliary.

tl;dr I smell IF(S)
>>
>>83792413
Ur a weeb so it's gonna be a bolt action arisaka or something you saw in an anime or whatever. Let me guess "bolt action is better then an ar-15 cause... ...because it just is ok!".
>>
>>83792463
Bolt action has more range, stopping power, more damage than a girly ar 15.
>>
>>83792406
>Carry a wakazashi around
You've been watching too many animes anon. Walk around in public carrying a sword and someone will call the cops. I suggested a pipe wrench cause its legal and doesn't arouse suspicion when you buy it.
>>83792413
>Nah; if I'm worried about immigrants, I'll carry my gun.
What kind do you have? I have a little smith and wessen (I think it's the 642) 5 shot revolver my dad bought me.
>>
For a funny comparison to introversion+sensation+thinking, with feeling left as rather undeveloped, I had a fren who liked to watch these documentaries where they show you how they make things. You know, the production process of food, objects, that kind of stuff.
He really liked to gather a lot of factoids of this nature and tell me about it, even about things he didn't particularly like and couldn't give less of a shit in feeling terms.
That was a very striking example of how these things work together to me, an intellectual interest in how things come to be in general. Of course he also happened to like history and really everything that has to do with this same line of interests, very obvious pattern there.

Specific typing of this person was IS(T) imo, because his interest, as "intellectual" as it is, fundamentally concerns itself with irrational facts without specifically making them fit to an idea first.

Also stereotypical in the sense of having good memory lol. Could count on him to remember anything. History lessons were his favorite subject in school and it shows, holy shit he didn't forget a date, name, or anything. Even debated the teacher because he's better at it lool
>>
I had a girl pull a knife out once while we were hanging out in a dark and secluded parking lot. She put it up to my neck then we kissed. It was really hot.
>>
Typing people or characters is definitely NOT off topic here.
That's all from me since I haven't watched this.
>>
>>83792652
>She put it up to my neck then we kissed. It was really hot.
I like this idea, a lot.
>>
>>83792803
Well, maybe you should finish telling me about your ideal date.
>>
>>83792418
Yeah I suppose I do tend to have a tendency of just blurting out what I think about things without really even meaning to. Suppose it is a lot like a judgement first kind of deal.
>Heh, the old name of intuition. Yes Jung himself called it like that before writing PT, interesting coincidence or did you already know?
>Anyways, it's telling me your rapport with the function might not be overly negative so it counts as possibly being merely a lower auxiliary.
Yeah I think I remember doing that? I read some of Jung's other stuff outside of PT several years ago, however my own personal feelings about intuition is if anything I tend to find people who are overly pessimistic and have a tendency to panic about things to be very annoying people who ruin the mood of things, which seems to be something I find in sensation types a lot who have an undifferentiated intuition. They never really seem to give possibilities a chance, and tend to stick with what they know too much for me. Then again I am not exactly someone who is very easily impressed by potential by itself.
>>83792765
Yeah, sorry I forgot that you even posted at me.
My own guess is that I can't figure out the bosses' type but maybe some sort of intuition typ, idk about Alan, Pim is an extroverted feeling type and charlie is probably sensation orientated of some kind. He does like his incredibly shitty food greasy food, which seems to be more of a se dom thing, also kind of a "Doom scroller" and a "conspiracy" guy.
However I am very bad at typing people. Maybe that is another point of me being a feeling type, sense it is quite hard for me to really diagnose much of anything and I frankly mostly just go by what I want or don't want. People can figure out what they want for themselves and it's not really my place to do it for them.
>>
>>83792589
>5 shot revolver my dad bought me.
Fucking pindos amerilards buying thier kids guns
"hey baby gurl yall jeever wantz a gun? Letz getz one after buying lard from walmart and gettin the double tripple goyburger from Mcgoyslop"
>>
>>83792652
uhhh... you sound like you want this to happen again
>>
>>83792589
>What kind do you have?
Ruger LCR chambered for .38 special +P
>I have a little smith and wessen (I think it's the 642) 5 shot revolver my dad bought me.
Nice!
>>
>today we larp as self-defense experts
Take a class and stop messing around... It's for your own safety, please.

>>83790986
>what will actually happen instead is getting attached to unconscious contents that you have no control of, and might arouse inappropriate instinctive reactions
This is possible but I doubt it's certain. You can't really have limitation certainty with things concerning the psychoid.
I could use a PT re-read myself. Especially since I didn't bother remembering abstractioning, wouldn't guess it'd be useful...

>>83791135
>If you could qualify why it's yucky
Now that's where almost all what you had said about symbols would apply to qualia.

>Differentiation does not equate to higher proficiency with said hammer
When you can tell the handle from the head, the broken hammer from a working one, between hammers of different quality, and what's ought to be hammered and how - oh it will inevitably develop the proficiency at least by unconscious influences working with the differentiated contents.

>That's practice, which is the development of a relationship with the hammer.
Not an exclusive one, even if it's irreplaceable.
Huh I want to use a HxH reference of Kurapika psychologically merging with chains to understand them better to develop his Nen ability but that's outta the left field I guess...

>Equating the ego to executive functioning is not a good thing to do.
I don't do that. It's a question of sets/categories/containers.
Unconscious doing things for you with your body, like sleepwalking, is executive functioning irrelevant to the whole, holistic you. It'd be irrelevant only by a unconscious-centric reductionism version of the composite you.

>>83792639
>Even debated the teacher because he's better at it lool
I accidentally had been ending up debating teachers over most pedantic stuff... One was so adept at bantz she cornered me at double bind, and I was like... "What was for homework, again?" She let me off the hook lol.
>>
>>83793042
>It'd be irrelevant only by a unconscious-centric reductionism version of the composite you.
*The phrasing got awkward but you get it.
>>
>>83790999
why is everyone ignoring my cool post and epic trips?
>>
>>83791935
>Oh and, if a lot of ambivalence presents itself in terms of attitude related to function, I choose to interpret it as proof of an auxiliary function.
/Objection!/
Ambivalence would happen only with equal differentiation of auxiliaries - i.e. no preferred aux, with at the "waterline" of the compass in the waters of the unconscious.

Even if ambivalent moments are possible, you'd need a lot of frames where the aux is on the waterline, and it's way more likely to have a 99.9% content that's split in some proportion between conscious and unconscious types of use.
>>
>>83793141
Nothing sparks much food for thought, and repeating digits became mundane with 4kek slowing down, except when it's a get maybe
>>
>>83791998
>its between drawing
That's a positive type of cope
>>
>>83792803
My ideal date? I'm adhd so perfer fun & stimulation over "romantic settings", so maybe going to 10 different places on one date without spending a lot. That said I get pretty twisted when I get sexual, but thats a different subject.
>>83793141
Well I just read. It was funny, good job.
>>
>>83793256 (me)
oops I resonded to myself: I meant it for this anon: >>83792816
...
But while I'm here I'll rant IDK why people think they need to go fancy resturants and clubs for dates, I find clubs dull, being a dark room full of sweaty people drunk dancing to ear-rape loud terrible music so loud you can't talk to anyone while a drink is like $15. And the fancy resturant thats $250 for 2 people for some bland ass fish.
>>
>>83785957
>type
intp-t
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
Irregular sleep
>What's your biggest cope right now?
Playing vidya and watching anime
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
It went as bad as expected.
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
Probably not.
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
Getting bullied in school when I was between 6 and 14. It may not be entirely my fault, but I also consider it a failure on my part to communicate and bond with even my own close family. Maybe I've been fucked from birth, but it is what it is.
>>
The real issue with immigration isn't what the rightoids claim:
>Hurr they're a bunch of rapists and criminals
Cause immigrants commit less crimes then native blacks. The real issue is over supply for jobs and houses/resources driving down wages while causing resources/housing prices to go up. This is particularly bad in Canada.
>>
>>83793390
This is assuming that FBI crime statistics are even reliable. Y'know how many honkies in the sticks like to bribe police officers with beer when they hang out at the bars right? Let alone all the unaccounted for white collar crime.
Still keeping a leash on migration numbers is a good thing I'd say.
>>
File: muslims.jpg (336.5 KB)
336.5 KB
336.5 KB JPG
>>83793390
>immigrants commit less crimes
Sure buddy, the muslim migrant hoards are peaceful and love the countries they moved too mmmm hmmmm.
>>
>I need to discuss politics on an incel board's astrology thread... or else THEY will win... the world is at stake... only I can STOP this MADNESS by writing a staple talking point HERE and NOW
>>
File: star.jpg (820 KB)
820 KB
820 KB JPG
Well if we're posting off topic: Then what MBTI type are the guys in picrel most likely to be?
>>
>>83793459
Von Franz's Puer Aeternus (obligatory read)
>>
>>83793390
Most Somalis are a bunch of criminals. Most Muslims are a bunch of rapists and criminals. Indians are worse than Somalis and also go out of their way to do the thing you described 10x. The majority of Hispanics are just trying to escape from countries whose governments are controlled by cartels aka criminals but also bring those same problems with them.
But yes chimping out and lack of resources are major problems too. I wouldn't say any one is worse or "realer" than the other though.
>>
>>83793459
what amount of that isn't just pure performance?
>>
>>83793469
>obligatory read
Can you summarize it please, thanks.
>>
>>83793506
I did a summary in paste.fo years ago but it stopped working so you'll have to read the book.
>>
>>83793503
50% because that's how negative persona poisoning goes
>>
>>83793459
>what MBTI type are the guys in picrel most likely to be?
>INTP's
They geek out on Star Wars' Force mechanics & tech (or worse the politics), often creating theories or debating canon endlessly.
>INFPs
They immerse themselves in the lore, maybe even maladative day-dream they're a Jedi or whatever, or write fanfiction or draw art, or do table top role-playing
>ENTP's
They're similar to the INTP but add in a desire to argue about plot points and alternate endings, power scalings, or "who would win" scenarios.
>ISTP's
They gravitate to Star Wars's tech (lightsabers, starships), building models or analyzing fight scenes.
>INFJs
They delve into Star Wars philosophical junk getting into taoism or joseph cambel or God forbid Jung.
>>
>>83793522
fine I'll listen to the audio book, it better be good, cause last time you assholes suggested a book: Satanic bible it was egdelord laughable garbage.
>>
>>83793604
In this thread? What's the archive post on that? We'll identify the poster and laugh at them for the rec
>>
>>83785957
ISTP is actually based and ME
>>
What type am I, if I think that modern Star Wars is dogshit and that it was never really *that* good
>>
>>83793459
Star Wars is such trash. It's an ecosystem of shit feeding on itself.
Yes the first movie followed the heros journey, and the second movie was a good subverions for a sci-fi action movie. But thats doesnt warrent 30,000 hours of media (yes counting all the books/comics/games/etc)
>>
>>83793641
>ISTP = Me
You're Russian? And the pic says America is ESTP....

So America is an extroverted version of Russia? And Russia is an introverted Version of America WTF?
>>
What's their type depending on their pfp?
Keep in mind that I don't agree with this ranking btw.
>>
>>83793674
>Russia is an introverted Version of America
Yes unironically: they're both giant multiculture empires that treat small nations around them like shit and don't give a fuck about anything but themselves. The big difference is, extroverts are better at making friends thus America won the cold war (made better alliances), but now america is fighting another extrovert (CCP=ESTJ) so it's more difficult.

Now if you use history + MBTI you can pretty much see who will win any long term conflict
>example: (1700-1920s)UK was ENTJ while (1700-1870s)France was ESFP, so obviously UK won).
China is ESTJ which is less palatable for alliances then ESTP, therefore America will ultimatly win but barely.
>>
>>83793713
i'll make list 4 u when I get back home in few minutes.
>>
Before, I used music as a sort of focus and intensity attenuator, but nowadays it's all completely distracting and inhibiting in this regard.
SAD and GRIM tracks get more appreciation though. I'll have to make a new playlist just for the subfeel.

>>83793576
And INTJs are not in the pic because they calmly meditate on HK-47 obviously?

>>83793773
>Now if you use history + MBTI you can pretty much see who will win any long term conflict
What's the MBTI for the Jewish folks? In advance: cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks, thanks!

>>83792391
Food metaphors are so American...
>deep secrets of the sublime structure of the psyche? sure, I'll listen, as long as you lay it out in burgers!
>>
I think that trying to type nations is kind of silly but also probably one of the most valid ways of applying Jungian psychology into something practical. That being said with the Japan example, I also think there is also a pretty good case of Introverted Feeling being something they keenly feel, it is also a culture where disagreements and the like are meant to be kept hush-hush because it isn't really supposed to be anyone else's business but your own. You're engagement with the greater whole of Japan is mostly meant to be an obligation of sorts. Hiding one's own values and downplaying cultural signifiers is a pretty big part of introverted feeling. In contrast Introverted Thinking types tend to be rather blunt and will just say what they think without really caring much about what the other party thinks because they are just vocalizing their ideas to get some sort of feedback. They are not very attached to their own reflections because those reflections are meant to be a guide of how to reach some sort of truth. That is not really something I see in Japanese culture that much, while there is some self-reflection going on, the overall focus is more on emotionalism than that. As Jung would say about someone he actually typed based just off of letters he read between two parties. The other being an extroverted Intuition type. It was quite interesting, forgot where I read it from though.

Another thing to keep in mind is class position as well, and what industry you are working in. Tech is very obviously so Extroverted Intuition that they are outright delusional about the capabilities of large language models, while Agribusiness is Extroverted Thinking. The leadership and politics is mostly Exroverted Sensation however, a lot of bombast but not that much in the way of value or pragmatic signalling outside of AMERICA FUCK YEAH but the values expressed is mostly for the sake of saying AMERICA FUCK YEAH more than it is about those actual values.
>>
>>83793780
Thx anon I'll be waiting
>>
File: types.png (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB PNG
>>83793906
>What's the MBTI for the Jewish folks? In advance: cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks, thanks!
Jews are overall ENTP (including Israel).
So if we compared that to Radical Islam=ESTJ, we can then determine who will win the civilization struggle in the region:
ESTJ is better tactically
ENTP is better strategically
in the short term, radical Islamists can do more damage & rally more support. In the long term the Jews can systematically shut them down. So Israel is going to win but it'll be hard won and take decades.
>>83793713
here I finished it (picrel)
>>
>>83794019
is this typing the characters or the people who'd use those pfps?
>>
>>83794026
typing of the characters personalitie.s
>>
>>83794027
>>83794019
Well thanks for the effort
Would you say they'd correlate with the people using the pfps?
>>
>>83794019
>>83794026
The hyper autist developing some *thing* (or multiple. Nobody can tell) while crossposting on /g/ and /sci/ is using Tohru to avatarfag and he's absolutely some INTP style thinkoid.
>>
what if you make your own pfps
>>
>>83793991
>I think that trying to type nations is kind of silly but also probably one of the most valid ways of applying Jungian psychology into something practical.
I agree lol. Wait till you see how accurate it is.
>That being said with the Japan example
Don't confuse animes for reality. Japan is a collectivist "face" saving society were: "doing your DUTY is more important then feelings so suck it up". They're ISTJ's to the core, even towards family and friends, AND they are blunt AF, they'll straight up call some someone fat or ugly, just because it's hierarchy based (you can only punch down not up) doesn't negate it.
>>
>>83794045
>The hyper autist developing some *thing* (or multiple. Nobody can tell) while crossposting on /g/ and /sci/ is using Tohru to avatarfag and he's absolutely some INTP style thinkoid.
You done complimenting yourself?
>>
I think I understand how to identify a feeling dom type. They'll be prone to believe that all thinking is only ever Horkheimer's "instrumental reason" (just learned the term by accident, how handy) - i.e. "logics are only for slop purposes only the primitives and the undifferentiated would care about"!

