Thread #41878234 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: IMG_9454.jpg (33.7 KB)
33.7 KB JPG
>is the ice wall an actual thing
>are there contintents on other side of the ice wall
>is that some of what we're being visited by? An advanced species that lives on another continent
>who knows about the ice wall
This isnt flat earth, im talking about the globe version. I always found it impressive we can fly from one part of the world to another in around a day, or is there another part of earth.
Redpill me on the icewall, aparently there was a war or something and the giants fled through a gap in the ice wall. This isnt flat earth its a still a globe
Answer all questions
43 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: flatism.png (22.2 KB)
22.2 KB PNG
https://www.unz.com/anepigone/flatism-is-racist/
>>
>>
File: how flat earth works.png (336.4 KB)
336.4 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Latitude_Celestial_Poles.mp4 (2.5 MB)
2.5 MB MP4
I'm going to leave some points. Notice that the flatties can't answer any of them and will instead lie to themselves and say that the sky can't tell you anything about the shape of the Earth. They know that these observations are incompatible with their model so they have to lie to themselves and others in order to keep living in their fantasy world.
>Why do we have two celestial poles? If the Earth was flat with a rotating dome above we would only have one. The usual response is no response at all or they will deny the existence of any south celestial pole.
>How can things in the sky rise and set near the horizon? The usual explanation is perspective but why then doesn't the Sun, Moon or any of the constellations shrink in size when they get closer and closer to the horizon? Their angular size remains constant. This could only work on a flat Earth if they actually went below the disc like the old Babylonians thought. It would be like the game Valheim (the developers are faggots btw) if you've ever played that. But this can't be the case because the Sun, Moon or the constellations are always above the horizon for some place on the Earth.
>Why do we all see the same side of the Sun, Moon or any of the planets? This would only be the case if they were far away but flat earthers don't think this. They think these objects are circling above the flat earth at close range.
Let's say that the Moon is currently above the equator and it's not very far away. Someone in the north would see one side of the Moon while someone in the south would see the backside but we don't see this in reality. Both observers see the same side and this would only work if the Moon was further away than the distance between the two places. But if the Moon was very high above the flat Earth then everyone would see the Moon straight above their head and this doesn't happen in reality.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
1. Ba'al created the earth flat, stationary, with a firmament in Canaanite and Ugaritic religions. Ba'al worshipers were flat earthers.
2. Jews maintained a flat earth belief until around 400 AD, 900 years after globe earth was discovered.
>>
>>41878268
>>41878273
Who's "he"?
I don't like flat earth either...more of an inner earth or expanding earth guy myself...not necessarily hollow but possibly very cavernous.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1708655564861522.jpg (146.7 KB)
146.7 KB JPG
>>41880645
exactly. High level science is corrupted.
Even then laymen can research a in-depth topic to the 'scientific limit' and see the break down and lies created to push 'narrative'.
>>
>>
>>41878234
no, there is no ice-wall, and no other idiotic meme made-up continents.
we know with 100% absolute certainty how big the globe is, and what shape and size all the continents are.
>nuh uh
if you think there are, nothing is stopping you from taking a boat and seeing for yourself to prove it right or wrong.
there ya go guys, i solved the whole thread for ya.
ask me if you need help anything else.
>>
File: MoonMap.webm (2.9 MB)
2.9 MB WEBM
>>41881510
Sounding pretty mad over there bud.... we just some basket weavers talkin over here.
>>
>>
>>41880489
>>41880645
>Can't explain basic observations that anyone can make. Better call the person a glowie instead.
Like I said, flatties can't address these points so they just happily ignore them. They know very well that their world view doesn't match reality so they resort to lying. Both to themselves and others.
>>41880660
>What do you think about inner earth? Or neutrino theory of expanding earth?
I used to believe in a hollow earth but I was never 100% convinced and I'm less convinced now. I still think it's a cool concept and I wish that it's true. Same goes for the expanding earth theory. It's interesting how the continents fit together nicely when you shrink the whole thing.
>>
>>
>>41880187
There's no south pole star, the closest thing would be sigma oceantis and you won't be able to see it at areas around the equator.
You can spot Polaris the North Star at areas up to 20 degrees south of the equator. Thats why Polaris is where latitude is derived from in AE maps.
You don't have to like earth measurements earth is measured flat. Looking up at the sky doesn't give you a measurement of earth. You can't measure earth curve with the black swan, game over
>>
>>41881601
>>41881654
Is this supposed to look like something?
What are we supposed to see here?
>>
>>
>>
File: Equator_Rotation.mp4 (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB MP4
>>41883458
>There's no south pole star, the closest thing would be sigma oceantis and you won't be able to see it at areas around the equator.
Whether there is or isn't a star bright enough to see with the naked eye near the south celestial pole is irrelevant and you know it. There would be no point of rotation at all to south on a flat earth with a rotating dome. The stars would be moving in straight lines parallel to the horizon in that direction. The fact that we do have two points of rotation that are 180° from each other is a clear indication that we live on a sphere. A sphere that is either rotating or has the stars rotate around it.
>>
>>
File: Sky_Rotation_20_South.mp4 (3.2 MB)
3.2 MB MP4
>>41883458
>You can spot Polaris the North Star at areas up to 20 degrees south of the equator.
That is a lie perpetrated by your guru and grifter Eric Dubay. You should buy all of his books (and some extra copies for good measure) so that you can please him even more.
At 20° south latitude the south celestial pole will be 20° above the horizon to the south and the north celestial pole will be 20° below it to the north so Polaris will not be visible. You will be able to see the Big Dipper though.
>Thats why Polaris is where latitude is derived from in AE maps
Then how do you know that you're south of the equator if Polaris is still visible according to you? You're contradicting yourself.
>>
>>41885449
>>41885272
Anon these morons cant even give you a map of flat earth, and you expect them to understand how any of this works?
Come on.
>>
>>
File: cricket.jpg (76.8 KB)
76.8 KB JPG
>>41880187
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17Jq0QqK4k0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>41885272
>>41885449
Stars move from east to west over our flat plane. Cant use the words east or west if you're a globetard because those are flat directions.
You can't make a claim of any star being below the horizon because "horizon" isn't a physical sphere edge it's an apparent location. Things don't go below it, you can only measure angles to bodies above it.
>>
>>