>>83794130
As for MYSELF, hmm WELL WELL WELL, just WHERE do I even START to BEGIN, ohhh my . . . . . . . .
>>
America is such an ESTP country. Look how it fights war: Comes in blows up a bunch of shit, then goes "meh, I'm bored of this" (or "this is to hard fuck this") and leaves.
>>
>>83794654
>America is such an ESTP country
WTF does that even mean? I hardly know any ESTPs and I live in America.
>>
>>83794670
>WTF does that even mean? I hardly know any ESTPs and I live in America.
It MEANS inside every American is a personality kernel of an ESTP. It comes out during times of duress, high emotion, or simple group think. THINK ABOUT IT: Americans default to being obnxious braggadocio's if something big happens like a election victory or a spaceship lands on something. Even a blue-pill introverted leftist who visits europe will be like "DOOD HOLY SHIT THIS FUCKIN AWESOME DOOD"

I'm not saying every American is an ESTP, I'm say it is their default cultural setting that they all FALL BACK ON if necessary.
>>
LISTEN UP! PUT DOWN YOUR CHAI LATTE(FAG) AND WITNESS THE GLORY OF AMERICA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! I'm gonna snort coke and drive 100 mph while a supermodel deepthroats me cause THIS is FREEDOM(shit is so cash).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yK0P1Bk8Cx4
Now why don't you go cry about being gay & weak while I celebrate how AWESOME it is to live in the greatest nation in the history of the world.
>>
posting itt because i appreciate the effort that went into the OP pic
>>
>>83794808
This is an effort thread. You are required to put effort forward or GTFO to and go to /biofem/ or /cut/
>>
>>83792589
>I have a little smith and wessen (I think it's the 642) 5 shot revolver my dad bought me.
Based gun. I carry either it or a Glock 17 depending on whether I want to pocket carry or carry IWB. Internal lock removed, ofc. d-don't tell anyone
>>
Threadly reminder to swab your casings with distilled alcohol in order to remove the finger prints just in case you decide to put down a feral nig and would rather not report the encounter
>>
Denatured alcohol, excuse me. It's been awhile
>>
https://youtube.com/shorts/txyUQzhe7Q0
>>
>>83794876
How about I don't live near them so I don't have to kell them. Have you thought of that?!
>>
>>83795188
>Alter your life choices based on the migratory behaviour of niggers
Absolute beta mindset. How about I go where I please, and live where and how I want?
>>
File: stone2.jpg (329.2 KB)
329.2 KB
329.2 KB JPG
>>83795188
White mans compassion is his undoing. I get it being compassionate to other whites is what elevated white society but do you think browns care about that? They don't want to elevate society, they ALL aspire to be is cruel tyrants, why do you think they all wanna be called "king/queen", they'll take being king of a mountain of shit, just as long as they're at the top. So they don't care if western civilization is destroyed and they're living in liberia 2.0.
>>
>>83794654
Wow so my ESTP arc was really just me coming to terms with being an american... #integration
>>
>>83795256
So much this. Women and their suicidal empathy are to blame for most of our problems. They're too emotional to vote. What a mistake
>>
>>83795007
Fuckign fake tiktok shit
>>
>>83795276
All Americans have an internal ESTP personality core that can override their dominate personality.
This is do to "hybrid vigor" (aka heterosis) giving Amerians a 12.4% increase in energy levels, and increase in thinking speed (5%), improved disease resistance, increased fertility, and better environmental adaptability (basically can survive posioning better) vs homgenious nationalities. This is particularly pronounced in F1 hybrids.

Basically the ESTP nature is biologically based.
>>
>>83795356
>Amerimutts are geneticlly superior
LMAO
>>
>>83795372
Americans are literally a master race cause they're objectivily geneticially superior.
Thats not conjecture
Thats not a theory
Thats not an opinion
Thats a measurable fact.
Here's some studies on Heterosis:
https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/bitstreams/9ee83383-1ca6-4794-b4b6-433ca03e34a1/download
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6709564/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40101147/
>>
>>83795007
You should really take shrooms for real, J, it would would help,
>>
>>83793160
Lol but I meant, compared to your main function(and inferior too, on the opposite end) you will see more ambivalence on the attitude of the aux, with still an obvious bias for your preferred attitude and one aux function. Whenever I notice that, I doubt somebody has a particular attachment to the function, it allows some spontaneousness and contamination with the unconscious there because it's not equivalent to the conscious standpoint either way.
I'm not getting into making an exact proportion ratio because it's way too dynamic imo, risks committing the same mistake as the "stackbrains".

Anyways, anon just keeps going on and on about how he FEELS about things, people, etc. given his posts, always charged with feeling judgments, always making a point to return to them, always DISGUSTINGLY FEELOIDING ALL OVER THE GODDAMN PLACE. VGH....
I kid, but yeah I'm confident enough he's IF(S) by now. Pray he doesn't go full INFJ-A or starts glazing Freud...
>>
>>83794714
>tfw internalized Se-groidism just by being American
Now that's actually disgusting.
>>
>>83795431
https://youtube.com/shorts/mMDfKy9ZT3I
>>
how to determine a kittys mbti
>>
>>83795627
Easy what does he act like? Mine is an ENFP who gets silly but sad if left alone. I've know cats that were estjs that like a ridged schedual and went on patrols to look for mice and had no time for play. I've know info cats that all they wanted to do is play tablet bug smashing video games and watch cat-TV (birds) and would otherwise mope. I've know cats that were estps that all the wanted to do was impress female cats.
>>
>>83795627
My dog is introverted because it's a guard dog, she will be aggressive if an unknown object doesn't prove itself to be innocuous.
All 4 main functions seem to be rather primitive, but dogs as a whole tend to affective feeling.
>>
File: IMG_4663.jpg (722.5 KB)
722.5 KB
722.5 KB JPG
>>83785957
>type
ISTP
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
Gooning and weed
>What's your biggest cope right now?
Thinking the near future will turn out for me regardless of my current situation.
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
My 18yo self would be completely btfo by all the things 27yo me has experienced by now, would probably think I am cool despite being in a shitshow now.
>Do you think you'll ever have sex Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
Yes and I have
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.

>be me mid 20s
>great 6-fig aircraft mechanic job
>lived with gf in cozy apartment and had pret much a great life I took for granted
>end up in a defensive shooting case
>ultimately charged with assault 2 (felony)

Its now been two months since ive been out of jail. I landed a great job offer which was then ultimately rescinded the day prior to my start date due to my record.

Back to living with parents, rotting and being a NEET like I used to be. My morale is very low when it comes to jobs, but I tend to figure things out.
>>
>>83795991
You gotta become an entrepreneur, then you don't have to apply for jobs.
>>
My cat is an INFP because he crys a lot and begs for food 6 hours a day and then sleeps the rest of the day
>>
>>83796229
I tried that in an MMO (where you can accumulate starting capital) and ended up with bulk that could be sold off only for cheaper because you can't reliably predict supply and price changes
>>
>>83792840
>However I am very bad at typing people. Maybe that is another point of me being a feeling type
Lol nah. Feeling types can detect motivations and intentions better on average than thinkoids, and these are very valuable data for typing since it's more about how things matter for the subject than what they actually do.
Don't compare yourself with *him*, he might be a feeloid too but more importantly he's fucking dumb and very deep into the projections. Smart feeloids are a thing.
>>
>>83796451
>Feeling types can detect motivations and intentions better on average than thinkoids
No they can't. They are more aware of their own feelings but thinking types are able to think about how others might be thinking.
>>
>>83796462
What no, feeling does the same with *everyone*, not just "your" feelings. They are aware of Feelings period.
Especially if they are extraverted, but for what's worth doing it along introversion only means you will touch upon the subjective factor(which is actually born out of collective unconscious, hence has validity outside of the purely personal subjectivity).
>>
>>83796473
>collective unconscious, hence has validity outside of the purely personal subjectivity
Collective unconscious is not actually valid. It doesn't actually exist.
>>
>>83796485
I'm going to start drawing occult function circles and a bunch of mandalas to summon Jung's ghost so he can haunt you and your dog/cat/spirit animal if you aren't a pet owner.
>>
>>83796485
Define "exist", anon?
>>
>>83796510
>exist
It's not real. It's made up. It does not exist in the real world. It's just something tumbler emo kids like to say.
>>83796497
>drawing occult function circles
The occult is not real either. It's a fantasy that goth girls like to play.
>>
>>83796544
Sounds like you mean "is not an object"
But then gravity isn't real.
Time isn't real.
Consciousness isn't real.
Perception isn't real.
Emotions are not real.
Thoughts are not real.
Even objects themselves are not real. What you know of as a "chair" is not a chair and simply does not exist.

I could go on.
>>
>>83796544
>It's a fantasy that goth girls like to play.
Counterpoint: on all levels except physical, I'm a little gothic lolits girl, specifically typed IS(F) too.
>>
Lets do a breakdown of an ESTP culture (USA & Mongol Empire):
>Main Strengths:
*Ungodly manuever warfare ability: will get to places rivals think is impossible and do it fast.
*Basically never have supply problems since they think of war as running a business.
*Ultra-effective merchants. They're quick to make new deals, and forgive past grudges for the sake of money.
>Weaknesses:
*If they don't win quick they give up
*they piss off allies without even trying who then stop cooperating
*they have NO grand strategy or diplomacy ability
*they have a low-brow culture they try to impose on everyone
>Who they're best at beating:
ISFP nations (like France) & ISFJ nations (like Canada). Since the ESTP is so bluntly destructive and unpreditable the more civlized ISF_'s get walloped.
>Who they're weakest against
INFJ and ENTJ. The ENTJ because they can do protracted grand strategy, and the INTJ because religous fanatics are the only thing that scares the estp.
>>
>>83796568
I will just tell them that we came into contact with an alien species and we possess foreign technology, that will fire up all the inferior intuition schizoing and they will be quaking in their boots.
Thanks Jung, Se-groids have no counter for this.
>>
>>83796568
>The ESFP's take on what it means to be a sensoid
>>
>>83796548
Those things are proven to exist though using experiments. No one would say gravity is just a theory. It's a real thing that can be measured and felt.

>>83796554
>I'm a little gothic lolits girl,
Sure you are. You exist just as much as the collective unconscious.
>>
File: 42IbnDT.jpg (21 KB)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>83796335
I do sales IRL, find things with a good 'spread': ideally $1-2 cost of good that sells for $20-30, then supply cost fluxuations matter less. If you're doing something like buying a lego set for $100 and selling it for $120 you're fucked if trends change. But if you buy anime statues for $3 and sell them for $50 it's less damaging.
>>
>>83796678
You can prove there are really archetypes and a collective unconscious, in theory, by pointing out how these keep showing up in all of human history regardless of time, space, culture, etc. etc.
It is a very logically and internally consistent idea, but of course we don't know how it looks like "physically" so it's mostly a sensoid concern.
>>
>>83796678
Archetypes and the collective unconscious can be felt as well. I guess it's an object now, just like gravity.
>>
>>83796712
>>83796738
What does the "collective unconscious" feel like?
>>
>>83796776
It's that weird feel you have when you are touching upon something that says something about hoomans as a whole, despite starting from something that was apparently only about yourself.
In dreams it's when you cannot really link the contents with your personal experience, thoughts, feelings, and what not, yet it seems to match something more primal and collective.
>>
>>83796784
>In dreams it's when you cannot really link the contents with your personal experience, thoughts, feelings, and what not, yet it seems to match something more primal and collective.
That's just schizophrenia.
>>
>>83796568
With their opportunism and innovative logistics and messenger outpost network aptitude and religious zeal around the "Perfect Integrated Khan" Mongol Empire is "ENTP." Even in the gay "Si=memory and tradition" it would be Si inf since the worship was more shaped around the current khan.
The horseback archery spam is just red herring cherry on top.

I think modern nations/states are less sensible to type since there's globalization cross-contamination and the governments are based on nepotism and blackmail infighting and outfighting mixed with realpolitik and populism.
Unless you're narrowing down something specific or at least pre-20th century, like fairy tales or culture or comparing approaches in specific fields. Now that's interesting.
>>
>>83796792
Holy extravertoid and possibly sensoid...
But yeah, you brought up one of the reasons for why I am very at odds with modern psychoanalysis. Yeah just slap a label and don't think about it, seriously? You call this a proper investigation?
>>
>>83796802
You can't investigate something that doesn't exist. You wouldn't investigate a ghost would you?
>>
>>83796894
Well *he* did.
>>
>>83796894
Hmph... Pffft... Skill issue.
Now give grant funds plox!
>>
>>83796910
He investigated something real like 11 herbs and spices to create delicious chicken recipes.
>>
>>83796922
JFC... JFC!
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddJHCUmIC8M

>Uh... SYNCHRONICITY!? AT THIS TIME OF YEAR, AT THIS TIME OF DAY, IN THIS OPPOSITE OF THE PSYCHOID, CONSTELLATED ENTIRELY WITH YOUR ARCHETYPES!?
> Yes!
> ...May I see it?
> ...No.
>>
>(Tada Kanako) In our current rapidly changing world that's overflowing with information, we want you to carve out your future without losing sight of yourself, of your own volition. To speak and act with respect and kindness to others. To seriously face your "true feelings" as "the truth". Things that are by no means easy.
>"Meitantei Precure!" is about seeing, perceiving, thinking for yourself, to find your "true answer". What we want to convey the most in this story is how we should "think things thoroughly on your own" without being swayed by those around us. And the future you reach through this process will be your very own "truth". The "truth" a detective arrives at will never waver. But the "truth" in life is something that can always change in accordance to "yourself".
>Our protagonist Anna travels back in time to 1999. How will she think, judge, and act? And what "truth" will she grasp in the future that is 2027? We would like you to watch with us until the very end.
huh..... magical girls?
Somebody stop these absolutely madmen, what the fuck is this upcoming season lmao. I love it

>>83796964
Kino, already watched it time ago.
>>
therw are so many cute infj boys on pdb why wasnt i doing this is the first place!!
its like mbti tinder
>>
>>83797080
>its like mbti tinder
The very concept of this sounds terrifying on a very fundamental level.
Type matching with a broken mess of a theory, mistypes abound, and generally high levels of ego inflation due to the positive descriptions, what could possibly go wrong?
No seriously just do astrology matching instead, much higher chance for things to work out.
>>
>>83797103
b-but,, the cute iffj boys,,
>>
>>83797135
He will be typed with 16p btw.
>>
File: IMG_1390.jpg (174.6 KB)
174.6 KB
174.6 KB JPG
>>83797173
b-bit the anime boys,,,
>>
>>83797177
>Sexuality
>Top laner
He's into BDSM
>>
>>83797188
but he is five foot four and very frail ,,
>>
>>83797188
Actually I think he meant he masturbates to LoL
>>
>>83797199
hhahaahahauHahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>
>>83797103
Obviously it will work with an universal ENFJ-A person- no wait, that'd be harsh anima/animus projection explosion down the road. Well then obviously it will work with barebacking your type - no wait, that's just entrenching the societal deindividuation while you service some anima/animus projection merged with stereotype projection. Well then astrology it i- oh, "practitioners" hide meth in their magic crystal stashes.

>>83797199
Finally a REAL gender
>>
Doary gorl is a lot like a goblin; always tryna date and fuck little tiny smol boys, make even smaller children. what is gonna happen when it gets bullied in school? it's a hard world out there and smol weak men aren't even men, they're just gnats who will be slapped away. Especially greek femboys, the worst of alll... spopp ohumm yeah, it's not okay to be short, or date japanese leaguye of legend players when you're a jewish girl from re9k what if he finds out that infj-a(he's an infp btw(just like every other infj male on the iwnwet)) sniffed your panteis through da comuper screen??? he gonna wan sniff 2, but isn t gonna let it be a forever ever with hubby and wifem, cause he's just a week smol frail puppet with mental angre issue :C very sad very sad. you just need ask your rabbi to arrange you a marriage and have a big fat greekojudaic weeding like in in rome !! you can invite all of /mbnti/ and have drama over who gets the corner slice of the round cake!! ^_^
>>
noooaa infj-a is sdefinitely a mistypedin INTP that got his brain fried from 12 yrs of pothead psyhcosis an halucinates shadow shafts peeking iut the walls says holy philosophist i am a wiz!

All the cute infj boyse on PDB HAve curly hairs and glases, awwwe
>>
File: IMG_1392.jpg (87.1 KB)
87.1 KB
87.1 KB JPG
he caled me a litle you guys,,
>>
tfw jeffrey dahmer was an INTP with schizotypal
i too am an INTP with schizotypal.
Jeffrey dahmer took home faggots into his house and performed lobotomy on them.
I too, take home faggots into my house and perform lobotomy on them.
>>
Good girl. Don't forget to forward us ALL the dick pics and the doxxes!
>>
>>83797422
Cyber love is bridled sexuality. Ditch the shackles. Return to spontaneous in-person loving.
>>
>>83797439
Fuck anything you see on the street buffets haven't been legal since Weimar, gramps
>>
>>83797435
omg he's suych a cute infj!!! why do they make them like this!!! HAHAHACHUSACHSAUHCAS
>>
>>83797443
IT'S ACTUALLY THE ONLY WAY TO HAVE SEX
THERE IS A REASON EVERYONE ON LINE IS WITHOUT CHILDREN AND EVERYONE IN REAL LIFE IS MARRIED WITH CHILDREN
>>
>acutalyly this japanese gnostic whose in japan is totally going to get me pRegntnant
sis, gnostics are anti-natalist and always have been they are death worshippers in the worst way. never getting sex chasing after vampires
>>
File: IMG_1388.jpg (194.9 KB)
194.9 KB
194.9 KB JPG
i may or may nit leve litle poet pieces trail to my drawbord for a litol infj into will make Him Him


why is this niglet spekaing down to me like an opresive priest from the midle ages?/
>>
i notice in a lot of mobile games they have an INFJ label, but no other mbti labels. Only the INFJ gets any attention. It's counterintuitive to actual INFJ behavior and design choices so I'm convinced it's a chinese psyop. to make me hate infjs. too bad though, i'll never dislike turbie she's too kind and sweet
>>
>I'm talkinga botu gnosticism with people on the internet
>literal 2nd century "Secret mysticism" that rejects christ
>Why you talking like middle age preacher
you wouldn't know the Spirit if it lifted you up and carried you straight to the Lord himself. You'd be like "Who is that, why's he got dumb uglkyu wholes in his hand is he a labubu?? hahahcahca cacaha i'm so quicktchungus" and he would say "I don't know this one. Send her back."
>>
Moore is shilling Adler really hard. I guess I REALLY have no choice but to check what Adler really is about.

>>83797497
>why is this niglet spekaing down to me like an opresive priest from the midle ages?/
Not sure but you should read Marion Woodman's Addiction to Perfection or else (You) won't make any friends.
>>
>WHJY YOU SO OPPRESIIVE WHY DON"T YOU LIKE FREEDOM
the freedom in question: Bowser's dog dick revenge 2
>>
Where did the first one go???
I'll tell you where it went, HE GOT PATCHY'D AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>
File: IMG_1393.jpg (140.1 KB)
140.1 KB
140.1 KB JPG
whats thr fuck is hapening lol i jsut blog abot my litle infj e-date and toonsbie starts losing his Christ charms
>>
Your blog disgusts me, in words you may understand it's filthy normgroid slop
>>
This ragebait is working on me, fuck
>>
File: IMG_1346.jpg (372.2 KB)
372.2 KB
372.2 KB JPG
so arw u just admiting your bottom tier scum ? cant catch cunny unless ur underr the comfy cloak of anonymos? date of /outdoors/? Lalalalla ahahahahahahahha _
>>
Jung-anon, Jung-anon.

Have you read into the Milgram experiment? (not discussing the anime one because I've yet to catch up)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment

I think this is where "unconventional Jungianiaty" could actually provide a good explanation, possibly.

How'd you reckon the consistently suggestive results across different populations?
Moore would say this is a suppression of the King into the shadow, with split projection of actives/positives onto the instructor, but this isn't quite savory for the mind, something's missing.

Are all people as much primitive feelers as much as they're primitive intuitives? Y'know, from the angle when some function is undifferentiated, it's effectively as much undifferentiated intuition (or was that about when primitives have nothing differentiated? I don't quite remember).
Is it merely participation mystique with the cybernetically raw microsocial setting of the experiment?
>>
File: IMG_8317.gif (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB GIF
i precogniticze a turrent of diarygirl shitpost streaming al summee,, huh! im gona infiltrate 50 infj dm and bye bye 4chan !
>>
No man wants to hear you talk about other men you're speaking to. Don't you have girlfriends for that shit? I'm not your girlfriend. Just post your tits and get on with it already that's what you're here for anyway isn't it twerp. Every one who comes into this thread is owned by me, because I'm the official thread baker, they gave me an official thread t-shirt that says baker on the name tag. That's especially true for infj girls, and so talking to other men is just unacceptable. To come in here and show off the 35 men you just texted because someone won't respond to you on discord doesn't make you interesting. Doesn't make your blog fun to read. It just reminds me of the picture of your panties and how you're such a tramp. Like really are you trying to have a stable relationship ever or do you not care about the future at all? Does anything outside of present moment even exist to you? Infj? No you're just looking for lust in all the wrong places and have no concept of what makes a relationship work because you've rejected the 10k years of proven history on how it works in favor of sex, drugs, and rock and roll. So keep on keep oning go own the libs by spreading your legs for every Tom dick and Harry that comes your way see if that makes you happy and gives you stability.
>>
File: IMG_1394.jpg (160.5 KB)
160.5 KB
160.5 KB JPG
its realy obvious whats stirring his schizoprehnia , is it ablist to laugh?
>>
>>83797781
Oh my blessed brothers in /mbti/... We have found the SANCTIMONIOUS VERMIN who keeps slipping the WRETCHED 16p links into the OP!

LET US LYNCH HIM.
HERE.
RIGHT. NOW.
>>
File: IMG_1395.jpg (131.8 KB)
131.8 KB
131.8 KB JPG
I told my New infja e-date abot our litle thread theatric tranny turbie enjoyer and he. says
> who cares what he wants
oh My goones so nonchalant
>>
>universal retard o'clock
>>
>>83785957
>>type
INTP
>>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
I like sugary goods too much
>>What's your biggest cope right now?
Rampant drug use
>>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
He'll be happy to know i'm quite more upbeat and less retarded nowadays
>>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No
Yeah
>>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
I don't really remember, my life is boring
>>
>>83797686
>Have you read into the Milgram experiment?
Now I did.
I can't say I find this surprising at all, for how much I'd like to hold back calling people sheeple I will do it anyway jesus lol. That's some 1V-triggering material.

>Moore would say this is a suppression of the King into the shadow, with split projection of actives/positives onto the instructor
Hmmmm, that's an interpretation that I'm sure can make some sense, but I dunno.

>Are all people as much primitive feelers as much as they're primitive intuitives?
If we are going with arguing it has to do with some sort of archetype activation/possession along with being projected into the experimenter, then the conscious personality fades in the background.... the conclusion might be right, but I'm not sure about the premises here.
Either way, the development of functions wouldn't help the teacher if they decided to submit their judgement to the experimenter completely.

The real question would be what that has to say about the ratio of personal differentiation, which would imply making conscious choices by following your typological orientation as far as possible - pitted against merely acting in function to societal demands(temporarily excluding everything else for the sake of argument).
But that ends up in realm of purely behavioral observations VS what's actually going on in the subject's psyche. One should have asked the "teachers" *WHY* they thought actually giving a shock to somebody who sounds like he is really in pain was a good idea, in what way are they valuing the "fake" experiment over the actor's well-being? All in the name of science? I'm sure some would have answered that, but the experiment is incomplete in a Junganical sense.

>Is it merely participation mystique with the cybernetically raw microsocial setting of the experiment?
At very least, I believe it's a little more advanced than participation mystique.
>>
One of the better perks of being an introverted feeling type is that you dont' need to go to a therapist kek.
>>
tl;dr
the experiment probably proves low volition in psychosophie as the average condition, but Junganically the value is hardly anything
>>
>>83785957
i wish a virtuoso bf...
>>
>>83798037
More like it's pointless because not even the best therapist could do anything about introverted feeloidisms.
>>
>prompt Claude to write a little story from [Se-groid character PoV]
>first 3 lines are just literally Se-groiding all over by describing literally every sense impression and specifically the items/people attached to it as opposed to turning over to the subjective side
Wow well done.
>>
Despite having no functions differentiated, primitives still do have an ego as they have executive function, no? As they did have their shamanic individuation rituals. You technically aren't able to conduit such for them to count as such without an ego, no?
Maybe I'll need another specialized Jung dive on this idk

>>83797993
>>83798062
I wonder if it could be that "1V"/"2V" (would 2V be exempt? 50/50 maybe) is the closest as a concept for what Jung should have discovered as factor of "differentiation of entelechy/individuation process," as practically the entirety of his work is literally around exactly this factor and making it differentiated.

>>83798062
I don't share the sentiment of the following but you ought to consider that introverts' dom feeloidings exist as a reference to triangulate where a holistic integration of the situation could be lacking, even if it's practically irrelevant to the IF(x) fuss and you might at best figure things out by meta-cross-inference that "even" the IF(x) might not understand when shown because... Underdeveloped auxes => can't latch onto an aux to pull the inferior thinking up just a little... Bombastic compass.
That's why "INFJ-A" is EF(S) btw

>>83798446
Uhhhh I realized the only fiction I like to read and draft is fiction that goes like that... That's why 99% of what I read is nonfiction.
>>
>>83798498
>I don't share the sentiment
*mostly because it's completely instrumental and "justifies" "society" "creating" types, that is.
>>
>>83798498
> 83798062
>I don't share the sentiment
Meant for >>83798105
Thank Jvvvng for another proof I'm not a Se-groid!!!
>>
>>83798498
>primitives still do have an ego
Good question. I lean on "lol no" but
> You technically aren't able to conduit such for them to count as such without an ego, no?
This point requires investigation indeed.

>would 2V be exempt?
Nah. It would be like excluding 2L as a real Thinking type, behavioral VS psychological nowithstanding.
>as practically the entirety of his work is literally around exactly this factor and making it differentiated.
Somehow I cannot imagine individuating without high enough volition but it might be just me.
Hm, maybe it's a difference between acting in accordance to your individuation VS doing the latter but not translating it into the former for [reasons]. A good reminder to always make sure to put a barrier between the behavior and the [current state of the psyche, including individuation stages, type, complexes and whatnot]

>>83798559
> that introverts' dom feeloidings exist as a reference to triangulate where a holistic integration of the situation could be lacking
If they were a very pure being made of "Fi", while at the same exact time having enough thinking and a very unbiased view on the matter somehow... eh ok let's just say that's going a little too much into spawning a purely ideal conceptual being into existence, no actual human is a perfect representation of archetypal Fi-groidism.

>>83798526
No danger of that really, not because nobody would try, but because that starts to approach simply being impossible.
>>
>>83793576
>ENTP's
They're similar to the INTP but add in a desire to argue about plot points and alternate endings, power scalings, or "who would win" scenarios.

Shit take
>>
>>83798559
Presented without original omments.
>>
By the way, on the Milgram experiment again.
Moore had an ongoing point that didn't mesh we'll with me.
It boils down to tackling own grandiosity (understandable part) but making apocalyptic doomerism that anyone's Self is inherently destructively grandiose, and that one should unquestionably support any mental/psychological/social/active imagination environment to the point that, well, the possibility of grandiosity in the environment isn't even considered.
(this HEAVILY reminds me of Marion Woodman's doomerism, except that hers was blaming anything on the person for not magically individuating quickly enough)

By taking Moore's statements I've seen as they are, one could say that the clueless sample participants pulling the voltage up did the right thing, since, in their angst, they they connected with the best social community they could connect (given they were isolated only into the experiment community being available), and they didn't act grandiose/inflated as they didn't make a fuss and they didn't disrupt a social establishment out of some personal considerations.
Nuancedly, any Jungian would completely disagree on this being a good conclusion to internalize (except maybe the Wotan-praising era Jung lolw), but the payload of the aggrandizing society-centric woo stuff (starting with Jung being ok with labeling archetypal factors as "subjective" factors) goes into exactly that direction.

Moore only talked of dysfunctional environments being a thing, but I've yet to ever see it being looked into in grandiosity sense, as I'm so far deep into week's worth of his material already.

>>83798581
>If they were a very pure being made of "Fi"
No, I'm also including their entelechy/individuation into the consideration.
>>
>>83798759
>anyone's Self is inherently destructively grandiose
Is it though? He seems to have fixated on that for some reason.
>Nuancedly, any Jungian would completely disagree on this being a good conclusion to internalize
Can confirm.

>No, I'm also including their entelechy/individuation into the consideration.
Then I wonder how well that would really go, considering an average case of introverted feeloid.
>>
Something occurred to me, people do not understand typology and therefore cannot accurately type someone due to a simple fact:
They don't know what differentiation is. They believe it to be some abstract concept of developing a skill. When in reality, as a simple concept, it's talking with the "other" of yourself and recognizing that "other" is a whole person in and of itself, and developing a relationship with that "other" part of yourself so that it sees you as a trustworthy participant to which they can express themselves.
They believe "actively using [a function]" is the differentiation of that function. But that's not what it is. That is the ego seizing control of a function to manipulate it to its own will, simple abstraction at the cost of the unconscious. It develops no relationship with the unconscious.

When the shadow trusts you, you do not need to seize control of its functions, it will offer them up, because you are cooperative partners.
>>
losers in here talking and debating over nothing instead of taking this morning's silver short

LMAO
>>
> 83798869
He- aw shucks 'n whoops I accidentally dropped the WELL-DESERVED (You) for the BASED troll bro CRASHING this TYPOLOGY thread with NO people UNTROLLED...

>>83798806
>>anyone's Self is inherently destructively grandiose
>Is it though? He seems to have fixated on that for some reason.
How do I answer this...

Moore had:
1. Outlined an ontology of evil as archetype of evil, aka archetypally draconic grandiosity (the main part of his works that I like, dragon stew flavor is optional in my mind though)
2. Tripped on his feet, confused the symptoms for the cause, did a failed category & logics flip and practically made an overlap of archetype of Self (and technically positional ontological self) with archetype of Evil because... just like any constellating archetype at all, both can cause... psychological and metabolical overwhelm, oh my! But otherwise archetype is Evil is never some other archetype, it's not an archetype of the Magician for example, it may only intrude into the manifestation! But as for the archetype of Self, nah, it's all grandiosity and archetype of Evil to be "tamed" like a "dragon" (the part of his works that I don't agree with and that he begrudgingly hinted to yes, be a bit of "reconsideration" of Jung. It's also not compatible with other "individuation" frameworks worth their salt, from Buddhism to Stirner, but that's a side note rant)
>>
you should do something with your life
nothing you write here means anything
>>
Consider this:
The abstract, meaningless nothingness is the meaning.
>>
>>83798904
Consider you are incredibly gay
>>
>>83798869
>>83798896
>>83798908
>>83798904
Now kiss homos!
>>
>>83798908
I will take it under great consideration.
>>
Considered and discarded
>>
Gotta do something while I wait for my not-so-subtle magical girl remix of Umikek to go online.

>>83798883
>(the main part of his works that I like, dragon stew flavor is optional in my mind though)
You can keep the dragons, they are cool.
Anyway, I'd need to check it out to properly connect with whatever background thinkoidisms there might be there. For now I can't say it sounds wrong indeed and using that example, somebody's "grandiosity" could have been beneficial to the actor... if he was actually getting hurt, that is, but that part doesn't matter as much as what the subjects are perceiving and acting upon. And many times, the truth is revealed just because somebody is too grandiose to let it go.

Also yes the OUTWARD FORM of the archetypes might overlap(an object that combines Evil + Magician? sure why not), but archetypes are all separate entities otherwise. Archetypal Evil is only that, period.
>>
Considered-
Held in tension
Not discarded,
Not rejected.
Integrated.
Understood.
Apricated:

Accepted.

Thank you for this opportunity for integration,
Universe.
>>
Maybe the real integration is what we choose to leave behind after completing The Work
>>
>>83798965
>completing The Work
Which microcycle bro?
>>
If you're leaving things behind,
you're merely repressing them,
By definition.
>>
>>83798866
Nice intuition, how about you back that up with a source?
Well anyway, though that is certainly something that could lead to confusion, personally I would have pointed out at how most people aren't even getting deeply into Jungism enough to know what the fuck is a "differentiation" in general.
The people who Jungpost here, it seems to me they get the concept with maybe one specific exception.

Ultimately it just means taking the function out of the undifferentiated unconscious blob and making it valid in its own right, which is how the term essentially means the same as doing abstraction of the function.
When the function is not currently active, it doesn't lose differentiation by itself(you can still very much access this abstracted Thinking however you please on a later time) BUT it will be part of the unconscious processing toward a content, because it's not like you can just completely prevent the activity of a function.
>>
>>83797781
And here we see TE's true colors.
>>
>>83785957
>>type
INTJ
>>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
Being on my PC a lot
>>What's your biggest cope right now?
Cope for what? The internet is my cope, I guess
>>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
Idk, probably glad that I got away from my shitty parents.
>>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
Already got it
>>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
What? Worst failure moment is letting other people decide things for me, even if I was underage and stupid.
>>
>>83785957
>>type
INFP
>>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
My avoidance has gotten completely out of hand. Haven't gotten the oil changed in my car in like a year and I'm pretty sure I have thyroid cancer. Think I'm just gonna kms
>>What's your biggest cope right now?
ASMR
>>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
He'd probably be surprised I'm still alive but not surprised at my life
>>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
I lost my virginity at 21 but I doubt I'll ever have sex again. Though maybe fuck a prostitute or something in the coming months.
>>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
Idk anon, none of my failures are very entertaining I don't think.
>>
>>83789157
Wish I could give you a big hug, anon. Stay the path, I'm sure it's waiting for you out there.
>>
>>83799166
>I'm pretty sure I have thyroid cancer.
Go to the fucking doctor ASAP, dumbass.
>>
>>83797827
I don't care where you find love on the spectrum.
I don't want to hear about it
>>
>>83799078
Sorry if the truth i spoke hurt your fee fees
>>
>>83799325
I don't know. I've always had this issue of avoiding things. When I was younger I could try and hype myself up and power through it. I thought as long as I keep working hard that something good will happen eventually. I can't really buy into that anymore. I have no motivation or will to live and all of my problems are too overwhelming. Can't really fight myself anymore. I don't even want to. I just want to be done with everything already. I'm too fucking tired. Like best case scenario, I go and it can be removed through surgery. Then what? I get to keep living? There's nothing in it for me.
>>
>>83799442
You should check it out so if it's even worse than you think, you can doom yourself around even harder!
>>
Alright i finished reading von franzs puer aeternus book. So it sounds like she talking about: extreme sport dudes and stoner mooch types not autistic incels like you find here.
>>
She's almost exclusively talkinga bout the "incel aspies" you find here.
>>
>>83799475
I might, might not. Hard to say at this point. I was feeling half motivated for a short bit like a week ago but I pretty much immediately sunk back down into depression.
>>
>>83799502
>>83799524
She talks about ALL of them.
>>
>>83799442
Nta, don't become a vulnerable narcassist by buying into the narrative you're the long suffering hero of the tragedy of your life story.

Here's how you get out of your slump: you change TINY daily habits and over a long time you move mountains.
>>
>>83799607
Primary the "incel aspies" who refuse to grow up.
>>
>>83799607
Wait, nta but, extreme sport adrenaline junkies are in the same group as neck beards?
>>
>>83799616
wtf how do you know your narcs? Did you read Elinor Greenberg's "Adaptations" book or something?

>>83799502
If you feel like a complete chud for the book focusing on men then read Addiction to Perfection next and you'll realize it's not sex-specific per se btw.

>>83799619
Callous, detached, projecting etc social butterflies did get covered, too. And the rich driving extreme sports cars to crash (if thay wasn't Woodman), and pilots either crashing or growing out of being pilots, etc (I'm suddenly recalling Ace Combat 7 on old pilot's angst lol)

>>83799624
Effectively yes since typically either are motivated by the unconscious into some escapism to kill themselves sooner not metaphorically for any "improvement", but literally. Adrenaline junkie gets the archetypal crash and the most stereotypical neckbeard flips from inner stress of following the societal pressure that made him a double bind neckbeard and does something too reckless.
>>
>>83799616
Which reggy is this? I like this advice.
>>
>>83799616
>buying into the narrative you're the long suffering hero of the tragedy of your life story
I don't think that. Though I guess that's how I used to cope with my life. But I stopped being able to buy into it. Life genuinely is just awful. There's nothing it for me. Not anything attainable anyway.
>>
>>83799714
>There's nothing it for me. Not anything attainable anyway.
I feel like these perspectives are so blind and act as if they're aware of everything that exists when in fact it's the opposite.

You can't know what all is out there unless you've found it and no one can know everything.
>>
File: mint_web.png (2.6 MB)
2.6 MB
2.6 MB PNG
>>83799714
>Life genuinely is just awful. There's nothing it for me. Not anything attainable anyway.
Some MFers look out the window on a sunny day and all they'll see is the smudges on the glass.
>>
>>83799686
>Effectively yes since typically either are motivated by the unconscious into some escapism to kill themselves sooner not metaphorically for any "improvement", but literally. Adrenaline junkie gets the archetypal crash and the most stereotypical neckbeard flips from inner stress of following the societal pressure that made him a double bind neckbeard and does something too reckless.
Can you explain ina fruedian or jungians ense why the man child exists? You seem to know stuff.
>>
>>83799760
>>83799789
There is no point in trying to convince him he's wrong. Hes already made up his mind and you won't change it. Can you people tell from how he's talking?
>>
The worst thing about people like that, his life probably isn't even that bad.
But he can spin a narrative of his life being horrible, which excuses his non-engagement with life.
Without realizing, his non-engagement is what's creating the perception that life is bad.

No amount of logic or reasoning can save someone in that cycle. He has to want to break it himself, or else he'll continue.
>>
>>83799701
>Which reggy is this?
It's an occasional avatarfag who posts here maybe once every 2 weeks. Hes mostly in his own minivlog threads threads he makes.
>>
>>83799760
>blind and act as if they're aware of everything that exists
Anon, if I couldn't make anything work when I was younger and stronger both mentally and physically. Why would I be able to do so now? I have tried and tried and tried. I'm tired of the constant cycle of improvement and failure. I can't maintain anything because it is just a constant battle against my own nature. Whatever's wrong with me, I can't fix it. I don't want to keep torturing myself anymore. I just want it to be done.
>>
>>83799502
>>83799524
Never read this tome, but as someone likely in the crosshairs. I can tell you from my side, you are all children to me. Regardless of how little I may seem an adult.
>>
>>83799888
>non-engagement with life
I wish. Everything would be so much more tolerable if I didn't have to do anything at all. No, the constant trying and failing to attain normalcy is what's left me so despondent. I've tried. I really did. You can believe whatever you want. But God damn, the cards I was handed were shit, I tried my fucking hardest to do something with them. I did more than ever thought I'd be able to. Just wasn't enough. It's never enough for anyone.
>>
>>83800390
ok but what's your mbti type
>>
>>83800407
INFP, obviously.
>>
File: BAWWWW.jpg (13.2 KB)
13.2 KB
13.2 KB JPG
>>83800390
>bawwwww feel bad for me.
>>
>>83800439
>INFP
oh ok carry on then
>>
>>83800439
>INFP
CRAWLING IN MY SKIN THESE WOUNDS THEY WILL NOT HE-AL
https://youtu.be/vZ7nTHxWyOk?si=xb6PvQdw6HH4i-cW&t=26
>>
>>83800478
I don't really get why people get so bent out of shape over stuff like this. Life sucks for some people. Just how it is.
>>
>>83800390
>trying and failing to attain normalcy
But why would anyone want that.
Normalfags are retarded, have flimsy morals, basic bitch tastes and no "vision" to speak of. Claiming they have differentiated functions at all is being generous compared to individuationCHADS. Anyone who has a definite type already stands above normies I M O. Don't try to bend yourself for them, make them bend to you.

Holy 1Vism I know.
>>
>>83800481
Thank you for respecting me and my nature, anon.
>>83800516
I do like Linkin Park. I should have leaned into the emo thing when I was in school but I was too autistic to have any kind of style.
>>
>>83785957
>>type
INTJ
>>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
Internet and sloth
>>What's your biggest cope right now?
Internet and sloth
>>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
It's over
>>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
I dunno probably
>>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
I don't wanna talk about it lol.

Does anyone actually talk in these threads or it is just disgusting e-drama
>>
>>83800559
>Linkin Park. I should have leaned into the emo thing when I was in school but I was too autistic to have any kind of style.
Per chance, how old are you m8?
>>
>>83800550
I dunno, anon. I've always wanted to belong somewhere. Also success is kind of predicated of your ability to navigate social situations.
>>
>>83800613
I'll be 30 this year. Time sure flies.
>>
>>83799816
>Can you explain ina fruedian or jungians ense why the man child exists?
I'll go with Jungian-oriented one, though Freud can actually get some mentions.

One could outline at least 4 reasons that may also involve others:
0. Abstractly: Idealistic perfectionism that doesn't get Death Mother archetype activity (per Marion Woodman based on Addiction to Perfection and https://danielasieff.com/media-type/writing/confronting-death-mother-an-interview-with-marion-woodman ) / Superego acting on Thanatos rules (neo-Freudian)
1. General: Shame culture (per Robert Moore; mentioned in the lectures on the King archetype)
2. Specific: Lack of "initiation"/"coming of age" ceremony creation/participation (general Jungian)
3. Hyper-specific: having your mind
stuck in some archetypal narrative of being some Hero that might only die while trying to reach the epic goals; not having the death be only metaphorical; not transforming the Hero archetype via rebirth into Warrior archetype (per Robert Moore, book on King Warrior Magician Lover archetypes)
4. [Bonus] My view without any woo: people will keep wallowing in whatever flavor of angst and drama as long as they're not explicitly bored of it ("even" Von Franz couldn't accelerate individuation of Puer Aeternus cases despite knowing the specifics and having the niche expertise to even have the monumental book with her lecture material).
>>
>>83800547
>I don't really get why people get so bent out of shape over stuff like this. Life sucks for some people. Just how it is.
I think it's an ENTP taking the piss. But If I were to conjecture, the issue with the INFP anon: he shows signs of vulerable narcissism, AKA he exerts narcassitic control by luring people who want to help him and then being dismissive, "nope, I'm not gonna listen or try, but I'm SO SAD :(". Typically this is something a female does, as the male narc is usually direct about it.
>>
>>83800390
What are these supposed shit cards you were handed?
What is this supposed normalcy you're attempting to gain, and how are you failing? Not only how, but what is causing the failure?

I also didn't say you were doing nothing. I said you weren't engaging. You also proved what I thought with this line:
>Everything would be so much more tolerable if I didn't have to do anything at all.
It's a very not so subtle nod to your actual aims. What you desire, and seek to attain.

How often do you find yourself giving up when things get what you might call "difficult"?
>>
>>83800673
>Idealistic perfectionism that doesn't get Death Mother archetype activity
that doesn't get rid of*
ALTHOUGH some pressure COULD bring actualizations out from the person. Go figure.

A good spot of the post to breach any perfectionism lel
>>
>>83800617
>I've always wanted to belong somewhere
I too have always wanted to belong and feel needed. There has never been a place where I fit in or was accepted. Not even here or in 4chan related discords. There's never been a place for me.
>>
>>83800583
>Does anyone actually talk in these threads or it is just disgusting e-drama
This might be most Junged-up thread over the last few years
>>
>>83800673
>death mother superego bs
People becoming perfectionists or pragmatists isn't a "death wish" it's a logical reaction to environmental instability like economic declines/etc.
>Shame Cutlure
Social accountability is a good thing. It's not holding you back from being a "king" which is delusional narcassism to the core
>no coming of age rituals
Hrmmm ever heard of college and the miliary? And even then everything is decentralized so you get to pick what your ceremony is
>Warrior archetype
Requires a purpose worth serving. Look at Mel she was literally a warrior and quit cause it wasn't worth serving. And nothing these days is truly worth serving.
>people will keep wallowing in whatever flavor of angst and drama as long as they're not explicitly bored of it
That's pure determinism. You can will yourself out by forming new habits.
>>
>>83800729
No one fits into 4chan everyone is here because no one likes them and this is the last resort.
>>
>>83800814
VGH bazed baZED BAZED. TND - Total Nuance Death. EVERYTHING IS WRONG, and, actually, you were too nuanced and thus wrong, ain't nobody going to think your convolutions out. Nerd ahh aura ong
>>
>>83800693
>supposed shit cards you were handed
Biggest one is just being autistic I think. But shitty home life, lots of domestic violence growing up. Meth head father going to prison. Mother was cold and distant. I wouldn't call her neglectful but I was never really held or told I was loved. She would also yell at me anytime I got hurt or was upset. Which was probably not helpful. Had trouble making friends growing up. I did do okay when I was younger and socializing was less complicated but it got more difficult the older I got. Went through most of high school with 0-1 friends. Got bullied a lot. Though I'll say I was probably definitely fucking annoying. But it's not like I was trying to be. I was just a social retard. Got insulted, spit on, hit, slammed into walls, told to kill myself, threatened with a knife, etc. Just kind of stopped talking to people after a certain point and never really managed to bounce back from that. Even after I managed to make some friends as an adult. Was just never really the same. There's more but you get the idea.
>supposed normalcy you're attempting to gain
The ability to communicate with other people effectively and form relationships with them. Or even just be able to be around other people without the constant pressure to keep up socially with them. The constant stress from having to keep up with normal people is one of the big things that drags me down I think.
>not so subtle nod to your actual aims
Now? Yeah that to me would be the only way I could really continue to live. I can't really handle working and keeping up with people. But that's definitely not what I wanted when I was younger. I wanted to be able to have an okay job and friends and a partner.
>How often do you find yourself giving up when things get what you might call "difficult"?
Specific tasks I can do easy enough. Vague tasks like social improvement, I give up easier. Though it's because it doesn't seem like I actually improve no matter much I practice.
>>
I'm reminded of that extraverts don't consider that introverts' arguments are thought through, as extraverts project their habits and expect iterations as if everything from everyone is just a starting point, nothing to think into.
Likewise, introverts tend to mistakenly expect for extraverts to consider the points deeply and to not push for more iterations.
I think I had read that on some Jungian professor blog (oh do I love keeping track of mental notes).

Even when you're used to it, sometimes the disparity becomes a COMPLETE psychological turnoff when the other party isn't at least intuitively aware of it.
>>
INFP is the most heckin valid race
>>
>>83801103
btw that's why "INFJ-A" is likely to be extraverted / EF(S). He absolutely goes for the iteration count
>>
>>83800814
>Mel she was literally a warrior
Shes not a fucking warrior, she's a fascist who joined for money and has no loyalty to anything except herself.
>>
>>83799816
It's simple, they get caught in a loop of behavior that reinforces itself. Then the ego identifies with that set of behavior and says "this is me". Then since the ego believes that it is that set of behaviors, it fights to keep them, because it believes if those behaviors are changed it will "die". It creates systems of new ideas to support the belief, and systems of repressed beliefs to support the belief.
By trying to change the behaviors associated with the beliefs, they wind up in a smaller loop of behaviors which support the larger belief in the identity in the larger belief structure. This is what most people call "self sabotage". Starting a change, getting dissuaded, believing you can't, thinking change is impossible, negative self talk, giving up because it's hard, etc. All these beliefs are fueled by the shadow, the unconscious.

Puer has this thing where its possessed by possibilities. "I could be this, or I could be that!" but then by trying to actualize any of those "could be's" the other possibilities collapse into impossibilities which feeds into an existential fear of making the wrong choice, and giving up, then go back to the drawing board of reimagining what could be, and repeating the process.
If the pattern is never broken, they get deeper into the imagining process and stop trying. The avoidance and the imagining take over the entire psyche.

That's why they say things like "I wish I could do nothing" that's the archetype speaking. It really wishes it didn't have to make a choice.
There's like 4 or 5 different psychological mechanisms reinforcing the behaviors, and they have to be addressed individually in a specific order, or else they fall back into the patterns of behavior. That's why you can't just say "just do x" to solve it.
>>
Robert Moore did call out differences between Warriors and Mercenaries, as archetypal behavior... It's right there in the audio recordings of the lectures.

One of my bosses got such a culture shock ick when I intuitively acted aloof based on the latter one just to avoid his extravertoiding lol.
>>
>>83797686
>How'd you reckon the consistently suggestive results across different populations?
Selection bias, for one thing. Although, one could argue that doesn't change much at all. The volunteers will naturally tend to value the Procession of Progress more than Some Guy.
The slow ramp up, and simple ignorance probably play a part. The fact that the Learner is a volunteer also, and that they are being paid to do something, also play a part. There just isn't a way to do a proper experiment on this subject, or really any sociological subject. I could go on, but that's my point.
I'm deriding the experiment, but by any sane standard the Wehrmacht did nothing wrong. That people need some pseudo-scientific ritual to reassure them of that fact is the disturbing thing. That this is a real experiment people carried out, continue to carry out, give weight to, and talk about to this day with some regularity is the disturbing thing.
In Jungian terms, it shows how """international capital""", the """modern academic establishment""", and the high class or social elite in general are pathologically Extraverted and Thinking (which is naturally emulated by lower classes). This wolf-in-experiment-clothes is better as an attitude test, or it would be if it wasn't famous. Really, it says much more about the people putting on the pantomime and the applauding audience than it does the poor actors.
>>
>>83801208
>I gave my boss the ick
Greentext story please
>>
>>83801229
>the Wehrmacht did nothing wrong
They were incompetent jobbers that consistently micromismanaged and backstabbed their less imperialistic "allies" though
>>
>>83801166
why are you obsessed with Mel and spreading her pantsu pics, Minto?
opportunistic targeting or did she do something specifically even before you phished and leaked to make you harass her?
>>
File: mumei.jpg (586.6 KB)
586.6 KB
586.6 KB JPG
>>83801166
Evidently not a very good fascist.
>>83801265
He's a mintoschizo, what else would one expect?
>>
>>83799701
That's the one who tricked mela into sharing pics of herself by pretending to be a girl and then posted them all over
>>
>>83801240
Not on this one I'm afraid. Since he had enough social aptitude to let the camaraderie grow instead of forcing it. Not bad for whatever ExTJ.

>>83801229
>The slow ramp up,
Micro-Overton window effect?
>and simple ignorance probably play a part.
Hmm as selective ignorance maybe. Reminds me of that's how passive shadow form of Magician can be. Though the general experiment seems to be more in the King side, but the King is informed by the Magician after all...
>The fact that the Learner is a volunteer also, and that they are being paid to do something, also play a part.
Payment is a sort of libidinal alchemical endorsement as well.
>There just isn't a way to do a proper experiment on this subject, or really any sociological subject
If we take away the perfectionism or the original chase for a hypothesis, the experiment brings something new out of the left field, as I see it.
>Really, it says much more about the people putting on the pantomime and the applauding audience than it does the poor actors.
However, consider that the experiment conductors are the "teachers" of the Milgram experiment that is SOCIETY (gangweed.jpg)
Are the dominos falling into a pattern for you yet? Rise up gamer
>>
>>83801157
I go for iteration because it's clear when someone isn't understanding what I'm saying. So I think if I reiterate it enough times or well enough, eventually they'll understand. (they basically never do)
I don't work through my thoughts externally though. The idea I've presented is complete, even if I don't present it in its complete form. Mostly because it's a very long thought that's connected to like 700 other thoughts. And the thoughts themselves aren't words, they're pictures that move and I have to grab that picture, hold onto it long enough to extract the words out while maintaining the picture itself and not losing its connections or accidentally going into the wrong mario-pipe into completely tangential thought process (which happens a lot).

Iteration = translation.
Not
Iteration = refining the thought
I simply want (YOU) to access the image I have WITHOUT killing it myself (or you killing it). Which is a lot to ask, which is why it fails so frequently.
It's like me trying to get you to taste a orange with your ears. Obviously the request is nonsense.
But, every now and then, I find a person who is willing to taste with their ears. Most are not.

Such is the life of having to deal with extroverted rational types though. Life goes on.
>>
>>83801207
>There's like 4 or 5 different psychological mechanisms reinforcing the behaviors, and they have to be addressed individually in a specific order, or else they fall back into the patterns of behavior. That's why you can't just say "just do x" to solve it.
What are those mechanisms?
>>
>>83801361
Ok but what if I see but I disagree?
>>
>>83801207
>It's simple, they get caught in a loop of behavior that reinforces itself.
A person would have to be pretty dumb to think the are their habits. Maybe it's true ignorance, they never even though to question it so they don't even know. It's living in 2 dimensions unware there is a 3rd dimension.
>By trying to change the behaviors associated with the beliefs, they wind up in a smaller loop of behaviors which support the larger belief in the identity in the larger belief structure.
Sounds exhausting. I had a roommate whos personality was "the tabletop game dude", but all he did was nit pick tabletop games as if he hated them. He wasted all his mental effort defending an indentity he no longer even vibed with.
>Puer has this thing where its possessed by possibilities.
Yeah but you have to chose a possibility or you end up like christ-chan, and that's an ugly thing to become.
>>
Why trick and be tricked when you can just free love, baby?
>>
Free love!? I'll take your entire stock! And sell it!
>>
>>83801391
Here, watch this:
I disagree that you disagree.

Do you see how saying "I don't agree" doesn't elaborate on exactly what you don't agree with or show that you understand what's being said?
If you said "I disagree with x" and I said "I didn't say, nor did I mean x" you clearly don't understand what I said. And this is what happens, almost all of the time.
Assuming you understand what I said simply because you disagree isn't a very good point of view. This is why I continuously had to ask Patchy to explain what he thought I meant, and when I asked him to, it was abundantly clear he didn't understand.

But, if you disagree with what I'm actually saying, I'm unbothered by that. It's when you disagree with something I'm not saying. Or when you try to force what I'm saying into some other narrow box.
>>
>>83801353
>Micro-Overton window effect?
If you wish, though i don't think it's wise to introduce invasive terms like this. To my mind it shares more blood with a classroom in February than a radio in November. It would be more like the latter were the learner shocking himself: That would be a more interesting experiment in general.
>selective ignorance
You think Johnny "4 dollars an hour" Jones knows what 450 volts will do to the human body? I can tell you i don't. If they weren't ignorant, the actors wouldn't have been able to convince them. The establishment is selectively ignorant, these simple people are simply ignorant.
>perfectionism
It just isn't science. Peer Review, Replication and self identification aren't enough to make it science. Not necessarily a problem, so long as all are aware of the fact and it's taken into due account.
>the experiment brings something new out of the left field, as I see it
You already know what i think this says about you, and that it does say about you more than anything else.
>consider that the experiment conductors are the "teachers" of the Milgram experiment that is SOCIETY
Two sentences before the one you quoted, i showed that i have.
>>
>>83801396
>A person would have to be pretty dumb to think the are their habits.
Everyone does it.
Even (you).
>>
>>83801559
>>83801396
You are your habits. You are not your potential. You are what you do.
>>
I hate your gay science dudee
>>
Migram experiment factoid...
>14 of the 40 subjects showed definite signs of nervous laughing or smiling.
Welp per Moore a shadow trickster would regress into detachment of treating everything as a joke.

>>83801476
fyi I try to not post pics on short posts.
>I disagree that you disagree
>Assuming you understand what I said simply because you disagree isn't a very good point of view
I don't subscribe to Hegelian Gnosticism if you get what I mean.

>>83801492
>It just isn't science
Science is a buzzword at this point. If you mean it's not holistic discovery then I agree. The other anon made a good point that it's a complete shame the teachers weren't asked the "why's".

>You think Johnny "4 dollars an hour" Jones knows what 450 volts will do to the human body?
What are the chances all of them would go for 300 volts if it's just ignorance distribution? Plus even with sample shocks and visible "teacher" stress and the "learner" acting hurt...

>You already know what i think this says about you
Something about being BASED and REDPILLED no doubt!

>Two sentences before the one you quoted, i showed that i have.
I see.
The question is then, where following the trail backwards stops pointing at yet another "teacher"?

>>83801559
NTA but, as a mild enjoyer of Deleuze-

>>83801579
This sounds like something I haven't read yet and it's from Nietzsche.
>>
pachyderm needs to go to /lit/
>>
>>83801642
I've been checking it often and let's just say even "INFJ-A" is a better alternative.
>>
I am absolutely chuffed to bits
>>
>>83801594
>Hegelian Gnosticism if you get what I mean.
I don't. I'm not an enjoyer of Hegel. I like Jung. I read Jung.
>>83801655
Tricked you into reading this spoiler.
>>
>>83801594
>The question is then, where following the trail backwards stops pointing at yet another "teacher"?
The spirit of fratricide. The dam of Christianity broke, and now we're just drowning in it. Only, now lacking brothers, we've turned on ourselves.
>>83801594
I think you're pathologically extraverted and thinking. Are you pretending to be retarded, or exhibiting selective ignorance?
>Science is a buzzword at this point
>at this point
>
And what the hell isn't, "at this point"? Within the context of this conversation, or at least my side of the conversation it is not. If you chose to read "sociology isn't science" as buzzwording, that's on you. What reason have you to assume i'm buzzshitting you?
>complete shame the teachers weren't asked the "why's
They couldn't have given real answers. The experiment itself presupposes that. Fortunately, the testers tells us their whys, and they're the interesting specimens.
>>
ugh Kris is online so I can't post my new [REDACTED]
>>
The Kris - INTJFemboi dynamic needs to be studied
>>
File: b6c.jpg (67.3 KB)
67.3 KB
67.3 KB JPG
>when anon tricks me
>>
Ended up JUNGING all over the place with that ET(N) woymin I mentioned. Was surprised at how quickly she got interested, criticized Freud too for being too obsessed over one idea (the sex drive), typed herself exactly as expected with big self awareness that her introverted *behavior* isn't natural but rather a learned reaction to [bad feeling-related experience with people] and picked intuition not because it sounded cool but because she quickly admitted her "function du reel" is rather lacking and she "fills the blanks" more often than not.
Almost can't believe this person never read Jung before (I'm like 80% sure she knew the general idea of his system though, and the relationship with Freud isn't something I brought up)

Also lol astrology correlations as soon as I mentioned the typology.
How truly Te-groided.... she still likes it though you can tell, went on to tentatively type people "only for fun". Can't pull this tsundere schtick on somebody who watches anime as much as I do come on now.
Plus she literally admitted having more knowledge on astrology than the average normie and recalls how to calculate ascendents, you didn't just read that accidentally come on now.

Literally me in that moment:
(too lazy to Photoshop circles rn, also phoneposting)
>>
Patchy never apologized for pretending to kill ximself
>>
Faking your own death is just how intuition+thinking types entertain themselves don't overthink it. Both attitudes lol
>>
File: IMG_1038.gif (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB GIF
ajoin Join up minty im Looking at You!
https://r7.whiteboardfox.com/76433659-9940-0969

>b b but i cAnt im block-
Ahhe
>>
sunone wthch friendren with me
>>
>>83803552
We need to give you an exosuit with multiple weapon systems.
>>
File: IMG_7052.png (261.7 KB)
261.7 KB
261.7 KB PNG
>>83803469
unlee f yew play Animal Crossing with meh
>>
>>83803621
I'm thinking robotic super-strength and two independently gimballed death lasers.
>>
>>83803621
>Animal Crossing
I hav stardw but nvr played it. I dun hav aminal crossing :*(
>>
Found this on reddit
It's about telling MBTI to fuck off because IT'S SHIT and Jvngian typology is better, and then just explaining in brief attitude-type and function-type, along with auxiliary and inferior functions.
https://www.rafaelkruger.com/psychological-types-explained-the-problem-with-mbti/
No really, that's the accurate summary.

>To exemplify, in my case, being an introverted intuitive type
It's always these fuckers. I swear it's always them writing and making articles/videos on Jungian typology in general... or perhaps, my brain is hardwired to be attracted by their content due to Ne-groid x Ni-groid memes. Or they are all fucken mistypes heh
>>
>>83803715
>my brain is hardwired to be attracted by their content due to Ne-groid x Ni-groid memes
What do you mean by this?
>>
>>83803720
>What do you mean by this?
These memes.
I tend to be attracted by stuff clearly written by introverted intuitive types(INxx in general, not necessarily INxJ actually), myself I am an extraverted intuitive(as in, the ENxP type, leaning Thinking auxiliary tho)
>>
>>83803621
post your fc and il add you
>>
>Lastly, Jung says that the technical term for the animus and anima is the inferior function, however, we tend to find them personified, making the animus and anima the empirical observation of the inferior function.
Cannot remember this very precise and unequivocal association but you know what, fair enough.
If I were to give a shape to my anima as if I didn't literally do it already for experimental active imagination purposes it would absolutely be a sensation/feeling type, it would be cute/modestly attractive with maybe just one or two flashy attributes, young-looking with round-ish, soft-looking facial features, not very pronounced tiddies, visibly shorter than my own height, it very much aims at the Si-groid shit of not having anything too exaggerated visually, preferably having just two or maybe three dominant colors, but still very much "obviously cute, one quirky feature here and there, gives moe feelings".
But I'm somewhat more ambivalent to the introversion/extraversion side of the things. Behaviorally, of course.
>>
>>83803715
Oh I know that Reddit grifter boy.
He's the one who had seemingly read Von Franz on the Puer Aeternus but decided the "solution" us just to pursue flow states instead of developing the executive function, despite Von Franz pre-emptively calling that out while discussing writer that had to put the feed into water tubs and listen to music to write without solving anything.

>>83803227
"Degenerates like you belong on a cross!"

>>83801887
>I don't
The point is "same understanding=/=same conclusions", unless exactly some flavor of Hegelian Gnosticism is at play and someone's playing supply and demand economics games with "truth."

>>83801935
>The spirit of fratricide. The dam of Christianity broke, and now we're just drowning in it
Either elaborate or read The Ancient City.

>What reason have you to assume i'm buzzshitting you?
"Science" is always a loaded and vague word in modernity.

>I think you're pathologically extraverted and thinking
Would that mean you can't comprehend introvert's attitude to mention it, but you can comprehend thinking function enough only to be paranoid of its presence and demonize it?

>They couldn't have given real answers
That's where Jungian amplification can come in handy!
>>
>>83803829
>Jung says that the technical term for the animus and anima is the inferior function, however, we tend to find them personified, making the animus and anima the empirical observation of the inferior function.
I've been thinking it's unreliable as a principle.
And Jung got himself tripped up on this because of lack of appropriate intuitings and experience bias what he encountered around this as it's written in the Red Book (ngl I've been thinking its publishing has been deliberately postponed exactly because you could intuitively cross-check the biases and discover the study methodology mistakes).

Since:
1. You have to differentiate out the archetype complexes first. Of course when in the unconscious things overlap in a stream, and you're not actively aware of that, and a requested letter gets dirty, you might think dirt is part of the intended letter.
2. Anima/Animus is what you consider to be appropriate for the opposite sex. Like being alive (optional (TM)). Features can overlap between sexes. Potentially including degrees of differentiation, and types.
3. The apparent type can be completely dependent on stage of Anima/Animus development.
4. Archetype complexes aren't static and might "change types" more often than you might expect.
5. Anima/Animus manifestations might be pointless to consider as a phenomenon, since in practice you only get screens for projecting your inner Anima/Animus contents, projection (whether under manufactured or natural conditions) being the most reliable clue on the current state of the archetype complex. Whether you're projecting on inner figures or the people out there.

>inb4 but what of my mental construct apparition?
Oh I dunno, it's not like you have to discard it?
>>
Of course, the ultimate question is, how do you make all the archetype complexes in your psyche pay their rent and pay their taxes?
>>
>>83785957
>type
infp
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
junk food and jerking off
>What's your biggest cope right now?
thinking i'll be a famous cartoonist one day
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
not much difference
>Do you think you'll ever have sex? Yes/No (for foids: do you think you'll get true love)
I don't actually know, no one has ever been attracted to me but I cope by thinking when I finish my comic and print copies to shill to a bunch of people i will find some girl who is impressed by my work and loves me
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
I'm still young so my only failures was school. I need to get famous from my comics. If i don't somehow start making money from art or at least try to network by handing my comics to random people, I will call that a failure/regret
>>83788991
fuck thats brutal, this is why I never drink with people
>>
>>83804191
>feed
*feet, sorry. lol
>>
>>83788991
>first pull up
If you can't do one I recommend trying to jump up and slowly lower yourself down. Go as slow as you can. I need to get back into doing pull ups.
>>
File: IMG_4512.jpg (85.7 KB)
85.7 KB
85.7 KB JPG
>>83785957
>type
infp
>What habit are you most ashamed of right now?
smoking weed on adhd meds
>What's your biggest cope right now?
ai bots for romantic rp, youtube, weed...
>What would your 18-year-old self think of you today?
that i lost it
>Do you think you'll get true love
i try not to think too much about it
>Worst failure moment in your life that would make a good green text.
when i greened out for the first time i started freaking out and texting a friend desperate that i was going to overdose and die. she started laughing at me. i laid naked in the bathroom floor nearly crying thinking i was gonna die and the last words id heard were my friend laughing at me.
it was only when the effects slightly died down that i was able to remember that you indeed can't overdose and die on weed.
>>
>>83804236
oh wow thats very interesting mr anon
>>
>>83804249
>*feet,
TE drooling rn
>>
>>83804208
>I've been thinking it's unreliable as a principle.
Like I said, I remember he was a lot more ambivalent on this. Yes he associated with the inferior function, but not as in "anima/animus is literally just the inferior function(but gendered)".

> Like being alive (optional (TM)).
Holy necrophilia...
>The apparent type can be completely dependent on stage of Anima/Animus development.
Aye that one is big. It might much more primitive than a "differentiated" function, so saying it's the inferior function could be misleading as in reality it could be content of other functions merged together.
>Archetype complexes aren't static and might "change types" more often than you might expect.
Imagine mistyping an archetype, couldn't be me.

>(ngl I've been thinking its publishing has been deliberately postponed exactly because you could intuitively cross-check the biases and discover the study methodology mistakes).
Jung would never...

>>83804229
Turns out not paying rent is the most archetypal crime ever.

>>83804191
I don't browse Reddit much, just happened to end on r/Jung while trying to find out links to other Jungian blogs.
>>
>>83804326
>Holy necrophilia...
People probably, hopefully, usually sublimate that through the undead.

>I remember he was a lot more ambivalent on this.
I remember only finding a lack of deliberate emphasis (as usual) so, yeah.
>>
Accidentally found a gemmy of "empirical research on sublimation" as it's known.
https://sci-hub.box/10.1037/a0033487
So if you're into creativity and habitually are sublimation/repression enjoyer, you might be better off going Freudian and sublimating hard... And Jungian approaches would mellow you out too hard... Or so the surface level implications say.
The surface level tradeoff is vital rawness VS structuring stuff around archetypes and alchemy dynamics. I don't like the latter and I can't unlearn... Wow wow wow wow I'll NEVER forgive Jung. Just kidding. Neither are reliable.
>>
>83804272
yawwwn
boring faggot tranny atleast troon out properly
>>
>>83804550
>spoiler
Too late, Jung is known to intellectually rape introverted intuitives from the grave, it was over before it even began for you and the game was rigged from the start.
Honestly I'd say both Intuition types, but the extraverted ones can be saved by the sheer power of stereotypical ADHD-like behaviors.
>>
>>83803384
Girl you draw so good wyd here, you got a blog?
>>
>>83804191
If you and I understand gravity the same, the conclusions that will be made about dropping a ball off a building will be the enough of "the same" to say they're the same.
If we disagree beyond superficial substance that doesn't really apply to the general understanding of gravity, one of us doesn't understand the concept.
Like if you said "the ball will hit an old lady then a dog" obviously this is unrelated to gravity.
But if you said "the ball will float away into space"
Obviously this is related to gravity and you don't understand the concept.

My claim is effectively equal to "the ball will fall" because this is both what Jung says, and what I've experienced myself.
If you think it's possible to come to a different conclusion, well. I don't know what to tell you. Because that's not merely a difference of opinion.
>>
>Frieren
>INTP
Midwit pseuds I swear to fucking God
>>
>>83785957
INTP reporting. I hate Frieren, but I do like After Dark, owls, and Portal 1.
>>
>>83785957
Forgive my sensoid moment but why is there nothing written below the ENTP animal and food?
Also I'm not quite sure which one the animal is supposed to be.
>>
Oh it's a weasel, right.
I prefer foxes.
>>
File: IMG_7051.jpg (92.7 KB)
92.7 KB
92.7 KB JPG
>Your type
>Most recent instance of autist-on-autist aggression you've witnessed?
>>
>>83804994
Ok, but because of the loaded presumptions of bias, this isn't a relevant metaphor and it doesn't explain anything here (my natural reply style for cases like this)
>>
>>83805248
Stoat. They make coats out of stoats. Stoat coats.
>>83804191
>Either elaborate or read The Ancient City.
Elaborate on what? I assume you were alluding to some archetype or another, so i answered with an archetype, that is the Spirit of Fratricide. It breaking lose is what opened modernity and what marked it's zenith. What is there to elaborate on? Maybe one day i shall read that book, to your memory.
>Would that mean
I was talkative last night and simply stated what i had before implied.
>you can't comprehend introvert's attitude to mention it, but you can comprehend thinking function enough only to be paranoid of its presence and demonize it
Have you observed as much? Separately though related, what do you think my type is, or more generally what's wrong with me?
>"Science" is always a loaded and vague word in modernity.
It's too easy to let it be.
>>
File: IMG_7335.jpg (12.2 KB)
12.2 KB
12.2 KB JPG
i, The mysteic matrix maidenw whometh webwoven your entire webforum with the whirl of my Wanndd takes plesure in claimeing mine payoff-
i am an IDOL, your ID'sinspirateuin , subcocniously you spasm plagiruze myine phantom-psuedo-placebo-psychosis,, retard on The router refrencing my scrolls of schizophrenia,, stabled to yuor walls,,Ah! I am your personality (PRINCESS) petitioner!
Hwhwhah, yuor entjre exitsnese is just a n Infantisle impresion of mine-GOD , a. i am that i amm!

>cunnycoven
>avastar

Ahh, Your dbt Is due, my Developmentaly delayed Dog!!
My Q histronia Q ? a HISTORIC relic of Cognitive complexity,, Ans which your conciosunes consults for a corect gramar MIS-speling

My onciouness is a curency, pay up PSUEDS

Summoning YAHWEH, The one my daddy warned me about, my master and mentor, the one and only GOD of ISRAEL
yabadabadOOOOOO!
did i mention im jewish?
ARAh NAQAMATHAKA
>>
TRIPS oh babie A TRRRIPLE ohhhe yae!
>>83805333
>>
>>83805279
It's not only relevant, it directly contradicts what you're trying to state.
"Same understanding != same conclusions" only goes so far.

Do you think it's possible for two people who have the same understanding of gravity to conclude different things about how a ball will behave once dropped from a building?
No.
In order for that to happen, one of the two people must be operating from a different understanding of gravity. Or else they'd both conclude the same thing:
The ball will fall.
>>
File: CureIdol.jpg (461.7 KB)
461.7 KB
461.7 KB JPG
>>83805330
>Stoat. They make coats out of stoats. Stoat coats.
No I mean it, I just googled "weasel" and I got that very same image.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel
Don't think I ever saw one IRL.

>>83805333
>i am an IDOL
Then throw yourself up in a frilly idol costume and start dancing around already. Shit grin not optional.
>>
File: IMG_5986.jpg (108.1 KB)
108.1 KB
108.1 KB JPG
*snifckwts* Ooah, i sense thy seethers silver,, that Cash floww, mine settlement??
>>
>>83805375
Damn, duped by a wily Least Weasel.
>>
>>83805330
>I assume you were alluding to some archetype
Not quite. More like, in the temporary microconsensus of the discussion, I'm wondering at what layer of society people can't anymore be dismissed as "they were clueless and wouldn't know better" (aka "teachers" per Milgram).
The Ancient City (the anthropological one) also has an audiobook version btw.

>the Spirit of Fratricide. It breaking lose is what opened modernity and what marked it's zenith
I'm just thinking, before modernity, that sort of spirit was appeased by ritual sacrifices of kings and shamans and the fellows marked as sacrifices (including "unjust" markings, although all and any were "sacred"), and modernity only obfuscated this ongoing process by layering it up in systems of abstractions and sophistry. Actually, I should also recommend The Golden Bough as well.

>Have you observed as much?
I'm inferencing from the stated expression, typologically.
>Separately though related, what do you think my type is,
IF(N) probably. Since some IT(S)/ET(S) type that would be disgruntled with my post and, instead, would likely state I'm warping the scientific sociology with the woo or something; plus some other factors that I intuit but don't want to elaborate on.
>or more generally what's wrong with me?
I'm not really into the pathologizing thing.

>>83805258
INTJ / IN(T)
My thoughts VS my thoughts obviously.

>>83805340
>same understanding of gravity
>conclude different things about how a ball will behave
How same? Newtonian gravity absolutely may not equal Einstein's GR gravity in calc results.
Your next argument will be presuming that your point of view is as certain as a ball falling somehow anyway. I would disagree that your opinion is as accurate and certain to be equated to a ball falling. You will claim I do not understand your point. I will reply that I may understand without agreeing. You will reiterate the Hegelian Gnosticism approach you don't like the flavor of because of how I termed it-
>>
File: IMG_1406.jpg (217.3 KB)
217.3 KB
217.3 KB JPG
Im so Gratefyl for my goyim tat i doint have some suboncious betflix subscripione to these generalls,, retardation renewal in REM sleep Oaaahh, up 4 4 days Shitpost SAMARSA streak Ohhh the shitstain splatered on thr wall,, Cogntive curl ans interpert the polka poops printed on the Paded panels,, ,
>>
>>83805498
>My thoughts VS my thoughts obviously.
Why can I 100% imagine it as a scene straight out of Umi but played entirely in your head?
>>
I just realized that intuitives can mistake the perceived dynamicity of patterns/objects as if they rationed the progression out by their rational auxiliary functions (i.e. as if they judged this out by feeling/thinking auxes).
Extraverted intuitives probably have an easier time not falling for the misconception. Since objects follow objective, not patternic, rules.

I've been re-consuming Psychological Types and I guess this is what Jung meant about dom function being the master and the aux function being the slave. Of course the master would take credit for slave's labours.
I guess that's why when I have to do thinkoid stuff where intuition fails me, my thinkoiding feels all EXPOSED and OVERWORKED.

>>83805604
ESPECIALLY the combat scenes
>>
>>83805258
>>Your type
ESFP-T
>>Most recent instance of autist-on-autist aggression you've witnessed?
Back in late November or early December, two guys playing 40K at my local hobby store got into a yelling match over whether or not one of their charge lanes was valid. I thought for a minute that it was actually going to come to blows.
>>
>>83805795
Jung had mentioned something like this but for all the other 3 functions, will post the relevant quote later.
>>
File: IMG_1414.jpg (281.8 KB)
281.8 KB
281.8 KB JPG
>D-Diargirl have HPD nod >~<
>S-She want 2 be Spesul t-t
>N.2627.777.77 Comgirl

Its like a rotataing dior of hypocritical retards that just worship the wordsalad i spill.
>wwait a momet let me refence mohameds schizophrnic sequences to P-prove my point, Its like a mudlsime Referncing pedo-pasages to suport child rape debates Lol

I am your peronality POPstar And yuo screened schizophrnicse just hate to admit so!

Who knows hiw many more!
>>
>The intuitive process is neither one of sense-perception, nor of thinking, nor yet of feeling, although language shows a regrettable lack of discrimination in this respect.
>One person will exclaim: "I can see the whole house burning down already!" Another will say: "It is as certain as two and two make four that there will be a disaster if a fire breaks out here." A third will say: "I have the feeling that this fire will lead to catastrophe."
>According to their respective temperaments, the one speaks of his intuition as a distinct seeing, that is, he makes a sense-perception of it. The other designates it as thinking: "One has only to reflect, and then it is quite clear what the consequences will be." The third, under the stress of emotion, calls his intuition a process of feeling.
Now Jung says this is purely an issue with language, but is that the whole story? People use those expressions in any language, and Jung himself should know, he is multi-lingual.

To me it's because intuition is quite simply a very "immaterial" function and one does not "see" it. How does an intuitive process even look like? Jung himself has no fucking idea, he can only give you vague thinkoid answers and hope you go
>"oh yeah, THAT. Yes, yes people do THAT indeed".
And a quick look at history will tell you that people are quite prone to confuse intuitive perception with literally having psychic powers, or receiving a revelation from God.... probably because of sensation types associating it directly with unconscious fantasies and intuitoids just going along with it because hey it's POSSIBLE. An intuitive type, especially the extraverted variant, is quite unable to simply say "uh no I can't see that happening" - because they can, right now, as soon you brought it up.
>>
>>83805498
>You will claim I do not understand your point.
I don't have to claim it, you've already systematically proved by it asserting you know what my claim is based on-
Which is wrong.
>>83801476
>If you said "I disagree with x" and I said "I didn't say, nor did I mean x" you clearly don't understand what I said.
Here, watch:
Hegelian Gnosticism is neither the claim I am making, nor is it related to my claim. (but I do like disproving you faulty understandings of things)
>I would disagree that your opinion is as accurate and certain to be equated to a ball falling.
I disagree you you disagree that my opinion is accurate. Simply based on the fact that you do not understand my opinion in the slightest.

>How same?
You're going to have to make that more clear.
>Newtonian gravity absolutely may not equal Einstein's GR gravity in calc results.
The predictive capabilities of a model bear no relationship to the topic at hand.
I can say with 100% certainty that both of these models would not only assert, but demand that a ball dropped off a building would fall to the ground.
It's one of the most blatant category errors you've made so far. The precision of a prediction is not what's relevant. Sure, one might say the ball lands and hits the old lady, bounces and hits the dog.
The other says it mises them both completely and bounces off the ground twice.
Not relevant.
All that matters is they agree on the real conclusion:
The ball will fall to the ground. Are you trying to assert that they disagree on this premise? They disagree on this conclusion of the balls behavior? One model will predict the ball flies away into the sky?

I already made this point clear here: >>83804994
And I don't feel restating it again past this point will serve any purpose. Because you will intentionally misunderstand it a third time.
>>
>is quite unable to simply say "uh no I can't see that happening" - because they can, right now, as soon you brought it up.
On that I will quickly add that they might object from the thinking or feeling side.
But intuition itself, much like sensation, is a completely unbiased perception should it not be falsified by any unconscious desire or general emotivity.
>>
>>83805795
>I guess that's why when I have to do thinkoid stuff where intuition fails me, my thinkoiding feels all EXPOSED and OVERWORKED.
Also I think this is less of an issue with the differentiation of the auxiliary thinking, and more about the fact that "you cannot think what you don't intuit" unless you force intuition in the background and just go "no now I gotta THINK, ONLY THINK". That requires a stronger conscious effort, after all you are trying to break from a "habit". Motivation is also an issue, the main function is also how things appear interesting to you and what tells your slaves to work for.
>>
>>83806275
>Motivation is also an issue, the main function is also how things appear interesting to you and what tells your slaves to work for.
Hmm, the interest is not from the inferior function? Since dom function is more mundane.

>>83806087
>How does an intuitive process even look like?
I volunteer the Game of Life (the cellular automata) as a demonstration that it to be processed... intuitively.

>>83806160
Ok. Your trvthful system is trvly great. I especially agree and like the [thing you didn't present], [thing you didn't present], [thing you didn't present], [thing you didn't present], [thing you didn't present], [thing you didn't present], [thing you didn't present], and OF COURSE we CANNOT forget the cherry on top, the nail in the coffin cake, the booby trap in the suspiciously placed cradle, that is [thing you didn't present]. Dare I say, it supercedes reality, even. Who needs survival or praxis or empiricism when you have the ultimate [thing you didn't present], the supreme messiah tool that lets us fight off ravenous tigers in the bushes.
FVCK conscious standpoint, FVCK life, FVCK feedback. Mere so-called "understanding" isn't ENOUGH, there's only utter SVBMISSION of dropping DOWN between the atomic CRACKS of the FLOOR, the least is ritualistic SELF-GUTTING with a RUSTED, DULL, and SERRATED KNIFE to yank the PULSATING INNARDS straight OUT of the PITIFUL body that may serve NOTHING BUT the SACRED [thing you didn't present]. Actually, while the fading consciousness is still present and high on adrenaline, the GUTS are ought to be GUTTED of their filthy contents to TRVLY gift the VLTIMATE sacrifice that [thing you didn't present] deserves AT LEAST as an APPETIZER for more, way-way more... I can simply intuit the wimpy Nick Land and his pathetic little hyperstitions peeing their ontological beds right now.
>>
>>83806333
>Hmm, the interest is not from the inferior function? Since dom function is more mundane.
Only if you reach the stage of life where you are bored of everything, except these things you never ever do(connected with the inferior function).
>>
I've been interested in mbti for a while because im interested in getting an introspect on myself to learn more about strength and weaknesses etc. Other than doing some MBTI and Ennegram tests (INTP 5w4 for anyone interested**) i dont know much about it and people suggest that its better to self-type rather than taking tests. How would i go about self-typing? Any books i should read or any sources i should visit?
>>
>>83806333
I bow to the arbiter of [I know what you're saying more than you know what you're saying]!
I bow to the extroverted thingkoid type and his reductive thinking patterns!
Oh! Great reducer, reduce my symbols to their constituent parts and tell me what they [MEAN]!

I ask of thee, Great Reducer!? What is WATER!?
His Holiness responds:
>It's hydrogen and two oxygen, you peasant!

BLESSED IS HE,
THE HOLINESS WHO DOESN'T COMPREHEND THE QUESTION!
PRAISE THE REDUCER!
>>
>>83806383
"Gifts Differing" from Isabel Myers herself, for the MBTI canon(which is Jungian doujin tho) Intuition no stop, don't go there...
"Psychological Types" from the man himself, the real canon(which is a huge crossover fanfic of both psychology, religion, literature, mythology, alchemy, it's fucken Smash Bros.)
"The Inferior Function", from what many people consider one of better Jungian ladies, Marie Louise Von Franz(contains some light fairytale doujins, but you think somebody who watches magical girls and idols thinks himself as too old for that?)

At very least. You can pick the rest out of random thread recommendations.
>>
The image was picked on accident, but I realize I'm very much acting like Kokoron ITT, but on Jungism lmao.
Her type is, of course, ENFP/EN(F)
>>
>>83806459
>>83806452
>[I know what you're saying more than you know what you're saying]!
Oh that's a good logic puzzle of a misconception to clarify.
Let's see...
___________________[Implications]<=[B's interpretation]
___________________^^^
[A's intended point]=>[A's expression]<=[B's interpretation]
___________________vvv
____________________[Relationship to the world it's expressed with]<=[B's interpretation]
>>
>>83806459
>>83806547
(wanted to do a doujin comment but nevermind, forgot to delete the link)
>>
>>83806566
I will leave the Jungian doujins to 16p memers: >>83803730
They even do crackships.
>>
>>83806547
Here, watch my next trick.

Instead of asserting I know what you're saying and then mishmashing your words into a meatgrinder to extract some projected meaning, I'll say:
I haven't the slightest clue what you're trying to say.
>>
>>83806600
Uhh, guess?
>>
>>83806630
Uhhh, you're saying you want to take a big old dick in your butt?
>>
>>83806672
No Freud, I'm pretty sure you are the one who wants to take dicks up your ass, my intuition told me so.
>>
>>83806687
Nope, I understand your point better than you do because of my superior intuition and thinking. You definitely want a dick in the butt.
>>
>>83806738
Heh, almost got me, but you forgot one thing.
Were you using SENSATION to sense if the dick ACTUALLY EXISTS? I sure hope it doesn't, because I haven't checked myself either.
>>
>>83805498
>I'm inferencing from the stated expression, typologically.
That's the wrong way to go about things. You either end up typing the expression, or your response to the expression, i think. At least if it was a statement offered on my own volition, or a series of statements done so, the input would be more pure.
>has an audiobook version
Then i'll probably will get to is sooner rather than later after all.
>I'm wondering at what layer of society people can't anymore be dismissed as "they were clueless and wouldn't know better"
There isn't one. It must be so when dealing with layers instead of people. Now, "shouldn't" is a different matter, but shoulds are troublesome things. Regarding particular persons:
>The difference between conscious realization and the lack of it has been roundly formulated in the saying of Christ already quoted: "Man, if indeed thou knowest what thou doest, thou art blessed: but if thou knowest not thou art cursed and a transgressor of the law." Before the bar of nature and fate, unconsciousness is never accepted as an excuse; on the contrary there are severe penalties for it.
From Answer to Job. The saying is from Luke, yet
>Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.
Is also from Luke.
>that sort of spirit was appeased by ritual sacrifices of kings and shamans and the fellows marked as sacrifices
That's a different sort of spirit. Still note worthy, and you aren't wrong about what's been done to it, but it isn't the Spirit of Fratricide.
>>83805795
>intuitives can mistake the perceived dynamicity of patterns/objects as if they rationed the progression out by their rational auxiliary functions
>Of course the master would take credit for slave's labours.
Tongue of the slip?
>>
>>83806783
I can say with the utmost certainty, I did, and it does. Unless I've confused my sense-perception with intuition- somehow.
>>
>>83806811
> Unless I've confused my sense-perception with intuition- somehow.
Junganically possible, my proof is the quote above: >>83806087
>According to their respective temperaments, the one speaks of his intuition as a distinct seeing, that is, he makes a sense-perception of it.
Whew that was close.
>>
That was some Umineko moment out of nowhere.
>>
>>83806831
It's only possible to communicate the intuition through sense language.
Which is to say, it's only possible for YOU to misunderstand my intuition as sensation (or any other function) based on the limitations of language.

Also, Jung quite clearly states what the process "looks like". It's symbolic image based. The images are perceived within the psyche. What is not clear is how those images came about. The process through which they were created.
But that same problem applies to sensation. One does not know how their psyche creates the image of "red" they perceive with their eyes.
Nor does one know how their psyche creates the symbolic images their intuition perceives.
>>
I'm outlining some stuff from PT and, from the outlines, it suddenly looks like it's from a completely new book. I'll either drop it raw or write something up next thread.

>>83806786
>Tongue of the slip?
Do you mean the pseudo-innuendos, or that I'm actually an introverted thinking type acting on an intuition aux that decided to rise up?

>That's a different sort of spirit. Still note worthy, and you aren't wrong about what's been done to it, but it isn't the Spirit of Fratricide.
Maybe, maybe.

>>83806786
>That's the wrong way to go about things. You either end up typing the expression, or your response to the expression, i think.
Even that would be ok as long as I don't push for some reckless certainty from the get-go!
>At least if it was a statement offered on my own volition, or a series of statements done so, the input would be more pure
Does inner databank of microintuitings not count?
Anyhow typing is always a dynamic practice and IF(N) is still quite probable (no, I don't do type racism fyi)
>>
I miss Mel and Dairygirl. They haven't posted in days maybe weeks.
>>
>>83806958
>What is not clear is how those images came about. The process through which they were created.
Hey I specified "process".
>One does not know how their psyche creates the image of "red" they perceive with their eyes.
The process of sensation is quite clear, because it's derived from sense perception and we have studied how the senses work. Although you can't see any function doing their thing, I can just put two random people in front of a red object and they will both say it's some shade of red, assuming they can see it properly.
The process of thinking can be always written down as a formula, anything you think follows rules that you can write about and make two random people produce the same results as well.
Feeling is where the lines get a little blurry, but it does seem like feeling types can agree on how specific feelings will go for nearly everyone, like the five stages of grief.
Intuition is where it's a big catbox that you have no fucking idea what you will find inside until you "observe" the result. though something tells me introverted intuitives can at least understand it will belong to a certain archetype, still without being being able to tell why would it be that specifically

As for the language observation, I did personally find that a bit of a very limited interpretation. Yes that's an issue, but it's not the whole story.
Intuition is very much the closest to magic LOL
>>
>>83806970
>I'm outlining some stuff from PT and, from the outlines, it suddenly looks like it's from a completely new book. I'll either drop it raw or write something up next thread.
Sounds hot. I also haven't read PT itself in a very long while now.
>>
>>83806014
Wait, until you compare your hips with hers.
>>
Though... if I define intuition as "perception by the way of the unconscious" -
then refer back to the concept of collective unconscious, hence archetypes that everyone can have intuitions about in more or less the same ways -
and find a method X, let's say for the sake of argument that it will involve using LLMs and not some unknown technology(because otherwise it would be the same as magic lmao) due to their probabilistic association algos, to produce a comphrensive list of everything that's currently associable with archetypes hmmmmm...
Holy shit we might just have figured out how to solve one of the biggest mysteries in PT: what is the process of intuition?
but the biggest of them all is still the transcendent function yeah, you can write off intuition as basically having the very same probability algos of a LLM in your brain too
>>
>>83806014
Somebody hopping on the flow straight swagger swipping. Self style stealing specialist.
>>
*begins to hallucinate about non-existent ladder-like structures*
If you have never watched it, Claude Plays Pokemon is a very insightful twitch stream about the true state of LLM AI currently, without getting babysit by external help and mostly left to its own devices. It's in Victory Road!
>>
>>83807044
But both are processes. If you don't clarify which process you're talking about, your meaning gets muddied. Especially when you apply the context to which you were replying to me.
>The process of sensation is quite clear
No it's not. It's equally as irrational as intuition. Because fundamentally, we don't know how sense perception works. We just know that light hits your eyes, then some magic happens in your brain, and bam you see red.
The process by which we get from physical stimulus to subjective experience is unknown. Thus, irrational.
We know surprisingly little about the process itself, just like intuition. And it's quite possible these processes are in their very nature, unknowable.
>The process of thinking can be always written down as a formula
The very same sort of reasoning can apply to intuition.
Image A appears + image B appears = such and such meaning.
It's effectively a formula (but it doesn't work in reverse, so it's not really a formula).
such and such meaning - image A != image B.

The process that generates subjective sense experience is never shown, same for intuition.
Whereas, feeling and thinking, the process is at least partially shown. And you can work backwards through the reasoning. Both feeling and thinking are subject to the same rules. 1+1=2 and 2-1=1. Both are equally rational in that sense and can be formulaically explained.
>>
>>83807434
NTA but I haven't the slightest clue what you're trying to say
>>
>>83807434
>irrational
Little clarification there: in Jungism, "irrational" means "not derived from reason" in the sense I didn't conceptualize the red object, I didn't deduce its presence, I just took it as fact instantly due to sensory magic.
>Because fundamentally, we don't know how sense perception works. We just know that light hits your eyes, then some magic happens in your brain, and bam you see red.
We went a little further than that, with knowing about the entire spectrum of colors, how the image is formed from the eyes etc.
Either way, I see red, you see red too. That is really everything I need to understand the process of sensation, you are recognizing the same facts as I am through sense perception... if I were to not use my eyes, but a camera instead, it still will produce a picture where the red objects are indeed red. Nothing could be more clear cut than that as far sensation goes.

>Image A appears + image B appears = such and such meaning.
But this formula stops working instantly the moment you try to test it out in an objective way. Even with yourself, no need to even involve a different person.
It's peak post-hoc rationalization that doesn't create any real rule, only the illusion of having logic'd it out. (I guess that answers Patchy question about whether extraverted intuitives are fooled by believing thier intuition is thought... no because it doesn't properly return to the objects indeed, I can't write it out as a formula that will work for everyone, hell I can't even make it work for myself)
>>
I-I'm sorry, /mbti/... :'(
>>
Uh ok. What for?
>>
If you're going to bake with 16p link - we won't forgive you.
>>
>>83806970
>typing is always a dynamic practice
For You.
>or that I'm actually an introverted thinking type acting on an intuition aux that decided to rise up?
There are multiple ways to reconcile those statements. I was merely echoing their request for reconciliation. As for my opinion, I definitely don't think that. I think you're actually an extroverted thinking type acting on an intuition aux that decided to "rise up". Just look at this post you linked earlier
>>83743925
>INTP types are probably the only ones where I can unintentionally make them feel distraught
How can you type that out and not consider that maybe you are an ET(N)? For an introvert, you aren't very introspective.
>Grant/Brownsword deniers may not like it but Fe trickster => Fe inferior dynamic is the best explanation here.
Look at what you chose to stoop to instead.
>Case #2
I read this as IT running head first into ET. Isn't that a much better explanation than the above? I'm sure a certain Mr. Ockham would agree.
>Even that would be ok as long as I don't push for some reckless certainty from the get-go!
These days, i don't like to share my thoughts on things until i'm relatively certain. Maybe that isn't a good thing, but it's how it is. I think it's possible you're EN(T), but ET(N) makes more sense to me and i don't want the conversation to get bogged down in possibleposting. I want you to tell me why i'm wrong and talk about yourself, and i thought cornering you with the seeming of a conviction would get you to do that, but all you did was reinforce the initial idea. And no comment on the Luke thing, really? Still, i've been having fun. I didn't sleep well, so today's waking is last night's sleeping. But if you don't feel like playing anymore, i suppose i'll have to find something else to do.
>>
>>83807594
(>^_^)><(^_^<)
You're missed and beloved .
You are not insignificant, You deserve love and hugs
>>
Easy formula:
Yotsuba default theme + letters in this post = redness
Any objections? Thought so. Sensation fully proved to have objectivity. I know about light and my eyes enough to determine it.

The operation above is called "addition", exactly like x+y is an addition, two units, which I could define as "facts" if I want to, are being added together in order to produce a whole result that's exactly the sum of its parts. That's what you always do with addition, everyone always does this regardless of how they like to count.

This webm shows a pissed off Tsubomi, who is openly rejecting whatever she is seeing and is at the limit of her patience. She feels angry, frustrated, she does not like the object who has caused this reaction at least for now. Most observing feeloids would say this is indeed the feeling here, if I were to make it fully static.

And I can't produce any possible example of intuition, because I can't make you possibly produce the same images without knowing how they are formed.
Much like I can't tell you if I added numbers together when I see "4". Could be the result of literally any operation.
>>
Hey foids (& moids too) how many times have your been sexually assaulted?
>>
>>83807157
>you can write off intuition as basically having the very same probability algos of a LLM in your brain too
https://youtu.be/1JSuF6HCqko

I used to always get called a chat bot or ai bot or llm. It's because I have a lot of intuition.
>>
>>83807650
>How can you type that out and not consider that maybe you are an ET(N)?
Good question!
1. I have more inferior sensation moments than inferior feeling moments.
2. If pondering myself into damnation allows me to achieve the same thing as some merely bothersome interaction with objects, I'd rather ponder.* Per Jung's swamp metaphor on attitudes, this is closer to habitual introversion.
3. *... unless I'm in the mood for overcompensation, i.e. trying to accumulate "ES(T)" aptitude via transcendent function use during external activities.
>For an introvert, you aren't very introspective.
That's ok since introversion isn't about introspection. Introversion is about "subjective factor" aka archetype aka Platonic pattern focus. Introspection is more of an individuation thing and is technically a separate function outside the psychological types.

>>Grant/Brownsword deniers may not like it but Fe trickster => Fe inferior dynamic is the best explanation here.
>Look at what you chose to stoop to instead.
...second best explanation is poor secondary feeling auxiliary!

>I read this as IT running head first into ET. Isn't that a much better explanation than the above?
Depends on what do you mean by this explanation. That is, how you'd elaborate on it.

>no comment on the Luke thing, really?
It just got delegated to my unconscious processing. So yeah, no comments in particular. "I'll ponder on it."
>>
>>83807736
Shitposting aside, I do believe there is inherently a conneciton between LLM and the intuitive process.
Of course, the LLM is a very dumb intuitoid that isn't even conscious of itself, but if the perception is by the way of the unconscious then it's capable of doing that by definition... I think? Besides, in my thinkoid skepticism I'm quite sure intuition boils down to spotting patterns unconsciously and producing an image that your mind is able to recognize as the pattern, as if it had a way to communicate directly in brain-speech but without wanting to tell you more than the results.
>>
>>83807777
witnessed lucky 7
>>
>>83807537
Mostly just elaborating on the complexity of what it means for a function (or anything, really) to be irrational in the Jungian sense.
>>83807539
It means more than that, though. It also means something akin to "accidental".
It doesn't mean exactly "not derived from reason" it means "beyond reason."
Something that cannot be reached through the process of reasoning. By trying to apply reason to it, what you get is an infinite regress of reasoning that never explains the thing.

There's multiple layers of irrationality to perception. The object you perceive exists irrationally. The guidance of your eyes to the object is also irrational. The light waves travelling to your eyes is irrational. Your eyes picking up the light is irrational. The decoding of the light into electricity to be transmitted across your nerves is irrational.
It's irrational all the way down.
(irrationality is not something that only applies to functions)

>it still will produce a picture where the red objects are indeed red
If no one is there to see the picture, is it red? ---No.---
Red only exists in perception. With no perceiver there is no red. A camera lacks a psyche, therefore cannot be a perceiver. It only recreates the conditions which a psyche can perceive as red.
(unified consciousness theory withheld)

In short, red is not objective. It's entirely subjective.
>>
>>83807777 (check)
>Shitposting aside, I do believe there is inherently a conneciton between LLM and the intuitive process
Just read Deleuze and Guattari already.

>>83807539
>whether extraverted intuitives are fooled by believing thier intuition is thought... no because it doesn't properly return to the objects indeed
It's more about contamination of this introspection because the intuitoiding can employ some micrologics moments from the thinkoiding.
>>
>>83807828
>Mostly just elaborating on the complexity of what it means for a function (or anything, really) to be irrational
Well, you're wrong.
>>
>>83807828
>A camera lacks a psyche
Not according to Adeptus Mechanicus.
>>
>>83807594
>I-I'm sorry, /mbti/... :'(
*hug* What's wrong, Turbie?
>>
lmao when I skim just "turbie" in the namefield I can't even tell the difference between turbie narc and turbie enjoyer narc
>>
>>83807839
Nope.
>>83807847
Ew. Robot worshipers are sinners. Transhumanism a SIN
>>
>>83807821
I was lucky enough to accidentally stumble on a possible future way to figure out how intuition truly works, so yeah my LUK is good today.

>>83807828
>It also means something akin to "accidental".
Holy synchronicity.
Yes but for the subject. I can "accidentally" see a red item, or I can deduce it rationally, say, I can deduce that if I cut myself with a knife, I will see a red liquid coming out from my fingers. My eyes aren't seeing it right now because I'm not going to do that, but I have a formula to anticipate this fact that I hope I don't need to explain here lol.
>Something that cannot be reached through the process of reasoning.
Huge mistake here. I literally just did that without using my eyes.

>The object you perceive exists irrationally.
But the Thinking image is a real thing that objects truly have, not something I made up in my brain because it sounds correct to me(and archetypally correct I suppose). Jung had an explanation for this despite being a big fucking Ti-groid, how could a Te-groid even exist at all if the objects and existence as a whole were fully irrational? Are they just full on delusional for you?

>If no one is there to see the picture, is it red?
Huh yeah? Reality doesn't start existing when I observe it, though for the subject it might certainly feel like that at times.
Muh catbox...

>a camera lack a psyche
... but it has eyes. It cannot tell you about the redness, but it can "see" it.
Well technically it can, just take a picture while being blind yourself, ask somebody else with functional eyesight what's the color(but who didn't perceive the object directly), they will say red

>>83807830
>Just read Deleuze and Guattari already.
Alright, but give me a very brief quote in specific that touches upon this point?

>>83807902
You VILL fuck the robot.
>>
>experience only makes sense when organized by intuitions (namely, space and time)
(from Wiki on Deleuze)
Holy intuitoid my man, how one-sided can this statement be. Actually accurate to Jungian intuition too, he used this very definition
>It is the fourth faculty of consciousness, intuition, which makes possible, at least approximately, the determination of space-time relationships.
>>
New thread:
>>83808114
>>83808114
& Also
>>83808114
>>
>>83807650
>typing is always a dynamic practice
I misinterpreted this as referring to my comment on the medium (typing up a letter on a keyboard). Now that i realize my mistake, i have a new smart ass remark to make.
>he isn't incessantly typing
But guess it's unfair of me seeing as i've been lurking for a month or so, fed on a steady diet of Patchyposts Same Look! New Taste!, while you'd have to go hunting in either into your memory or the archives.
I really don't understand where you're getting that F from in IF(N), other than "everyone is the opposite of what they type me as", or "he agrees with INFJ-A". If you'd care to inform me i'd enjoy it, but i won't mind too much if you don't.
Maybe typing could be said to be dynamic, depending on one takes that word.
>>83807767
>I have more inferior sensation moments than inferior feeling moments.
IRL, that may very well be; ITT, i'm not so sure. IRL is more important anyway, so i'll just have to take your word for it.
>overcompensation
Do you intend to do this in the thread (or online/4chan in general)? Or, can you tell you're doing it here, despite not intending it per se?
>pondering myself into damnation
>Introversion is about "subjective factor" aka archetype aka Platonic pattern focus
That doesn't sound right. To me that sounds like you're describing intuition as introversion. To my mind, that lends credence to the theory of the N tail wagging the ET dog.
>It just got delegated to my unconscious processing. So yeah, no comments in particular. "I'll ponder on it."
Good. Ponder away. I will too.
>That is, how you'd elaborate on it.
I'll get back to you on that.
>>
>>83807847
>Not according to Adeptus Mechanicus.
>>
>>83798935
A yes man can only accept and never reject. It isn't truth. It is cowardice.
>>
Jinglepantsu gvng was here
>>
>>83808883
but do it bounce

Reply to Thread #83785957


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)